13:30:27 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 13:30:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-irc 13:30:37 meeting: i18n ITS working group 13:30:40 chair: Yves 13:30:42 scribe: Felix 13:30:46 scribeNick: fsasaki 13:30:51 present: Felix, Yves 13:31:06 rrsagent, make log public 13:53:24 YvesS has joined #i18nits 13:58:50 zakim, dial felix-home 13:58:50 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 13:58:51 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has now started 13:58:52 +Felix 13:59:22 zakim, what is the code? 13:59:22 the conference code is 48794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), YvesS 13:59:38 zakim, dial felix-home 13:59:38 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has ended 13:59:40 Attendees were Felix 13:59:42 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 13:59:45 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has now started 13:59:48 +Felix 14:00:01 +Yves_Savourel 14:00:16 -Felix 14:00:18 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has ended 14:00:20 Attendees were Felix, Yves_Savourel 14:00:44 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has now started 14:00:51 +Yves_Savourel 14:01:05 zakim, who is here? 14:01:05 On the phone I see Yves_Savourel 14:01:07 On IRC I see YvesS, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki 14:01:22 :( 14:02:43 I got dropped once as well. But it seems to work now. 14:03:49 ok 14:05:42 do you want to use something else? like yahoo messenger voice? 14:06:04 +Felix 14:07:08 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3456 14:08:33 Yves proposal: 14:08:33 "It is generally recommended to avoid using attribute to store text, however, 14:08:33 in this specific case, the need to provide the notes without interfering with 14:08:33 the structure of the host document is outweighing the drawbacks of using an 14:08:33 attribute. 14:10:04 resolution: go back to i18n core with the text proposal 14:11:39 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3459 14:14:05 ... 14:14:56 ... 14:16:27 ... 14:16:35 ... 14:17:35 Yves: normal processing for ITS markup about ITS markup 14:17:48 .. that is: local has precedence over global 14:18:14 action: Yves to try in his implementation of ITS markup about ITS markup in the case of locNote works 14:21:33 Yves: locNote, termInfo, ruby (with rt / rb), span 14:21:40 .. are elements with textual content 14:21:54 .. problem would be ruby 14:23:27 element span { inline except ruby } 14:24:03 rt or rb { inline except ruby } 14:25:03 rt or rb { inline except ruby and except span } 14:25:22 rt or rb { inline except ruby and except its:span } 14:25:49 rt or rb { inline except its:ruby and except its:span } 14:28:32 Felix: how about adding local markup to inline elements, without its:span? 14:29:00 Action: Felix to draft a text how to work-around the problem of arbitrary nesting of its:span in ruby 14:30:02 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466 14:30:55 Felix proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0253.html 14:31:00 Yves agrees 14:34:24 Conformance of the schemas with respect to IRIs doesn't work since it depends on the schema language 14:36:07 However, people should expect an IRI if they process the "xxxRef" values 14:36:17 resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0253.html plus today's discussion 14:37:34 action: Felix to draft a text for the role of IRIs before and after ITS processing 14:38:28 topic: discussion about language 14:38:56 concerns 3468, 3515 and others 14:39:12 Yves: question which remains: is xml:lang normative or not? 14:41:41 14:43:28 let $french := //` 14:43:38 [lang()=fr] 14:43:58 let $french := //* [lang()="fr"] 14:46:10 14:46:34 14:52:05 resolution: stick with the text we have, decide for now that it is non-normative 14:54:20 14:58:06 http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-defaults-etc 15:01:28 15:01:44 langPointer="../langcode"/ 15:04:06 Example c) at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0162.html is a valid example 15:04:39 our resolution works also for 3469 15:04:59 and 3480 15:05:34 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 15:08:19 resolution: don't change the name of translatability, go back to i18n core 15:11:22 topic: 3482 15:11:32 already closed, Felix has to go back to WG 15:11:42 topic: 3494 15:11:50 action for Felix left 15:11:58 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3495 15:13:20 Felix: looks good to me 15:14:13 Yves: the WG needs to look at it 15:14:47 topic: 3501 15:14:52 resolved via 3502 15:15:04 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3509 15:15:41 Felix: that might take until September 15:16:08 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3511 15:17:02 Felix: new example looks fine to me 15:17:29 same for http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 15:18:12 topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3513 15:18:45 Yves: I'll write a paragraph about this 15:20:27 topic: next calls 15:20:36 Yves: no call this week, too many people on vacation 15:21:23 action: Felix to send the i18n core comments with resolutions back to i18n core 15:24:09 -Felix 15:24:10 I18N_ITS()10:00AM has ended 15:24:12 Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Felix 15:24:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 15:25:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:30:35 Zakim has left #i18nits