IRC log of swbp on 2006-03-06

Timestamps are in UTC.

17:58:21 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #swbp
17:58:21 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc
17:58:23 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #swbp
17:58:31 [RalphS]
Meeting: SWBPD WG
17:58:49 [RalphS]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0010.html
17:59:06 [RalphS]
Previous: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/20-swbp-minutes.html 2006-02-20
17:59:18 [RalphS]
zakim, this will be swbp
17:59:18 [Zakim]
ok, RalphS; I see SW_BPD()1:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute
18:01:05 [JeffP]
JeffP has joined #swbp
18:01:08 [Zakim]
SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started
18:01:15 [Zakim]
+??P0
18:01:17 [Zakim]
-??P0
18:01:18 [Zakim]
SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended
18:01:19 [Zakim]
Attendees were
18:01:28 [Zakim]
SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started
18:01:31 [Zakim]
+Libby_Miller
18:01:42 [Zakim]
+Ralph
18:01:44 [Zakim]
-Ralph
18:01:45 [Zakim]
+Ralph
18:02:07 [Zakim]
+??P3
18:02:09 [Zakim]
+Alistair_Miles (was ??P3)
18:02:22 [Zakim]
+JeffP
18:02:42 [Zakim]
+David_Wood
18:02:44 [Benjamin]
Hi all I wont be joining by phone, on IRC only tonight
18:03:03 [aliman]
zakim, alistair is really me
18:03:03 [Zakim]
+aliman; got it
18:03:04 [JeffP]
Hi Ben
18:03:18 [dwood]
dwood has joined #swbp
18:03:52 [raphael]
raphael has joined #swbp
18:03:54 [raphael]
hi all
18:04:01 [libby]
zakim, mute me
18:04:01 [Zakim]
Libby_Miller should now be muted
18:04:37 [dwood]
Regrets: Deb McGuinness, Elisa Kendall, Ben Adida, Gary Ng, Benjamin Nguyen (IRC only), Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Chris Halaschek, David Booth (expected to be 30 minutes late), Tom Baker, Giorgos Stamou
18:04:41 [Zakim]
+??P5
18:04:50 [guusschreiber]
guusschreiber has joined #swbp
18:04:50 [RalphS]
zakim, ??p5 is Raphael
18:04:50 [Zakim]
+Raphael; got it
18:05:10 [raphael]
zakim, mute me
18:05:10 [Zakim]
Raphael should now be muted
18:05:41 [RalphS]
zakim, nominate a victim
18:05:41 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose aliman
18:05:49 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Ralph
18:05:56 [RalphS]
Scribe: Ralph
18:06:03 [RalphS]
ScribeNick: RalphS
18:07:18 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
18:07:35 [RalphS]
zakim, ipcaller is Guus
18:07:35 [Zakim]
+Guus; got it
18:07:50 [RalphS]
zakim, mute guus temporarily
18:07:50 [Zakim]
Guus should now be muted
18:08:06 [Zakim]
Guus should now be unmuted again
18:08:43 [RalphS]
zakim, mute guus
18:08:43 [Zakim]
Guus should now be muted
18:08:55 [RalphS]
Chair: DavidW
18:09:04 [guusschreiber]
im on the phone
18:09:06 [RalphS]
Topic: Admin
18:09:11 [dwood]
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 20 Feb 2005 telecon:
18:09:11 [dwood]
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/20-swbp-minutes.html
18:09:15 [guusschreiber]
second
18:09:33 [RalphS]
RESOLVED to accept the minutes of the 20 Feb 2005 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/20-swbp-minutes.html
18:09:35 [dwood]
PROPOSED next meeting 20 March 2006
18:09:59 [guusschreiber]
I'm at risk
18:10:05 [dwood]
me, too
18:10:28 [RalphS]
RESOLVED next meeting 20 March 2006
18:10:28 [guusschreiber]
I can do the agenda
18:10:42 [RalphS]
DavidW is at risk
18:10:47 [RalphS]
Ralph backup chair
18:11:14 [RalphS]
zakim, who's on the call?
