20:44:51 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr
20:44:51 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-ws-addr-irc
20:45:10 <bob> zakim, this will be ws_addrwg
20:45:10 <Zakim> ok, bob; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 15 minutes
20:45:39 <bob> Meeting: Web Services Addressing WG Teleconference
20:45:54 <bob> Chair: Bob Freund
20:47:26 <bob> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/7D5D3FDA429F4D469ADF210408D6245A0390D2@jeeves.freunds.com
20:49:27 <Jonathan> Jonathan has joined #ws-addr
20:55:14 <Zakim> WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started
20:55:20 <prasad> prasad has joined #ws-Addr
20:55:21 <Zakim> +Bob_Freund
20:57:10 <David_Illsley> David_Illsley has joined #ws-addr
20:58:11 <Zakim> +Jonathan_Marsh
20:58:14 <Zakim> -Bob_Freund
20:58:16 <Zakim> +Bob_Freund
20:59:09 <Zakim> +David_Illsley
20:59:28 <Zakim> +Hugo
21:00:50 <marc> marc has joined #ws-addr
21:02:00 <Nilo> Nilo has joined #ws-addr
21:02:29 <Katy> Katy has joined #ws-addr
21:02:43 <Zakim> +??P3
21:02:44 <Zakim> +Prasad_Yendluri
21:02:52 <yinleng> yinleng has joined #ws-addr
21:02:54 <Zakim> +Nilo
21:02:57 <Zakim> +Paul_Downey
21:03:20 <Zakim> +Andreas_Bjarlestam
21:04:17 <Zakim> +Dave_Hull
21:04:34 <Zakim> +[IBM]
21:04:38 <pauld> zakim, who is ??P3
21:04:38 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is ??P3', pauld
21:04:43 <dhull> dhull has joined #ws-addr
21:04:56 <Zakim> +Tom_Rutt
21:05:00 <pauld> zakim, IBM contains Paco
21:05:00 <Zakim> +Paco; got it
21:05:01 <dhull> issue MM01: Does anyone else have BC in the final four?
21:05:16 <dhull> issue MM02: Is 'Nova really that good?
21:05:19 <Zakim> + +44.196.286.aaaa - is perhaps Katy_Warr?
21:05:35 <Zakim> + +44.796.805.aabb
21:05:51 <TRutt> TRutt has joined #ws-addr
21:05:57 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
21:06:31 <bob> zakim aabb is mlittle
21:06:32 <pauld> zakim, aabb is Mark_Little
21:06:32 <Zakim> +Mark_Little; got it
21:06:44 <Zakim> +Pete_Wenzel
21:06:44 <pauld> zakim, aaaa is really Katy_Warr
21:06:45 <Zakim> sorry, pauld, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'
21:06:54 <bob> zakim Microsoft is vernal
21:07:16 <pauld> zakim, you bloody well should know aaaa
21:07:16 <Zakim> I don't understand 'you bloody well should know aaaa', pauld
21:07:18 <Zakim> +??P15
21:07:30 <Zakim> +Vikas_Deolaliker
21:08:10 <vikas> vikas has joined #ws-addr
21:08:15 <Zakim> -Mark_Little
21:08:25 <yinleng> zakim, ??P15 is me
21:08:25 <Zakim> +yinleng; got it
21:08:44 <Pete> Pete has joined #ws-addr
21:09:15 <Paco> Paco has joined #ws-addr
21:09:17 <pauld> zakim, who is here?
21:09:17 <Zakim> On the phone I see Bob_Freund, Jonathan_Marsh, David_Illsley, Hugo, ??P3, Prasad_Yendluri, Paul_Downey, Nilo, Andreas_Bjarlestam (muted), Dave_Hull, [IBM], Tom_Rutt, Katy_Warr?
21:09:20 <Zakim> ... (muted), [Microsoft], Pete_Wenzel, yinleng, Vikas_Deolaliker
21:09:22 <Zakim> [IBM] has Paco
21:09:23 <Zakim> On IRC I see Paco, vikas, TRutt, dhull, yinleng, Katy, Nilo, marc, David_Illsley, prasad, Jonathan, RRSAgent, Zakim, bob, pauld, hugo
21:09:27 <Zakim> -??P3
21:10:05 <Zakim> +Dave_Orchard
21:11:43 <Zakim> +GlenD
21:12:44 <Zakim> +??P13
21:13:39 <TonyR> TonyR has joined #ws-addr
21:13:55 <TonyR> zakim, who is on the phone?
