14:00:58 RRSAgent has joined #i18ncore 14:00:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc 14:01:01 meeting: i18n core working group 14:01:06 chair: Francois 14:01:10 scribe: Felix 14:01:13 r12a has joined #i18ncore 14:01:17 scribeNick: fsasaki 14:01:21 zakim, dial richard 14:01:21 ok, r12a; the call is being made 14:01:22 I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has now started 14:01:23 +Richard 14:01:41 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0011.html 14:01:48 +Felix 14:02:00 fyergeau has joined #i18ncore 14:02:16 +[IBM] 14:02:34 fyergeau_ has joined #i18ncore 14:02:52 me rrsagent, make log public 14:03:14 +[IPcaller] 14:03:19 zakim, [ is fyergeau 14:03:19 +fyergeau; got it 14:04:29 zakim, who is here? 14:04:29 On the phone I see Richard, Felix, Mary, fyergeau 14:04:30 On IRC I see fyergeau_, fyergeau, r12a, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki 14:05:40 topic: action items 14:06:03 action: Felix to find out how we should handle ws-i18n "policy" now, with the policy wg (ONGOING) 14:06:22 +Karunesh_Arora 14:06:57 action: Richard (if you want): Report on SSML workshop, and WWW 2006 (DONE) 14:07:21 Richard: not much left to say 14:07:34 Francois: nothing ground breaking? 14:07:49 Richard: the composite message scenario for SSML? 14:08:06 .. we thought about SSML in two contexts: 14:08:30 .. handcrafting a text, putting things into it, then an SSML processor works with it 14:08:39 .. that scenario is e.g. for a telephone prompt 14:08:46 .. a different scenario might be a news read 14:08:56 .. where you read news e.g. for a data base 14:09:12 .. in that case you will not do any special tweaks of low level attributes / elements 14:09:31 .. at the SSML workshop, there was a third scenario: you get some information from the DB 14:09:32 karora has joined #i18Ncore 14:09:50 .. e.g. you get the date from the DB in "the date is ..." 14:10:02 .. or "the total number of pages printed is ..." 14:10:13 .. if you say "we printed seven pages" 14:10:28 .. that would be difficult for languages with high inflection 14:10:56 .. all the rules on composite messages I wrote recently in an article apply in that case 14:11:08 .. we have to see what the implemencations will be 14:11:22 Francois: interesting. Is there an allowance for variables in SSML? 14:11:42 Richard: that is up to you, SSML has no specific facility for that 14:11:54 .. but some Greek people did that 14:12:21 Francois: so the SSML processor gets just plain SSML, but a different processor does the rest? 14:12:24 Richard: yes 14:12:38 .. e.g. you could use the say-as element 14:12:49 .. you can have that as part of a template for your sentence 14:13:11 .. but that would not be so easy with e.g. news feeds, because you first would need to identify e.g. ordinal numbers 14:13:27 Francois: any conclusion for the workshop? 14:13:38 topic: SSML i18n workshop report (by Richard) 14:13:53 Richard: we gathered requirements 14:13:59 .. there will be a summary 14:14:17 .. there might be another workshop 14:14:29 .. these guys are kean on i18n 14:14:43 .. they want more people more Indian e.g. 14:15:56 Felix: would ITS be a place to describe such constraints as with the variable stuff? 14:16:03 Richard: don't know, maybe in ITS 14:16:12 topic: Workshop in India 14:16:24 Richard: on the 2nd and 3rd of August 14:16:38 .. a workshop with strong interest in speech 14:17:04 .. maybe people from the voice browser wg 14:17:16 .. Felix might be able to participate as well 14:17:26 Felix: I will make that clear ASAP 14:17:33 Francois: organized by the Indian office? 14:17:35 Richard: yes 14:17:47 topic: action items (part 2) 14:18:00 action: all to look at charmod resid test suite and gather feedback (PENDING) 14:18:12 action: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) 14:18:22 action: Mary to review http://www.w3.org/TR/its/ after 18 May before 30 June (PENDING) 14:18:31 action: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws-i18n (PENDING) 14:18:42 action: Richard to create a wiki on "first letter", post a blog and write a mail to the Unicode list about it (PENDING) 14:19:17 topic: discussion of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0009.html comments on intput mode 14:19:49 Richard: I already got a response from Martin, he felt he could deal with this 14:20:12 .. I don't think there is s.t. specific at this time, Steven just wants somebody to talk to 14:20:29 Martins mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0012.html 14:21:08 Richard: there is a specific issue, and Martin has responded already 14:22:12 action: Everybody to look at input mode discussion, see Martin's mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0012.html 