18:11:14 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Libby_Miller (muted), Ralph, aliman, JeffP, David_Wood, Raphael (muted), Guus (muted)
18:11:25 [RalphS]
Topic: 3. TASK FORCE UPDATES
18:11:32 [Benjamin]
on IRC only
18:11:33 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL
18:11:51 [RalphS]
Alistair: I've just written up a few issues; flagging them as place-holders
18:11:56 [RalphS]
... these don't have to be resolved immediately
18:12:05 [RalphS]
... see SKOS Core Proposals and Issues
18:12:16 [guusschreiber]
q+ to ask for each TF their plan for May i finish
18:12:19 [RalphS]
... I've also hacked-up a validator for SKOS
18:12:26 [RalphS]
... see SKOS Core home page
18:12:37 [RalphS]
... a Chinese translation of labels and comments has been contributed
18:12:55 [chalaschek]
chalaschek has joined #swbp
18:12:57 [RalphS]
... it's a quite meticulous bit of work
18:13:18 [RalphS]
... last week at the face-to-face we had two very good discussions about some of the SKOS open issues
18:13:34 [RalphS]
... 1. whether or not SKOS Core can be imported into an OWL ontology
18:13:48 [RalphS]
... 2. the relationship between SKOS and OWL
18:13:49 [Zakim]
-Guus
18:14:16 [RalphS]
... if you have a SKOS thesaurus and and OWL ontology that cover the same area, how do you assert relationships between the two?
18:14:26 [RalphS]
... I don't consider either of these vital to the immediate success of SKOS
18:14:47 [RalphS]
... the question of whether we expect to get a third SKOS WD out in the lifetime of this WG is still open
18:15:03 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
18:15:03 [RalphS]
DavidW: I suggest RFC 2119 MUST/MAY/SHOULD language
18:15:21 [RalphS]
... this defines useful keywords
18:15:46 [guusschreiber]
zakim, [IPcaller] is Guus
18:15:46 [Zakim]
+Guus; got it
18:15:46 [RalphS]
... referencing this RFC and using those terms is consistent with other specs
18:17:42 [RalphS]
... if we do a third WD it won't have substantive changes to SKOS Core, mostly a new appendix on extension
18:18:00 [RalphS]
... beyond May, resolution of issues on Issues and Proposals list
18:18:10 [dwood]
zakim, I am David_Wood
18:18:10 [Zakim]
ok, dwood, I now associate you with David_Wood
18:18:21 [RalphS]
... if proposal to do a SKOS Recommendation goes ahead, I would like to write a Use Cases and Requirements document
18:18:27 [RalphS]
... this would take a couple of months to do
18:18:44 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns
18:19:30 [raphael]
zakim, unmute me
18:19:30 [Zakim]
Raphael should no longer be muted
18:19:36 [dwood]
ack guus
18:19:36 [Zakim]
guusschreiber, you wanted to ask for each TF their plan for May i finish
18:19:36 [RalphS]
Guus: there's progress on the Semantic Interoperability note
18:19:39 [dwood]
q?
18:19:41 [RalphS]
... Mike sent a link to the new draft
18:19:48 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10]
18:20:08 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0170.html Mike's review
18:20:25 [RalphS]
Raphael: I will do my review during the week
18:20:36 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review Semantic Integration note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
18:21:07 [RalphS]
ACTION: Guus remind Giorgos, Fabien, and Phil that their review of Semantic Interoperability editor's draft should now commence
18:21:21 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
18:21:44 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
18:21:50 [RalphS]
Guus: no progress report on part-whole note
18:23:04 [RalphS]
ACTION: Guus check with Elisa and Deb on which remaining OEP notes are feasible to complete by 1 May
18:23:18 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: Elisa/Chris to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and Alan) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
18:23:36 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.3 WordNet
18:23:53 [RalphS]
DavidW: Aldo is asking for an additional reviewer
18:24:08 [Benjamin]
I can review
18:25:01 [RalphS]
ACTION: Benjamin review WordNet editor's draft
18:25:19 [aliman]
zakim, mute me
18:25:19 [Zakim]
aliman should now be muted
18:25:45 [RalphS]
Benjamin, Guus wonders if you can complete the review before the next telecon?
18:25:58 [RalphS]
(please :)
18:26:04 [Benjamin]
sure I can ralph
18:26:08 [RalphS]
thanks
18:27:11 [RalphS]
Guus: my target is to publish the current editor's draft as a WD by 1 May
18:27:30 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes
18:27:38 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: DavidW prod Evan for his comments on the XSCH Editor's Draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/20-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
18:27:45 [RalphS]
[DONE] ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ by next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
18:28:21 [RalphS]
Jeff: Evan's comments were mostly editorial
18:28:27 [RalphS]
... I added some to section 3.6
18:29:05 [RalphS]
Ralph: I reported my quick review at the previous telecon
18:29:13 [RalphS]
... I'm comfortable publishing
18:29:39 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0007.html Evan's review
18:30:31 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0009.html Jeff's response to Evan's comments
18:31:17 [RalphS]
PROPOSE to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ as a Working Group Note
18:31:47 [RalphS]
Guus: did we give sufficient notice on the agenda of this motion?
