Title:
State: RAISED OPEN PENDING POSTPONED SUBSUMED CLOSED
Product: All RDFa Recipes SKOS VM
Raised By: Everyone Abhishek Rungta Alistair Miles Antoine Isaac Ben Adida Bernard Horan Clay Redding Dan Brickley Daniel Maycock Daniel Rubin David Peterson Diego Berrueta Ed Summers Elisa Kendall Fabien Gandon Francesco de Leo Guus Schreiber Jan Henke Jeremy Carroll Jon Phipps Justin Thorp Justin Thorp Manu Sporny Margherita Sini Michael Hausenblas Mirghani Mohamed Quentin Reul Rachel Yager Ralph Swick Sean Bechhofer Siegfried Handschuh Simone Onofri Thomas Baker Vit Novacek
Description: Can a resource have two "preferred lexical labels"? Can a lexical label be both "preferred" and "alternative" for the same resource? If a lexical label is "hidden", can it also be "preferred" or "alternative" for the same resource? See also <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/BasicLexicalLabelSemantics> Imagine the SKOS vocabulary consisted only of skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel. I.e. forget everything else for the moment. Now, consider the following RDF graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "bar"@en. The resource ex:foo has two different preferred lexical labels in the same language. Is this graph inconsistent? What about the following: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and an alternative lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Consider another graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Finally, consider: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both an alternative and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent?
Add notes: