IRC log of tsdtf on 2006-09-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:05:33 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf
- 12:05:33 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-irc
- 12:05:38 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tsdtf
- 12:05:48 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be TSD TF
- 12:05:48 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, shadi
- 12:05:53 [shadi]
- zakim, this will be TSD
- 12:05:53 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 25 minutes
- 12:06:02 [shadi]
- meeting: TSD TF
- 12:06:31 [shadi]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Sep/0001.html
- 12:06:46 [shadi]
- agenda+ Follow-up review of integration tools and CVS
- 12:06:55 [shadi]
- agenda+ Follow-up review of TCDL
- 12:07:05 [shadi]
- agenda+ Start of test production phase
- 12:07:23 [shadi]
- chair: CarlosV, Christophe
- 12:21:26 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has joined #tsdtf
- 12:24:40 [Christophe]
- Christophe has joined #tsdtf
- 12:27:07 [CarlosI]
- CarlosI has joined #tsdtf
- 12:29:31 [Sandor]
- Sandor has joined #tsdtf
- 12:29:43 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started
- 12:29:44 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 12:30:52 [ChrisR]
- ChrisR has joined #tsdtf
- 12:31:07 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 12:31:08 [Zakim]
- -??P1
- 12:31:09 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 12:31:35 [shadi]
- zakim, ? is really CarlosI
- 12:31:35 [Zakim]
- +CarlosI; got it
- 12:31:39 [Zakim]
- +Sandor_Herramhof
- 12:32:17 [Zakim]
- +Vangelis
- 12:32:48 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 12:33:11 [shadi]
- zakim, ipcaller is really Chris
- 12:33:11 [Zakim]
- +Chris; got it
- 12:34:45 [carlos]
- carlos has joined #tsdtf
- 12:35:42 [Zakim]
- +Johannes
- 12:36:40 [carlos]
- Zakim, Johannes is really CarlosV
- 12:36:40 [Zakim]
- +CarlosV; got it
- 12:37:08 [Tim]
- Tim has joined #tsdtf
- 12:37:22 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland
- 12:38:47 [shadi]
- regrets: Shane
- 12:39:02 [shadi]
- scribe: Tim
- 12:39:06 [shadi]
- scribenick: Tim
- 12:40:13 [Zakim]
- +Christophe
- 12:40:31 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 12:40:31 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Follow-up review of integration tools and CVS" taken up [from shadi]
- 12:41:43 [Tim]
- CV: replicate structure from BentoWeb or not?
- 12:42:04 [Michael]
- Michael has joined #tsdtf
- 12:42:14 [Tim]
- CV: name of technology missing from top-level structure?
- 12:42:14 [Zakim]
- +Cooper
- 12:43:03 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Aug/0040.html
- 12:43:09 [Tim]
- CV: we have XHTML currently, but what about other technologies?
- 12:43:59 [Tim]
- CS: what is argument for organizing by SCs?
- 12:44:27 [Tim]
- SAZ: Understanding WCAG2.0 document structured by SC..
- 12:45:15 [Tim]
- ..two ways of grouping (1) by technologies, or (2) by SC
- 12:45:59 [Tim]
- CV: can filter anyway by metadata
- 12:46:33 [Tim]
- SAZ: doesn't feel strongly one way or another, but OK if currently structured by technology
- 12:47:26 [Tim]
- MC: no strong feelings, just so long as metadata contains relevant information, basic organization doesn't matter..
- 12:48:30 [Tim]
- CS: in BentoWeb, metadata not big XML file, but file for each test case
- 12:48:58 [Tim]
- CV: could metadata file have different name from test file?
- 12:49:20 [Tim]
- SAZ: What about file extensions?
- 12:49:35 [Tim]
- CV: depend on technology..
- 12:50:15 [Tim]
- SAZ: What about granularity (spread out resources)?