18:32:07 [RalphS]
Ralph: we sheduled this meeting last time with the expectation we would have the reviewer's comments
18:32:22 [RalphS]
RESOLVED to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ as a Working Group Note
18:32:33 [RalphS]
ACTION: Ralph to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ as a Working Group Note
18:33:20 [RalphS]
DavidW: any other documents from XSCH TF?
18:33:22 [RalphS]
Jeff: no
18:34:00 [RalphS]
RESOLVED: XSCH TF is closed with thanks to Jeremy and Jeff
18:34:14 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management
18:35:10 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: Tom find a place for the footnote on "simplest" recipe [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/20-swbp-minutes.html#action16]
18:35:20 [RalphS]
Ralph: Tom wants to talk about this before making a change
18:35:30 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0008.html [VM] Action to add 303-redirect reference
18:35:37 [aliman]
zakim, unmute me
18:35:37 [Zakim]
aliman should no longer be muted
18:36:15 [aliman]
ralph: re both rdfhtml and vmtf ... the docs we want to publish are still in the pipeline, hope to be done within a few days ...
18:37:14 [aliman]
re rdf/a, we discovered semantics of rdf lists, unordered lists are like rdf:bag, ordered lists are like rdf:seq, navigation bag like rdf:alt ...
18:37:26 [Zakim]
+DBooth
18:37:38 [aliman]
so we proposed adding this to the rdf/a semantics, as syntactic sugar for constructing these, decided to proceed ...
18:37:43 [aliman]
q+ re bags etc
18:37:51 [aliman]
q+ to talk about re bags etc
18:38:24 [aliman]
... html wg expected to have published ??? last week ... but not published yet. Authoritative spec of RDF/A will be there.
18:39:01 [aliman]
... productive discussion of rdf/a at htmlwg last week, mostly discussed marketing and educational activities now that we're settled on the design ...
18:39:54 [aliman]
also from discussion last week it's clear there's a lot of interest in xhtml 1.1 module for rdf/a ... tf had this on the back burner ...
18:40:05 [danbri]
danbri has joined #swbp
18:40:20 [aliman]
in recent discussions steve pemberton was opinion you can't do enough of rdf/a under constraints of xhtml 1.1 modullarisation ...
18:40:49 [aliman]
he's now changed his opinion, so task force resolved to take up this work item and actively look into xhtml 1.1 module for some subset of rdf/a ...
18:41:23 [aliman]
mark birbeck has action to do first draft ... a couple of issues we're looking into. This is a new item we had expected to defer, but based on feedback from last week we're going to do more quickly.
18:41:29 [aliman]
guus: timing?
18:42:05 [aliman]
ralph: this tf is meeting weekly, mark did not give eta for his draft, but hope to have discussed how much of rdf/a can be put into xhtml 1.1 module within 2 weeks.
18:42:14 [aliman]
guus: publication of html wg or swbp wg?
18:42:59 [aliman]
ralph: still expectation that normative spec will come from html wg. html wg charter is up for renewal (along with swbp) not yet clear that rdf/a module is not in html wg charter, but it can now be added to html wg charter.
18:43:19 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
18:43:23 [aliman]
zakim, unmute me
18:43:23 [Zakim]
aliman should no longer be muted
18:44:06 [aliman]
ralph: in case the wg is not aware, a rough draft of semantic web activity charter was sent to AC on friday 24th feb ...
18:44:23 [aliman]
that draft notes several questions for the A/C before the final version ...
18:44:35 [aliman]
one question is where should the rdf/a work continue?
18:44:53 [aliman]
...exoectation that it will continue, but 24/3 draft does not say where.
18:44:58 [aliman]
dave: informal indications?
18:45:32 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos
18:45:36 [aliman]
ralph: encourage wg particpants to encourage their a/c reps to express opinion.
18:46:00 [dwood]
ack aliman
18:46:00 [Zakim]
aliman, you wanted to talk about re bags etc
18:46:13 [RalphS]
Alistair: everytime I've mentioned rdf:Bag or rdf:Seq people have said 'no!'
18:46:25 [RalphS]
... how widely has the idea of including this in RDF/A been considered?
