14:58:54 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:58:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/11-rif-irc 14:59:00 zakim, who is on the call 14:59:02 I don't understand 'who is on the call', csma 14:59:07 zakim, this is rif 14:59:07 ok, FrankMcCabe; that matches SW_RIF()11:00AM 14:59:08 zakim, who is on the call? 14:59:08 On the phone I see ??P13 14:59:18 zakim, ??P13 is me 14:59:18 +csma; got it 14:59:22 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 14:59:23 +[NRCC] 14:59:41 +[Fujitsu] 14:59:48 zakim, fuijtsu is me 14:59:48 sorry, FrankMcCabe, I do not recognize a party named 'fuijtsu' 14:59:56 zakim, fujitsu is me 14:59:56 +FrankMcCabe; got it 14:59:57 GiorgosStoilos has joined #rif 15:00:00 +David_Hirtle 15:00:06 +Allen_Ginsberg 15:00:08 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 15:00:12 IanH has joined #rif 15:00:17 zakim, mute me 15:00:17 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 15:00:18 +??P18 15:00:20 +PaulaP 15:00:22 josb has joined #rif 15:00:24 +Dave_Reynolds (was Guest P20 74394) 15:00:26 +Dave_Reynolds 15:00:27 zakim ??P18 is me 15:00:34 +Axel_Polleres 15:00:44 +[DERI] 15:00:45 zakim, ?P18 is me 15:00:51 pfps has joined #rif 15:00:54 sorry, AlexKozlenkov, I do not recognize a party named '?P18' 15:01:07 Elisa has joined #rif 15:01:16 +??P32 15:01:25 zakim, ??P18 is me 15:01:28 +AlexKozlenkov; got it 15:01:30 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 15:01:31 mute me 15:01:32 +??P34 15:01:43 zakim, ??P34 is me 15:01:50 +pfps; got it 15:01:53 zakim, mute me 15:01:53 AlexKozlenkov should now be muted 15:02:10 +Elisa_Kendall 15:02:19 scribenick: FrankMcCabe 15:02:30 + +1.503.317.aaaa 15:02:31 +[IBM] 15:02:34 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:02:34 +Harold; got it 15:02:36 zakim mute me 15:02:58 zakim, [ibm] is temporarily StellaMitchell 15:02:58 +StellaMitchell; got it 15:03:02 +Sandro 15:03:23 zakim, mute me 15:03:23 Elisa_Kendall should now be muted 15:03:30 +[IPcaller] 15:03:41 JeffP has joined #rif 15:03:48 topic 'RIF 11 July http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jul/0013.html' 15:04:14 +Leora_Morgenstern 15:04:18 41# 15:04:30 zakim, please mute me 15:04:30 Leora_Morgenstern should now be muted 15:04:31 sandro has changed the topic to: RIF 11 July http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jul/0013.html 15:04:34 agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jul/0013.html 15:04:44 +??P8 15:05:22 +[IVML] 15:05:27 CSMA: What about the summer? 15:05:40 zakim, [IVML] is me 15:05:40 +GiorgosStoilos; got it 15:05:47 +1 normally 15:06:03 - +1.503.317.aaaa 15:06:28 Continue meetings as normal during the summer 15:06:38 ^^csma 15:06:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jul/att-0018/minutes.txt 15:06:46 SaidTabet has joined #RIF 15:06:50 cma: Propose to accept above minutes 15:07:04 +1 15:07:06 +1 15:07:16 +1 15:07:21 s/cma/csma/ 15:07:31 zakim, mute me 15:07:31 sorry, igor, I do not see a party named 'igor' 15:07:53 csma: Minutes of july 4th accepted 15:08:07 DaveR sent a request! 15:08:29 It is addressed. 15:08:55 pfps: No change for F2F4 15:09:12 [steps out for a few moments] 15:09:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jul/0015 15:09:44 zakim, unmute me 15:09:44 Elisa_Kendall should no longer be muted 15:09:50 EvanWallace has joined #rif 15:10:09 -[IPcaller] 15:10:12 +Gary_Hallmark 15:10:37 moment 15:10:44 +Evan_Wallace 15:10:47 ok 15:11:03 +??P9 15:11:10 johnhall has joined #rif 15:11:17 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/28 15:11:19 zakim, ??P9 is me 15:11:19 +igor; got it 15:11:34 Action 28: closed 15:11:49 Action 28 [closed] 15:11:59 +??P28 15:12:09 [returns from interrupt] 