14:22:21 topic: compound doc issue 14:22:36 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0010.html 14:24:09 Richard: accessibility people have raised the same issue as we did about compound documents 14:24:38 Francois: We tried, CDF refused 14:37:33 Felix: coming from an ITS perspective and the problems we have with the conref mechanism, I tend to agree with the CDF people 14:38:12 Richard: people might want to use this stuff 14:38:30 Francois: CDF people say the stuff would be like standalone 14:39:05 .. I am still worried that people create compound documents with images 14:39:31 Richard: we should get it in the i18n BP document 14:39:48 Felix: Yves said he will take care of that 14:40:16 Richard: we talk about documents included by reference 14:40:28 .. if the SVG is included in the HTML file, what do we say? 14:40:40 Francois: in that case, the xml:lang will apply 14:41:27 .. from the case of accessibility, we could say "we tried with CDF, they pushed back" 14:41:35 .. accessiblity might be stronger 14:41:52 Richard: but the same theory applies 14:42:10 .. if we agree with CDF, we should go back to accessibility like that as well 14:42:18 .. and people should be educated 14:42:58 .. to use language information in every included piece 14:43:57 action: Richard to reply to accessibility people about CDF issue 14:44:06 Richard: we should also say: 14:44:13 that the referenced document would be handled as if it were read on its own 14:44:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 14:45:01 topic: two possible approaches to LTLI 14:45:07 see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006AprJun/0073.html 14:48:23 Francois: Did Mark make some recommendations? 14:48:41 Felix: he proposed to built locale identifiers on top of RFC 3066bis 14:49:45 Francois: I think that matches current practice more closlely than the other solution (i.e. having locale and language totally separated) 14:49:57 Richard: what are we dealing with here? E.g. collations? 14:50:48 Francois: what a locale is depends very much on the application area 14:51:07 Felix: what notion fits to ws i18n? 14:51:17 Mary: depends also on application 14:54:00 discussion on various notions of locale 14:55:38 topic: rechartering preparation - any news? 14:55:55 Richard: no news yet. 14:56:46 topic: other business? 14:56:53 Francois: not here next week 14:57:32 Richard: let's have a call 14:57:52 .. at some time, we should go through some concepts of RFC 3066bis 14:58:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 14:58:45 -fyergeau 14:58:47 -Felix 14:58:49 -Mary 14:58:50 -Richard 14:58:51 Francois: please tackle ITS if possible next week 14:58:59 Mary: will do 14:59:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 14:59:38 -Karunesh_Arora 14:59:40 I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM has ended 14:59:41 Attendees were Richard, Felix, [IBM], Mary, [IPcaller], fyergeau, Karunesh_Arora 14:59:46 Zakim has left #i18ncore 15:03:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 15:04:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-minutes.html fsasaki 15:50:20 r12a has left #i18ncore 16:32:35 rrsagent, bye 16:32:35 I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-actions.rdf : 16:32:35 ACTION: Felix to find out how we should handle ws-i18n "policy" now, with the policy wg (ONGOING) [1] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-06-03 16:32:35 ACTION: Richard (if you want): Report on SSML workshop, and WWW 2006 (DONE) [2] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-06-57 16:32:35 ACTION: all to look at charmod resid test suite and gather feedback (PENDING) [3] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-18-00 16:32:35 ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) [4] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-18-12 16:32:35 ACTION: Mary to review http://www.w3.org/TR/its/ after 18 May before 30 June (PENDING) [5] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-18-22 16:32:35 ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws-i18n (PENDING) [6] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-18-31 16:32:35 ACTION: Richard to create a wiki on "first letter", post a blog and write a mail to the Unicode list about it (PENDING) [7] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-18-42 16:32:35 ACTION: Everybody to look at input mode discussion, see Martin's mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jun/0012.html [8] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-22-12 16:32:35 ACTION: Richard to reply to accessibility people about CDF issue [9] 16:32:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/13-i18ncore-irc#T14-43-57 16:32:42 fsasaki has left #i18ncore