15:52:51 RRSAgent has joined #rif 15:52:51 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-irc 15:52:57 Harold has joined #rif 15:52:59 zakim, this is rif 15:52:59 ChrisW, I see SW_RIF()11:00AM in the schedule but not yet started. Perhaps you mean "this will be rif". 15:53:09 zakim, this will be rif 15:53:09 ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 15:53:52 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:56:13 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 15:56:20 DavidHirtle has joined #rif 15:56:48 Hassan has joined #rif 15:56:52 Deborah_Nichols has joined #rif 15:57:17 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:57:24 +Leora_Morgenstern 15:57:27 csma has joined #rif 15:57:31 -Leora_Morgenstern 15:57:32 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 15:57:33 Attendees were Leora_Morgenstern 15:57:38 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:57:45 +Deborah_Nichols 15:57:45 Allen has joined #rif 15:58:08 +Hassan_Ait-Kaci 15:58:21 FrankMcCabe has joined #rif 15:58:31 +Allen_Ginsberg 15:58:32 josb has joined #rif 15:58:45 +??P8 15:58:45 zakim, mute me 15:58:46 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 15:58:59 +Dave_Reynolds (was Guest P9 74394) 15:59:00 +Dave_Reynolds 15:59:02 +[Fujitsu] 15:59:05 -??P8 15:59:06 + +4279aaaa 15:59:10 zakim, fujitsu is me 15:59:10 +FrankMcCabe; got it 15:59:22 zakim, ??P8 is me 15:59:23 +[NRCC] 15:59:27 I already had ??P8 as ??P8, csma 15:59:35 zakim, [ibm] is temporarily me 15:59:35 sorry, ChrisW, I do not recognize a party named '[ibm]' 15:59:35 johnhall has joined #rif 15:59:38 +[IBM] 15:59:40 zakim, [ibm] is temporarily me 15:59:42 +JacekK 15:59:46 +ChrisW; got it 15:59:56 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:59:56 +Harold; got it 16:00:03 +??P2 16:00:09 zakim, ??P8 is csma 16:00:09 I already had ??P8 as ChrisW, ChrisW 16:00:13 igor has joined #rif 16:00:20 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:00:20 On the phone I see Deborah_Nichols (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), FrankMcCabe, Dave_Reynolds (muted), +4279aaaa, Harold, csma, josb (muted), ??P2 16:00:38 I think ?? P8 was me, but I got disconnected 16:00:48 zakim, ??P2 is me 16:00:48 +LeoraMorgenstern; got it 16:00:51 +David_Hirtle 16:00:59 Because when I got disconnected, it said - ??P8 16:01:02 EvanWallace has joined #rif 16:01:06 - +4279aaaa 16:01:13 +[IPcaller] 16:01:18 pfps has joined #rif 16:01:29 zakim [ipcaller] is me 16:01:33 zakim, csma is really LeoraMorgenstein 16:01:33 +LeoraMorgenstein; got it 16:01:44 + +4279aabb 16:01:45 +??P19 16:01:54 zakim, ??P19 is me 16:01:54 +pfps; got it 16:01:58 zakim, aabb is me 16:01:58 +csma; got it 16:02:03 zakim [IPcaller] is me 16:02:07 +Mike_Dean 16:02:14 +Evan_Wallace 16:02:25 +Igor_Mozetic 16:02:30 zakim, [IPcaller is me 16:02:30 +johnhall; got it 16:02:31 zakim, mute me 16:02:31 Igor_Mozetic should now be muted 16:02:35 zakim, who is on the call? 16:02:35 On the phone I see Deborah_Nichols (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), FrankMcCabe, Dave_Reynolds (muted), Harold, LeoraMorgenstein, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, 16:02:39 ... David_Hirtle (muted), johnhall, csma, pfps, Mike_Dean, Evan_Wallace, Igor_Mozetic (muted) 16:02:40 zakim, mute me 16:02:40 johnhall should now be muted 16:02:55 Uli has joined #rif 16:03:01 Donald_Chapin has joined #rif 16:03:03 +Sandro 16:03:11 +[IVML] 16:03:27 SaidTabet has joined #RIF 16:03:29 IanH has joined #rif 16:03:33 +??P31 16:03:39 Darko has joined #rif 16:03:42 +??P32 16:03:45 +Donald_Chapin (was ??P32) 16:03:45 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:46 