18:46:37 [RalphS]
... I understand there are problems with these when merging RDF data
18:46:50 [RalphS]
... in SKOS we've decided to stay away from these
18:47:48 [RalphS]
Ralph: concern noted. The HTML TF believes the RDF semantics are identical to the HTML semantics
18:49:09 [RalphS]
... rdf Collections do not have the semantics of being closed w.r.t. a single document, nor does HTML
18:49:29 [RalphS]
DavidW: I concur with Alistair that there's been some nay-saying over the years
18:49:55 [RalphS]
... but I also concur that RDF and HTML seem to be in agreement on whether these are closed w.r.t. a single document
18:50:11 [RalphS]
Alistair: Bijan Parsia and Pat Hayes may have opinions on this
18:50:19 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos
18:50:33 [libby]
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/03-swbp-minutes.html#item02
18:50:36 [RalphS]
Libby: some discussion last Friday
18:50:55 [RalphS]
... summary is that we now have 40 items listed in DOAP on the page
18:51:05 [RalphS]
... this page has been quite successful
18:51:21 [RalphS]
... I took an action on Friday to update the description on the ADTF page
18:51:24 [libby]
(relatively speaking :)
18:51:36 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability
18:51:41 [RalphS]
(no representative)
18:51:43 [libby]
zakim, mute me
18:51:43 [Zakim]
Libby_Miller should now be muted
18:52:02 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0148.html Minutes of 21 Feb editor's meeting
18:52:18 [RalphS]
DavidW: are we comfortable that this TF can move along?
18:52:35 [RalphS]
Guus: my expectation was that they would produce the document that we currently have and anything else is a bonus
18:52:42 [RalphS]
DavidW: should we close the task force now then?
18:52:53 [RalphS]
Guus: they're still working on more, so let's let them proceed
18:54:50 [RalphS]
Ralph: we talked about each of the TFs on Friday; see those meeting records
18:55:02 [RalphS]
... personally, I think RDFTM is a candidate for an Incubator Group
18:55:18 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.9 Tutorial Page
18:55:27 [Benjamin]
I'd like to point to
18:55:31 [Benjamin]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0131.html
18:55:41 [Benjamin]
I set up a poll forum
18:55:59 [Benjamin]
noone has looked at it yet, so no comments on the value of our ressources on the tutorial page
18:56:00 [RalphS]
DavidW: there has not been much input to Benjamin's form
18:56:17 [Benjamin]
indeed David
18:56:22 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0131.html Tutorials page quality assessment
18:56:39 [RalphS]
DavidW: everyone please help Benjamin get feedback
18:56:43 [dwood]
http://akengro.t1hosting.co.uk/w3ctut/index.php
18:56:52 [Benjamin]
pages _should_ all be linked (checked last week) so I figure 404 error is temporary
18:57:16 [RalphS]
DavidW: I've gone through a few of the pages myself; more pages should be checked
18:57:39 [Benjamin]
If you want to pop your opinion on the pages you checked feel free to
18:57:52 [dwood]
will do
18:57:55 [Benjamin]
either vote / post if there is something specific to say about a page
18:58:05 [RalphS]
"pop" means "enter"?
18:58:18 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.10 SE - Software Engineering
18:58:19 [Benjamin]
write down, sorry ;)
18:58:22 [RalphS]
[PENDING] ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE Primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24]
18:58:45 [RalphS]
Ralph: we have Director's approval to publish
18:59:04 [RalphS]
Topic: 3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation
18:59:28 [RalphS]
Raphael: two telecons ago the TF agreed that the Image Annotaton document is ready for WD if Mike Uschold does not object
18:59:39 [RalphS]
... Mike sent comments and I answered them today
19:00:31 [raphael]
the answer of mike comments are ni http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0018.html and in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0019.html
19:01:50 [RalphS]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
19:02:00 [RalphS]
Raphael: what about the internal links in image_annotation?
19:02:36 [RalphS]
... and links to the second editor's draft
19:02:43 [RalphS]
Ralph: where are the links to the second editor's draft?
19:03:22 [raphael]
href="resources/interop.html"
19:04:49 [RalphS]
Ralph: we won't be able to publish a Technical Report that references other editors drafts in any significant way
19:05:49 [RalphS]
Raphael: two telecons ago the WG agreed to publish contingent on Mike's approval
19:06:01 [RalphS]
-> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27 RESOLUTION: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval of changes.