- 12:50:38 [Tim]
- CV: has to do with server issues
- 12:51:35 [Tim]
- SAZ: now explained that tests grouped by technologies, so there isn't a large
- 12:51:48 [Tim]
- group of them, makes sense..
- 12:52:33 [Tim]
- CV: test files can be reused for different SCs/techniques, so need to enforce naming conventions
- 12:53:11 [Tim]
- CV: agree on structure for now.. close topic?
- 12:53:44 [Tim]
- Resolution: agree to accept naming convention and directory structure from BentoWeb
- 12:54:59 [Tim]
- CV: clarification to group tests by main technology..
- 12:56:15 [Tim]
- CS: also we will use newer version of naming convention
- 12:57:14 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 1
- 12:57:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 1, Follow-up review of integration tools and CVS, closed
- 12:57:15 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 12:57:17 [Zakim]
- 2. Follow-up review of TCDL [from shadi]
- 12:57:18 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 12:57:18 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Follow-up review of TCDL" taken up [from shadi]
- 12:58:04 [Tim]
- CV: new draft of TCDL with example sent, so far no comments
- 12:58:57 [Tim]
- CS: ruleset description not included, also want to add description of language called RuleSetXML
- 13:00:28 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Aug/att-0046/BenToWeb_TCDL_W3C_Submission_DraftD.html
- 13:00:30 [Tim]
- CS: current format too verbose or descriptive, that's why example added to use only required attributes and elements
- 13:01:23 [Tim]
- CV: what do others (besides BenToWeb) think of document?
- 13:01:41 [Tim]
- CR: looks good to me (haven't gone over it in detail)
- 13:02:12 [Tim]
- SAZ: discussion on mailing list re: disabilities section - any follow-up?
- 13:02:26 [Tim]
- CS: requires a lot of changes
- 13:03:24 [Tim]
- CV: issue is how to define disability types, not feasible to incorporate right now
- 13:04:27 [Tim]
- CV: do we accept current version of TCDL as current description?
- 13:05:03 [Tim]
- CI:plans to incorporate whole TCDL language or subset of it?
- 13:05:40 [Tim]
- CS: TCDL has many optional sections, so use all of it is quite a lot of work, so don't
- 13:05:52 [Tim]
- need to subset it if don't use options
- 13:06:33 [Tim]
- CI: If we want to use it for WCAG, need to subset it..
- 13:07:08 [Tim]
- CS: questions are validation process used in test suite itself..
- 13:07:37 [Tim]
- CI: haven't discussed problems separating accessibility and other issues,
- 13:08:03 [Tim]
- not in scope of this task force.. will WCAG WG work on this issue?
- 13:08:33 [Tim]
- CV: related to how we validate it, since we need user feedback
- 13:09:01 [Tim]
- CI: are we going to define WCAG questions?
- 13:09:32 [Tim]
- CV: we're just talking about test cases - different issue
- 13:10:15 [Tim]
- we decide we need feedback from users
- 13:11:01 [Tim]
- CI: we're going to confuse people asking for schema related to WCAG2?..
- 13:11:30 [Tim]
- need to just cover use cases - just use subset?
- 13:12:07 [Tim]
- CI: example, "test case mode" define "one expert" - what kind of expert - needs to go
- 13:12:18 [Tim]
- through WCAG WG?
- 13:12:39 [Tim]
- CS: it's how we in task force review test cases
- 13:13:29 [Tim]
- SAZ: how is test case evaluated, or how test case is developed?
- 13:14:00 [Tim]
- SAZ: Only take vocabulary we need, don't take BenToWeb specific info..
- 13:14:14 [shadi]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Aug/att-0046/TCDL_TSDTF_sc3.1.1_l1_001.xml
- 13:14:24 [Tim]
- we may need to look at other elements to consider adoption?
- 13:14:58 [Tim]
- SAZ: may look at CS's minimal example, and then start looking to add to that to match our needs
- 13:15:34 [Tim]
- SAZ: description and purpose should come from WCAG in this example - maybe need smaller language?
