Edit comment LC-2307 for Web Applications Working Group

Quick access to LC-2301 LC-2302 LC-2303 LC-2304 LC-2305 LC-2306 LC-2307 LC-2308 LC-2309 LC-2310

Comment LC-2307

Comment Shortname:

Commenter: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

Message-id:

Section of the document concerned:

[Free text description]Document as a wholeWidgets 1.0: Widget URIs /**/ /************************... Abstract This specification defines the widget URI scheme t... Status of This Document This section describes the status o... Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Not in this specif... 1. Introduction This section is non-normative. Resources in... 1.1 Not in this specification There are many different effo... 2. Conformance As well as sections marked as non-normative,... producers consumers valid widget URIs 3. Definitions Throughout this specification, wherever the... URI 4. Widget URIs Widget URIs are URIs as per [URI] and [RFC39... Widget URIs 4.1 Syntax A valid widget URI must adhere to the IRI gramma... 4.2 Authority A producer may include an authority component... opaque 4.3 Base URI and Relative URI Reference Resolution When com... 4.4 Mapping widget URIs to files within a widget package To... A. Usage as Origin In some contexts one needs to map a URI... B. Requirements This section is non-normative. Must allow... D. References D.1 Normative references [RFC2119] S. Bradn... D.1 Normative references [RFC2119] S. Bradner. Key words f... [RFC2119] [RFC3987] [URI] [WIDGETS] D.2 Informative references [HTML5] Ian Hickson; David Hyat... [HTML5]
or

Refinement of the section concerned:

Status:

open proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other assigned to Nobody

Type: substantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Resolution status:

Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter

Response status:

No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):

Comment:

6) ** EDITORIAL RE FRAGMENT **

"Note that assigning semantics or interpretation to the query or fragment components is outside the scope of this specification. The ways in which they are used depends on the content types that they are applied to, or what executable script decides to do with them."

The wording might be taken to mean that a URI scheme registration normally *does* assign semantics or interpretation to the fragment components.

Suggestion: drop this note.

Related issues: (space separated ids)

WG Notes:

Resolution:

(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)