IRC log of rif on 2006-03-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:38:33 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rif
- 14:38:33 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-rif-irc
- 14:39:07 [sandro]
- sandro has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Mar/0209
- 14:39:26 [sandro]
- sandro has changed the topic to: 21 March Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Mar/0209
- 14:49:43 [innovimax]
- sandro i am new to rif
- 14:53:18 [sandro]
- Ah, I see you now. People usually go by their own name instead of their organization's name.
- 14:53:34 [innovimax]
- ok sorry
- 14:53:41 [innovimax]
- i reconnect
- 14:53:46 [sandro]
- you can just use /nick
- 14:54:14 [moz]
- moz has joined #rif
- 14:54:23 [moz]
- i'm back
- 14:54:55 [sandro]
- and welcome. :-) Do folks call you "moz" in person, or just on-line?
- 14:55:22 [moz]
- online
- 15:08:12 [moz_]
- moz_ has joined #rif
- 15:25:17 [moz_]
- sandro are you here ?
- 15:25:44 [sandro]
- yes.
- 15:25:51 [moz_]
- i'm trying to use xchat and it is trying to connect to mmclure.w3.org
- 15:26:01 [moz_]
- and it doesn't work
- 15:26:12 [sandro]
- what port?
- 15:26:20 [moz_]
- 6667
- 15:26:45 [sandro]
- You'll want port 6665 for this.
- 15:27:03 [sandro]
- (An unfortunate historical artifact.)
- 15:33:07 [moz_]
- any idea on how to specify port with xchat (sorry) ?
- 15:34:44 [sandro]
- xchat >> Server List , pick the server, click Edit, select the server, click edit, change the /6667 to /6665.
- 15:34:57 [sandro]
- (at least, that looks like it will do it.)
- 15:37:47 [patranja]
- patranja has joined #rif
- 15:39:56 [ChrisW]
- ChrisW has joined #rif
- 15:44:05 [FrankMcCabe]
- FrankMcCabe has joined #rif
- 15:50:02 [DavidHirtle]
- DavidHirtle has joined #rif
- 15:52:17 [PhilippeB]
- PhilippeB has joined #rif
- 15:52:29 [sandro_]
- sandro_ has joined #rif
- 15:53:20 [sandro_]
- keeper is a bot.
- 15:54:01 [MoZ]
- MoZ has joined #rif
- 15:54:12 [sandro_]
- I sent e-mail about MoZ a few minutes ago.
- 15:54:23 [sandro_]
- (new member)
- 15:54:38 [Allen]
- Allen has joined #rif
- 15:54:39 [MoZ]
- chear all i am a new member
- 15:54:46 [ChrisW]
- hi moz
- 15:54:52 [ChrisW]
- welcome
- 15:55:20 [ChrisW]
- please read: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/TeleconEtiquette
- 15:55:30 [ChrisW]
- and: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UsingZakim
- 15:55:47 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif
- 15:55:48 [josb]
- josb has joined #rif
- 15:57:26 [EvanWallace]
- EvanWallace has joined #rif
- 15:57:48 [csma]
- csma has joined #rif
- 15:58:01 [DaveReynolds]
- DaveReynolds has joined #rif
- 15:58:12 [Harold]
- Harold has joined #rif
- 15:58:40 [MoZ]
- thanks ChrisW
- 15:59:16 [sandro]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:59:16 [Zakim]
- sorry, sandro, I don't know what conference this is
- 15:59:18 [AxelPolleres]
- AxelPolleres has joined #rif
- 15:59:23 [sandro]
- zakim, this is rif
- 15:59:23 [Zakim]
- ok, sandro; that matches SW_RIF()11:00AM
- 15:59:27 [sandro]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:59:27 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Allen_Ginsberg, Sandro, [NRCC], ??P14
- 15:59:27 [Allen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:59:29 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see AxelPolleres, Harold, DaveReynolds, csma, EvanWallace, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, Allen, MoZ, sandro, PhilippeB, DavidHirtle, FrankMcCabe, ChrisW, PaulaP, RRSAgent,
- 15:59:31 [Zakim]
- ... Zakim, Keeper
- 15:59:32 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted
- 15:59:35 [sandro]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:59:35 [Zakim]
- Sandro should now be muted
- 15:59:37 [Zakim]
- +??P24
- 15:59:46 [csma]
- zakim, ??P24 is me
- 15:59:49 [Zakim]
- +csma; got it
- 15:59:53 [Zakim]
- +[DERI]
