IRC log of xproc on 2006-07-13
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:49:19 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 14:49:19 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-xproc-irc
- 14:49:21 [Norm]
- zakim, this will be xproc
- 14:49:21 [Zakim]
- ok, Norm; I see XML_PMWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 11 minutes
- 14:49:57 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 14:49:57 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 14:49:57 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 14:49:57 [Norm]
- Date: 13 July 2006
- 14:49:57 [Norm]
- Chair: Norm
- 14:49:58 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2006/07/13-agenda.html
- 14:50:00 [Norm]
- Meeting: 28
- 14:51:38 [Alessandro]
- Alessandro has joined #xproc
- 14:57:32 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has joined #xproc
- 14:59:01 [Norm]
- MSM, old ETA was today + 1 week :-)
- 14:59:49 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has now started
- 14:59:58 [Zakim]
- +Norm
- 15:00:26 [MoZ]
- MoZ has joined #xproc
- 15:00:43 [Zakim]
- +[ArborText]
- 15:00:54 [MoZ]
- Zakim, what is the code?
- 15:00:54 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200), MoZ
- 15:01:13 [Zakim]
- +Alessandro_Vernet
- 15:01:42 [Zakim]
- +??P3
- 15:01:59 [Norm]
- zakim, ??P3 is MoZ
- 15:01:59 [Zakim]
- +MoZ; got it
- 15:02:28 [Norm]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:02:28 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, PGrosso, Alessandro_Vernet, MoZ
- 15:04:22 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has joined #xproc
- 15:05:49 [AndrewF]
- AndrewF has joined #xproc
- 15:05:57 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Milowski
- 15:06:29 [Norm]
- zakim, mute alex_milowski
- 15:06:29 [Zakim]
- Alex_Milowski should now be muted
- 15:06:37 [Zakim]
- +??P41
- 15:06:37 [Norm]
- zakim, unmute alex_milowski
- 15:06:39 [Zakim]
- Alex_Milowski should no longer be muted
- 15:06:43 [AndrewF]
- zakim, ? is AndrewF
- 15:06:43 [Zakim]
- +AndrewF; got it
- 15:08:29 [MoZ]
- MSM are you around ?
- 15:08:49 [Norm]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 15:08:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, PGrosso, Alessandro_Vernet, MoZ, Alex_Milowski, AndrewF
- 15:09:35 [Norm]
- Present: Alessandro, Mohamed, Norman, Paul, Alex, Andrew
- 15:09:39 [Norm]
- Regrets: Murray
- 15:09:45 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda?
- 15:09:45 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2006/07/13-agenda.html
- 15:09:53 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:09:59 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous teleconference?
- 15:10:11 [Norm]
- Norm, since they were never published
- 15:10:12 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: 20 July
- 15:10:12 [Norm]
- Any regrets?
- 15:10:26 [Norm]
- None given.
- 15:10:29 [Norm]
- Topic: Face-to-face: 2-4 Aug 2006.
- 15:10:29 [Norm]
- Registration is closed. Make sure your arrangements are in order.
- 15:10:42 [MSM]
- zakim, please call Michael-Office
- 15:10:42 [Zakim]
- ok, MSM; the call is being made
- 15:10:42 [MoZ]
- hurray !
- 15:10:43 [Zakim]
- +Michael
- 15:11:27 [Norm]
- Topic: Review of open action items
- 15:11:53 [Norm]
- A-27-01
- 15:11:54 [Norm]
- Completed
- 15:12:04 [Norm]
- A-27-02: Norm to write up some straw syntaxes for some of the use cases
- 15:12:26 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:12:27 [Norm]
- Continued.
- 15:12:40 [Norm]
- A-23-02: Richard to write a syntax proposal
- 15:12:40 [rlopes]
- zakim [IP is Rui
- 15:12:42 [Norm]
- Continued.
- 15:12:49 [Norm]
- A-23-03: Norm to write a syntax proposal
- 15:12:50 [Norm]
- Continued
- 15:12:54 [rlopes]
- zakim, +[IP is Rui
- 15:12:54 [Zakim]
- sorry, rlopes, I do not recognize a party named '+[IP'
- 15:12:55 [Norm]
- A-13-01: MSM to draft a complete table; ETA: 20 July 2006
- 15:12:58 [Norm]
- Continued.
- 15:13:10 [Norm]
- Topic: XProc syntax
- 15:13:15 [rlopes]
- zakim, [IP is Rui
- 15:13:15 [Zakim]
- +Rui; got it
- 15:14:10 [Norm]
- Alex: I worked through some of my examples.