On the phone I see Deborah_Nichols (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), FrankMcCabe, Dave_Reynolds (muted), Harold, LeoraMorgenstern.a, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, 16:03:51 ... DavidHirtle (muted), johnhall (muted), csma, pfps, Mike_Dean, Evan_Wallace, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Sandro, [IVML], ??P31, Donald_Chapin 16:03:53 zakim, LeoraMorgenstein is really me 16:03:53 sorry, ChrisW, I do not recognize a party named 'LeoraMorgenstein' 16:03:55 PaulV has joined #RIF 16:03:56 +Darko_Anicic 16:04:01 zakim, mute me 16:04:01 Donald_Chapin should now be muted 16:04:02 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:04:03 On the phone I see Deborah_Nichols (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), FrankMcCabe, Dave_Reynolds (muted), Harold, LeoraMorgenstern.a, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, 16:04:07 ... DavidHirtle (muted), johnhall (muted), csma, pfps, Mike_Dean, Evan_Wallace, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Sandro, [IVML], ??P31, Donald_Chapin (muted), Darko_Anicic 16:04:07 MalaMehrotra has joined #rif 16:04:30 +??P34 16:04:38 ack leora 16:04:40 zakim, LeoraMorgenstern.a is really me 16:04:40 +ChrisW; got it 16:04:44 ack leora 16:04:47 zakim, mute me 16:04:47 +[LMU] 16:04:49 Darko_Anicic should now be muted 16:05:06 +Mala_Mehrotra 16:05:20 Yes 16:05:28 +[IPcaller] 16:05:29 sandro has joined #rif 16:05:37 -[LMU] 16:06:11 +[LMU] 16:06:37 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:06:37 On the phone I see Deborah_Nichols (muted), Hassan_Ait-Kaci (muted), Allen_Ginsberg (muted), FrankMcCabe, Dave_Reynolds (muted), Harold, ChrisW, josb (muted), LeoraMorgenstern, 16:06:40 ... DavidHirtle (muted), johnhall (muted), csma, pfps, Mike_Dean, Evan_Wallace, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Sandro, [IVML], ??P31 (muted), Donald_Chapin (muted), Darko_Anicic (muted), 16:06:42 ... IanH (muted), Mala_Mehrotra, PaulV (muted), PaulaP (muted) 16:06:45 zakim, uli is ??P31 16:06:45 sorry, Uli, I do not recognize a party named 'uli' 16:06:53 ok 16:07:08 MarkusK has joined #rif 16:07:09 zakim, mute me 16:07:09 LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted 16:07:10 scribeNick: PaulaP 16:07:17 rrsagent, point? 16:07:18 I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'point' 16:07:24 rrsagent, pointer? 16:07:24 See http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-irc#T16-07-24 16:07:32 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-minutes.html sandro 16:07:40 zakim, ??p31 is possibly uli 16:07:40 +uli?; got it 16:07:47 +1 16:07:47 csma: accept minutes of last week 16:07:56 GiorgosStoilos has joined #rif 16:07:57 csma: any comment? 16:08:02 csma: no comments 16:08:09 csma: minutes of last week accepted 16:08:22 RESOLVED: accept minutes of last meeting (3/21) 16:08:23 csma: amendments to agenda? 16:08:34 csma: there are none 16:08:41 Topic: F2F meetings 16:08:53 csma: F2F2 minutes late 16:09:00 Meeting: RIF 16:09:01 csma: accept minutes of F2F2 16:09:11 +??P36 16:09:14 csma: any requests for modifications? 16:09:22 +1 16:09:31 +1 16:09:32 zakim, saidtabet is ??P36 16:09:32 sorry, SaidTabet, I do not recognize a party named 'saidtabet' 16:09:32 Chair: Christian de Sainte Marie 16:09:36 I object 16:09:43 zakim, unmute me 16:09:43 IanH should no longer be muted 16:09:45 zakim, SaidTabet is ??P36 16:09:45 sorry, SaidTabet, I do not recognize a party named 'SaidTabet' 16:09:53 zakim, ??P36 is me 16:09:53 +SaidTabet; got it 16:09:53 rrsagent, make minutes 16:09:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-minutes.html sandro 16:10:03 zakim, mute me 16:10:03 SaidTabet should now be muted 16:10:05 ian: has a comment 16:10:18 ian: but thought iti is about F2F4 16:10:28 PROPOSED: accept minutes of F2F2 meeting 16:10:31 ian: no comment on F2F2 16:10:43 csma: minutes of F2F2 are accepted 16:10:51 csma: news on F2F3? 