W3C

Edit comment LC-2589 for Tracking Protection Working Group

Quick access to

Next: LC-2590

Comment LC-2589
:
Commenter: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org> on behalf of Do-Not-Track Community Group

or
First, the introduction is written from the industry standpoint; e.g. the rationale for DNT is “we don’t want to offend the user because this leads to lost revenue,” rather than “the user has certain privacy rights that we must respect.” Moreover, as noted above, users’ privacy interests are aligned against both commercial and government actors.

Second, we are concerned about the presence of statements like “Advertising revenue is the single largest source of funding on the Web.” We do not know if this is true and we question its relevance here. The Internet includes vast non-commercial contributions of universities, government, libraries, nonprofit organizations and individual users. We expect that the W3C DNT standard will be adopted by these non-commercial entities as well.
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2589.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:47:07 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org