- 15:16:05 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jul/0002.html
- 15:16:51 [Norm]
- Alex: Maybe it's easier to look at the large document example
- 15:17:12 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jul/0016.html
- 15:17:44 [Norm]
- Norm: Is this the one you had in mind?
- 15:17:46 [Norm]
- Alex: Yes
- 15:17:57 [Norm]
- ...There's one tweak, the 'from' attribute is wrong in this one.
- 15:18:25 [Norm]
- ...The idea is that you are selecting an expression (@select) over an input document (@over)
- 15:18:36 [Norm]
- ...The thing you select has to be an element, so that it can be made into a document.
- 15:18:48 [Norm]
- ...That's provide as input labeled "iteration" (@to)
- 15:19:08 [Norm]
- ...The output of the for-each is the input that's been processed.
- 15:19:37 [alexmilowski]
- <p:for-each select="section" over="large-doc" to="iteration" replacement="transformed">
- 15:19:37 [alexmilowski]
- <!-- input isn't needed here because this "for-each" has
- 15:19:37 [alexmilowski]
- to iterate over elements. The input is identified by
- 15:19:37 [alexmilowski]
- the 'over' attribute and the binding for each result
- 15:19:37 [alexmilowski]
- element is specified by the 'to' attribute. -->
- 15:19:38 [alexmilowski]
- <p:output name="final" from="large-document"/>
- 15:21:12 [Norm]
- ...So in this example, the output is a little funny
- 15:21:23 [Norm]
- Some discussion which the scribe couldn't follow
- 15:23:44 [Norm]
- Norm attempts to summarize
- 15:26:02 [Norm]
- Alex: The way I've been using the output element is that there's a name for it and a from that refers to whatever you're labelling
- 15:26:11 [Norm]
- ...So what is the from?
- 15:26:22 [Norm]
- ...In the case of a normal step, it'd be something the component defined.
- 15:30:07 [Norm]
- Norm and Alex attempt to come to an understanding...
- 15:30:49 [Norm]
- Alex: The p:output can't be from 'transformed' because that's just the inner result. And it can't be 'large-doc' because it's not large-doc, it's large-doc after modification.
- 15:32:09 [alexmilowski]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jul/0028.html
- 15:33:21 [Norm]
- Norm: This suggestion makes p:for-each something like a p:output in the sense that it defines a label for its output
- 15:34:09 [Norm]
- Alex: I think an issue we should raise for later is whether there's some grand unification of this and iterating over documents. We should make sure we come back to that.
- 15:34:32 [Norm]
- ...It would be unfortunate if we couldn't extend this to the concept of iterating over sequences of documents
- 15:35:32 [Norm]
- Norm: This example has multiple steps
- 15:36:10 [Norm]
- Norm: You've used the explicit naming of each input and output as opposed to the alternative which was naming though the step name.
- 15:36:28 [Norm]
- Alex: I said no defaults, no magic, no prefixing.
- 15:37:09 [Norm]
- Norm: Ok, so that was a significant part of your proposal.
- 15:37:19 [Norm]
- Alex: In the end, I think it might be very confusing to users.
- 15:37:23 [Norm]
- Norm: I'm inclined to agree.
- 15:38:10 [MoZ]
- Alex, are steps systematicaly anonymous ?
- 15:38:53 [Norm]
- Norm: Anything else we should spend time discussing?
- 15:39:40 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jul/0017.html
- 15:40:31 [Norm]
- Alex: Most interesting bit is the p:url step
- 15:40:33 [alexmilowski]
- http://www.smallx.com/tideinfo/
- 15:40:45 [alexmilowski]
- http://www.smallx.com/tideinfo-service/
- 15:44:08 [Norm]
- Alex: The url step performs an http action and possibly massages the result (based on content-type) to produce a well-formed XML result
- 15:44:24 [Norm]
- Alex: The following steps cleanup and filter the result data.
- 15:45:08 [Norm]
- Alex: There's nothing earth shattering here except for the retrieval step.
- 15:45:36 [Norm]
- ...I could have done this through XSLT using document() calls, but that would require XSLT to be able to handle HTML documents
- 15:47:03 [Norm]
- Alessandro: the only thing I see are purely syntactic. What's the best name for these attributes, for example?
- 15:47:05 [Norm]
- Naming is hard.
- 15:47:54 [Norm]
- Alex: The naming issues and not having defaults haven't really been an issue for me. That makes me pretty comfortable with a first-round story that doesn't have any defaults.
- 15:48:32 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jul/0019.html
- 15:49:00 [Norm]
- Alex: The biggest thing to not here are the parameters.
