IRC log of htmltf on 2006-04-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:54:08 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #htmltf
- 12:54:08 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/04/10-htmltf-irc
- 12:54:16 [RalphS]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML TF
- 12:54:29 [RalphS]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0002.html
- 12:54:50 [RalphS]
- Previous: 2006-04-03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0003.html
- 12:56:17 [Steven]
- That's last week's agenda RalphS
- 12:56:59 [Steven]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0009
- 12:57:03 [RalphS]
- thanks, Steven
- 12:57:29 [RalphS]
- clicked too far down the index page :(
- 12:59:25 [Steven_]
- Steven_ has joined #htmltf
- 12:59:38 [Steven_]
- weak network here
- 13:01:28 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has now started
- 13:01:35 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 13:04:12 [MarkB_]
- MarkB_ has joined #htmltf
- 13:05:03 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 13:05:06 [Steven_]
- zakim, dial steven-mobile
- 13:05:06 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven_; the call is being made
- 13:05:07 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:05:11 [MarkB_]
- zakim, i am ?
- 13:05:11 [Zakim]
- +MarkB_; got it
- 13:05:50 [Steven_]
- can you hear me?
- 13:05:57 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 13:06:01 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #htmltf
- 13:06:13 [Steven_]
- I hear nought
- 13:06:19 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 13:06:24 [Steven_]
- zakim, dial steven-mobile
- 13:06:24 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven_; the call is being made
- 13:06:26 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:07:20 [RalphS]
- Chair: Ben
- 13:07:33 [Steven_]
- zakim, country code 86?
- 13:07:33 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Steven_.
- 13:07:38 [RalphS]
- zakim, where is +86?
- 13:07:38 [Zakim]
- country code 86 is China
- 13:08:48 [RalphS]
- Topic: Action Item Review
- 13:09:18 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ben review Jeremy's actions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/20-htmltf-minutes.html#action14]
- 13:09:41 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007.html following up on issues assigned to Jeremy [Ben]
- 13:09:50 [RalphS]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Ben start separate mail threads on remaining discussion topics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action04]
- 13:09:56 [RalphS]
- Ben: expect to complete this this week
- 13:10:06 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Ben to develop a plan for a marketing/news web site about RDF/A and send it to the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action16]
- 13:10:24 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0008.html The RDF/A Marketing Site [Ben]
- 13:10:49 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Mark, Steven, and Ralph respond to Ben's off-list draft of response to Bjoern [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action05]
- 13:11:04 [Steven_]
- Done by Steven
- 13:11:30 [RalphS]
- Mark: I started writing a reply to Ben, will complete soon. Bjoern has received several messages from us so the tone should not imply this is the first reply.
- 13:11:43 [RalphS]
- ... hope to finish my comments today
- 13:11:50 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben update his bookmarklet for XHTML mode [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-htmltf-minutes.html#action12]
- 13:11:52 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:12:00 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben to draft full response to Bjoern's 2004 email [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
- 13:12:02 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:15:09 [RalphS]
- Ralph: I'm happy with Ben's latest draft of response to Bjoern
- 13:15:30 [RalphS]
- [WITHDRAWN] ACTION: Jeremy followup on HEAD about= edge case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action03]
- 13:15:38 [RalphS]
- [WITHDRAWN] ACTION: Jeremy followup with Mark on the question of multiple triples from nested meta and add to issues list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action01]
