IRC log of dawg on 2006-03-21

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:28:31 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #dawg

14:28:31 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc

14:28:32 [DanC]

Zakim, who's on the phone?

14:28:32 [Zakim]

On the phone I see +1.617.894.aaaa

14:28:37 [DanC]

an early bird

14:28:51 [Zakim]

+DanC

14:29:10 [Zakim]

+??P4

14:29:13 [EnricoFranconi]

EnricoFranconi has joined #dawg

14:29:14 [DanC]

Zakim, aaaa is LeeF

14:29:14 [Zakim]

+LeeF; got it

14:29:18 [AndyS_]

zakim, ??P4 is I

14:29:18 [Zakim]

+AndyS_; got it

14:29:41 [DanC]

agenda + Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

14:29:47 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:29:51 [DanC]

agenda + comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction

14:29:55 [jeen]

Zakim, [IPcaller] is me

14:29:55 [Zakim]

+jeen; got it

14:29:59 [DanC]

agenda + Toward CR: protocol editing, etc.

14:30:02 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:30:06 [DanC]

agenda + Toward CR: exit criteria

14:30:09 [SteveH]

Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH

14:30:09 [Zakim]

+SteveH; got it

14:30:17 [DanC]

agenda + Toward CR, comments, misc

14:30:28 [DanC]

agenda + MIME type registrations

14:30:34 [DanC]

agenda + test suite maintenance

14:30:40 [DanC]

agenda + JSON results format

14:30:44 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:30:50 [JanneS]

zakim, IPcaller is JanneS

14:30:50 [Zakim]

+JanneS; got it

14:31:06 [EliasT]

EliasT has joined #dawg

14:31:08 [SerT]

SerT has joined #dawg

14:31:09 [DanC]

Meeting: RDF Data Access Weekly

14:31:11 [DanC]

Scribe: JanneS

14:31:13 [DanC]

Chair: DanC

14:31:23 [JanneS]

I noticed topic was set to '1400Z' and was worried if I was late for the meeting

14:31:26 [kendallclark]

kendallclark has joined #dawg

14:31:28 [SteveH]

zakim, mute me

14:31:28 [Zakim]

SteveH should now be muted

14:31:32 [Zakim]

+[IBMCambridge]

14:31:43 [DanC]

Regrets: Libby Miller, Sven Groppe

14:31:50 [Zakim]

+Kendall_Clark

14:31:51 [DanC]

Zakim, [IBMCambridge] holds Elias

14:31:51 [Zakim]

+Elias; got it

14:31:55 [EliasT]

Zakim, IBMCambridge is me

14:31:55 [Zakim]

+EliasT; got it

14:32:23 [Zakim]

+??P10

14:32:42 [DanC]

Zakim, ??P10 is Souri

14:32:42 [Zakim]

+Souri; got it

14:32:49 [DanC]

noted, Jeen

14:33:10 [DanC]

Regrets+ Pat Hayes

14:33:17 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:33:22 [EnricoFranconi]

zakim, ipcaller is me

14:33:22 [Zakim]

+EnricoFranconi; got it

14:33:33 [ericP]

zakim, please dial ericP-617.2

14:33:33 [Zakim]

ok, ericP; the call is being made

14:33:34 [Zakim]

+EricP

14:33:46 [Souri]

Souri has joined #dawg

14:33:47 [DanC]

Zakim, mute EnricoFranconi

14:33:48 [Zakim]

EnricoFranconi should now be muted

14:33:59 [DanC]

Zakim, unmute EnricoFranconi

14:33:59 [Zakim]

EnricoFranconi should no longer be muted

14:34:22 [ericP]

zakim, please disconnect ericP

14:34:22 [Zakim]

EricP is being disconnected

14:34:24 [Zakim]

-EricP

14:34:25 [ericP]

zakim, please dial ericP-617.2

14:34:25 [Zakim]

ok, ericP; the call is being made

14:34:26 [Zakim]

+EricP

14:34:40 [DanC]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:34:40 [Zakim]

On the phone I see LeeF, DanC, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH (muted), JanneS, EliasT, Kendall_Clark, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP

14:34:43 [Zakim]

EliasT has Elias

14:35:21 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to ammend Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 to show Elias Torres present and correct the spelling of Souripriya Das, and to approve it, as ammended, as a true record

14:35:29 [ericP]

second

14:35:30 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0448.html minutes 14 MAr

14:35:39 [DanC]

so RESOLVED

14:35:47 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1400Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair

14:36:10 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1430Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair

14:36:21 [DanC]

Zakim, pick a scribe

14:36:21 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark

14:36:33 [JanneS]

28 March?

14:36:43 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to meet again 28 March, 1430Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair

14:37:01 [ericP]

27 March, 1400Z + 24.5 hours

14:37:05 [DanC]

RESOLVED: to meet 28 March, 1430Z, KendallC to scribe

14:37:20 [Zakim]

-SteveH

14:37:22 [DanC]

ACTION: EricP to email the semweb CG about a sparql-dev mailing list. Done; see new mailing list from DanC 9 Mar [DONE]

14:37:24 [Souri]

Souri has joined #dawg

14:37:33 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:37:41 [SteveH]

Zakim, IPcaller is me

14:37:41 [Zakim]

+SteveH; got it

14:37:46 [SteveH]

got kicked off

14:37:49 [SteveH]

zakim, mute me

14:37:49 [Zakim]

SteveH should now be muted

14:37:55 [DanC]

8 actions done

14:38:30 [DanC]

Topic: public-sparql-dev

14:38:38 [DanC]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0436.html

14:38:54 [DanC]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-dev/

14:39:00 [DanC]

EricP: am I the maintainer?

14:39:02 [DanC]

DanC: I hope so

14:41:13 [DanC]

DanC: think about what you need for a CR decision

14:41:26 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

14:41:26 [Zakim]

agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda" taken up [from DanC]

14:41:30 [DanC]

Zakim, close item 1

14:41:30 [Zakim]

agendum 1, Convene, take roll, review records and agenda, closed

14:41:31 [Zakim]

I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is

14:41:32 [Zakim]

2. comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction [from DanC]

14:41:34 [ericP]

i found 6 subscribe requests to public-sparql-dev-request@w3.org

14:41:36 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

14:41:36 [Zakim]

agendum 2. "comments related to rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction" taken up [from DanC]

14:42:18 [DanC]

ACTION: Enrico to explain definitions in reply to LeeF's questions (done: 28 Feb) [DONE]

14:42:29 [DanC]

ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP; follow up on that to get text back into rq23 [CONTINUES]

14:42:39 [DanC]

LeeF: I'm likely to ask to withdraw, based on discussion with AndyS

14:42:55 [SerT]

yes

14:43:14 [JanneS]

CTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction, in reply to 2005-09-11T21:34:55Z Ian Horrocks DONE

14:43:33 [JanneS]

ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from 2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard discussion

14:43:51 [Zakim]

-LeeF

14:43:54 [ericP]

ACTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction, in reply to 2005-09-11T21:34:55Z Ian Horrocks [DONE]

14:43:56 [DanC]

LeeF? does that share state with your earlier action?

14:44:09 [ericP]

JanneS, just noticed it was missing the initial 'A'

14:44:26 [JanneS]

uh, learning to copy&paste

14:44:32 [ericP]

np

14:44:36 [SerT]

not yet

14:44:58 [SerT]

yes

14:45:09 [JanneS]

LeeF's action continued.

14:45:21 [JanneS]

ACTION: SergioT to respond to 2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider (overtaken by more recent last call?) [ CONTINUED ]

14:45:46 [DanC]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0021.html

14:46:05 [JanneS]

ACTION: SerT to make test case for bnode scope in different BGPs. DONE in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0446.html

14:46:15 [SerT]

that's done

14:46:27 [SerT]

I sent the testcases around

14:46:31 [DanC]

yes, thanks

14:46:44 [AndyS_]

I checked them in

14:47:00 [DanC]

bonus points

14:47:07 [AndyS_]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0451.html

14:47:35 [jeen]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/

14:47:43 [LeeF]

LeeF has joined #dawg

14:48:03 [DanC]

perhaps dawg-construct-identity ?

14:48:13 [AndyS_]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-ident.rq

14:48:33 [AndyS_]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-reif.rq

14:48:38 [ericP]

second

14:48:49 [AndyS_]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/query.rq

14:48:51 [JosDeRoo]

JosDeRoo has joined #dawg

14:48:54 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to adopt dawg-construct-identity dawg-construct-subgraph dawg-construct-reification

14:49:04 [DanC]

so RESOLVED

14:49:37 [SerT]

testcase for my action is in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/

14:49:40 [AndyS_]

Jeen - we ought to email about the subgraph test more clearly

14:49:59 [DanC]

Regrets+ JosDeRoo

14:50:03 [DanC]

ok, Jos

14:50:04 [SerT]

that was about maintaining bnode coreferences in answersets

14:50:18 [DanC]

sergio, is that a different test, related to this agendum?