- 15:49:20 [Norm]
- ...There's one input that contains two elements. I'm going to need those lots of times.
- 15:50:02 [Norm]
- ...So I grab them right at the beginning.
- 15:53:27 [Norm]
- Alex: There's a whole question of if you use parameters, where are they available. Is it implicit or explicit? Etc.
- 15:53:43 [Norm]
- Alex: This is a straight-through pipe. In fact it has to stream because the output of the last two steps can blow up to millions of elements.
- 15:54:49 [Norm]
- Norm: Are you making parameters copies or pointers to a document?
- 15:54:53 [Norm]
- Alex: I'm making copies.
- 15:57:29 [Norm]
- Alex: There are two interesting things: I have a bunch of custom steps, how do we deal with those, and I have a need to reuse the inputs to the pipeline at a later part, what's the right way to do that? With parameters? Or an input dependency? And how would that work.
- 15:57:34 [Norm]
- s/work./work?/
- 15:58:20 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business?
- 15:58:24 [Norm]
- None.
- 15:58:50 [Norm]
- Scribe apologizes for rather poor minutes this week.
- 16:00:42 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 16:00:43 [Zakim]
- -PGrosso
- 16:00:44 [Zakim]
- -Rui
- 16:00:46 [Zakim]
- -Alessandro_Vernet
- 16:00:47 [Zakim]
- -MoZ
- 16:00:47 [Zakim]
- -AndrewF
- 16:00:51 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has left #xproc
- 16:00:52 [Zakim]
- -Michael
- 16:00:57 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has left #xproc
- 16:04:08 [Norm]
- rrsagent, set logs world-visible
- 16:04:11 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:04:11 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 16:04:36 [Norm]
- Norm, remember to publish the $#@$#@ minutes!
- 16:05:53 [Zakim]
- disconnecting the lone participant, Alex_Milowski, in XML_PMWG()11:00AM
- 16:05:57 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
- 16:05:59 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Norm, PGrosso, Alessandro_Vernet, MoZ, Alex_Milowski, AndrewF, Michael, [IPcaller], Rui
- 16:39:45 [MoZ]
- Zakim, bye
- 16:39:45 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc
- 16:40:27 [MoZ]
- Rssagent, bye
- 17:44:27 [Norm]
- Norm has joined #xproc
- 18:24:52 [MoZ]
- Rssagent, quit
- 18:25:38 [MoZ]
- Norm, i didn't notice at the f2f that there won't be any telcon in july, is this the case ?
- 18:25:47 [MoZ]
- for xls
- 18:25:53 [MoZ]
- s/xls/xsl/
- 18:40:14 [Norm]
- I think so. I didn't really get a clear picture on that either
- 18:40:31 [Norm]
- I'm just going to wait until another agenda comes out, I think :-)
- 19:09:16 [MoZ]
- Norm, i was afraid that i lost some part of the discussion during f2f
- 19:09:23 [Norm]
- I don't think so
- 19:09:32 [MoZ]
- ...but i didn't sleep that much ;)
- 19:11:00 [MoZ]
- so it's official you will be at toronto, then montreal ?
- 19:12:18 [Norm]
- Yes!
- 19:14:13 [MoZ]
- great
- 19:15:06 [Norm]
- You bet!
- 19:26:30 [MoZ]
- Extreme Anxiety is over...but what about Extreme Stress ?
- 19:30:58 [MoZ]
- Norm, any idea of what Sharon was speaking about we she said that "if any member could help" or something like for the tests suite ?
- 19:31:08 [Norm]
- Not off the top of my head
- 19:31:20 [Norm]
- Extreme Stress grows ever more extreme :-)
- 19:31:29 [Norm]
- There's a code-freeze for Java on Monday so I'm heads down bug fixing
- 19:31:59 [MoZ]
- on what part are you working ?
- 19:32:02 [MoZ]
- JAXP
- 19:32:06 [MoZ]
- is it ?
- 19:37:12 [MoZ]
- JAXB too ?
- 19:41:39 [MoZ]
- Norm, it's java 6 Rc ?
- 19:41:56 [Norm]
- I'm working on JAXP 1.4 for Java 6 (whatever we call that these days)
- 19:43:15 [MoZ]
- ok good luck with bugs..
- 19:50:18 [Norm]
- thanks!
- 21:59:22 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent /help
- 21:59:30 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent leave
- 21:59:35 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent quit
- 21:59:40 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent thanks
- 21:59:47 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent, thanks
- 21:59:59 [MoZ]
- RSSAgent, help
- 22:00:15 [MoZ]
- RRSAgent bye
- 22:00:22 [MoZ]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 22:00:22 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items