15:12:10 zakim, +??P28 is me 15:12:10 sorry, SaidTabet, I do not recognize a party named '+??P28' 15:12:11 csma: SPARQL, XQUERY, XPATH, PRR, SBVR no news 15:12:18 AlexKozlenkov has joined #rif 15:12:28 zakim, ??P28 is me 15:12:28 +SaidTabet; got it 15:12:31 zakim, mute me 15:12:31 igor should now be muted 15:12:34 Elisa: ODM was recommended for adoption at OMG Boston Meeting 15:12:34 zakim, mute me 15:12:34 SaidTabet should now be muted 15:12:47 Elisa: FTF starts in September 15:12:53 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 15:13:17 zakim, mute me 15:13:17 Elisa_Kendall should now be muted 15:13:19 zakim, who is on the phone 15:13:19 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', AlexKozlenkov 15:13:29 zakim, who is here? 15:13:29 On the phone I see csma, Harold, FrankMcCabe, David_Hirtle, Allen_Ginsberg (muted), PaulaP (muted), AlexKozlenkov (muted), Dave_Reynolds, Axel_Polleres (muted), josb (muted), IanH 15:13:32 ... (muted), pfps, Elisa_Kendall (muted), StellaMitchell (muted), Sandro, Leora_Morgenstern (muted), JeffP, GiorgosStoilos, Gary_Hallmark, Evan_Wallace, igor (muted), SaidTabet 15:13:37 Can you send a pointer to these discussions? 15:13:37 ... (muted) 15:13:39 On IRC I see GaryHallmark, AlexKozlenkov, johnhall, EvanWallace, SaidTabet, JeffP, StellaMitchell, Elisa, pfps, josb, IanH, AxelPolleres, GiorgosStoilos, DaveReynolds, RRSAgent, 15:13:42 DaveR What is our position on Semantic Coordination Group 15:13:42 ... Allen, Zakim, csma, LeoraMorgenstern, igor, DavidHirtle, FrankMcCabe, Harold, PaulaP, sandro, trackbot, Keep 15:13:55 zakim, mute me 15:13:55 SaidTabet was already muted, SaidTabet 15:14:26 csma: The rule layer in SW stack needs to be synched with RIF 15:14:36 MichaelKifer has joined #rif 15:14:46 +[IPcaller] 15:14:49 zakim, ipcaller is me 15:14:49 +johnhall; got it 15:14:57 zakim,mute me 15:14:57 johnhall should now be muted 15:15:00 csma: Is the RIF going to develop a rule language or is a rule interchange format different to a rule language 15:15:17 csma: This needs to be clarified with the SCG 15:16:29 daver: debate on fourth goal for RIF to develop rule language not reflected on SWCG 15:16:59 csma: I wrote that it was not a goal, not part of the charter 15:17:11 csma: no decision, currently under dicsussion 15:18:05 daver: I see the followup message, that it was your opinion not the RIF's policy 15:18:26 daver: Is this an extension of the charter or not 15:19:02 csma: Prefer to interpret the charter in a minimal way given that it is already v. broad in scope 15:19:26 csma: Jury out on whether RIF implies rule language or not 15:19:29 -IanH 15:20:08 daver: Followup in the SWCG following any discussion/decision in RIF 15:21:12 csma: ACTION Let SWCG know that there is an ongoing discussion and they will be updated 15:21:27 ACTION csma will let SWCG know that there is an ongoing discussion and they will be updated 15:21:43 ACTION: csma will let SWCG know that there is an ongoing discussion and they will be updated 15:21:43 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:21:47 q+ to ask sandro re: possibility of edit 15:21:56 +[IPcaller] 15:22:14 zakim, IPcaller is me 15:22:14 +MichaelKifer; got it 15:22:21 ack david 15:22:21 DavidHirtle, you wanted to ask sandro re: possibility of edit 15:22:27 zakim, mute me 15:22:27 MichaelKifer should now be muted 15:23:12 daveH: Style of UCR doesnt work well in IE or Firefox 15:23:34 ACTION: sandro: to fix the styles of the UCR 15:23:34 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:23:48 thanks Sandro; I wasn't sure if anything could be done after publication 15:24:17 csma: How do we get feedback. 