13:48:15 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 13:48:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc 13:48:19 meeting: i18n ITS working group 13:48:26 scribe: Felix 13:48:32 scribeNick: fsasaki 13:48:37 chair: Yves 13:48:56 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006AprJun/0017.html 13:49:08 rrsagent, make log public 13:52:53 YvesS has joined #i18nits 13:56:33 fsasaki has joined #i18nits 13:57:27 Hi felix 13:57:32 hi Yves 13:57:54 Strange: http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html is displayed as a blank page with IE 13:58:41 I can see the source HTML but the display is blank 13:59:08 I run the security update this morning: maybe it has to do with it. It looks OK on Firefox. 13:59:58 it also does not work with my IE :( 14:00:26 http://www.w3.org/TR/its/ displays fine. 14:00:55 It used to work this weeked. And even Monday I think. 14:01:04 the diff version as well ... 14:01:27 I uploaded a new version today as itstagset.html 14:01:28 AZ has joined #i18nits 14:01:33 I will have a look 14:01:33 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 14:01:38 zakim, dial felix-home 14:01:38 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 14:01:40 +Yves_Savourel 14:02:09 +Sebastian_Rahtz 14:02:11 -Yves_Savourel 14:02:12 +Yves_Savourel 14:02:18 zakim, dial felix-home 14:02:19 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 14:02:21 +Felix 14:02:41 Hi Andrzej. Sorry: I've listed you in the regrets: I thought you would be travelling. Good to have you. 14:03:08 +Andrzej_Zydron 14:03:13 +??P18 14:03:24 chriLi has joined #i18nits 14:04:12 rahtz has joined #i18nits 14:04:13 topic: proposal about versioning 14:04:31 yves: last consensus: we don't have a consensus 14:04:36 .. proposals: 14:04:43 .. 1) put ITS version on root of the document 14:05:34 .. 2) put ITS version attribute only on the root if there is no its:rules element, otherwise it would be at its:rules 14:06:09 .. 3) as 1), and if there is no attribute present, we assume that it is version 1.0 14:06:49 felix: I have no thought now, let's go through it during the f2f 14:06:54 yves: o.k. 14:07:01 topic: product's that ITS should encompass 14:07:18 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2761 14:07:30 yves: that is the current state 14:07:40 .. I commented on what we had proposed by Christian and Felix 14:07:51 .. Felix entered most of the changes in the draft 14:08:37 .. so is everybody o.k. with what we have as a conformance text? 14:09:17 Andrzej: they are quite resonable conformance critera 14:09:50 GoutamSaha has joined #i18nits 14:10:32 action: yves and felix to integrate the link related stuff into the conformance section 14:10:45 topic: element within text 14:10:48 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#datacat-within-text 14:11:12 yves: one issue: the subflow issue is left 14:11:23 .. Andrzej wants also a "subflow" attribute 14:11:41 .. it would say that we content would be a different part of the text 14:11:59 .. I think it is difficult to make the difference between subflow and not subflow 14:12:09 Andrzej: the problem I have: 14:12:22 .. if we don't list them as with "within text" 14:12:53 .. we will have problems with segmentation processes 14:13:26
  • some text:

    some more text

  • 14:13:39 yves: what would you do with cases like that? 14:13:53 .. e.g. XHTML allows those type of things 14:14:04 sebastian: what would you do about embedded graphics? 14:14:16 Andrzej: it is a subflow 14:14:37 yves: so these subflows we would have a placeholder, and the text woud be extracted separately? 14:14:41 Andrzej: yes 14:14:53 .. treating this separately gives you good granularity 14:15:11 .. so the emmbedded graphic is not a problem, but the list with a paragraph 14:15:30 .. it is o.k. in DITA, XHTML, DocBook 14:16:39 .. they are a kind of "top level elements" 14:17:03 yves: so if p is in li, would p be a subflow? 14:17:06 Andrzej: no 14:17:12 Yves: so what do we do with it? 14:17:26 Andrzej: the process would segment the sentence and come to the p 14:17:43 yves: so you would have a text broken in different segments 14:17:55 Andrzej: yes, since the p is not designed to be a subflow 14:18:52 .. I think true subflows are index markers, titles in XHTLM etc. 14:19:30 yves: I see the problem that people will not know how to differentiate the usage of these two categories? 14:19:48 .. I would say: we don't need subflow as a category, it is just within text 14:21:40 .. so we say: not listing it as an inline element would make it a subflow? 14:21:46 sebastian: because it is the default? 14:21:58 Yves: yes. so we could get rid of the subflow attribute? 