19:06:55 [RalphS]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0093.html [MM] Image Annotation for the Semantic web - Review [Mike]
19:07:26 [RalphS]
DavidW: have we checked the copyright permission on all the images?
19:07:35 [RalphS]
Raphael: only one image was a problem and we removed it
19:07:42 [RalphS]
... we have explicit permission on the others
19:08:03 [RalphS]
... these are archived in the WG mail archive
19:08:39 [RalphS]
Raphael: we've asked for another TF member to have write access to the TF pages
19:08:58 [guusschreiber]
[sorry, got called away]
19:09:47 [dwood]
The NASA image should be explicitly attributed to NASA in compliance with http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/copyright.html
19:11:28 [RalphS]
... this person would update the pages after the WG closes
19:12:14 [RalphS]
Ralph: the preference at this time is to have the WG materials frozen when the WG closes and for new work to be done under the charter of an Incubator Group
19:12:49 [RalphS]
... if the Incubator Group proposal is submitted within the next month, I think it is highly probable that there will be an XG approved before the end of this WG
19:13:17 [RalphS]
ACTION: Raphael confirm that the license message from NASA has been sent to the public WG list
19:13:47 [RalphS]
DavidW: even with the license email, the way I interpret the copyright statement we must explicitly attribute the image
19:14:05 [RalphS]
... just add the words "we got this from NASA"
19:14:39 [RalphS]
... the NASA copyright says "NASA must be acknowleged as the source of this image"
19:14:42 [Zakim]
-Guus
19:15:01 [RalphS]
ACTION: Raphael add NASA attribution text to the Image Annotation editor's draft
19:15:55 [RalphS]
ACTION: Ralph work with Raphael to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html as a Working Draft
19:16:31 [RalphS]
DavidW: what are the plans to finish this to Note by 1 May?
19:16:44 [RalphS]
Raphael: we do hope to get to Note by 1 May
19:16:50 [guusschreiber]
sorry. my telephone connection is gone
19:17:02 [RalphS]
... there is still a lot of work to do on second document on vocabularies for annotating multimedia
19:17:14 [RalphS]
... TF is not clear on how much we can do by the end of the WG
19:17:23 [RalphS]
... we have a telecon scheduled for next week to discuss
19:17:41 [guusschreiber]
suggest an action for chairs to prepare list of expected outcomes of SWBP for next telecon
19:17:46 [RalphS]
... so I won't guarantee that the second document will even be ready for review by the end of the WG
19:18:20 [RalphS]
ACTION: David and Guus prepare a list of expected outcomes of SWBP for 20 March telecon
19:18:39 [RalphS]
[adjourned]
19:18:41 [Zakim]
-Libby_Miller
19:18:42 [aliman]
thanks dave, bye all
19:18:45 [Benjamin]
bye all
19:18:45 [Zakim]
-DBooth
19:18:46 [Zakim]
-David_Wood
19:18:46 [Zakim]
-JeffP
19:18:47 [libby]
cheers!
19:18:48 [raphael]
bye all
19:18:48 [Zakim]
-Raphael
19:18:48 [guusschreiber]
bye
19:18:50 [Zakim]
-aliman
19:18:50 [RalphS]
rrsagent, please make this record public
19:18:53 [Zakim]
-Ralph
19:18:54 [Zakim]
SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended
19:18:55 [Zakim]
Attendees were Libby_Miller, Ralph, Alistair_Miles, JeffP, David_Wood, aliman, Raphael, Guus, DBooth
19:19:02 [RalphS]
rrsagent, please draft minutes
19:19:02 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-minutes.html RalphS
19:42:57 [danbri]
danbri has joined #swbp
21:20:33 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #swbp
21:20:43 [RalphS]
rrsagent, bye
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-actions.rdf :
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus remind Giorgos, Fabien, and Phil that their review of Semantic Interoperability editor's draft should now commence [1]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T18-21-07
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Guus check with Elisa and Deb on which remaining OEP notes are feasible to complete by 1 May [2]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T18-23-04
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Benjamin review WordNet editor's draft [3]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T18-25-01
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Ralph to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ as a Working Group Note [4]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T18-32-33
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Raphael confirm that the license message from NASA has been sent to the public WG list [5]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T19-13-17
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Raphael add NASA attribution text to the Image Annotation editor's draft [6]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T19-15-01
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Ralph work with Raphael to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html as a Working Draft [7]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T19-15-55
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: David and Guus prepare a list of expected outcomes of SWBP for 20 March telecon [8]
21:20:43 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-irc#T19-18-20