- 15:59:59 [Zakim]
- +??P30
- 16:00:05 [Zakim]
- +Evan_Wallace
- 16:00:22 [SaidTabet]
- SaidTabet has joined #rif
- 16:00:27 [Zakim]
- +DavidHirtle
- 16:00:39 [Zakim]
- +??P36
- 16:00:46 [Zakim]
- -??P14
- 16:00:47 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 16:00:54 [Zakim]
- +Axel_Polleres
- 16:00:56 [ChrisW]
- zakim, [ibm] is temporarily me
- 16:00:56 [Zakim]
- +ChrisW; got it
- 16:00:58 [Zakim]
- +??P39
- 16:01:03 [Zakim]
- +Philippe_Bonnard (was ??P39)
- 16:01:16 [PhilippeB]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:01:16 [Zakim]
- Philippe_Bonnard should now be muted
- 16:01:24 [Zakim]
- +??P43
- 16:01:25 [Zakim]
- +Dave_Reynolds (was ??P43)
- 16:01:37 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, ??P30 is me
- 16:01:37 [Zakim]
- +LeoraMorgenstern; got it
- 16:01:44 [Deborah_Nichols]
- Deborah_Nichols has joined #rif
- 16:01:45 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:01:45 [Zakim]
- LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted
- 16:02:04 [cgi-irc]
- cgi-irc has joined #rif
- 16:02:07 [Zakim]
- +PaulaP
- 16:02:12 [JeffP]
- JeffP has joined #rif
- 16:02:14 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:02:14 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Sandro (muted), [NRCC], csma (muted), josb (muted), LeoraMorgenstern (muted), Evan_Wallace, David_Hirtle (muted), ??P36, ChrisW,
- 16:02:16 [Zakim]
- ... Axel_Polleres (muted), Philippe_Bonnard (muted), Dave_Reynolds (muted), [LMU]
- 16:02:16 [Zakim]
- +Deborah_Nichols
- 16:02:37 [Zakim]
- +??P48
- 16:02:41 [csma]
- Who is ??P36
- 16:02:50 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #rif
- 16:03:00 [Zakim]
- +[Fujitsu]
- 16:03:04 [pfps]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:03:08 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Sandro (muted), [NRCC], csma (muted), josb (muted), LeoraMorgenstern (muted), Evan_Wallace, David_Hirtle (muted), ??P36, ChrisW,
- 16:03:09 [FrankMcCabe]
- zakim, Fujitsu is me
- 16:03:14 [SaidTabet]
- zakim, ??P48 is me
- 16:03:18 [Zakim]
- ... Axel_Polleres (muted), Philippe_Bonnard (muted), Dave_Reynolds (muted), [LMU], Deborah_Nichols (muted), ??P48, [Fujitsu]
- 16:03:19 [pfps]
- zakim, ??p36 is me
- 16:03:29 [Harold]
- zakim, [NRCC] is me
- 16:03:30 [Zakim]
- +FrankMcCabe; got it
- 16:03:32 [MalaMehrotra]
- MalaMehrotra has joined #rif
- 16:03:38 [Zakim]
- +SaidTabet; got it
- 16:03:42 [Zakim]
- +pfps; got it
- 16:03:44 [Zakim]
- +Harold; got it
- 16:03:44 [SaidTabet]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:03:56 [Zakim]
- SaidTabet should now be muted
- 16:04:11 [Zakim]
- -[LMU]
- 16:04:17 [MarkusK]
- MarkusK has joined #rif
- 16:04:22 [sandro]
- yes
- 16:04:23 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 16:04:49 [Zakim]
- +Mala_Mehrotra
- 16:04:57 [JeffP]
- zakim, ??P7 is me
- 16:05:03 [Donald_Chapin]
- Donald_Chapin has joined #rif
- 16:05:06 [Uli]
- Uli has joined #rif
- 16:05:08 [Zakim]
- +PaulaP
- 16:05:12 [JosDeRoo]
- JosDeRoo has joined #rif
- 16:05:20 [Zakim]
- +JeffP; got it
- 16:05:24 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:05:51 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:05:54 [josb]
- +1
- 16:05:56 [csma]
- +1
- 16:05:56 [johnhall]
- johnhall has joined #rif
- 16:06:02 [Zakim]
- +??P26
- 16:06:04 [Zakim]
- +Donald_Chapin (was ??P26)
- 16:06:08 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Dean
- 16:06:12 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should now be muted
- 16:06:16 [Zakim]
- +??P51
- 16:06:20 [Zakim]
- -Donald_Chapin
- 16:06:40 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: f2f2 minutes are now out; please go over them
- 16:07:05 [Zakim]
- +Jos_De_Roo
- 16:07:28 [JosDeRoo]
- Zakim, mute me
- 16:07:29 [Zakim]
- Jos_De_Roo should now be muted
- 16:07:41 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:08:00 [josb]
- zakim, who is talking?