- 13:15:46 [RalphS]
- [WITHDRAWN] ACTION: Jeremy look into the XHTML namespace issue and write thoughts into email [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action02]... next
- 13:15:52 [RalphS]
- [WITHDRAWN] ACTION: Jeremy propose wording on reification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action02]
- 13:16:02 [benadida]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007
- 13:16:57 [RalphS]
- ACTION: Ben integrate Jeremy's action into list of issues
- 13:17:12 [RalphS]
- s/action/actions
- 13:17:29 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Mark work on a first draft of an RDF/A XHTML 1.1 module [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action01]
- 13:17:52 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0023.html [ACTION] Produce XHTML M12N 1.1 Schemas for RDFA [Mark]
- 13:18:04 [RalphS]
- ACTION: once Steven sends editors' draft of XHTML2, all TF members take a look and comment on showstopper issues only [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action01]
- 13:18:06 [RalphS]
- -- continues
- 13:18:34 [MarkB_]
- zakim, mute me
- 13:18:34 [Zakim]
- MarkB_ should now be muted
- 13:19:04 [MarkB_]
- zakim, unmute me
- 13:19:04 [Zakim]
- MarkB_ should no longer be muted
- 13:19:31 [RalphS]
- Topic: Report on W3C Presentation
- 13:19:55 [RalphS]
- Ben: I presented a version of my Semantic Technologies talk to the W3C Staff last week
- 13:20:04 [RalphS]
- ... had more demos and technical detail
- 13:20:26 [RalphS]
- ... there was a lot of interest in seeing how this would work as an XHTML 1.1 module
- 13:20:53 [RalphS]
- ... interest in deployment issues for existing browsers
- 13:26:46 [RalphS]
- Steven: redefining 'rel' became an issue
- 13:28:00 [RalphS]
- Ralph: I think redefining 'rel' is a backwards compatibility question
- 13:28:53 [RalphS]
- Mark: 'rel' values without prefix are in the XHTML namespace, and there won't be anything at the URI.
- 13:29:08 [RalphS]
- ... HTML has been that way (nothing at the URI) for years, so what's the problem?
- 13:29:22 [RalphS]
- ... layered approach is good and should be emphasized
- 13:29:42 [RalphS]
- Ben: Mozilla liked the changes to 'rel'
- 13:32:03 [RalphS]
- Ralph: key message in Ben's presentation is the benefit that comes from putting RDF statements in the same document with the hypertext
- 13:33:37 [RalphS]
- Mark: someone has posted a suggestion to use RDF/A to markup text values in an RDF/XML OWL document
- 13:33:55 [RalphS]
- ... he noted that he needed to invent a namespace for the RDF/A attributes in order to do this
- 13:34:08 [RalphS]
- ... wanted to identify medical terms in the text
- 13:34:39 [RalphS]
- ... ~November 2005 in SWBPD list
- 13:35:23 [RalphS]
- Ben: mnemonic "DRY" - Don't Repeat Yourself -- was suggested for the goal to not repeat data between RDF and display
- 13:36:06 [RalphS]
- Topic: XHTML 1.1 Module
- 13:36:36 [RalphS]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0023.html Mark's draft of module
- 13:37:13 [RalphS]
- Mark: I found I had to create more new modules rather than just override existing ones
- 13:37:28 [RalphS]
- ... I tried to resolve all the issues; e.g. CURIEs in href
- 13:37:35 [RalphS]
- ... not sure what we should try to release first
- 13:37:48 [RalphS]
- ... perhaps just META and LINK everywhere and QNames in 'rel'
- 13:38:10 [benadida]
- q+ to talk about next WG
- 13:38:15 [RalphS]
- ... clicking on a link that contains '[...]' is trickier
- 13:38:57 [Zakim]
- benadida, you wanted to talk about next WG
- 13:39:23 [RalphS]
- Ben: there is interest in having an XHTML 1.1 module proposal to be input to the proposed SemWeb Deployment WG
- 13:40:04 [RalphS]
- ... in that sense, having a complete proposal is good; can now start looking at how much of it could be deployed
- 13:40:26 [RalphS]
- Mark: if there's a good case for implementing the whole thing, I'd much prefer that
- 13:40:49 [RalphS]
- Ben: there will be concern for folk who choose not to upgrade their browser for a while
- 13:41:42 [Zakim]
- RalphS, you wanted to ask about changes to XHTML 1.1
- 13:43:37 [RalphS]
- Ralph: is the XHTML 1.1 [modularization] specification being reopened for change? I'm a neophyte in XHTML 1.1 stuff.
