This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Other specs in this tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2429 LC-2453 LC-2454 LC-2455 LC-2461 LC-2462 LC-2463 LC-2468 LC-2470 LC-2472 LC-2473 LC-2474 LC-2477 LC-2478 LC-2479 LC-2480 LC-2495 LC-2497 LC-2498 LC-2499 LC-2501
Previous: LC-2472 Next: LC-2429
SC 4.1.1 requires limited validity checks for markup: unique ID values, proper tag nesting and closing and a check for duplicate attributes. However, the WCAG 2 Understanding documentat suggests that conformance claim could include something along the lines of: "The documented set of accessibility-supported content technologies relied upon for this claim includes XHTML 1.0 (Transitional), CSS 2 and JavaScript 1.2. " Refer: example conformance claims on http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/conformance.html#uc-conformance-requirements-head Does this imply that one can make such a statement only after ensuring that markup / CSS / JS code is valid? Please clarify whether validating the code for CSS / JS / XHTML beyond what is suggested in SC 4.1.1 is required for a conformance claim if for instance, all three technologies are used.