- 16:08:05 [Zakim]
- + +353208789aaaa
- 16:08:06 [Zakim]
- +Donald_Chapin (was +353208789aaaa)
- 16:08:10 [Zakim]
- josb, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisW (50%), [IPcaller] (58%)
- 16:08:15 [johnhall]
- zakim, ipcaller is me
- 16:08:15 [Zakim]
- +johnhall; got it
- 16:08:20 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:08:20 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should now be muted
- 16:08:24 [johnhall]
- sakim,mute me
- 16:08:29 [sandro]
- zakim, mute johnhall
- 16:08:29 [Zakim]
- johnhall should now be muted
- 16:08:44 [johnhall]
- OK thanks
- 16:08:47 [DavidHirtle]
- topic: f2f meetings
- 16:09:16 [AxelPolleres]
- q+
- 16:09:20 [Zakim]
- +Gary_Hallmark
- 16:09:25 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: f2f3 will be in Montenegro June 8-9
- 16:09:32 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F3
- 16:09:37 [csma]
- ack axel
- 16:09:39 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:09:55 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:09:56 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Sandro, Harold, csma (muted), josb (muted), LeoraMorgenstern (muted), Evan_Wallace, David_Hirtle (muted), pfps, ChrisW, Axel_Polleres,
- 16:10:00 [Zakim]
- ... Philippe_Bonnard (muted), Dave_Reynolds (muted), Deborah_Nichols (muted), SaidTabet (muted), FrankMcCabe, JeffP, Mala_Mehrotra, PaulaP (muted), MarkusK (muted), Mike_Dean,
- 16:10:02 [Zakim]
- ... ??P51 (muted), Jos_De_Roo (muted), johnhall (muted), Donald_Chapin (muted), Gary_Hallmark, [IPcaller]
- 16:10:15 [GaryHallmark]
- GaryHallmark has joined #rif
- 16:10:39 [MichaelKifer]
- MichaelKifer has joined #rif
- 16:10:44 [DavidHirtle]
- axel: wiki page updated with hotel details etc.
- 16:11:15 [cgi-irc]
- cgi-irc is StanDevitt
- 16:11:45 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: for f2f4 two possibilities so far...
- 16:11:49 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Kifer
- 16:12:01 [Uli]
- zakim, did you see me, Uli?
- 16:12:01 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Uli.
- 16:12:14 [DavidHirtle]
- ... could be before or after ISWC in Atlanta
- 16:12:14 [sandro]
- No, Uli.
- 16:12:31 [sandro]
- It may be easier to read http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html when you are looking for yourself.
- 16:13:03 [sandro]
- zakim, unmute johnhall
- 16:13:03 [Zakim]
- johnhall should no longer be muted
- 16:13:04 [johnhall]
- Zakin, unmute me
- 16:13:17 [johnhall]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:13:17 [Zakim]
- johnhall was not muted, johnhall
- 16:13:22 [Elisa]
- Elisa has joined #rif
- 16:13:31 [sandro]
- zakim, who is talking?
- 16:13:42 [Zakim]
- sandro, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
- 16:13:48 [sandro]
- zakim, who is talking?
- 16:14:01 [Zakim]
- sandro, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisW (68%), johnhall (27%)
- 16:14:44 [csma]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:14:44 [Zakim]
- csma should no longer be muted
- 16:15:05 [DavidHirtle]
- johnhall: will ask about 3rd and 4th of November
- 16:15:35 [Zakim]
- +Elisa_Kendall
- 16:16:02 [Elisa]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:16:02 [Zakim]
- Elisa_Kendall should now be muted
- 16:16:06 [Donald_Chapin]
- q+
- 16:16:19 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:16:19 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should no longer be muted
- 16:16:57 [DavidHirtle]
- pfps: Athens Center in Athens, Georgia is a possibility
- 16:17:27 [csma]
- q?
- 16:17:34 [csma]
- ack donald
- 16:17:48 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:17:48 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should now be muted
- 16:18:45 [csma]
- q+
- 16:19:33 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: in Atlanta (3-4 Nov or 4-5) $25 per day plus breaks
- 16:20:10 [ChrisW]
- +$15/person/day for lunhc
- 16:20:54 [MichaelKifer]
- q+
- 16:20:55 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: we're still open to proposals if anyone's willing to sponsor (doesn't have to be at same time as ISWC)
- 16:20:55 [Elisa]
- That drive is doable -- mostly freeway, fyi.
- 16:21:04 [EvanWallace]
- ISWC in Athens, GA, not Atlanta
- 16:21:05 [csma]
- ack csma
- 16:21:14 [JosDeRoo]
- Zakim, cgi-irc is StanDevitt
- 16:21:14 [Zakim]
- sorry, JosDeRoo, I do not recognize a party named 'cgi-irc'
- 16:21:27 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: expect in the range of 40 people
- 16:21:41 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:21:48 [johnhall]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:21:48 [Zakim]
- johnhall should now be muted
- 16:22:25 [johnhall]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:22:25 [Zakim]
- johnhall should no longer be muted
- 16:22:32 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: what is the feeling of everyone regarding having the f2f collocated with ISWC? ... many straight days of meetings
- 16:22:34 [johnhall]
- q+
- 16:22:42 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is talking?