15:24:26 I tthink we should contact commercial most rule vendors 15:24:43 csma: The liaisons shouldspread the word in their respective groups 15:24:48 most commercial rule zakim, unmute me 15:24:56 Yes, I could do it 15:25:11 zakim, unmute me 15:25:11 AlexKozlenkov should no longer be muted 15:25:13 yes 15:25:31 ACTION: AlexKozlenkov will contact commercial rules vendors to take a look at the UCR 15:25:31 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:25:39 I could notify the sparql wg again, since we have no "real" liaison at sparql 15:26:17 AlexK: there are now many rules languages/vendors. Ensuring interoperability will be hard. 15:26:27 trackbot, this is rifwg 15:26:44 ACTION: AlexK will contact JSR94 community 15:26:44 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:26:49 zakim, mute me 15:26:49 AlexKozlenkov should now be muted 15:27:43 csma: action 33 closed 15:27:50 csma: action 38 continued 15:28:13 csma: action 9 continued 15:28:27 csma: action 41 continued 15:28:46 continued 15:29:02 csma: action 39 continued 15:29:33 csma: action 35 closed 15:29:48 csma: action 55 closed 15:30:08 continued! 15:30:23 sorry, that was for the nexrt one! 15:30:26 csma: action 52 closed 15:30:35 ;-) 15:30:47 yes. 15:30:54 csma: action 53 continued 15:31:05 done 15:31:12 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Document_issues 15:31:17 Notification to DAWG has been sent 15:31:29 csma: action 56 closed 15:32:48 csma: issues against UCR document should be recorded as issues 15:33:07 s/Notification to DAWG has been sent/Notification of the publication of the 2nd WD of the UCR document has been sent to DAWG/ 15:33:19 ACTION: Sandro rename use and requirements into one category 15:33:19 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:33:27 FrankMcCabe has left #rif 15:33:43 FrankMcCabe has joined #rif 15:34:00 csma: We need to prioritize issues 15:34:15 csma: discuss this next meeting 15:34:52 ACTION: csma put organization of issues on next agenda 15:34:52 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:35:13 csma: RIFRAF actions 15:35:20 q? 15:35:24 zakim, unmute me 15:35:24 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 15:36:00 Michael: Cannot remember action 44 15:36:11 Michael: Cannot remember action 43 15:36:18 q+ 15:36:46 ack harold 15:36:59 HaroldB: How do languages supprt built-ins? 15:37:24 HaroldB: There wa some confusion about the status of the last powerpoint slides 15:37:39 cma: Yes. 15:37:54 topic: RIFRAF 15:38:08 csma: Many of the requirements were moved to the RIFRAF 15:38:27 q+ 15:38:28 zakim, mute me 15:38:29 MichaelKifer should now be muted 15:38:48 csma: Do we have the proper criteria in the RIFRAF 15:39:24 csma: E.g. RIF should support production rules, first order, normative rules, combined language rule sets 15:39:49 ack frank 15:40:33 +1 to not putting RIF requirements in RIFRAF 15:41:02 csma: RIFRAF contains discriminators not requirements 15:41:24 RIFRAF gives a framework in which to define the space of coverage which we require RIF to cover 15:42:37 csma: We need enough discriminators to cover the field 15:42:37 Absolutely, Phase 2 requirements should not simply disappear 15:43:27 csma: Group languages into related groups and derive requirements from the groups 15:44:31 haroldb: does space mean that not everything needs to be covered 15:45:07 daver: framework to allow us to decsribe space of languages. Some will be covered, some not 15:45:59 csma: The choices for covered languages depend on the criteria themselves 15:46:37 csma: We might not see e.g. production rules emerge without the right discriminators e.g. actions on conclusions 15:46:59 csma: How do we enusre coverage of discriminators 15:47:07 There is currently not enough detail for production or reaction rules. 