14:50:30 [JosDeRoo]

thanks DanC

14:50:31 [jeen]

andyS, in relation to the requirements you mean?

14:50:33 [SerT]

that was the one mentioned in the action

14:50:47 [SerT]

I added two testcases about construct

14:51:02 [SerT]

but there wasn't a specific action

14:51:33 [DanC]

is dawg-bnode-coreference ready?

14:51:36 [DanC]

AndyS says yes

14:51:42 [AndyS_]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Construct/query-subgraph.rq

14:51:55 [AndyS_]

That is a new test we needed to cover UC&R

14:52:07 [AndyS_]

(subgraph requirment)

14:52:07 [DanC]

Jeen 2nds dawg-bnode-coreference (in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/manifest.ttl _

14:53:30 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to adopt dawg-bnode-coreference (in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/BNodes/manifest.ttl )

14:53:46 [DanC]

so RESOLVED.

14:54:58 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

14:54:58 [Zakim]

agendum 3. "Toward CR: protocol editing, etc." taken up [from DanC]

14:55:25 [JanneS]

ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL [ CONTINUED ]

14:55:26 [LeeF]

haven't gotten to it yet

14:55:31 [LeeF]

this week hopefully

14:55:39 [JanneS]

ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results. [ CONTINUED ]

14:55:46 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html WSD WG comments

14:56:06 [LeeF]

zakim, LeeF is with EliasT

14:56:06 [Zakim]

+LeeF; got it

14:56:44 [ericP]

LeeF, while you're in the validating mindset, you may want to run the WSDL1.1 through HugoH's 1.1=>2.0 xslt service

14:57:09 [LeeF]

yes, I suppose I may want to do that

14:57:10 [LeeF]

:-)

14:57:25 [ericP]

of *course* you do

14:58:27 [DanC]

ACTION KC: change query/queryrequest names as requested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html

14:59:29 [DanC]

(maybe not)

15:00:33 [DanC]

action -10

15:02:35 [DanC]

ACTION KC: confirm that SPARQL WSDL query/queryrequest and maxOccurs do not need to be changed, despite http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html

15:04:09 [LeeF]

sure

15:06:09 [DanC]

KC is not aware of any substantive changes to SPARQL WSDL that he's inclined to make

15:06:18 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

15:06:18 [Zakim]

agendum 4. "Toward CR: exit criteria" taken up [from DanC]

15:06:56 [JanneS]

ACTION: SteveH and AndyS to map approved tests to UC&R features. DONE in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0455.html ?

15:07:13 [DanC]

ACTION AndyS: conjure some LIMIT/OFFSET tests

15:07:31 [SteveH]

done as fas as im concerned

15:08:21 [JanneS]

ACTION: DanC to noodle on SOAP exit criteria [ DONE during teleconf ]

15:08:41 [DanC]

since (a) we have a WSDL requirement, (b) we're resolved to have a test for every requirement by CR exit

15:08:49 [DanC]

Zakim, next item

15:08:49 [Zakim]

agendum 5. "Toward CR, comments, misc" taken up [from DanC]

15:09:29 [JanneS]

ACTION: DanC to respond to major technical: underspecified errors

15:10:34 [JanneS]

DanC: are there still major issues from Oracle?

15:10:49 [DanC]

old last comment status: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2006Mar/att-0022/lc-status-report.html__charset_us-ascii

15:13:27 [DanC]

(Janne, pls note these arguments?)

15:13:29 [DanC]

(or somebody?)

15:13:49 [JanneS]

Oracle's implementation elaborated: identifier length problem related to colum name length

15:14:02 [Zakim]

-jeen

15:14:33 [JanneS]

Souripriya thinks there isn't an issue with this, though. Internal discussions to take place within oracle

15:15:36 [DanC]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html major technical: underspecified errors

15:15:37 [JanneS]

DanC: another issue is the underspecified errors in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html

15:16:07 [kendallclark]

wow, I can't hear Eric at all.

15:17:21 [JanneS]

Kendall: we've rather taken light-weight approach to describing errors (instead of enumerating lots of them)

15:18:19 [AndyS_]

QL doc defines what SPARQL *is* - if anything gets outside what it *is* then it isn't SPARQL and what happens is not defined by the spec.

