14:27:49 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:27:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc 14:29:24 Zakim, this is dawg 14:29:24 ok, DanC; that matches SW_DAWG()10:30AM 14:29:30 Zakim, call DanC-BOS 14:29:30 ok, DanC; the call is being made 14:29:31 +DanC 14:29:50 +??P1 14:29:52 zakim, ??P1 is me 14:29:52 +AndyS; got it 14:30:03 Zakim, IBMCambridge is me 14:30:03 +EliasT; got it 14:30:19 Chair: DanC 14:30:23 Scribe: EliasT 14:30:27 +Libby_Miller 14:30:31 Sven_Groppe has joined #dawg 14:30:33 zakim, mute me 14:30:33 Libby_Miller should now be muted 14:30:36 +[IPcaller] 14:30:40 +[IBMCambridge] 14:30:44 Zakim, [IPcaller] is me 14:30:44 +jeen; got it 14:30:47 Zakim, IBMCambrdige is LeeF 14:30:47 sorry, LeeF, I do not recognize a party named 'IBMCambrdige' 14:30:58 Zakim, IBMCambridge is LeeF 14:30:58 +LeeF; got it 14:31:01 So picky. 14:31:11 agenda + Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-18T14:30Z 14:31:18 agenda + Future meetings 14:31:19 EricP - extracted examples - any updates? I hope to make the corrections I noted in email 14:31:26 agenda + JSON results format 14:31:34 agenda + punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate 14:31:36 many of the examples aren't checked though 14:31:40 agenda + valueTesting 14:31:47 agenda + test suite maintenance 14:31:52 if there is an update soon I coudl do all fixes at once 14:31:54 agenda + MIME type registrations 14:32:00 agenda + UC&R end-game 14:32:07 Zakim, take up item 1 14:32:07 agendum 1. "Convene RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-04-18T14:30Z" taken up [from DanC] 14:32:09 Meeting: RDF Data Access Working Group weekly telecon 14:32:16 Zakim, who's on the phone? 14:32:16 On the phone I see EliasT, DanC, AndyS, Libby_Miller (muted), jeen, LeeF 14:32:26 Souri has joined #dawg 14:32:42 DanC has changed the topic to: DAWG 18 apr http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda 14:32:59 +JacekK 14:33:13 Regrets: Kendall Clark 14:33:18 JacekK is me 14:33:30 Zakim, JacekK is Sven_Groppe 14:33:30 +Sven_Groppe; got it 14:33:54 agenda is ok 14:33:58 +Souri 14:34:01 Jeen -- sound check? 14:34:16 Regrets: KendallC 14:34:43 zakim, please dial ericP-617 14:34:43 ok, ericP; the call is being made 14:34:45 +EricP 14:34:52 zakim, thank you 14:34:52 you are very welcome, ericP 14:35:00 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/11-dawg-minutes minutes 11 apr 14:35:00 oo 14:35:06 has it always been that polite? 14:35:35 RESOLVED to approve minutes 11 Apr 14:35:54 Zakim, next item 14:35:54 agendum 2. "Future meetings" taken up [from DanC] 14:36:49 I'm in the mood to meet next 30 May 14:39:33 jeen: Do we need a full meeting to work on the test suite? 14:39:43 DanC: Well, to approve tests you need a WG decision. 14:40:51 ericP: Looking for items that need WG decisions in agenda 14:41:39 DanC: valueTesting seems to be needing more WG work. 14:42:23 AFS notes that fn => http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions 14:42:34 DanC: if we don't decide when to meet next, we need a 7-day notice before we can meet. 14:43:34 PORPOSED: to meet next 2 May, EricP or KC to chair. 14:43:48 JB: regrets 2 May 14:43:58 I can't make it either 14:44:18 9 shoudl be ok 14:44:21 PORPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair. 14:44:22 probably OK 14:45:00 +[IPcaller] 14:45:25 Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH 14:45:25 +SteveH; got it 14:45:28 Even http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions is wrong because it seems to be /# for .../xpath-functions/#not 14:45:33 zakim, mute me 14:45:33 SteveH should now be muted 14:45:46 Zakim, pick a victim 14:45:46 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose LeeF 14:45:55 i can if i'm there, but i'm a bit at risk 14:46:00 say, 70% chance of it being OK 14:46:29 :-p 14:46:43 PORPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe 14:47:06 RESOLVED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe. 14:47:10 PROPOSE: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe 14:47:19 PROPOSED: to meet next 9 May, EricP or KC to chair, Lee or Jeen to scribe 14:47:23 Zakim, next item 14:47:23 agendum 3. "JSON results format" taken up [from DanC] 14:47:49 ACTION: EricP to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/ [CONTINUES] 14:48:49 comments to sparql-dev. Note 14:49:01 Zakim, next item 14:49:01 agendum 4. "punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate" taken up [from DanC] 14:49:02 ACTION: EricP to change status to reflect that comments should go to sparql-dev 14:50:17 ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate [CONTINUES] 14:50:38 Zakim, next item 14:50:38 agendum 5. "valueTesting" taken up [from DanC] 14:51:29 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0002.html Geoff's comment 14:52:03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html 14:52:28 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html Equality in FILTER [#ValueTesting] Seaborne, Andy (Tuesday, 18 April) 14:53:11 (boolean isn't a subtype of integer, is it?) 14:54:42 AFS: XQ F&O says False < True 14:55:10 Souri: Does XPath say that? 14:55:25 http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-boolean-less-than 14:55:52 Hmm - no boolean-compare which is odd 14:56:35 AFS: having < apply to booleans helps with sorting 14:57:41 I'd be happiest with a general what does "=" mean principle 14:57:47 DanC: would prefer to make WG decision based on tests 14:58:50 DanC: are replies to Geoff should be backed by tests. 