15:47:30 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Critical_Factors_Analysis 15:48:00 There are coverage requirements in the CFA analysis 15:49:06 ok 15:49:17 I'll try :) 15:49:35 ACTION: PaulaP to analyse RIFRAF discriminators cover CFA 15:49:35 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:50:26 csma: We need the space of rule languages populated. We have 5 or 6 at the moment but need more 15:51:05 csma: Suggest a questionnaire to help populate the RIFRAF 15:51:08 +1 15:51:11 =1 15:51:13 +1 15:54:02 I think I can take it over, if you formulate the concrete responsibility again. 15:54:22 ACTION: alexP & sandro to prepare a questionnaire and organize it and keep track 15:54:22 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 15:55:17 s/alexP/Axel/ 15:55:44 csma: The questionnaire allows people to complete an entry in the RIFRAF for a rule language oftheir choice 15:56:24 csma: If there are new criteria then the q may need to be modified and edited also 15:56:58 csma: the group thanks Axel 15:57:35 sorry, still continued/ 15:58:16 -GiorgosStoilos 15:58:23 csma: action 20 continued 15:58:28 csma: action 22 continued 15:59:18 q+ 15:59:18 csma: we need a strawman semantics for RIFRAF 15:59:29 ack harold 15:59:38 harold: We are working on this at the moment 16:00:08 zakim, unmute me 16:00:08 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 16:00:18 harold: we have an update on semantics wrt positive conditions, e.g. model theoretic semantics 16:00:22 q+ 16:00:32 -SaidTabet 16:00:51 harold: now moving to horn logic and conditions 16:01:15 michael: it is possible to give a semantics inc conditions. parameterized by the language 16:01:18 MoZ_ has joined #rif 16:01:37 michael: esp. model theoretic semantic based language 16:01:58 csma: can it be extended to negative conditions and built-ins? 16:02:28 michael: should be ok. 16:02:48 michael: am planning to enhance wiki 16:03:40 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions 16:03:53 csma: Did pfps look at the positive conditions section above? 16:04:53 pfps: this is a cut and paste of previous extensibility document 16:05:33 michael: parameterized by the model semantics of the language 16:06:21 pfps: My issue was that there was no contraint on mappings in and out of the RIFRAF 16:06:26 michael: to be done 16:07:05 pfps: Need requirements on mappings <-> RIFRAF 16:07:13 michael: yes 16:07:44 pfps: Need requirements on mappings <-> RIF 16:08:02 pfps: needs to be moved from email discussion to the document 16:08:05 pfps, can u go to A.1 Basis: Positive Conditions", click "Info", then "Diff", you'll see the changes afer the copy and paste. 16:09:55 q- 16:09:59 zakim, mute me 16:09:59 MichaelKifer should now be muted 16:10:19 ACTION: michael to update semantics for positive conditions taking account of email discussion on contraints on RIF mappings 16:10:20 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:11:47 csma: Mapping between existing rule languages and existing semantics 16:12:09 pfps: There are big gaps in the mapping at the moment. 16:12:31 pfps: possible to have degenerate compliance 16:13:18 zakim, unmute me 16:13:18 MichaelKifer should no longer be muted 16:13:30 q? 16:14:05 michael: Issue is pfps wants a unified luaguage for a super-language which is inherently small (without PRs, LP, etc) 16:14:27 pfps: I am not asking for that (I think) 16:14:52 ACTION: pfps will describe loophole he sees in the semantics 16:14:52 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:15:12 zakim, mute me 16:15:12 MichaelKifer should now be muted 16:15:22 harold: Next step is to proceed to horn clauses 16:15:43 harold: We might be able to make progress in 2 weeks 16:16:34 