- 13:16:17 [Tim]
- CS: description - description of test materials and purpose - purpose of test itself
- 13:16:59 [Tim]
- CV: per test case, for every technique there would be many test cases
- 13:17:12 [Tim]
- SAZ: where is mapping to WCAG SC?
- 13:17:20 [Tim]
- CS: In rule section
- 13:18:26 [Tim]
- SAZ: start by minimal example, and then add to it (taking from TCDL) - another approach?
- 13:19:07 [Tim]
- SAZ: goal is minimal set of vocabulary that can describe our tests, we're opening up too many questions?
- 13:19:28 [Tim]
- .. opening up scope of task force?
- 13:20:17 [Tim]
- CV: we should be careful in reviewing/disregarding elements, "test mode" is relevant element
- 13:20:55 [Tim]
- SAZ: BenToWeb person to send examples of metadata?
- 13:21:05 [Tim]
- CV: Sure, they're on line..
- 13:21:13 [Tim]
- SAZ: maybe some smaller examples?
- 13:21:45 [Tim]
- CS: the example provided is from scratch, and could be real
- 13:22:51 [Tim]
- CV: ask eveyone to review in detail, and comment on mailing list, to streamline TCDL,
- 13:22:58 [Tim]
- by next week
- 13:23:41 [Tim]
- SAZ: Can people spend more time reviewing this in detail this week? - answer is yes
- 13:25:00 [Tim]
- Action: non-BenToWeb people to review current draft
- 13:25:31 [Tim]
- Action: CS to complete current draft with missing sections
- 13:26:11 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 2
- 13:26:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, Follow-up review of TCDL, closed
- 13:26:12 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 13:26:13 [Zakim]
- 3. Start of test production phase [from shadi]
- 13:26:27 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 13:26:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Start of test production phase" taken up [from shadi]
- 13:26:44 [Tim]
- CV: wait for next week for producing minor examples
- 13:27:12 [Tim]
- CV: 1-2 weeks finish up new version of test cases - maybe task force can
- 13:27:17 [Tim]
- review them?
- 13:28:18 [Tim]
- CV: maybe can review what is public from BenToWeb? - starting point
- 13:29:02 [Tim]
- SAZ: makes sense - close several test samples this way, and test our structure and metadata, and process within task force
- 13:29:40 [Tim]
- CV: in two weeks can have some examples ready
- 13:29:49 [Tim]
- SAZ: next week finalize TDCL
- 13:30:05 [Zakim]
- -Christophe
- 13:30:07 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 13:30:10 [Zakim]
- -Chris
- 13:30:12 [Zakim]
- -Cooper
- 13:30:13 [Zakim]
- -Sandor_Herramhof
- 13:30:13 [Zakim]
- -CarlosV
- 13:30:17 [Zakim]
- -CarlosI
- 13:30:19 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 13:30:43 [Vangelis]
- Vangelis has left #tsdtf
- 13:30:46 [Sandor]
- Sandor has left #tsdtf
- 13:34:54 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 13:34:54 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Vangelis
- 13:35:06 [shadi]
- zakim, drop vangelis
- 13:35:06 [Zakim]
- Vangelis is being disconnected
- 13:35:07 [Zakim]
- WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended
- 13:35:08 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Shadi, CarlosI, Sandor_Herramhof, Vangelis, Chris, CarlosV, Tim_Boland, Christophe, Cooper
- 13:35:11 [shadi]
- zakim, bye
- 13:35:12 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tsdtf
- 13:35:20 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 13:35:24 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 13:35:24 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi
- 13:35:25 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 13:35:30 [shadi]
- rrsagent, bye
- 13:35:30 [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-actions.rdf :
- 13:35:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: non-BenToWeb people to review current draft [1]
- 13:35:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-irc#T13-25-00
- 13:35:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: CS to complete current draft with missing sections [2]
- 13:35:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/05-tsdtf-irc#T13-25-31