- 16:22:47 [josb]
- It is good to co-locate in order to reduce travel
- 16:22:53 [Zakim]
- ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: csma (85%), pfps (4%), johnhall (19%)
- 16:23:24 [johnhall]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:23:24 [Zakim]
- johnhall should now be muted
- 16:23:31 [AxelPolleres]
- +1 to mk
- 16:23:32 [pfps]
- +1, colocation saves money and time, at the expense of some weariness
- 16:23:36 [MarkusK]
- +1
- 16:23:42 [josb]
- +1 to MK
- 16:23:54 [DavidHirtle]
- mkifer: understand csma's argument, but worth it
- 16:24:13 [EvanWallace]
- +1 on avoiding another marathon ISWC
- 16:24:29 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:24:35 [ChrisW]
- ack johnhall
- 16:24:37 [MichaelKifer]
- q-
- 16:24:53 [DavidHirtle]
- johnhall: there's an OMG meeting in Washington in December
- 16:25:00 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: December is too late
- 16:25:16 [johnhall]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:25:16 [Zakim]
- johnhall should now be muted
- 16:25:36 [FrankMcCabe]
- +1 from me too
- 16:26:03 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:26:03 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 16:26:22 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: we're still open but it seems people favor colocation with ISWC
- 16:26:27 [mdean]
- mdean has joined #rif
- 16:26:28 [Elisa]
- nothing new from us.
- 16:26:29 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, unmure me
- 16:26:29 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'unmure me', Donald_Chapin
- 16:26:34 [DavidHirtle]
- topic: liaison
- 16:26:38 [ChrisW]
- ack donald
- 16:26:38 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:26:42 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should no longer be muted
- 16:27:28 [Donald_Chapin]
- http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/2006-03-02
- 16:27:38 [DavidHirtle]
- donald: OMG publication -- parts might be interesting for us
- 16:27:44 [Donald_Chapin]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:27:44 [Zakim]
- Donald_Chapin should now be muted
- 16:27:52 [DavidHirtle]
- topic: UC&R
- 16:27:55 [Allen]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:27:55 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted
- 16:28:11 [csma]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:28:11 [Zakim]
- csma should no longer be muted
- 16:29:36 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were Allen_Ginsberg, Sandro, csma, josb, Evan_Wallace, DavidHirtle, Axel_Polleres, ChrisW, Philippe_Bonnard, Dave_Reynolds,
- 16:29:36 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rif
- 16:29:39 [Zakim]
- ... LeoraMorgenstern, PaulaP, Deborah_Nichols, FrankMcCabe, SaidTabet, pfps, Harold, Mala_Mehrotra, JeffP, MarkusK, Donald_Chapin, Mike_Dean, Jos_De_Roo, johnhall, Gary_Hallmark,
- 16:29:40 [PaulaP]
- yes
- 16:29:42 [Zakim]
- ... StanDevitt, Michael_Kifer, Elisa_Kendall
- 16:29:45 [josb]
- is was already dropped
- 16:29:45 [PaulaP]
- drop the action
- 16:29:49 [josb]
- s/is/it/
- 16:29:51 [AxelPolleres]
- didn't we drop it last time?
- 16:29:56 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rif
- 16:29:57 [csma]
- ACTION: Christian to create new Wiki page for requirements [DONE]
- 16:30:00 [josb]
- a few weeks ago already!
- 16:30:02 [sandro]
- zakim, this is rif
- 16:30:02 [Zakim]
- ok, sandro; that matches SW_RIF()11:00AM
- 16:30:07 [sandro]
- zakim, who is here?
- 16:30:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Allen_Ginsberg, Sandro, Harold, csma, josb (muted), LeoraMorgenstern (muted), Evan_Wallace, David_Hirtle (muted), pfps, ChrisW, Axel_Polleres (muted),
- 16:30:10 [Zakim]
- ... Philippe_Bonnard (muted), Dave_Reynolds (muted), Deborah_Nichols (muted), SaidTabet (muted), FrankMcCabe, JeffP, Mala_Mehrotra, PaulaP (muted), MarkusK (muted), Mike_Dean,
- 16:30:14 [Zakim]
- ... ??P51 (muted), Jos_De_Roo (muted), johnhall (muted), Donald_Chapin (muted), Gary_Hallmark, StanDevitt, Michael_Kifer, Elisa_Kendall (muted)
- 16:30:18 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see mdean, Elisa, MichaelKifer, GaryHallmark, johnhall, JosDeRoo, Uli, Donald_Chapin, MarkusK, MalaMehrotra, pfps, JeffP, cgi-irc, Deborah_Nichols, SaidTabet,
- 16:30:21 [Zakim]
- ... AxelPolleres, Harold, DaveReynolds, csma, EvanWallace, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, Allen, MoZ, sandro, PhilippeB, DavidHirtle, FrankMcCabe, ChrisW, PaulaP, RRSAgent, Keeper
- 16:30:42 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: last week had discussion about whether to keep track of original use cases in the public draft
- 16:30:44 [csma]
- ACTION: Dieter to review the Requirements [DROPPED]
- 16:30:57 [DavidHirtle]
- ... decided we wouldn't for the first draft
- 16:31:03 [ChrisW]
- [DONE] ACTION: chair to include the discussion on the 50 use cases (links to wiki in public drafts) in the agenda for the next telecon
- 16:31:23 [ChrisW]
- [DONE] ACTION: editors of the UCR document to write a stub which marks that requirements will follow in a later version
- 16:31:33 [ChrisW]
- [DONE] ACTION: editors to remove paragraph to which chrisw objects
- 16:31:46 [josb]
- q+
- 16:32:19 [Harold]
- q+
- 16:32:23 [Zakim]
- -StanDevitt
- 16:32:24 [DavidHirtle]
- ... what do we do with initial use cases -- is it necessary to link back to them e.g. when discussing reqs?
- 16:32:58 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:33:03 [Uli]
- zakim, ??51 is possibly Uli
- 16:33:03 [Zakim]
- sorry, Uli, I do not understand your question
- 16:33:06 [DavidHirtle]
- josb: not good idea to link to wiki pages
- 16:33:14 [csma]
- +1 to not linking to wiki from public drafts
- 16:33:18 [DavidHirtle]
- josb: at least not in final documents
- 16:33:21 [ChrisW]
- p51
- 16:33:23 [sandro]
- Uli, try "41#" to test it.
- 16:33:45 [sandro]
- Zakim ??P51 is Uli
- 16:33:54 [ChrisW]
- zakim, ??p51 is uli
- 16:33:54 [Zakim]
- +uli; got it
- 16:33:55 [csma]
- q?
- 16:33:57 [sandro]
- q- Uli
- 16:33:57 [josb]
- q-
- 16:34:02 [csma]
- ack, josb
- 16:34:04 [sandro]
- q- ??P51
- 16:34:27 [DavidHirtle]
- harold: in order to get wide adoption of RIF once ready, good to have wide selection of use cases
- 16:34:35 [StanDevitt2]
- StanDevitt2 has joined #rif
- 16:34:39 [DavidHirtle]
- ... good to keep around
- 16:35:07 [DavidHirtle]
- ... e.g. link from RIF homepage
- 16:35:22 [PaulV]
- PaulV has joined #rif
- 16:35:47 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: like the idea of encouraging people to submit use cases
- 16:35:58 [sandro]
- q?
- 16:35:59 [DavidHirtle]
- harold: people could reuse existing template
- 16:36:02 [sandro]
- q+
- 16:36:06 [sandro]
- ack Harold
- 16:36:17 [csma]
- ack sandro
- 16:36:21 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller.a]
- 16:36:48 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: if people want to give us another use case, they should look over existing ones
- 16:36:49 [Allen]
- q+
- 16:37:20 [Zakim]
- -Philippe_Bonnard
- 16:38:25 [AxelPolleres]
- +1 to csma, makes sense.
- 16:38:27 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: we need comments on use cases in document, not the original ones
- 16:38:27 [josb]
- +1 to csma: we need comments on UCR draft, not original use cases
- 16:38:58 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: keep harold's idea in mind at least for later
- 16:39:00 [sandro]
- +1 (for this draft, at least)
- 16:39:23 [DavidHirtle]
- allen: agree with csma re: comments only on UCR draft
- 16:39:31 [AxelPolleres]
- we should internally discuss, monitor, whether the original use cases are *covered*, the original authors being responsible for this.
- 16:39:51 [igor]
- igor has joined #rif
- 16:40:10 [DavidHirtle]
- ... may be useful later to have appendix where relevant original wiki use cases are mentioned
- 16:40:18 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:40:23 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:40:25 [Allen]
- q-
- 16:40:26 [josb]
- sound to me like opening a big can of worms
- 16:40:29 [csma]
- ack allen
- 16:40:37 [sandro]
- scribenick: DavidHirtle
- 16:40:42 [sandro]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 16:40:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-rif-minutes.html sandro
- 16:40:49 [sandro]
- RRSAgent, pointer?
- 16:40:49 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-rif-irc#T16-40-49
- 16:41:48 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #rif
- 16:41:49 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: don't need to have this discussion each time we publish
- 16:43:01 [josb]
- We can do that as an exception, but by default we should not link to wiki
- 16:44:29 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: later, could tell people to feel free to add info on implementation to public wiki page
- 16:45:49 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: followup to publication - we want to disseminate the WD as much as possible
- 16:46:16 [DavidHirtle]
- ... make sure that as many people read the document as possible
- 16:46:51 [DavidHirtle]
- ... please disseminate within your organizations, lists, etc.
- 16:47:03 [Allen]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:47:03 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted
- 16:47:04 [igor]
- bye
- 16:47:44 [PaulV]
- PRR liaison: no problem disseminating, although RIF stage 1 / horn rules may not be of too much interest
- 16:48:21 [Elisa]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:48:21 [Zakim]
- Elisa_Kendall should no longer be muted
- 16:48:23 [Donald_Chapin]
- SBVR Liaison will do
- 16:48:32 [DavidHirtle]
- ACTION: Paul, Donald and Lisa to publicize WD within the standards you represent
- 16:48:50 [Elisa]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:48:50 [Zakim]
- Elisa_Kendall should now be muted
- 16:49:03 [PaulV]
- Action confirmed for PRR Liaison to publish the UCR draft
- 16:49:12 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: (action contingent on actual release, of course)
- 16:49:51 [csma]
- ACTION: csma to publicise to Java Rules
- 16:49:53 [josb]
- what about sparql?
- 16:49:56 [sandro]
- ACTION ChrisW tell commonlogic about UCR pub
- 16:50:13 [sandro]
- ACTION CSMA tell java-rules about UCR pub
- 16:50:23 [csma]
- Action: ChrisW to publicise to ICO CL
- 16:50:24 [sandro]
- ACTION: ChrisW tell commonlogic about UCR pub
- 16:50:29 [johnhall]
- yes
- 16:51:24 [csma]
- ACTION: John Hall to publicise to R community
- 16:52:02 [csma]
- s/R com/BR com/
- 16:52:40 [csma]
- ACTION: JosB to publicise to SPARQL
- 16:53:02 [csma]
- ACTION: Sandro to set up a wiki page to record dissemination actions
- 16:53:46 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: what to do with comments after publication?
- 16:54:07 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: respond to comments as a group
- 16:54:27 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: don't reply before discussion
- 16:55:15 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: one of chairs should reply that it's been received
- 16:55:23 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: could have autoreply...
- 16:55:58 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: everyone will receive comments from the list
- 16:56:28 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: we'll talk about it offline
- 16:57:17 [pfps]
- not important, in WebOnt only document editors were on the distribution list by default
- 16:57:35 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: proposal - chairs only get the comments
- 16:57:44 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- Do we have the web page for the comments that are not sent to the mailing list?
- 16:57:45 [DavidHirtle]
- ... and editors
- 16:57:58 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- I mean, what is the url for that web page?
- 16:58:01 [Allen]
- q+
- 16:58:13 [Allen]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:58:13 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted
- 16:58:36 [DavidHirtle]
- allen: at f2f had brainstorming session and made list of requirements -- is it on the wiki?
- 16:58:42 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: yes
- 16:58:50 [DavidHirtle]
- s/yes/yes, a while ago
- 16:59:01 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F2/RequirementsBrainstorming
- 16:59:10 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- q+
- 16:59:14 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:59:14 [Zakim]
- LeoraMorgenstern should no longer be muted
- 16:59:45 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Dean
- 16:59:49 [Zakim]
- -Jos_De_Roo
- 16:59:53 [Allen]
- q-
- 16:59:59 [Allen]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:59:59 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted
- 17:00:10 [SaidTabet]
- Bye everyone.
- 17:00:16 [Zakim]
- -SaidTabet
- 17:00:22 [Zakim]
- -PaulV
- 17:00:31 [ChrisW]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Chris to start email discussion about what issues are "fuzzy" wrt phase 1 & 2
- 17:00:32 [Zakim]
- -Elisa_Kendall
- 17:00:38 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: Paula's requirements list was bottom up; brainstorming was building on this
- 17:00:44 [Elisa]
- bye all
- 17:01:00 [ChrisW]
- [PENDING] ACTION: Chris to start email discussion about what issues are "fuzzy" wrt phase 1 & 2
- 17:01:22 [DavidHirtle]
- leora: do we have the URL for the comments not going to the mailing list?
- 17:01:35 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg
- 17:01:47 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- q-
- 17:01:47 [sandro]
- "Comments from the public to the Working Group are welcome at public-rif-comments@w3.org (public archive"
- 17:01:50 [LeoraMorgenstern]
- zakim, mute me
- 17:01:50 [Zakim]
- LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted
- 17:02:04 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller.a]
- 17:02:08 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Design_Constraints/Terminology
- 17:02:21 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: while going over brainstorming results, struck me that we're using "RIF" in different ways
- 17:02:35 [ChrisW]
- Public commetns url: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments
- 17:04:42 [DavidHirtle]
- chrisw: can you add them to the glossary?
- 17:05:07 [Harold]
- q+
- 17:05:09 [DavidHirtle]
- sandro: looking for comments; if this doesn't work for you, propose something else
- 17:05:23 [Allen]
- q+
- 17:05:33 [Allen]
- zakim, unmute me
- 17:05:33 [Zakim]
- Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted
- 17:05:34 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Design_Constraints
- 17:05:48 [josb]
- q?
- 17:07:31 [FrankMcCabe]
- q+
- 17:07:54 [sandro]
- ack Harold
- 17:08:03 [Allen]
- q-
- 17:08:13 [DavidHirtle]
- harold: by default, we should stick to the charter
- 17:08:44 [DavidHirtle]
- csma: when adding a design constraint to the list, wouldn't mention whether phase 1 or phase 2
- 17:09:32 [ChrisW]
- you can't hear?
- 17:09:34 [ChrisW]
- david?
- 17:09:41 [Zakim]
- -David_Hirtle
- 17:09:46 [DaveReynolds]
- q+
- 17:10:00 [Deborah_Nichols]
- yes
- 17:10:00 [PaulaP]
- I can try to scribe
- 17:10:24 [DavidHirtle]
- thanks Paula
- 17:10:30 [ChrisW]
- scribenick: PaulaP
- 17:10:52 [PaulaP]
- csma: is not an issue of phase 1 or 2
- 17:11:21 [Zakim]
- + +33.8.72.47.aabb
- 17:11:32 [PaulaP]
- csma: it is an issue of urgency and depends on the use of rif core and extensions
- 17:11:49 [PaulaP]
- csma: we can derive the definitions from the design constraints
- 17:11:56 [sandro]
- +1 csma -- don't state phasing in your Design Constraints -- state urgency
- 17:11:59 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 17:12:02 [PaulaP]
- csma: and still keep the charter issues
- 17:12:22 [PaulaP]
- frank: there is a methodology for capturing requirements
- 17:12:48 [PaulaP]
- frank: establish high-level goals and identify factors that are necessary for these goals
- 17:13:08 [PaulaP]
- frank: very useful and helps clarify what is important
- 17:13:16 [csma]
- http://wiki.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/Goals,_Critical_Success_Factors_and_Requirements
- 17:13:29 [PaulaP]
- frank: there should be 3 or 4 high-level goals
- 17:13:43 [DaveReynolds]
- ack me
- 17:13:48 [PaulaP]
- frank: identify from them technology requirements
- 17:13:52 [Zakim]
- +DavidHirtle
- 17:13:58 [csma]
- ack frankmc
- 17:14:09 [PaulaP]
- dave: a huge number of requirements at moment
- 17:14:16 [PaulaP]
- dave: need proposals on email
- 17:14:46 [PaulaP]
- chris: the discussion on the process could take too long
- 17:14:49 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 17:15:01 [PaulaP]
- chris: but we can try to make proposals on email
- 17:15:16 [josb]
- if you don't structure your discussion, it will go on forever
- 17:15:28 [PaulaP]
- Topic: Designing for extensability
- 17:15:43 [josb]
- s/discussion/discussion on requirements/
- 17:16:09 [PaulaP]
- csma: the objective of phase 1 is on achitecture principles and focus on extensions
- 17:16:56 [JeffP]
- q?
- 17:16:57 [PaulaP]
- csma: the idea of limiting the expressive power of rif to horn rules is just for postponing difficult issues to phase 2
- 17:17:18 [StanDevitt]
- StanDevitt has joined #rif
- 17:17:19 [PaulaP]
- csma: we should focus on the extension mechanisms and the basics for rif core
- 17:17:42 [PaulaP]
- csma: afterwards we can start dealing with difficult issues
- 17:18:06 [PaulaP]
- csma: this is also mentioned in the conclusion of the workshop we had
- 17:18:27 [csma]
- q?
- 17:18:34 [PaulaP]
- csma: we should leave the semantical and theoretical questions for phase 2
- 17:18:46 [GaryHallmark]
- +1 for extensibility. Or to put it another way, to make sure we don't paint ourselves into a corner and preclude e.g. reactive rules
- 17:18:55 [PaulaP]
- chris: any further discussions?
- 17:18:59 [Uli]
- -1 for "semantical questions"
- 17:19:10 [PaulaP]
- chris: this is an important point not clear from the charter
- 17:19:16 [Uli]
- ok
- 17:19:28 [StanDevitt]
- Another way to put it is to be sure that phase 1 design does not limit the later extensibility.
- 17:19:30 [PaulaP]
- csma: difficult features instead of semantical questions
- 17:19:54 [PaulaP]
- csma: there are many ways to deal with the extensibility mechanisms
- 17:20:17 [PaulaP]
- csma: not really clear how and where we should start
- 17:20:36 [PaulaP]
- chris: it is important for our work
- 17:20:53 [PaulaP]
- chris: need to devote more time next week on this issue
- 17:21:13 [PaulaP]
- chris: think to propose kinds of such mechanisms
- 17:21:28 [josb]
- What is an "extensibility mechanism"?
- 17:21:34 [PaulaP]
- chris: based on these proposals the group can start discussions
- 17:22:12 [csma]
- ACTION: chair to put design for extensibility and discussion of proposals on agenda for next telecon
- 17:22:25 [csma]
- q?
- 17:22:44 [PaulaP]
- chris: we define a core language to be extended
- 17:22:46 [josb]
- ah
- 17:22:51 [StanDevitt]
- +1
- 17:22:55 [Harold]
- q+
- 17:22:59 [PaulaP]
- chris: need to define how we extend this core
- 17:23:18 [sandro]
- q+
- 17:23:26 [PaulaP]
- harold: e.g. in lisp you have functions for defining new functions
- 17:23:37 [PaulaP]
- harold: this is not the case for rif
- 17:23:38 [josb]
- Shouldn't we say "methods for extension"?
- 17:23:39 [sandro]
- ack sandro
- 17:23:44 [sandro]
- q- Harold
- 17:24:10 [PaulaP]
- harold: we can use different syntactic methods, semantically is much more difficult
- 17:24:10 [josb]
- +1 to Harold: we need to take both syntactic and semantic aspects into account
- 17:24:27 [josb]
- We need to distinguish between syntactic and semantic extensions
- 17:24:29 [csma]
- +1 to josb
- 17:24:38 [PaulaP]
- sandro: things to be added are to be added by the designers, not by the programmers
- 17:24:57 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 17:25:01 [PaulaP]
- csma: we can find a better term than mechanism
- 17:25:04 [sandro]
- s/ers/ers (in a programming-language analogy)
- 17:25:21 [PaulaP]
- csma: if we define this mechanism
- 17:25:28 [Zakim]
- -Evan_Wallace
- 17:25:37 [Zakim]
- -uli
- 17:25:37 [PaulV]
- Bye
- 17:25:44 [Zakim]
- -Gary_Hallmark
- 17:25:44 [Allen]
- Bye
- 17:25:46 [Zakim]
- -MarkusK
- 17:25:46 [JeffP]
- bye
- 17:25:47 [josb]
- bye
- 17:25:48 [Zakim]
- -johnhall
- 17:25:50 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Kifer
- 17:25:50 [Zakim]
- -PaulV
- 17:25:51 [Zakim]
- -FrankMcCabe
- 17:25:51 [Zakim]
- -Harold
- 17:25:52 [Zakim]
- -Deborah_Nichols
- 17:25:53 [Zakim]
- -Dave_Reynolds
- 17:25:54 [Zakim]
- -Donald_Chapin
- 17:25:55 [Zakim]
- -josb
- 17:25:57 [Zakim]
- -JeffP
- 17:25:59 [Zakim]
- -Mala_Mehrotra
- 17:26:01 [Zakim]
- - +33.8.72.47.aabb
- 17:26:03 [Zakim]
- -LeoraMorgenstern
- 17:26:05 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 17:26:07 [Zakim]
- -Axel_Polleres
- 17:26:09 [Zakim]
- -Allen_Ginsberg
- 17:26:17 [sandro]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 17:26:17 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-rif-minutes.html sandro
- 17:27:00 [MalaMehrotra]
- bye
- 17:27:37 [PaulaP]
- bye
- 17:27:38 [Zakim]
- -pfps
- 17:27:40 [Zakim]
- -David_Hirtle
- 17:27:42 [Zakim]
- -PaulaP
- 17:27:52 [Zakim]
- -Sandro
- 17:27:54 [Zakim]
- -ChrisW
- 17:27:54 [Zakim]
- -csma
- 17:27:55 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended
- 17:27:56 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Allen_Ginsberg, Sandro, csma, josb, Evan_Wallace, DavidHirtle, Axel_Polleres, ChrisW, Philippe_Bonnard, Dave_Reynolds, LeoraMorgenstern, PaulaP, Deborah_Nichols,
- 17:28:01 [Zakim]
- ... FrankMcCabe, SaidTabet, pfps, Harold, Mala_Mehrotra, JeffP, MarkusK, Donald_Chapin, Mike_Dean, Jos_De_Roo, johnhall, Gary_Hallmark, StanDevitt, Michael_Kifer, Elisa_Kendall,
- 17:28:04 [Zakim]
- ... [IPcaller], uli, PaulV, +33.8.72.47.aabb
- 17:30:46 [MoZ]
- aabb was me Mohamed ZERGAOUI
- 17:31:15 [MoZ]
- i still discovering the way it works
- 17:39:14 [csma]
- csma has left #rif
- 17:39:27 [sandro]
- MoZ, why is your last name written in all caps?
- 17:40:51 [MoZ]
- Mohamed Zergaoui
- 17:40:58 [MoZ]
- Mo...Z...
- 17:41:45 [sandro]
- No, I understand that part. I'm wondering why you said "aabb was me Mohamed ZERGAOUI" instead of "aabb was me Mohamed Zergaoui".
- 17:42:26 [MoZ]
- oh sorry a reflex to put names in caps...
- 17:44:09 [sandro]
- It's not a problem -- I'm just not familiar with that convention.
- 17:44:20 [sandro]
- (and I wondered if it meant something in particular.)
- 17:46:42 [MoZ]
- sandro, it happens when last names and fist names are close
- 17:47:03 [MoZ]
- sandro, in my case, it's not ;-)
- 17:48:38 [sandro]
- So Innovimax is a french start-up?
- 17:48:58 [MoZ]
- sandro, yes
- 17:49:25 [sandro]
- Cool. :-)
- 17:49:37 [MoZ]
- Innovimax work for the moment for legal publishing and wish to work with pharma
- 17:58:14 [MoZ]
- MoZ has joined #rif
- 18:09:35 [DavidHirtle]
- DavidHirtle has left #rif
- 19:34:52 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rif