21:13:55 <Zakim> On the phone I see Bob_Freund, Jonathan_Marsh, David_Illsley, Hugo, Prasad_Yendluri, Paul_Downey, Nilo, Andreas_Bjarlestam (muted), Dave_Hull, [IBM], Tom_Rutt, Katy_Warr? (muted),
21:13:58 <Zakim> ... [Microsoft], Pete_Wenzel, yinleng, Vikas_Deolaliker, Dave_Orchard, GlenD, ??P13
21:13:59 <Zakim> [IBM] has Paco
21:14:09 <TonyR> zakim, ??p13 is me
21:14:09 <Zakim> +TonyR; got it
21:14:25 <Zakim> +Steve_Vinoski
21:15:03 <vinoski> vinoski has joined #ws-addr
21:15:34 <dorchard> dorchard has joined #ws-addr
21:20:39 <Zakim> +Marc_Hadley
21:21:24 <pauld> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/report/
21:24:07 <bob> ack hu
21:27:49 <TonyR> zakim, who is making noise
21:27:49 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is making noise', TonyR
21:27:51 <TonyR> zakim, who is making noise?
21:28:02 <Zakim> TonyR, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Bob_Freund (67%), GlenD (23%)
21:29:46 <bob> Following a discussion with the Director about cr3, I would like to make the following suggestion to the Working Group to strengthen the text about xml:id by replacing: 
21:29:46 <bob>  
21:29:46 <bob>   Attribute extensibility allows use of xml:id[xml:id] for 
21:29:46 <bob>   identification of these elements if desired. 
21:29:46 <bob>  
21:29:48 <bob> by: 
21:29:50 <bob>  Hugo's proposal
21:29:52 <bob>   An xml:id[xml:id] attribute SHOULD be used for identification of 
21:29:54 <bob>   these elements when desired, as allowed by the attribute 
21:29:56 <bob>   extensibility. 
21:32:27 <andreas> andreas has joined #ws-addr
21:34:40 <bob> zakim, who is making noise
21:34:40 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is making noise', bob
21:34:52 <pauld> "This is an apparent flaw in the design of Canonical XML. The Exclusive XML Canonicalization Version 1.0 specification does not have this feature and may be more appropriate for documents containing IDs."
21:35:15 <bob> zakim, who is making noise?
21:35:16 <pauld> from: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/
21:35:26 <Zakim> bob, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Jonathan_Marsh (65%), Dave_Orchard (4%), Nilo (14%), GlenD (24%)
21:35:28 <pauld> http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicSecurityProfile-1.0.html#Canonicalization
21:36:03 <pauld> says use exclusive canonicalisation
21:36:13 <bob> Resolution: close with no action
21:37:06 <bob> Hugo's email on note:
21:37:09 <bob> I would like to discuss the status section of the SOAP 1.1 Request Optional Response HTTP Binding document (current draft at [1]). 
21:37:09 <bob>  
21:37:09 <bob> The status section needs to contain some customized text about the document and what the document is intended to do with it, which was unclear to me based on our discussion at the F2F[2]. 
21:37:09 <bob>  
21:37:10 <bob> More to the point, I would like to know how to deal with comments, and suggest that it would make sense to publish as a Working Draft first before retiring the document as a Working Group Note. 
21:44:18 <bob> Resolution: accept Hugo's proposal, open comments for minimum window & coordinate with XMLP
21:45:09 <bob> Jonathan's point:
21:45:35 <bob> Jonathan's issue on cr namespace:Core spec section 1.2 says: "The Working Group intends to maintain the value of the Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core namespace URI that was assigned in the Candidate Recommendation unless significant changes are made that impact the implementation of the specification." 
21:45:35 <bob>  
21:45:35 <bob> I assume this can be removed in the PR version.  Possibly the RDDL document could use some updated language about the final namespace URI too. 
21:46:39 <TRutt> q+
21:47:26 <bob> ack tr
21:49:24 <bob> Resolutions: clean up elements without changing namespace
21:50:08 <bob> Section 3.2.1 states: 
21:50:08 <bob>  
21:50:08 <bob>   
21:50:08 <bob>  
21:50:08 <bob> Comparison of [destination] property values is out of scope, other than using simple string comparison to detect whether the value is anonymous, that is, where [destination] has the value "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous". 
21:50:11 <bob>  
21:50:13 <bob>   
21:50:15 <bob>  
21:50:18 <bob> I don’t believe this changed when we added the “none” URI, though it probably should have.  A complete solution would allow both anon and none URIs to be detected through simple string comparison: 
21:50:20 <bob>  
21:50:22 <bob>   
21:50:24 <bob>  
21:50:26 <bob> Comparison of [destination] property values is out of scope, other than using simple string comparison to detect whether the value is anonymous, that is, where [destination] has one of the values "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous" or “http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none”. 
21:50:30 <bob>  
21:50:32 <bob>   
21:50:34 <bob>  
21:50:36 <bob> This is unfortunately probably related to the implementation of a LC issue rather than a CR one. 
21:50:38 <bob>  
21:50:40 <bob> abve is quoted from Jonathan's email
21:50:42 <bob> s/clean up/remove/
21:51:09 <dhull> q+
21:51:38 <bob> ack dh
21:52:34 <bob> Resolution: Close with no action
21:52:57 <bob> Jonathan's comment re infoset
21:52:59 <bob> The reference in the Core and SOAP bindings to the Infoset is to the first edition.  Should they not be to the second edition instead?
