15:02:05 RRSAgent has joined #webcgm 15:02:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-irc 15:02:41 zakim, this is WebCGM 15:02:42 ok, SG; that matches GA_WebCGM()11:00AM 15:03:17 scribe: SG 15:03:30 chair: lofton 15:04:02 thierry has joined #webcgm 15:04:09 hello 15:04:35 zakim, ??P11 is Dave 15:04:35 +Dave; got it 15:04:39 zakim, who's talking? 15:04:50 BB, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Lofton_Henderson (9%), Thierry (99%) 15:04:59 rrsagent, make logs member 15:06:09 zakim, who's talking 15:06:09 I don't understand 'who's talking', lofton 15:06:18 zakim, who's talking? 15:06:39 lofton, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Thierry (70%) 15:06:53 -Thierry 15:07:06 Chris has joined #webcgm 15:07:17 zakim, code? 15:07:17 the conference code is 932246 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), Chris 15:07:38 +??P29 15:08:03 I am back on the US Zakim number 15:08:15 +??P46 15:08:29 zakim, ??P46 is me 15:08:29 +Chris; got it 15:09:05 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Jul/0055.html 15:09:26 zakim, ??P46 is thierry 15:09:26 I already had ??P46 as Chris, thierry 15:09:32 scribe: Stuart 15:09:40 scribenick: SG 15:09:45 zakim, ??P29 is me 15:09:45 +thierry; got it 15:09:47 chair: lofton 15:10:20 +Don 15:10:24 topic: roll call 11:00am EDT, membership, agenda 15:10:35 who is here? 15:10:51 cgi-irc has joined #webcgm 15:10:57 zakim, who is here? 15:10:57 On the phone I see Dave (muted), Stuart, Lofton_Henderson, BenoitB, thierry, Chris, +1.713.977.aacc 15:10:59 On IRC I see cgi-irc, Chris, thierry, RRSAgent, BB, Zakim, davec, lofton, SG, trackbot 15:11:17 regrets: deiter 15:12:02 zakim, +1.713.977.aacc is Don 15:12:02 +Don; got it 15:12:11 don has joined #webcgm 15:12:24 topic: routine WG business 15:13:07 lofton: there is a cookbook for producing minutes 15:13:11 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html 15:13:33 lofton: the hotel rates are 114 (that includes breakfast) 15:15:31 lofton: It looks like all have registered with the exception of Don. 15:15:58 the rate I got was 112.40 15:16:02 topic: LC comments 15:17:49 lofton: drafted a response to the i18n-core comments are there any objections or comments 15:18:57 (noobjections) 15:19:32 We will create a single response to the three comments 15:20:32 action: thierry update the status of the response document 15:20:32 Created ACTION-2 - Update the status of the response document [on Thierry Michel - due 2006-07-27]. 15:21:41 action Thierry will send the response to i18n with a copy to the webcgm mailing list 15:21:54 action: Thierry will send the response to i18n with a copy to the webcgm mailing list 15:21:55 Created ACTION-3 - Will send the response to i18n with a copy to the webcgm mailing list [on Thierry Michel - due 2006-07-27]. 15:22:50 lofton: done with the i18n-core comments now about picture behaviors 15:23:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Jul/0050.html 15:29:25 F -+- S 15:29:25 | 15:29:25 +- X -+- S1 15:29:25 | 15:29:25 +- S2 15:29:56 just joking lofton:) 15:31:43 BB tried allthe examples except linking toanamed object,and they worked as chris said 15:31:46 IsoDraw has to following options for Picture behaviors, they are called: 15:32:14 Default, IsoView, Frame, Parent Frame, Whole Page, New Window, Frame... 15:32:46 Request -- can Benoit or Chris send an email with the actual code(s) for Chris's example(s)? 15:35:32 bb: The ISOview implementation matches explaination given by Chris 15:39:35 It would be useful for this WG to ask why it has gone 15:42:19 (gone from the CDF spec) 15:42:33 dc has joined #webcgm 15:42:38 Ask where? CDF WG? 15:42:43 yes 15:44:12 http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation-child-documents 15:44:54 At that URL, there is extensive treatment of "picture behaviors" in the context of various standards (SVG, WebCGM, HTML, etc) 15:45:08 It is all missing from the latest editors draft... 15:45:22 http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml 15:46:20 write to member-cdf@w3.org 15:46:44 action: lofton to send a message to CDF list noting the 3 missing sections from the lateste editor draft 15:46:45 Created ACTION-4 - Send a message to CDF list noting the 3 missing sections from the lateste editor draft [on Lofton Henderson - due 2006-07-27]. 15:47:19 chris: we should also note that webCGM found those sections valuable 15:49:56 topic: Tracker status [7] ? 15:50:27 trackbot, status? 15:50:47 trackbot, ACTION-1 ? 15:51:42 Thierry: sent out a reminder to review for last call comments, and maybe should also send out a request to the chairs list 15:58:40 Thierry suggests using any extra time at F2F for: look at test suite; and, start CR-required implementation report. 15:58:47 Lofton and Chris agree. 16:02:32 -Chris 16:02:34 -Don 16:02:37 -BenoitB 16:02:46 rrsagent, make logs public 16:02:50 -Dave 16:02:57 rrsagent, bookmark 16:02:57 See http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-irc#T16-02-57 16:03:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:03:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-minutes.html SG 16:03:38 rrsagent, bye 16:03:38 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-actions.rdf : 16:03:38 ACTION: thierry update the status of the response document [1] 16:03:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-irc#T15-20-32 16:03:38 ACTION: Thierry will send the response to i18n with a copy to the webcgm mailing list [2] 16:03:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-irc#T15-21-54 16:03:38 ACTION: lofton to send a message to CDF list noting the 3 missing sections from the lateste editor draft [3] 16:03:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/20-webcgm-irc#T15-46-44