16:10:56 No news 16:10:57 there are no news 16:11:01 q? 16:11:05 RESOLVED: accept minutes of F2F2 meeting [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Mar/att-0230/Feb27-rif-minutes.html] and [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Mar/att-0230/Feb28-rif-minutes.html] 16:11:10 csma: no news on F2F3 16:11:19 csma: move to F2F4 16:11:21 I have let BR Forum know that we don't need meeting space for F2F4 16:11:40 ian: I have no problem with the proposal 16:12:06 ian: there is a wiki page for proposing hosting F2F meetings 16:12:41 ian: chairs haven't replied with the fact that we have a procedure on this 16:12:45 q+ 16:13:01 csma: we should be more careful about procedures 16:13:09 zakim, unmute me 16:13:09 Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted 16:13:34 chris: solution is simple: take the proposal and put it on the wiki 16:13:51 allen: I can put the proposal on the wiki 16:13:51 +Gary_Hallmark 16:14:01 +q 16:14:06 q+ 16:14:08 chris: criticism accepted 16:14:11 q- 16:14:22 csma: action on Allen to put the proposal on the wiki 16:14:29 ACTION: Allen to put MITRE proposal on f2f4 wiki page 16:14:31 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 16:15:11 csma: people submitting such proposals should also inform us about deadlines for deciding about acceptance 16:15:13 q? 16:15:27 allen: should go into the proposal on the wiki? 16:15:35 csma: yes 16:15:54 pfps: hotel information is needed 16:16:11 allen: is difficult to say something about costs 16:16:44 allen: MITRE will look for a kind of arrangement for a rate 16:16:59 allen: there is a hotel for 119 16:17:29 allen: MITRE will give a couple of proposals for hotels and arrange a MITRE rate for attendees 16:17:47 csma: it would be good to have an idea for the price of hotels 16:18:10 csma: not necessarily for making the arrangements, just to give a flavor 16:18:41 Does it have to be North America, or just not Europe? 16:18:50 csma: following 2 F2F meetings in Europe, we should have the next one in the US 16:19:06 zakim, mute me 16:19:06 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 16:19:08 csma: Just not Europe? 16:19:11 North America is fine for *me* 16:19:20 +Jos_De_Roo 16:19:28 csma: North America, not just not Europe 16:19:29 JosDeRoo has joined #rif 16:19:36 q? 16:19:45 csma: reason is the location of RIF participants 16:19:47 q- 16:19:48 ack pfps 16:19:51 Zakim. mute me 16:20:00 Zakim, mute me 16:20:00 Jos_De_Roo should now be muted 16:20:03 csma: any other comments on F2F meetings? 16:20:09 csma: no comments 16:20:24 zakim, unmute me 16:20:24 Donald_Chapin should no longer be muted 16:20:30 Topic: Liaisons 16:20:41 csma: sparql? 16:20:54 csma: xquery, xpath? 16:21:01 csma: common logic? 16:21:08 csma: prr? 16:21:13 paul: no news on prr 16:21:21 csma: sbvr? 16:21:35 donald: specification is public 16:21:54 donald: comments on sbvr until July 16:22:30 csma: any comment on other groups we should be aware of? 16:22:34 csma: no comments 16:22:39 Topic: UCR 16:22:50 csma: review actions 16:23:06 csma: our first working draft has been released 16:23:09 ACTION: ChrisW tell commonlogic about UCR pub [DONE] 16:23:24 chris: my action is done 16:23:28 ACTION: csma to publicise to Java Rules [DONE] 16:23:36 done 16:23:39 csma: my action is also done 16:23:39 ACTION: John Hall to publicise to BR community [DONE] 16:23:49 continued 16:23:55 ACTION: JosB