21:54:42 <bob> Resolution: Hugo will fix this other stale references
21:55:49 <bob> Topic: Glen's issue "Where do faults go?"
21:56:31 <dhull> q+
21:57:20 <dhull> q-
21:57:34 <dhull> q+
21:59:21 <bob> ack dh
22:01:37 <dorchard> What about generating a relatesTo for each messageID?
22:02:12 <dorchard> From a common sense, it does "relate to" each of the message ids...
22:06:23 <dorchard> Our job is to deal with edge cases.  that's 90+% of specs is the edge cases.
22:08:15 <bob> Glen's comments / proposal on the topic
22:08:19 <bob> I'd propose we fix this by adding something like the following at the end of the last paragraph in section 3.2: "In that case, any duplicated headers MUST NOT be used to populate the appropriate MAPs - the MAPs should be interpreted as if no such headers were present."  I *think* this should do it, and since we're already clear about the lack of an explicit FaultTo causing faults to go to ReplyTo, I think we're covered there. 
22:08:19 <bob>  
22:08:19 <bob> I'd also like to add, for clarity, section headings for the last two paragraphs of section 3.2: 
22:08:19 <bob>  
22:08:21 <bob> 3.2.1 Sending Messages 
22:08:23 <bob>  
22:08:25 <bob> 3.2.2 Receiving Messages 
22:16:58 <marc> A recipient MUST generate a wsa:InvalidAddressingHeader (see 016.4.1 Invalid Addressing Header) fault if such a message is received and any header with an incorrect cardinality MUST be ignored.
22:18:44 <GlenD> GlenD has joined #ws-addr
22:20:53 <marc> A recipient MUST generate a wsa:InvalidAddressingHeader (see 6.4.1 Invalid Addressing Header) fault if such a message is received; headers with an incorrect cardinality are not used to populate the corresponding abstract properties.
22:21:18 <GlenD> Alternate proposal - replace 2nd sentence with
22:21:19 <GlenD> If a message contains more than one wsa:To [...] targeted at a recipient, the corresponding property MUST NOT be populated.
22:22:49 <dhull> brb
22:23:38 <marc> A recipient MUST generate a wsa:InvalidAddressingHeader (see 6.4.1 Invalid Addressing Header) fault if such a message is received; headers with an incorrect cardinality MUST NOT be used to populate the corresponding abstract properties.
22:24:30 <bob> Resolution: accept text above
22:25:06 <bob> 3.2.1 Sending Messages 
22:25:06 <bob>   
22:25:06 <bob>  3.2.2 Receiving Messages 
22:25:58 <bob> Resolution: accept above changes
22:27:02 <bob> Resolution: take core and soap to PR
22:29:08 <bob> Resolution: Hugo clarifies that WG note may be published without comment period
22:29:28 <marc> ed copy updated:http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#s12moduledesc
22:30:47 <dorchard> gEt LoSt
22:31:41 <dorchard> Sometimes called "alternating character camel-case v2"
22:35:24 <Zakim> -Jonathan_Marsh
22:39:08 <Zakim> -Paul_Downey
22:39:37 <Zakim> -Andreas_Bjarlestam
22:39:39 <Zakim> -Tom_Rutt
22:39:39 <Zakim> -Dave_Orchard
22:39:40 <Zakim> -Bob_Freund
22:39:41 <Zakim> -Steve_Vinoski
22:39:43 <Zakim> -GlenD
22:39:44 <Zakim> -Marc_Hadley
22:39:45 <Zakim> -Dave_Hull
22:39:46 <vinoski> vinoski has left #ws-addr
22:39:46 <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
22:39:48 <Zakim> -Hugo
22:39:49 <Zakim> -yinleng
22:39:50 <Zakim> -Pete_Wenzel
22:39:52 <Zakim> -Prasad_Yendluri
22:39:54 <Zakim> -David_Illsley
22:39:56 <Zakim> -Katy_Warr?
22:39:56 <yinleng> yinleng has left #ws-addr
22:39:58 <Zakim> -TonyR
22:40:00 <Zakim> -Vikas_Deolaliker
22:40:28 <Zakim> -[IBM]
22:41:28 <bob> Scribe: Pete
22:41:34 <bob> thanks pete for scribing
22:41:52 <bob> rrsagent, make logs public
22:42:12 <bob> rrsagent, generate minutes
22:42:12 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/13-ws-addr-minutes.html bob
22:43:50 <Zakim> -Nilo
22:43:51 <Zakim> WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has ended
22:43:52 <Zakim> Attendees were Bob_Freund, Jonathan_Marsh, David_Illsley, Hugo, Prasad_Yendluri, Nilo, Paul_Downey, Andreas_Bjarlestam, Dave_Hull, Tom_Rutt, Paco, +44.196.286.aaaa,
22:43:56 <Zakim> ... +44.796.805.aabb, [Microsoft], Mark_Little, Pete_Wenzel, Vikas_Deolaliker, yinleng, Dave_Orchard, GlenD, TonyR, Steve_Vinoski, Marc_Hadley