harold: look at existing toc to see current approach 16:16:47 csma: better to lead the discussion by email 16:17:16 ACTION: harold, michael to email ideas about extending semantics to cover horn logic 16:17:16 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:18:22 csma: We need more volunteers to see how existing semantics and syntactic mappings are useful 16:18:39 zakim, unmute me 16:18:39 AlexKozlenkov should no longer be muted 16:19:33 alex There are many rule languages that belong to the PR categories. Existing semantic analysis not helpful to those languages 16:20:16 zakim, mute me 16:20:16 AlexKozlenkov should now be muted 16:20:18 I can also try to find time to map the cond lang to Xcerpt/XChange 16:20:23 ACTION: alex will look at condition part of a sample PR language to see if semantic mapping is feasable, easy etc. 16:20:24 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:21:02 ACTION: paulaP will look at condition part Xcerpt/XChange see if semantic mapping is feasable, easy etc. 16:21:02 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:21:04 I will 16:21:12 Which language? 16:21:37 any version of prolog? 16:21:40 No, no preferenc 16:21:57 Okay 16:22:03 zakim, unmute me 16:22:03 Leora_Morgenstern should no longer be muted 16:22:19 ACTION: Leora will look at condition part of prolog to see if semantic mapping is feasable, easy etc. 16:22:19 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:22:31 ACTION: Frank will look at condition part of Go! to see if semantic mapping is feasable, easy etc. 16:22:31 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 16:22:36 go! 16:22:37 Okay, so you don't need me to do a version of Prolog, then. 16:22:43 q+ 16:22:52 ack leora 16:23:19 The issue wrt prolog is the meta language 16:24:31 zakim, mute me 16:24:31 Leora_Morgenstern should now be muted 16:24:36 q? 16:24:47 zakim, who is here? 16:24:47 On the phone I see csma, Harold, FrankMcCabe, David_Hirtle, Allen_Ginsberg (muted), PaulaP (muted), AlexKozlenkov (muted), Dave_Reynolds, Axel_Polleres (muted), josb (muted), pfps, 16:24:50 ... Elisa_Kendall (muted), StellaMitchell (muted), Sandro, Leora_Morgenstern (muted), JeffP, Gary_Hallmark, Evan_Wallace, igor (muted), johnhall (muted), MichaelKifer (muted) 16:24:54 On IRC I see MoZ, FrankMcCabe, MichaelKifer, GaryHallmark, AlexKozlenkov, johnhall, EvanWallace, JeffP, StellaMitchell, Elisa, pfps, josb, IanH, AxelPolleres, DaveReynolds, 16:24:56 ... RRSAgent, Allen, Zakim, csma, LeoraMorgenstern, igor, DavidHirtle, Harold, PaulaP, sandro, trackbot, Keep 16:25:10 +1 16:25:12 csma: Propose to adjourn 16:25:20 OK, bye folks 16:25:20 bye 16:25:23 -Evan_Wallace 16:25:24 bye 16:25:24 -igor 16:25:24 -AlexKozlenkov 16:25:26 -Axel_Polleres 16:25:26 -Allen_Ginsberg 16:25:27 -Gary_Hallmark 16:25:29 -Harold 16:25:31 -PaulaP 16:25:33 -Elisa_Kendall 16:25:37 -Sandro 16:25:38 exit 16:25:39 -JeffP 16:25:41 -johnhall 16:25:43 -Dave_Reynolds 16:25:47 -StellaMitchell 16:25:49 -Leora_Morgenstern 16:25:51 -josb 16:25:55 -pfps 16:25:55 rrsagent, make minutes 16:25:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/07/11-rif-minutes.html csma 16:26:09 -David_Hirtle 16:26:17 -MichaelKifer 16:30:57 -FrankMcCabe 16:31:01 -csma 16:31:02 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:31:03 Attendees were csma, FrankMcCabe, David_Hirtle, Allen_Ginsberg, PaulaP, Dave_Reynolds, Axel_Polleres, josb, AlexKozlenkov, IanH, pfps, Elisa_Kendall, +1.503.317.aaaa, Harold, 16:31:07 ... StellaMitchell, Sandro, Leora_Morgenstern, JeffP, GiorgosStoilos, Gary_Hallmark, Evan_Wallace, igor, SaidTabet, johnhall, MichaelKifer 16:57:18 RRSAgent, make record public 17:58:47 FrankMcCabe has joined #rif 18:31:05 Zakim has left #rif