Edit comment LC-1468 for Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group

Quick access to LC-1464 LC-1465 LC-1466 LC-1467 LC-1468

Comment LC-1468

Comment Shortname:

Commenter: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>

Message-id:

Section of the document concerned:

[Free text description]Document as a wholeW3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0 /**/ code { font-fami... W3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0 W3C Working Draft 12 July 2006 Abstract Status of this Document Revision Description Table of Contents Appendices 1 Overview 1.1 What is mobileOK? 1.2 Why mobileOK? 1.3 Who is mobileOK for? 1.4 Form of the mobileOK label 1.4.1 Verification and Trustability 1.4.2 Asserting Compliance with Individual Tests 1.4.3 Visual Representation 1.5 Requirements 2 mobileOK Label Test Suites 2.1 Testing Parameters 2.1.1 HTTP Request 2.2 mobileOK Level 1 2.2.1 AUTO_REFRESH (partial) 2.2.2 CHARACTER_ENCODING_SUPPORT 2.2.3 CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE 2.2.4 CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT 2.2.5 DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE 2.2.6 EXTERNAL_RESOURCES 2.2.7 GRAPHICS_FOR_SPACING 2.2.8 IMAGE_MAPS 2.2.9 IMAGES_RESIZING 2.2.10 IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE 2.2.11 LARGE_GRAPHICS 2.2.12 LIMITED 2.2.13 LINK_TARGET_FORMAT 2.2.14 MEASURES 2.2.15 NO_FRAMES 2.2.16 NON-TEXT_ALTERNATIVES (partial) 2.2.17 OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPT (partial) 2.2.18 PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT 2.2.19 PAGE_SIZE_USABLE 2.2.20 PAGE_TITLE (partial) 2.2.21 POP_UPS 2.2.22 PROVIDE_DEFAULTS 2.2.23 REDIRECTION 2.2.24 STYLE_SHEETS_SIZE 2.2.25 STYLE_SHEETS_USE 2.2.26 TABLES_ALTERNATIVES 2.2.27 TABLES_LAYOUT (partial) 2.2.28 TABLES_NESTED 2.2.29 TABLES_SUPPORT 2.2.30 VALID_MARKUP 2.3 mobileOK Level 2 2.3.1 ACCESS_KEYS (partial) 2.3.2 AVOID_FREE_TEXT 2.3.3 BACKGROUND_IMAGE_READABILITY 2.3.4 CACHING 2.3.5 COLOR_CONTRAST 2.3.6 CONTENT_FORMAT_PREFERRED 2.3.7 CONTROL_LABELLING 2.3.8 CONTROL_POSITION 2.3.9 COOKIES 2.3.10 ERROR_MESSAGES 2.3.11 FONTS 2.3.12 LINK_TARGET_ID 2.3.13 MINIMIZE 2.3.14 MINIMIZE_KEYSTROKES 2.3.15 NAVBAR 2.3.16 NAVIGATION 2.3.17 SCROLLING (partial) 2.3.18 STRUCTURE 2.3.19 STYLE_SHEETS_SUPPORT 2.3.20 TAB_ORDER 2.3.21 USE_OF_COLOR 2.4 Best Practices Outside mobileOK Scope 3 Label Technical Specification A Use Cases (Non-Normative) A.1 Certification Provider A.2 Content Adaptation A.3 Content Syndication / Aggregator A.4 Individual Content Author A.5 Search Engine A.6 Software Developer A.7 Operator A.8 Accepting or Rejecting a mobileOK claim B Acknowledgements (Non-Normative) C References (Non-Normative) BestPractices Techniques WCL RDF EARL
or

Refinement of the section concerned:

Status:

open proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other assigned to Nobody

Type: substantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Resolution status:

Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter

Response status:

No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):

Comment:

Hello,

Congratulations on your First Public Working Draft [1] for mobileOK. A
comment for 2.2:

"If the document's MIME type, as specified in the HTTP response
Content-Type header, is not application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml or
application/xhtml+wml , FAIL"

These are called Internet Media Types (rather than MIME I think) and are
not registered. Are you planning to register them?

I am not an expert but am checking to see if mobileOK requires XHTML
Basic and Basic requires application/xhtml+xml.

"If the document's DOCTYPE's PUBLIC identifier is not an XHTML
Basic identifier (at present, "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.1//EN" or
"-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"), FAIL"

In case the references help, the topic came up in March of 2004 on two
different W3C lists [2,3].

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobileOK-20060712/
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Mar/0001
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Mar/0000

Hope this helps,

Related issues: (space separated ids)

WG Notes: I responded that we'll fix the doc accordingly on 7/28, and did in the next draft.

Resolution: Fixed per comment.

(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)