15:18:35 [JanneS]

DanC: planning to give one week now for organizations to get ready for entering CR

15:18:38 [DanC]

# ACTION: DanC to respond to major technical: underspecified errors [WITHDRAWN]

15:18:53 [DanC]

ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments

15:19:19 [EnricoFranconi]

I guess so

15:19:25 [AndyS_]

e.g. It's an RDQL query - could choose to find the RDQL parser to be helpful but it's not SPARQL anymore

15:19:43 [EnricoFranconi]

yes

15:20:23 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html comment status 1.68

15:20:47 [DanC]

ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments [WITHDRAWN]

15:21:20 [kendallclark]

they were legion :0

15:21:23 [kendallclark]

erp, :>

15:22:33 [JanneS]

Kendall: from experience PPS's comments help us find bugs

15:22:52 [JanneS]

DanC: PPS's comments could be converted to test cases at best

15:23:19 [DanC]

I'm inclined to mark his comments [needstest], but not critical to CR

15:24:00 [JanneS]

('at best' not good English in my previous note, oh well)

15:24:19 [ericP]

please

15:24:35 [JanneS]

# ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier Corby], potentially automating examples2tests progress [CONTINUED ]

15:24:46 [JanneS]

ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier Corby], potentially automating examples2tests progress [ CONTINUED ]

15:25:41 [DanC]

# ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. Note: the thread is closed as of 14 March [DONE]

15:25:48 [JanneS]

ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. DONE

15:26:38 [Zakim]

-SteveH

15:26:45 [DanC]

ACTION DanC: send [OK?] msg to 2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider on Section 1 and Section 2, basically, [needstest]

15:27:33 [ericP]

sweet!

15:27:35 [JanneS]

AndyS: Lee sent OK msg already to that

15:27:45 [DanC]

bonus points to lee http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0001.html

15:27:59 [LeeF]

right

15:28:35 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 cr request, 1.21

15:28:40 [JanneS]

ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: CR request, in progress

15:30:15 [DanC]

1.114 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/Overview.html

15:30:17 [SteveH]

are we going beyond 1530Z?

15:30:32 [DanC]

. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl

15:31:12 [DanC]

sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:14:45

15:31:14 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

15:31:17 [DanC]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd

15:31:20 [SteveH]

Zakim, IPcaller is SteveH

15:31:20 [Zakim]

+SteveH; got it

15:31:29 [DanC]

sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:15:22

15:31:35 [SteveH]

zakim, mute me

15:31:35 [Zakim]

SteveH should now be muted

15:32:50 [DanC]

AndyS: overview, defns, parsers

15:33:04 [ericP]

how about this examples.hmtl that i'm working on?

15:33:29 [DanC]

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ results format 1.78 $ of $Date: 2006/01/04 15:59:22

15:33:35 [ericP]

specifically, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/examples

15:33:36 [ericP]

yes

15:33:40 [AndyS_]

Overview: 1.664

15:34:00 [ericP]

ok, drop it

15:34:09 [ericP]

right

15:34:12 [AndyS_]

Defns: v1.3

15:34:32 [AndyS_]

Parsers: its a directory

15:34:42 [JanneS]

DanC: planning to go CR on March-29

15:35:24 [ericP]

i can make a read-only bit in ycaker

15:35:26 [ericP]

yacker

15:36:27 [ericP]

i can vouch for the C and C++ versions as well

15:36:33 [ericP]

yup

15:36:48 [DanC]

ACTION: check in C and C++ generated grammars.

15:37:09 [ericP]

hmm, i guess diff would work

15:37:23 [AndyS_]

BNF is v1.1

15:37:44 [DanC]

rq23/parsers/sparql.bnf 1.1, concur

15:39:01 [EliasT]

currently swapping

15:39:02 [DanC]

Zakim, who's on the phone?

15:39:02 [Zakim]

On the phone I see DanC, AndyS_, JanneS, EliasT, Kendall_Clark, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP, SteveH (muted)

15:39:04 [Zakim]

EliasT has Elias, LeeF

15:39:37 [JanneS]

Looking for todo items @@ in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349

15:43:05 [JanneS]

DanC: there are no process requirements for a minimum duration, rather just market acceptance with a reasonable time window such as 2 months

15:43:10 [DanC]

several advise in favor of 30 May 2006

15:43:11 [JanneS]

Kendall: 2 months a reasonable minimum

15:43:45 [JanneS]

AndyS: we could look for implementations outside the WG members for more credibility

15:43:57 [DanC]

CR exit critera += XQuery F&O to PR

15:44:49 [JanneS]

DanC: there is risk that the XQuery dependency will delay our CR

15:45:17 [JanneS]

(this scribe should finish in 5 mins, if that's ok)

15:46:11 [JanneS]

DanC: @@ XML Query review comments: done

15:46:38 [JanneS]

DanC: @@ dependency on WSDL 2.0: Kendall coordinating

15:46:55 [kendallclark]

I will certainly know for sure before the drop-dead point.