to publicise to SPARQL [CONTINUED] 16:23:59 (be be done soon) 16:24:02 csma: jos' action is continued 16:24:15 PRR publication done 16:24:18 JosB to publicise to SPARQL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-rif-minutes.html#action11] [CONTINUED] 16:24:44 ACTION: Paul to publicize to PRR & BMI [DONE] 16:24:56 ACTION: Donald to publicize to SBVR [DONE] 16:25:29 ACTION: Elisa to publicize to ODM [DROPPED] 16:25:37 evan: can take of Elisa's action 16:25:46 ACTION: Evan to publicize to ODM 16:26:00 ACTION: Sandro to set up a wiki page to record dissemination actions [CONTINUED] 16:26:26 csma: remind you that comments are expected 16:26:31 rrsagent, make minutes 16:26:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 16:26:53 csma: the comments on the UCR working draft will be answered by the chairs 16:27:01 To Report an SBVR Bug/Issue to the OMG: http://www.omg.org/technology/agreement.htm 16:27:16 csma: the comments and answers are archived 16:27:43 sandro: nothing more to do after the UCR publication 16:28:13 Topic: Gathering design constraints 16:28:49 csma: critical success factor and goals can be applied in an informal way 16:29:07 frank: this is not a formal methodology 16:29:29 OMG's "Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules" Interim Specification (http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/2006-03-02) 16:29:32 frank: it is in a sense a reason to believe in you and your work 16:30:08 csma: it is appealing to use this methodology 16:30:42 "grokked" == "understood deeply" 16:30:48 q? 16:30:50 frank: the information I've sent about this would be enough for using the methodology 16:31:29 csma: the idea is to start with the goals 16:32:08 frank: actually we need to identify goals, critical success factors and requirements 16:32:17 frank: this is an ideal situation 16:32:53 +1 use a 3 level outline to organize the large number of existing requirements we have collected 16:33:00 csma: I propose to start a structured collection of design constraints 16:33:10 csma: continue this with an addition 16:33:29 csma: when someone proposes a new design constraint 16:33:50 csma: then also comment if this is a goal, a critical success factor or a requirement 16:34:03 frank: you also need a restrictive side of it 16:34:18 frank: need a quality control for this 16:34:26 frank: we have to review it 16:34:45 csma: of course, the next step would be to discuss them 16:34:56 q+ 16:35:07 csma: and determine if they really are goals, requirements, ... 16:35:10 zakim, unmute me 16:35:10 LeoraMorgenstern should no longer be muted 16:35:29 csma: we discuss them and need to converge 16:35:37 ack leora 16:35:55 leora: we should also put up a kind of measure for requirements 16:36:05 frank: it should be obvious 16:36:27 csma: it depends on the design constraint 16:36:53 +1 with csma's design proposal 16:36:54 csma: and explain why and if a requirement is a measurable one, give the measure 16:37:06 csma: there are no other comments 16:37:08 zakim, mute me 16:37:08 LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted 16:37:16 q+ 16:37:22 ack me 16:37:23 csma: we should start adding design constraints on the wiki page 16:37:45 does "design constraint" = "requirement"? 