14:22:02 Andrzej: yes 14:23:04 sebastian: I will think about a better name than withinText until next week 14:23:50 topic: proposal for ruby 14:23:58 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-sec 14:24:15 yves: what felix did: 14:24:58 .. he went through the definition of the ruby module 14:26:24 yves: I saw you implemented the same model as the ruby w3c tr? 14:26:39 felix: yes, including the conformance 14:26:54 yves: how will we test for ruby? 14:28:28 felix: I would say for local we don't have to do anything 14:28:44 .. just rely on existing tests for ruby 14:28:53 .. as for global rules, we can handle ruby like everything else 14:29:24 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-sec 14:29:32 topic: rescheduling of topics 14:29:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006AprJun/0014.html 14:30:27 yves: describes topics for next week (f2f week) 14:31:23 .. processing expectations for ruby / dir, http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2915 14:31:33 .. metadata for rules 14:31:40 .. indicator for constraints 14:32:01 .. everybody fine with that? 14:32:13 Andrzej: I will be in Shanghai next week 14:32:18 .. I have to leave now 14:32:25 -Andrzej_Zydron 14:32:47 topic: further action items 14:33:08 draft URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060414/ 14:33:56 action: Everybody to think about which W3C working groups shoud comment on the tagset last call draft (ONGOING) 14:34:45 yves: please send your ideas to Felix 14:35:00 felix: Liam Quin said the draft looks o.k. 14:35:14 .. I'd propose to have CSS, XSLT 14:35:31 action: Sebastian to give feedback on the 'overriding' change proposal, Diane to look at it again (ONGOING) 14:35:49 yves: Sebastian, what do you think about our current terminology in the spec? 14:36:07 sebastian: I think we are overriding 14:36:15 yves: so we all agree 14:36:59 sebastian: a term like "precedence" is a social time 14:37:31 action: editor's to replace 'overwriting' with 'overriding' in the spec 14:37:50 action: Yves to summarize "loc prop" discussion (DONE) 14:38:06 action: Yves to summarize the terminology discussion on "localization properties" (DONE) 14:38:17 action: Yves to write a paragraph on versioning for the tagset draft (PENDING) 14:38:23 yves: that's for the f2f 14:38:33 action: Editor's of the techniques document: give examples how to use its:locInfoRef (DONE) 14:38:40 http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601TechLocInfoDev 14:39:00 yves: please comment and make change proposals in the wiki 14:40:18 action: Richard to describe an additional level of conformance for Ruby (DROPPED) 14:40:35 action: Spec editors to integrate discussion result about bugs 2881,2,3 (DONE) 14:41:51 topic: f2f topics 14:43:28 felix: should we talk about the schema design? 14:43:42 sebastian: we are too deep in the topic 14:44:04 .. let's be prepared to talk about the schema design, but it is not absolutly mandatory 14:45:18 sebastian: what do I have to prepare except internet and a phone, a projector? 14:46:01 yves: me, christian and felix are in the same hotel 14:47:42 yves: any comments on the f2f? 14:48:34 felix: I will try to organize the work better 14:49:31 christian: a further topic: organization of work in the group 14:50:30 Hi Goutam :) 14:50:59 Good Night Felix, Yves and Everyone 14:52:09 Hi Yves, Felix 14:54:55 Bye 14:55:24 topic: next meeting 14:55:37 yves: please think about locations, timing 14:55:59 -Sebastian_Rahtz 14:56:05 -Yves_Savourel 14:56:17 http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060414/ 14:58:13 -Christian 14:58:14 -Felix 14:58:16 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 14:58:17 Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Sebastian_Rahtz, Felix, Andrzej_Zydron, Christian 14:58:35 present: Andrzej, Christian, Felix, Goutam, Sebastian, Yves 14:58:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:58:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 15:17:09 rrsagent, bye 15:17:09 I see 10 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-actions.rdf : 15:17:09 ACTION: yves and felix to integrate the link related stuff into the conformance section [1] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-10-32 15:17:09 ACTION: Everybody to think about which W3C working groups shoud comment on the tagset last call draft (ONGOING) [2] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-33-56 15:17:09 ACTION: Sebastian to give feedback on the 'overriding' change proposal, Diane to look at it again (ONGOING) [3] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-35-31 15:17:09 ACTION: editor's to replace 'overwriting' with 'overriding' in the spec [4] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-37-31 15:17:09 ACTION: Yves to summarize "loc prop" discussion (DONE) [5] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-37-50 15:17:09 ACTION: Yves to summarize the terminology discussion on "localization properties" (DONE) [6] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-38-06 15:17:09 ACTION: Yves to write a paragraph on versioning for the tagset draft (PENDING) [7] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-38-17 15:17:09 ACTION: Editor's of the techniques document: give examples how to use its:locInfoRef (DONE) [8] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-38-33 15:17:09 ACTION: Richard to describe an additional level of conformance for Ruby (DROPPED) [9] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-40-18 15:17:09 ACTION: Spec editors to integrate discussion result about bugs 2881,2,3 (DONE) [10] 15:17:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/12-i18nits-irc#T14-40-35 15:17:12 zakim, bye 15:17:12 Zakim has left #i18nits