15:47:40 [JanneS]

DanC: @@ no changes to protocol since Jan WD: confirmed

15:48:45 [JanneS]

Klyne's comment : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Apr/0010.html

15:49:36 [ericP]

does it? cwm?

15:49:47 [ericP]

doing it by quads

15:52:09 [EnricoFranconi]

bye!

15:52:22 [Zakim]

-EnricoFranconi

15:52:23 [kendallclark]

we failed at any supererogation. big woop.

15:52:25 [AndyS_]

cwm stores "literal graphs"

15:52:33 [SerT]

got to leave...

15:52:49 [DanC]

"WG will enter the second phase in which it will write a formal specification and test cases for this language."

15:53:31 [kendallclark]

and "formal specification" is a bit vague

15:54:30 [kendallclark]

do we have any flowery language anywhere?! :>

15:56:25 [SteveH]

I still the the design in the spec. is bad

15:57:14 [ericP]

we don't have to worry about hayes's objection?

15:57:16 [ericP]

cool!

15:57:33 [ericP]

i think unicode prob is solved

15:58:10 [ericP]

he has no new info. all the old info on $ vs ? is still relevent

15:59:15 [kendallclark]

i've heard *no* complaints from actual implementers or sparql trainers on the ?/$ point.

15:59:24 [kendallclark]

harold's point notwithstanding

15:59:34 [kendallclark]

he's only claimed that he thinks this will confuse, not that it confuses.

15:59:46 [DanC]

WBS form http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/

16:00:09 [ericP]

if steve has a formal objection to SPARQL Query, does he have a formal objection to going to CR?

16:00:26 [JanneS]

DanC: in CR WG is still formally obliged to respond to all comments

16:00:28 [ericP]

(danc)

16:00:43 [DanC]

PROPOSED: to advance SPARQL to CR as discussed in this meeting, contingent on successful outcomes of actions in this meeting.

16:00:59 [DanC]

responses to proposal to be gathered via http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/

16:01:22 [DanC]

you'll get "please fill out the form" notice in email today.

16:01:39 [SteveH]

will fill in form

16:02:05 [DanC]

ACTION: Jeen to figure out whether he can become test case editor and report back by telecon on Mar 14 [DONE]

16:02:21 [ericP]

2nd

16:02:22 [JanneS]

2nded

16:02:24 [DanC]

ADJOURN.

16:02:32 [Zakim]

-Souri

16:02:36 [Zakim]

-SteveH

16:02:43 [JanneS]

Zakim, who WAS on the phone

16:02:46 [Zakim]

I don't understand 'who WAS on the phone', JanneS

16:02:58 [Zakim]

-Kendall_Clark

16:03:04 [Zakim]

-EricP

16:03:09 [LeeF]

Zakim, list attendees

16:03:23 [Zakim]

As of this point the attendees have been +1.617.894.aaaa, DanC, LeeF, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH, JanneS, Kendall_Clark, Elias, EliasT, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP

16:03:54 [Zakim]

-JanneS

16:04:03 [AndyS_]

Interest here in a RDF/JSON

16:04:27 [Zakim]

-EliasT

16:04:33 [Zakim]

-DanC

16:04:45 [Zakim]

-AndyS_

16:04:48 [AndyS_]

AndyS_ has left #dawg

16:04:57 [Zakim]

SW_DAWG()9:30AM has ended

16:05:01 [Zakim]

Attendees were +1.617.894.aaaa, DanC, LeeF, AndyS_, jeen, SteveH, JanneS, Kendall_Clark, Elias, EliasT, Souri, EnricoFranconi, EricP

16:05:38 [DanC]

RRSAgent, make logs world-access

16:05:45 [DanC]

RRSAgent, pointer?

16:05:45 [RRSAgent]

See http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc#T16-05-45

16:09:19 [JosDeRoo]

JosDeRoo has left #dawg

16:15:56 [DanC]

RRSAgent, stop