15:01:02 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 15:01:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-irc 15:01:09 meeting: i18n ITS working group (editor's call) 15:01:14 chair: Yves 15:01:17 scribe: Felix 15:01:25 scribeNick: fsasaki 15:01:31 rrsagent, make log public 15:03:34 chriLi has joined #i18nits 15:04:38 +??P4 15:04:41 -Felix 15:04:42 +Felix 15:05:31 +Diane_Stoick 15:06:44 YvesS has joined #i18nits 15:07:04 sorry I was lost in thinking... I'm coming 15:07:53 +Yves_Savourel 15:09:16 diane has joined #i18nits 15:09:32 topic: today's topics 15:09:46 christian: my proposal: Richard's input on an overview section 15:10:00 .. then the question: should we continue talking about data categories? 15:10:34 .. a related topic: the name "tag" inside "internationalization tag set" 15:12:33 felix: another possible topic: http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset-diff-20060222.html 15:16:41 .. how about reviewing change proposals in later calls 15:17:24 topic: richard's change proposals 15:17:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0252.html 15:20:00 Christian: I would adopt SECTION 1.1, as Richard proposed 15:24:36 yves: do we need so extensive changes in sec. 2? 15:24:52 christian: maybe the title of the section does not fit with the content 15:25:14 .. what we currently have on basic concepts are really ITS concepts 15:25:22 .. Richard describes ITS use cases 15:26:24 .. it is identical until 2.2. 15:29:12 felix: we might need sections for ITS users, and ITS implementors 15:29:27 .. Richard wrote about users, Christian for implementors? 15:29:44 christian: ITS usage scenarios would make sense 15:30:18 .. I would adopt the whole section 2.1 15:30:33 yves: as a section before 1.2? 15:33:08 christian: yes 15:34:22 christian: or 1.1? 15:34:31 Diane: before the examples 15:36:08 yves: so: 2.1 of Richard as new section 1.1 15:37:29 topic: sec. 2.2. of Richard's proposal 15:37:36 yves: a lot of rewriting necessary 15:39:26 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2882 15:39:37 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2883 15:47:23 yves: should the spec contain lot's of explanatory parts? 15:48:54 christian: it should have 15:49:15 .. my basic concepts section describe ITS from the perspective of our own work 15:49:28 .. Richard describes how stuff could be used 15:50:24 yves: is it possible to mix the sections? 15:50:32 christian: I'd take Richard's 2.1 and 2.2 15:50:48 .. and turn this into our new 1.1., with the title usage scenarios 15:52:34 diane: some if it is out of date 15:54:36 felix: how about having Christian and Richard as the main responsibles for ITS "explanation"? 15:55:06 christian: how about writing a mail to Richard, saying what we change? 15:56:41 .. if he is o.k. with that, the editor's would need to ensure that stuff is implemented 15:57:48 felix: how about dividing the work between normative and non-normative parts? 15:58:35 .. christian and Richard could work on that 15:58:44 topic: techniques document 15:59:02 christian: we should push the group to look at the things in bugzilla 16:00:16 action: Yves to post a mail to start a thread about localization properties 16:02:45 felix: don't we do too much, then we discuss many other issues? 16:03:43 yves: maybe it does not need the same participation 16:07:10 action: felix to make a time schedule including all bugs 16:08:23 -Christian 16:08:24 -Diane_Stoick 16:08:26 -Yves_Savourel 16:09:34 -Felix 16:09:36 I18N_ITS(EDIT)10:00AM has ended 16:09:38 Attendees were Dialer, Felix, Christian, Diane_Stoick, Yves_Savourel 16:09:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:09:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/24-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:17:47 yves?