14:59:35 Geoff's comment is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Apr/0003.html (not 0002) 14:59:57 ACTION: EricP to propose text and tests to add {boolean < > = != boolean} to SPARQL 15:00:07 ah... indeed, 0002 is the wrong one 15:00:07 As we discussed last week, I have acked him offlist that I fwd'ed it to the WG list 15:00:33 i dont like librdf 15:00:33 maybe it doesn't like you :-P 15:01:35 must leave because of Kindergarten opening times... 15:01:50 enjoy, Sven 15:01:56 DanC: can you look for roman numeral test? 15:02:01 -Sven_Groppe 15:02:29 Sven_Groppe has left #dawg 15:03:12 DanC: it should be that no processor says "2 != II^^:roman" 15:03:25 +! to what danc is saying 15:03:28 +1 even 15:03:47 (= sometimes being equivalence and sometimes value compare?) 15:04:45 FILTER ( "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral = "two"^^xsd:numericText ) in a naive processor falls through to the {RDFTerm = RDFTerm} test and = FALSE 15:04:46 What about ?p = ?? 15:05:11 when the processor understands both xsd:romanNumeral and xsd:numericText, we get TRUE 15:06:19 DanC: it would be interesting to see what users think getting type errors when we have unknown terms. 15:06:51 (er... integer and decimal do intersect) 15:07:17 FILTER ( ?p sameAs ) 15:07:39 ericP: if we have error propagation then tests would only change from error to TRUE when implementation learns about new types. (since all of our xsd types don't intersect) 15:07:42 FILTER ( ?p sameTermAs ) 15:07:58 FILTER ( !(?p sameTermAs ) ) 15:08:07 (cwm calls it log:equalTo, I think, which is also goofy.) 15:08:14 maybe FILTER ( !(?p ¥ ) ) ? 15:10:28 ericP: the common usage is to be it numeric comparison and same term comparison, however the syntax gives us a non-monotonic behavior. 15:10:37 AndyS: it could be monotonic if we throw an error. 15:11:48 AndyS: if it doesn't have a clue, throws an error. 15:11:55 FILTER ( "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral = "two"^^xsd:numericText ) 15:12:25 ericP: how do we differentiate between numeric and term compare? 15:12:30 (?x = "XI"^^xsd:romanNumeral) (?y = "two"^^xsd:numericText) 15:12:32 DanC: you put it in the BGP 15:12:42 FILTER ( ?x = ?y ) 15:12:45 ericP: sorry for being dense 15:12:54 s/XI/II/ ?? 15:13:15 (?x = "II"^^xsd:romanNumeral) (?y = "two"^^xsd:numericText) 15:13:24 DanC: it should be an error. 15:13:25 FILTER ( ?x = ) 15:13:40 (should as in: that's what AFS is proposing) 15:13:58 AndyS: it should return an error. 15:14:03 Zakim, mute my dog 15:14:03 I don't understand 'mute my dog', DanC 15:14:10 lol 15:14:19 Present: DanC's dog 15:15:18 Can do same-rdf-term by (1) BGP or (2) FILTER with str/datatype/lang (a bit verbose but uncommon?) 15:15:37 ericP: I believe AndyS proposal to remove RDFTerm equal when the two are typed literals. 15:16:21 AFS isn't able to confirm based on the way that got recorded, but such is life 15:17:20 EricP's or mine? 15:17:24 All this has no bearing on error propagation, right? 15:17:26 AndyS: yours. 15:18:05 The discussion email is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0047.html 15:18:16 Summary "=" on literals means sameValueAs 15:19:05 in soviet russia... 15:20:10 Zakim, list actions 15:20:10 I don't understand 'list actions', DanC 15:20:16 RRSAgent, list actions 15:20:16 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-actions.rdf : 15:20:16 ACTION: EricP to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/ [CONTINUES] [1] 15:20:16 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-47-49 15:20:16 ACTION: EricP to change status to reflect that comments should go to sparql-dev [2] 15:20:16 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-49-02 15:20:16 ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate [CONTINUES] [3] 15:20:16 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-50-17 15:20:16 ACTION: EricP to propose text and tests to add {boolean < > = != boolean} to SPARQL [4] 15:20:16 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc#T14-59-57 15:20:29 ACTION EricP: draft text for open-world = 15:21:04 ACTION Andy: draft of open-world = tests 15:21:43 Zakim, next item 15:21:43 agendum 6. "test suite maintenance" taken up [from DanC] 15:22:05 ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [CONTINUES] 15:23:41 ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [WITHDRAWN] 15:24:29 ACTION AndyS: contribute a couple tests for computed-properties/virtual-prop/builtin. one usingn lists, and one not using lists 15:24:55 ACTION: EricP and Jeen to fix OPTIONAL coding [DONE] 15:25:36 jeen's work is noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0020.html 15:26:55 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/extracted-examples/extract 15:26:56 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/extracted-examples/extract 15:27:38 Zakim, next item 15:27:38 agendum 7. "MIME type registrations" taken up [from DanC] 15:28:24 ACTION: EricP to respond to Dirk on MIME type stuff [CONTINUES] 15:28:35 ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests (2Mar) [CONTINUES] 15:29:12 May 2 15:29:17 sorry 15:29:25 ADJOURN. 15:29:39 -Souri 15:29:46 -Libby_Miller 15:29:47 -jeen 15:29:48 bye 15:30:00 -SteveH 15:30:10 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:30:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-minutes.html EliasT 15:30:19 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 15:30:35 RRSAgent, please stop