Edit comment LC-1467 for Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group

Quick access to LC-1464 LC-1465 LC-1466 LC-1467 LC-1468

Comment LC-1467

Comment Shortname:

Commenter:

Message-id:

Section of the document concerned:

[Free text description]Document as a wholeW3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0 /**/ code { font-fami... W3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0 W3C Working Draft 12 July 2006 Abstract Status of this Document Revision Description Table of Contents Appendices 1 Overview 1.1 What is mobileOK? 1.2 Why mobileOK? 1.3 Who is mobileOK for? 1.4 Form of the mobileOK label 1.4.1 Verification and Trustability 1.4.2 Asserting Compliance with Individual Tests 1.4.3 Visual Representation 1.5 Requirements 2 mobileOK Label Test Suites 2.1 Testing Parameters 2.1.1 HTTP Request 2.2 mobileOK Level 1 2.2.1 AUTO_REFRESH (partial) 2.2.2 CHARACTER_ENCODING_SUPPORT 2.2.3 CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE 2.2.4 CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT 2.2.5 DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE 2.2.6 EXTERNAL_RESOURCES 2.2.7 GRAPHICS_FOR_SPACING 2.2.8 IMAGE_MAPS 2.2.9 IMAGES_RESIZING 2.2.10 IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE 2.2.11 LARGE_GRAPHICS 2.2.12 LIMITED 2.2.13 LINK_TARGET_FORMAT 2.2.14 MEASURES 2.2.15 NO_FRAMES 2.2.16 NON-TEXT_ALTERNATIVES (partial) 2.2.17 OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPT (partial) 2.2.18 PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT 2.2.19 PAGE_SIZE_USABLE 2.2.20 PAGE_TITLE (partial) 2.2.21 POP_UPS 2.2.22 PROVIDE_DEFAULTS 2.2.23 REDIRECTION 2.2.24 STYLE_SHEETS_SIZE 2.2.25 STYLE_SHEETS_USE 2.2.26 TABLES_ALTERNATIVES 2.2.27 TABLES_LAYOUT (partial) 2.2.28 TABLES_NESTED 2.2.29 TABLES_SUPPORT 2.2.30 VALID_MARKUP 2.3 mobileOK Level 2 2.3.1 ACCESS_KEYS (partial) 2.3.2 AVOID_FREE_TEXT 2.3.3 BACKGROUND_IMAGE_READABILITY 2.3.4 CACHING 2.3.5 COLOR_CONTRAST 2.3.6 CONTENT_FORMAT_PREFERRED 2.3.7 CONTROL_LABELLING 2.3.8 CONTROL_POSITION 2.3.9 COOKIES 2.3.10 ERROR_MESSAGES 2.3.11 FONTS 2.3.12 LINK_TARGET_ID 2.3.13 MINIMIZE 2.3.14 MINIMIZE_KEYSTROKES 2.3.15 NAVBAR 2.3.16 NAVIGATION 2.3.17 SCROLLING (partial) 2.3.18 STRUCTURE 2.3.19 STYLE_SHEETS_SUPPORT 2.3.20 TAB_ORDER 2.3.21 USE_OF_COLOR 2.4 Best Practices Outside mobileOK Scope 3 Label Technical Specification A Use Cases (Non-Normative) A.1 Certification Provider A.2 Content Adaptation A.3 Content Syndication / Aggregator A.4 Individual Content Author A.5 Search Engine A.6 Software Developer A.7 Operator A.8 Accepting or Rejecting a mobileOK claim B Acknowledgements (Non-Normative) C References (Non-Normative) BestPractices Techniques WCL RDF EARL
or

Refinement of the section concerned:

Status:

open proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other assigned to Nobody

Type: substantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Resolution status:

Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter

Response status:

No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):

Comment:

Related issues: (space separated ids)

WG Notes: I believe this was Andrea's comment titled "MOK, 2.2.4 CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT" from 7/26? I replied and changed the doc according to my message, which seems to have implicitly resolved this as there were no further comments. "The MIME types I wrote down were supposed to reflect the default delivery context, but I neglected to include image/jpeg, yes. That's an oversight and should be fixed. I think text/css should be included too for completeness, yes. An audio file is not mobileOK because it's out of the scope of documents we're considering. I don't think we want to allow plugins as mobileOK, no. I'm thinking of Java applets and Flash. Otherwise I favor sticking to the current test, with the fixes above."

Resolution: Resolved per Sean's reply in the next draft

(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)