This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Other specs in this tool Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2267 LC-2268 LC-2269 LC-2270 LC-2289 LC-2316 LC-2317 LC-2318 LC-2319 LC-2320 LC-2321 LC-2322 LC-2323 LC-2324 LC-2327 LC-2328 LC-2329 LC-2358 LC-2359 LC-2360
Previous: LC-2289 Next: LC-2316
Overall, I'd say that the document quality is still marginal at best; it uses a lot of imprecise terminology and muddies the waters more than it clarifies things. Many (if not most) of its requirements aren't testable. My concern is that Recommending this document will cause more harm than good to the Web overall (even if it does represent a consensus of sort among a more limited community).