Title:
State: RAISED OPEN PENDING POSTPONED SUBSUMED CLOSED
Product: All RDFa Recipes SKOS VM
Raised By: Everyone Abhishek Rungta Alistair Miles Antoine Isaac Ben Adida Bernard Horan Clay Redding Dan Brickley Daniel Maycock Daniel Rubin David Peterson Diego Berrueta Ed Summers Elisa Kendall Fabien Gandon Francesco de Leo Guus Schreiber Jan Henke Jeremy Carroll Jon Phipps Justin Thorp Justin Thorp Manu Sporny Margherita Sini Michael Hausenblas Mirghani Mohamed Quentin Reul Rachel Yager Ralph Swick Sean Bechhofer Siegfried Handschuh Simone Onofri Thomas Baker Vit Novacek
Description: Tentative Resolution: class is rdf:type, while role is xhtml2:role. Related: Syntactic Sugar for class attribute Initial Motivation was to reduce the use of rdf:type in some examples. Discussions: July 2006: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0009 August 2005: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Aug/0003 July 2005: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#item02 Points of Debate about role: + should we use role in some RDF way that is equivalent to rdf:type at all? + if we do, does that mean role is equivalent to rdf:type, or is a subproperty of rdf:type? + is role more of a declaration of "plays the role of" for purposes of client user interface? + maybe we need a new syntactic sugar for rdf:type? But that's possibly a slippery slope. Points of Debate about class: + should class be rdf:type? Another predicate? + Mark's post: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0009 + only for scoped classes-discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0063.html
Add notes: