14:28:31 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dawg
14:28:31 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc
14:28:32 <DanC> Zakim, who's on the phone?
14:28:32 <Zakim> On the phone I see +1.617.894.aaaa
14:28:37 <DanC> an early bird
14:28:51 <Zakim> +DanC
14:29:10 <Zakim> +??P4
14:29:13 <EnricoFranconi> EnricoFranconi has joined #dawg
14:29:14 <DanC> Zakim, aaaa is LeeF
14:29:14 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it
14:29:18 <AndyS_> zakim, ??P4 is I
14:29:18 <Zakim> +AndyS_; got it
14:29:41 <DanC> agenda + Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
14:29:47 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:29:51 <DanC> agenda + comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction
14:29:55 <jeen> Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
14:29:55 <Zakim> +jeen; got it
14:29:59 <DanC> agenda + Toward CR: protocol editing, etc.
14:30:02 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:30:06 <DanC> agenda + Toward CR: exit criteria
14:30:09 <SteveH> Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH
14:30:09 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
14:30:17 <DanC> agenda + Toward CR, comments, misc
14:30:28 <DanC> agenda + MIME type registrations
14:30:34 <DanC> agenda + test suite maintenance
14:30:40 <DanC> agenda + JSON results format
14:30:44 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:30:50 <JanneS> zakim, IPcaller is JanneS
14:30:50 <Zakim> +JanneS; got it
14:31:06 <EliasT> EliasT has joined #dawg
14:31:08 <SerT> SerT has joined #dawg
14:31:09 <DanC> Meeting: RDF Data Access Weekly
14:31:11 <DanC> Scribe: JanneS
14:31:13 <DanC> Chair: DanC
14:31:23 <JanneS> I noticed topic was set to '1400Z' and was worried if I was late for the meeting
14:31:26 <kendallclark> kendallclark has joined #dawg
14:31:28 <SteveH> zakim, mute me
14:31:28 <Zakim> SteveH should now be muted
14:31:32 <Zakim> +[IBMCambridge]
14:31:43 <DanC> Regrets: Libby Miller, Sven Groppe
14:31:50 <Zakim> +Kendall_Clark
14:31:51 <DanC> Zakim, [IBMCambridge] holds Elias
14:31:51 <Zakim> +Elias; got it
14:31:55 <EliasT> Zakim, IBMCambridge is me
14:31:55 <Zakim> +EliasT; got it
14:32:23 <Zakim> +??P10
14:32:42 <DanC> Zakim, ??P10 is Souri
14:32:42 <Zakim> +Souri; got it
14:32:49 <DanC> noted, Jeen
14:33:10 <DanC> Regrets+ Pat Hayes
14:33:17 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:33:22 <EnricoFranconi> zakim, ipcaller is me
14:33:22 <Zakim> +EnricoFranconi; got it
14:33:33 <ericP> zakim, please dial ericP-617.2
14:33:33 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
14:33:34 <Zakim> +EricP
14:33:46 <Souri> Souri has joined #dawg
14:33:47 <DanC> Zakim, mute EnricoFranconi
14:33:48 <Zakim> EnricoFranconi should now be muted
14:33:59 <DanC> Zakim, unmute EnricoFranconi 
14:33:59 <Zakim> EnricoFranconi should no longer be muted
14:34:22 <ericP> zakim, please disconnect ericP
14:34:22 <Zakim> EricP is being disconnected
14:34:24 <Zakim> -EricP
14:34:25 <ericP> zakim, please dial ericP-617.2
14:34:25 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
14:34:26 <Zakim> +EricP
14:34:40 <DanC> Zakim, who is on the phone?
14:34:40 <Zakim> On the phone I see LeeF, DanC, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH (muted), JanneS, EliasT, Kendall_Clark, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP
14:34:43 <Zakim> EliasT has Elias
14:35:21 <DanC> PROPOSED: to ammend Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 to show Elias Torres present and correct the spelling of Souripriya Das, and to approve it, as ammended, as a true record
14:35:29 <ericP> second
14:35:30 <DanC> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0448.html minutes 14 MAr
14:35:39 <DanC> so RESOLVED
14:35:47 <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1400Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair
14:36:10 <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1430Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair
14:36:21 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
14:36:21 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark
14:36:33 <JanneS> 28 March?
14:36:43 <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet again 28 March, 1430Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair
14:37:01 <ericP> 27 March, 1400Z + 24.5 hours
14:37:05 <DanC> RESOLVED: to meet  28 March, 1430Z, KendallC to scribe
14:37:20 <Zakim> -SteveH
14:37:22 <DanC> ACTION: EricP to email the semweb CG about a sparql-dev mailing list. Done; see new mailing list from DanC 9 Mar [DONE]
14:37:24 <Souri> Souri has joined #dawg
14:37:33 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:37:41 <SteveH> Zakim, IPcaller is me
14:37:41 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
14:37:46 <SteveH> got kicked off
14:37:49 <SteveH> zakim, mute me
14:37:49 <Zakim> SteveH should now be muted
14:37:55 <DanC> 8 actions done
14:38:30 <DanC> Topic: public-sparql-dev
14:38:38 <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0436.html
14:38:54 <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-dev/
14:39:00 <DanC> EricP: am I the maintainer?
14:39:02 <DanC> DanC: I hope so
14:41:13 <DanC> DanC: think about what you need for a CR decision
14:41:26 <DanC> Zakim, next item
14:41:26 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda" taken up [from DanC]
14:41:30 <DanC> Zakim, close item 1
14:41:30 <Zakim> agendum 1, Convene, take roll, review records and agenda, closed
14:41:31 <Zakim> I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
14:41:32 <Zakim> 2. comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction [from DanC]
14:41:34 <ericP> i found 6 subscribe requests to public-sparql-dev-request@w3.org
14:41:36 <DanC> Zakim, next item
14:41:36 <Zakim> agendum 2. "comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction" taken up [from DanC]
14:42:18 <DanC> ACTION: Enrico to explain definitions in reply to LeeF's questions (done: 28 Feb) [DONE]
14:42:29 <DanC> ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP; follow up on that to get text back into rq23 [CONTINUES]
14:42:39 <DanC> LeeF: I'm likely to ask to withdraw, based on discussion with AndyS
14:42:55 <SerT> yes
14:43:14 <JanneS> CTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction, in reply to 2005-09-11T21:34:55Z Ian Horrocks DONE
14:43:33 <JanneS> ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from 2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard discussion
14:43:51 <Zakim> -LeeF
14:43:54 <ericP> ACTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction, in reply to 2005-09-11T21:34:55Z Ian Horrocks [DONE]
14:43:56 <DanC> LeeF? does that share state with your earlier action?
14:44:09 <ericP> JanneS, just noticed it was missing the initial 'A'
14:44:26 <JanneS> uh, learning to copy&paste
14:44:32 <ericP> np
14:44:36 <SerT> not yet
14:44:58 <SerT> yes
14:45:09 <JanneS> LeeF's action continued.
14:45:21 <JanneS> ACTION: SergioT to respond to 2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider (overtaken by more recent last call?) [ CONTINUED ]
14:45:46 <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html
14:46:05 <JanneS> ACTION: SerT to make test case for bnode scope in different BGPs. DONE in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0446.html
14:46:15 <SerT> that's done
14:46:27 <SerT> I sent the testcases around
14:46:31 <DanC> yes, thanks
14:46:44 <AndyS_> I checked them in
14:47:00 <DanC> bonus points
14:47:07 <AndyS_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0451.html
14:47:35 <jeen> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/
14:47:43 <LeeF> LeeF has joined #dawg
14:48:03 <DanC> perhaps dawg-construct-identity ?
14:48:13 <AndyS_> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-ident.rq
14:48:33 <AndyS_> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-reif.rq
14:48:38 <ericP> second
14:48:49 <AndyS_> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/query.rq
14:48:51 <JosDeRoo> JosDeRoo has joined #dawg
14:48:54 <DanC> PROPOSED: to adopt dawg-construct-identity dawg-construct-subgraph dawg-construct-reification
14:49:04 <DanC> so RESOLVED
14:49:37 <SerT> testcase for my action is in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/
14:49:40 <AndyS_> Jeen - we ought to email about the subgraph test more clearly 
14:49:59 <DanC> Regrets+ JosDeRoo
14:50:03 <DanC> ok, Jos
14:50:04 <SerT> that was about maintaining bnode coreferences in answersets
14:50:18 <DanC> sergio, is that a different test, related to this agendum?
14:50:30 <JosDeRoo> thanks DanC
14:50:31 <jeen> andyS, in relation to the requirements you mean?
14:50:33 <SerT> that was the one mentioned in the action
14:50:47 <SerT> I added two testcases about construct
14:51:02 <SerT> but there wasn't a specific action
14:51:33 <DanC> is dawg-bnode-coreference ready?
14:51:36 <DanC> AndyS says yes
14:51:42 <AndyS_> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-subgraph.rq
14:51:55 <AndyS_> That is a new test we needed to cover UC&R 
14:52:07 <AndyS_> (subgraph requirment)
14:52:07 <DanC> Jeen 2nds  dawg-bnode-coreference (in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/manifest.ttl _
14:53:30 <DanC> PROPOSED: to adopt dawg-bnode-coreference (in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/manifest.ttl )
14:53:46 <DanC> so RESOLVED.
14:54:58 <DanC> Zakim, next item
14:54:58 <Zakim> agendum 3. "Toward CR: protocol editing, etc." taken up [from DanC]
14:55:25 <JanneS> ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL [ CONTINUED ]
14:55:26 <LeeF> haven't gotten to it yet
14:55:31 <LeeF> this week hopefully
14:55:39 <JanneS> ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results. [ CONTINUED ]
14:55:46 <DanC> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html WSD WG comments
14:56:06 <LeeF> zakim, LeeF is with EliasT
14:56:06 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it
14:56:44 <ericP> LeeF, while you're in the validating mindset, you may want to run the WSDL1.1 through HugoH's 1.1=>2.0 xslt service
14:57:09 <LeeF> yes, I suppose I may want to do that
14:57:10 <LeeF> :-)
14:57:25 <ericP> of *course* you do
14:58:27 <DanC> ACTION KC: change query/queryrequest names as requested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html
14:59:29 <DanC> (maybe not)
15:00:33 <DanC> action -10
15:02:35 <DanC> ACTION KC: confirm that SPARQL WSDL  query/queryrequest and maxOccurs do not need to be changed, despite http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html
15:04:09 <LeeF> sure
15:06:09 <DanC> KC is not aware of any substantive changes to SPARQL WSDL that he's inclined to make
15:06:18 <DanC> Zakim, next item
15:06:18 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Toward CR: exit criteria" taken up [from DanC]
15:06:56 <JanneS> ACTION: SteveH and AndyS to map approved tests to UC&R features. DONE in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0455.html ?
15:07:13 <DanC> ACTION AndyS: conjure some LIMIT/OFFSET tests
15:07:31 <SteveH> done as fas as im concerned
15:08:21 <JanneS> ACTION: DanC to noodle on SOAP exit criteria [ DONE during teleconf ]
15:08:41 <DanC> since (a) we have a WSDL requirement, (b) we're resolved to have a test for every requirement by CR exit
15:08:49 <DanC> Zakim, next item
15:08:49 <Zakim> agendum 5. "Toward CR, comments, misc" taken up [from DanC]
15:09:29 <JanneS> ACTION: DanC to respond to major technical: underspecified errors
15:10:34 <JanneS> DanC: are there still major issues from Oracle?
15:10:49 <DanC> old last comment status: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2006Mar/att-0022/lc-status-report.html__charset_us-ascii
15:13:27 <DanC> (Janne, pls note these arguments?)
15:13:29 <DanC> (or somebody?)
15:13:49 <JanneS> Oracle's implementation elaborated: identifier length problem related to colum name length
15:14:02 <Zakim> -jeen
15:14:33 <JanneS> Souripriya thinks there isn't an issue with this, though. Internal discussions to take place within oracle
15:15:36 <DanC> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html major technical: underspecified errors
15:15:37 <JanneS> DanC: another issue is the underspecified errors in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html
15:16:07 <kendallclark> wow, I can't hear Eric at all.
15:17:21 <JanneS> Kendall: we've rather taken light-weight approach to describing errors (instead of enumerating lots of them)
15:18:19 <AndyS_> QL doc defines what SPARQL *is* - if anything gets outside what it *is* then it isn't SPARQL and what happens is not defined by the spec.
15:18:35 <JanneS> DanC: planning to give one week now for organizations to get ready for entering CR
15:18:38 <DanC> # ACTION: DanC to respond to major technical: underspecified errors [WITHDRAWN]
15:18:53 <DanC> ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments
15:19:19 <EnricoFranconi> I guess so
15:19:25 <AndyS_> e.g. It's an RDQL query - could choose to find the RDQL parser to be helpful but it's not SPARQL anymore
15:19:43 <EnricoFranconi> yes
15:20:23 <DanC> -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html comment status 1.68
15:20:47 <DanC> ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments [WITHDRAWN]
15:21:20 <kendallclark> they were legion :0
15:21:23 <kendallclark> erp, :>
15:22:33 <JanneS> Kendall: from experience PPS's comments help us find bugs
15:22:52 <JanneS> DanC: PPS's comments could be converted to test cases at best
15:23:19 <DanC> I'm inclined to mark his comments [needstest], but not critical to CR
15:24:00 <JanneS> ('at best' not good English in my previous note, oh well)
15:24:19 <ericP> please
15:24:35 <JanneS> # ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier Corby], potentially automating examples2tests progress  [CONTINUED ]
15:24:46 <JanneS> ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier Corby], potentially automating examples2tests progress  [ CONTINUED ]
15:25:41 <DanC> #  ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. Note: the thread is closed as of 14 March   [DONE]
15:25:48 <JanneS> ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. DONE
15:26:38 <Zakim> -SteveH
15:26:45 <DanC> ACTION DanC: send [OK?] msg to 2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider on Section 1 and Section 2, basically, [needstest]
15:27:33 <ericP> sweet!
15:27:35 <JanneS> AndyS: Lee sent OK msg already to that
15:27:45 <DanC> bonus points to lee http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0001.html
15:27:59 <LeeF> right
15:28:35 <DanC> -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 cr request, 1.21
15:28:40 <JanneS> ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: CR request, in progress
15:30:15 <DanC> 1.114  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/Overview.html
15:30:17 <SteveH> are we going beyond 1530Z?
15:30:32 <DanC> . http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl
15:31:12 <DanC> sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:14:45
15:31:14 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:31:17 <DanC> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd
15:31:20 <SteveH> Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH
15:31:20 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
15:31:29 <DanC> sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:15:22
15:31:35 <SteveH> zakim, mute me
15:31:35 <Zakim> SteveH should now be muted
15:32:50 <DanC> AndyS: overview, defns, parsers
15:33:04 <ericP> how about this examples.hmtl that i'm working on?
15:33:29 <DanC> -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ results format 1.78 $ of $Date: 2006/01/04 15:59:22 
15:33:35 <ericP> specifically, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/examples
15:33:36 <ericP> yes
15:33:40 <AndyS_> Overview: 1.664
15:34:00 <ericP> ok, drop it
15:34:09 <ericP> right
15:34:12 <AndyS_> Defns: v1.3
15:34:32 <AndyS_> Parsers: its a directory
15:34:42 <JanneS> DanC: planning to go CR on March-29
15:35:24 <ericP> i can make a read-only bit in ycaker
15:35:26 <ericP> yacker
15:36:27 <ericP> i can vouch for the C and C++ versions as well
15:36:33 <ericP> yup
15:36:48 <DanC> ACTION: check in C and C++ generated grammars.
15:37:09 <ericP> hmm, i guess diff would work
15:37:23 <AndyS_> BNF is v1.1
15:37:44 <DanC> rq23/parsers/sparql.bnf 1.1, concur
15:39:01 <EliasT> currently swapping
15:39:02 <DanC> Zakim, who's on the phone?
15:39:02 <Zakim> On the phone I see DanC, AndyS_, JanneS, EliasT, Kendall_Clark, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP, SteveH (muted)
15:39:04 <Zakim> EliasT has Elias, LeeF
15:39:37 <JanneS> Looking for todo items @@ in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
15:43:05 <JanneS> DanC: there are no process requirements for a minimum duration, rather just market acceptance with a reasonable time window such as 2 months
15:43:10 <DanC> several advise in favor of 30 May 2006
15:43:11 <JanneS> Kendall: 2 months a reasonable minimum
15:43:45 <JanneS> AndyS: we could look for implementations outside the WG members for more credibility
15:43:57 <DanC> CR exit critera += XQuery F&O to PR
15:44:49 <JanneS> DanC: there is risk that the XQuery dependency will delay our CR
15:45:17 <JanneS> (this scribe should finish in 5 mins, if that's ok)
15:46:11 <JanneS> DanC: @@ XML Query review comments: done
15:46:38 <JanneS> DanC: @@ dependency on WSDL 2.0: Kendall coordinating
15:46:55 <kendallclark> I will certainly know for sure before the drop-dead point.
15:47:40 <JanneS> DanC: @@ no changes to protocol since Jan WD: confirmed
15:48:45 <JanneS> Klyne's comment : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Apr/0010.html
15:49:36 <ericP> does it? cwm?
15:49:47 <ericP> doing it by quads
15:52:09 <EnricoFranconi> bye!
15:52:22 <Zakim> -EnricoFranconi
15:52:23 <kendallclark> we failed at any supererogation. big woop.
15:52:25 <AndyS_> cwm stores "literal graphs"
15:52:33 <SerT> got to leave...
15:52:49 <DanC> "WG will enter the second phase in which it will write a formal specification and test cases for this language."
15:53:31 <kendallclark> and "formal specification" is a bit vague
15:54:30 <kendallclark> do we have any flowery language anywhere?! :>
15:56:25 <SteveH> I still the the design in the spec. is bad
15:57:14 <ericP> we don't have to worry about hayes's objection?
15:57:16 <ericP> cool!
15:57:33 <ericP> i think unicode prob is solved
15:58:10 <ericP> he has no new info. all the old info on $ vs ? is still relevent
15:59:15 <kendallclark> i've heard *no* complaints from actual implementers or sparql trainers on the ?/$ point.
15:59:24 <kendallclark> harold's point notwithstanding
15:59:34 <kendallclark> he's only claimed that he thinks this will confuse, not that it confuses.
15:59:46 <DanC> WBS form http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/
16:00:09 <ericP> if steve has a formal objection to SPARQL Query, does he have a formal objection to going to CR?
16:00:26 <JanneS> DanC: in CR WG is still formally obliged to respond to all comments
16:00:28 <ericP> (danc)
16:00:43 <DanC> PROPOSED: to advance SPARQL to CR as discussed in this meeting, contingent on successful outcomes of actions in this meeting.
16:00:59 <DanC> responses to proposal to be gathered via http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/
16:01:22 <DanC> you'll get "please fill out the form" notice in email today.
16:01:39 <SteveH> will fill in form
16:02:05 <DanC> ACTION: Jeen to figure out whether he can become test case editor and report back by telecon on Mar 14 [DONE]
16:02:21 <ericP> 2nd
16:02:22 <JanneS> 2nded
16:02:24 <DanC> ADJOURN.
16:02:32 <Zakim> -Souri
16:02:36 <Zakim> -SteveH
16:02:43 <JanneS> Zakim, who WAS on the phone
16:02:46 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who WAS on the phone', JanneS
16:02:58 <Zakim> -Kendall_Clark
16:03:04 <Zakim> -EricP
16:03:09 <LeeF> Zakim, list attendees
16:03:23 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been +1.617.894.aaaa, DanC, LeeF, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH, JanneS, Kendall_Clark, Elias, EliasT, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP
16:03:54 <Zakim> -JanneS
16:04:03 <AndyS_> Interest here in a RDF/JSON
16:04:27 <Zakim> -EliasT
16:04:33 <Zakim> -DanC
16:04:45 <Zakim> -AndyS_
16:04:48 <AndyS_> AndyS_ has left #dawg
16:04:57 <Zakim> SW_DAWG()9:30AM has ended
16:05:01 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.617.894.aaaa, DanC, LeeF, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH, JanneS, Kendall_Clark, Elias, EliasT, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP
16:05:38 <DanC> RRSAgent, make logs world-access
16:05:45 <DanC> RRSAgent, pointer?
16:05:45 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc#T16-05-45
16:09:19 <JosDeRoo> JosDeRoo has left #dawg
16:15:56 <DanC> RRSAgent, stop