16:37:51 no 16:37:55 dave: suggest to use the mailing list to discuss the design constraints 16:38:10 all requirements are design constraints 16:38:30 csma: when adding design constraints, send also an email 16:38:30 the OWL UC&R doc may make the distinction clear: http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-goals 16:38:57 dave: just use the email for starting the discussion on design constraints 16:38:59 +1 on discussing these things on email 1st 16:39:14 frank: it is hard to extract the information on email 16:39:24 csma: I agree with Frank 16:39:50 csma: we use the term design constraint to avoid limiting us to requirements 16:40:10 csma: I prefer having a description on the wiki page 16:40:31 csma: their classification should be discussed through email 16:40:38 q? 16:40:41 wiki + email conversation 16:40:56 csma: there are no other comments on this 16:40:57 so requirements rollup to crit. success factors rollup to goals and all are design constaints? 16:41:09 Topic: Specific design constraints 16:41:21 csma: there are no design constraints yet 16:41:35 q+ 16:41:35 csma: we can skip this for this telecon 16:41:51 csma: start working on the page on design constraints 16:42:08 -SaidTabet 16:42:09 csma: so as to have something to discuss on email and at the next telecon 16:42:47 csma: we continue to discuss design constraints during the next telecons 16:42:49 ACTION: chair to put design for extensibility and discussion of proposals on agenda for next telecon [DONE] 16:42:52 ack me 16:43:00 csma: are there comments on the UCR work? 16:43:15 -IanH 16:43:23 dave: there is enough material on requirements 16:43:40 dave: why just another wiki page? 16:43:59 q+ 16:44:05 csma: I would like to have more comments on how the requirements relate to the use cases 16:44:24 csma: also motivation for requirements or goals 16:44:37 csma: requirements can be taken from the existing lists 16:45:01 csma: do not add a new slightly different requirement, but discuss the existing ones 16:45:18 csma: this way we can have a collective list 16:45:37 csma: it is just a way to consolidate the lists we have 16:45:58 ideally some one with vision, time, and experience could take a crack at organizing the list we already have acording to the 3 level hierachy of goals, and crit. success factors 16:46:00 dave: we will end with a long page on design constraints 16:46:09 dave: but it is fine with me 16:46:23 dave: let see how the work on the wiki evolves 16:47:00 csma: I propose to start to organize the list 16:47:06 q+ 16:47:14 csma: we should not just reinvent the list 16:47:23 csma: look at what we have already 16:47:26 ack frank 16:47:45 frank: could be helpful to have someone to structure the list 16:47:49 +1 to dave's/frank's suggestion 16:47:53 +1 16:48:14 +1 16:48:14 q+ to suggest people proposing design constraints should shoulder the burden of fitting them into Frank's Hierarchy, and arguing for them on a telecon and in e-mail as necessary 16:48:36 csma: there is no suitable list at moment 16:48:44 q+ 16:48:58 ack harold 16:48:59 harold: structuring is important 16:49:05 zakim, unmute me 16:49:05 Donald_Chapin was not muted, Donald_Chapin 16:49:24 harold: is better than having flat lists 16:49:40 harold: we could have a couple of clusters of requirements 16:50:03 csma: there are places to reference the use cases in the template 16:50:24 csma: we added the structuring 16:50:37 harold: the template seems to encourage flat lists 16:50:58 harold: an example is the list from the F2F2 brainstorming 16:51:08 harold: need to do it on the fly 16:51:23 csma: we have already structure in Paula's list 16:51:43 harold: perhaps we give names to constraints 16:51:58 ack sandro 16:51:58 sandro, you wanted to suggest people proposing design constraints should shoulder the burden of fitting them into Frank's Hierarchy, and arguing for them on a telecon and in e-mail 16:51:58 harold: we can then simpler reference and discuss them 16:52:01 ... as necessary 16:52:54 sandro: the important thing here is to motivate the requirements and having discussions during the