List of comments on “SPARQL 1.1 Service Description” (dated 8 November 2012)

Status: allopen proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other Type: allsubstantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Quick access to LC-2746

Comment LC-2746

Commenter: Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@isb-sib.ch> (archived message)

Context: in

Status:

open proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other assigned to Nobody

Type: substantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Comment:

Dear Workgroup,

http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example defines a
prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is
deprecated and is not used in the examples.

Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the technical
impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source of confusion.

Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward,
Jerven Bolleman

Related issues: (space separated ids)

WG Notes:

Resolution:

(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)