- 13:43:55 [RalphS]
- Steven: don't get confused by the "1.1" numbering of both XHTML and XHTML Modularization
- 13:44:19 [RalphS]
- Mark: I'm only saying that the changes needed to META and LINK are so fundamental ...
- 13:44:38 [RalphS]
- ... what Modularization expects you to do is create a layer that redefines things in the modularization
- 13:44:50 [RalphS]
- ... e.g. to add 'about' you go to 'common.extra' and simply add your attribute
- 13:45:02 [RalphS]
- ... the architecture is designed to make it easy to add elements and attributes
- 13:45:16 [RalphS]
- ... you're not supposed to need layers unless you want to fundamentally alter the architecture
- 13:45:28 [RalphS]
- ... and I decided that such a fundamental change was appropriate
- 13:46:08 [RalphS]
- Steven: yes, Modularization does provide an extension mechanism but you cannot, e.g. add 'href' to 'common.extras' because you'll get duplicate href definitions
- 13:46:28 [RalphS]
- Mark: I only had to modify existing definitions for A, LINK, and imagemap
- 13:46:55 [RalphS]
- ... I found I had to make more changes to the schemas than I would have preferred to make
- 13:48:15 [RalphS]
- Ralph: so everything you needed to do to add RDF/A as an XHTML 1.1 module can be done without a WG in the HTML Activity making changes to existing XHTML specs?
- 13:48:34 [RalphS]
- Mark: right, the existing specs are enough to support this work
- 13:48:47 [RalphS]
- Steven: we've learned that attributes should not be hardwired to specific elements
- 13:49:18 [RalphS]
- ... modularization does not allow a local attribute to be generalized; this is the one feature we didn't consider
- 13:49:23 [RalphS]
- ... so this makes href more difficult
- 13:49:42 [RalphS]
- Mark: we need to discuss how this moves forward
- 13:49:52 [RalphS]
- ... e.g. 'name' is currently required and needs to be made optional
- 13:50:17 [RalphS]
- ... so relationship between documents that are fully HTML-conformant and new documents that are HTML+RDF/A conformant
- 13:50:47 [RalphS]
- ... a new document might not be conformant to an older schema
- 13:52:55 [RalphS]
- q+ to ask how best to keep records of the early modularization work on W3C site
- 13:54:30 [Zakim]
- RalphS, you wanted to ask how best to keep records of the early modularization work on W3C site
- 13:56:03 [Steven_]
- zakim, mute me
- 13:56:03 [Zakim]
- sorry, Steven_, I do not see a party named 'Steven_'
- 13:56:14 [Steven_]
- zakim, I am Steven
- 13:56:14 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven_, I now associate you with Steven
- 13:56:18 [Steven_]
- zakim, mute me
- 13:56:18 [Zakim]
- Steven should now be muted
- 13:57:49 [RalphS]
- Ralph: Mark, please email snapshots of your pages to TF mailing list or to www-archive@w3.org
- 13:59:18 [RalphS]
- ... could also use W3C Wiki
- 14:00:04 [Steven_]
- url of pages?
- 14:00:05 [RalphS]
- Mark: there is a 'print' button that will print all the pages as a single document
- 14:00:24 [benadida]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007
- 14:00:32 [RalphS]
- ... note, too, that comments are enabled on the skimstone site
- 14:00:54 [RalphS]
- Topic: Proposals on Some Outstanding Issues
- 14:01:03 [RalphS]
- Ben: please read 0007 and respond
- 14:01:16 [RalphS]
- next meeting: Tuesday 18 April 1300 UTC
- 14:01:30 [RalphS]
- [adjourned]
- 14:01:31 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 14:01:33 [Zakim]
- -MarkB_
- 14:01:33 [benadida]
- benadida has left #htmltf
- 14:01:34 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 14:01:37 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:01:40 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has ended
- 14:01:42 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, Steven, MarkB_, Ben_Adida
- 14:02:01 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 14:04:10 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 14:04:10 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/04/10-htmltf-minutes.html RalphS
- 14:23:31 [Steven_]
- Steven_ has left #htmltf
- 16:16:00 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #htmltf