telecons 16:53:09 sandro: not just a couple of sentences on the wiki page 16:53:35 sandro: when you put something on the page, you need to be prepared to discuss it in the next telecon 16:53:55 csma: need also to take responsability for introduced design constraints 16:54:15 csma: put your name when you add a design constraint 16:54:48 ack donald 16:55:02 csma: if you want to defend an existing requirement, take your requirements from the existing lists 16:55:23 donald: we confuse people with the notion of design constraints 16:55:44 csma: a design constraint could be a requirement, a goal, a success factor 16:55:59 donald: it should be made clear on the wiki 16:56:05 csma: it is already 16:56:30 donald: is there an official status of the existing requirements' lists 16:56:41 donald: it is important to understand where we are 16:57:17 csma: the idea is to consolidate the existing requirements and recognize new ones 16:57:30 donald: are we going to build on Paula's lists? 16:57:35 q? 16:58:03 -PaulV 16:58:10 PaulV has left #RIF 16:58:11 csma: we start with the existing lists (Paula's, Allen's work) 16:58:28 sandro: we should not forget the existing work 16:58:42 zakim, mute me 16:58:42 Donald_Chapin should now be muted 16:58:48 sandro: it is an evolving understanding 16:59:00 csma: we are at the end of our telecon today 16:59:10 csma: start working on design constraints 16:59:31 harold: is the existing template a final one? 16:59:48 csma: no, it needs to be modified based on the discussion today 16:59:49 ACTION: csma to modify design constraint template to take into acccount what was said today 16:59:54 The wiki page template already has name slot - the title 17:00:10 ACTION: Chris to start email discussion about what issues are "fuzzy" wrt phase 1 & 2 [CONTINUED] 17:00:26 sandro: The idea is that we need to have focussed discussion on these things, one at a time, and we can draw on those previous pages as we need in shaping the decision process. 17:00:27 csma: there is another item on the agenda 17:00:41 csma: we will discuss it during the next telecon 17:00:47 rrsagent, drop action 11 17:00:47 Sorry, have to go - bye 17:01:02 -johnhall 17:01:04 ACTION: chair to put design for extensibility and discussion of proposals on agenda for next telecon [CONTINUED] 17:01:12 csma: any other comments? 17:01:27 -uli? 17:01:30 csma: thank you for attending 17:01:31 -Darko 17:01:39 -Darko_Anicic 17:01:45 -Igor_Mozetic 17:01:47 -Dave_Reynolds 17:01:48 -Evan_Wallace 17:01:49 yes 17:01:49 -Donald_Chapin 17:01:50 bye 17:01:50 -FrankMcCabe 17:01:52 -josb 17:01:53 bye 17:01:53 -LeoraMorgenstern 17:01:55 -Gary_Hallmark 17:01:56 -Sandro 17:01:57 -Hassan_Ait-Kaci 17:01:57 rrsagent, make minutes 17:01:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:01:59 -Deborah_Nichols 17:01:59 end of telecon 17:02:00 -Jos_De_Roo 17:02:02 -DavidHirtle 17:02:04 -Mike_Dean 17:02:06 -Allen_Ginsberg 17:02:14 Darko has left #rif 17:02:36 bye 17:02:37 -PaulaP 17:02:46 -Harold 17:03:51 -ChrisW 17:03:58 -csma 17:12:47 csma has left #rif 17:32:32 -pfps 17:42:06 -[IVML] 18:05:00 disconnecting the lone participant, Mala_Mehrotra, in SW_RIF()11:00AM 18:05:05 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 18:05:06 Attendees were Deborah_Nichols, Hassan_Ait-Kaci, Allen_Ginsberg, Dave_Reynolds, +4279aaaa, FrankMcCabe, josb, Harold, LeoraMorgenstern, +4279aabb, pfps, csma, Mike_Dean, 18:05:10 ... Evan_Wallace, Igor_Mozetic, johnhall, DavidHirtle, Sandro, [IVML], Donald_Chapin, Darko_Anicic, ChrisW, IanH, Mala_Mehrotra, PaulV, PaulaP, uli?, SaidTabet, Gary_Hallmark, 18:05:13 ... Jos_De_Roo 18:34:33 JosDeRoo has joined #rif 19:32:03 Zakim has left #rif