20:05:44 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 20:05:44 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc 20:05:48 rrsagent, make log world 20:06:01 +David_MacDonald 20:06:07 +??P14 20:06:09 meeting: WCAG WG 20:06:13 zakim, ??P14 is Bengt_Farre 20:06:13 +Bengt_Farre; got it 20:06:27 chair: Gregg Vanderheiden 20:06:59 +Becky_Gibson 20:07:09 Becky has joined #wai-wcag 20:07:10 Sofia has joined #wai-wcag 20:07:42 zakim, who's here? 20:07:42 On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Cynthia_Shelly, Michael_Cooper, Judy, Sorcha_Moore, Tim_Boland, Yvette_Hoitink, Roberto_Scano (muted), John_Slatin, Christophe_Strobbe, 20:07:45 ... Gregg_and_Ben, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, Bengt_Farre, Becky_Gibson 20:07:46 On IRC I see Sofia, Becky, RRSAgent, bengt, gregg, Sorcha, Andi, Christophe, jslatin, Yvette, Zakim, judy, rscano, Michael 20:07:49 scribe: Michael 20:07:51 ben has joined #wai-wcag 20:08:01 +Sofia_Celic 20:08:06 topic: Presentation from Judy 20:08:06 RRSAgent, pointer? 20:08:06 See http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T20-08-06-1 20:08:36 Meeting: WCAG Weekly Telecon 20:08:40 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006JanMar/0370.html 20:08:46 Chair: Gregg_Vanderheiden and John_Slatin 20:08:54 Regrets: Luca_Mascaro, Roberto_Castaldo, Roberto_Ellero 20:09:07 agenda+ Discussion of Candidate Reccomendation Phase 20:09:13 zakim, take up agendum 1 20:09:13 agendum 1. "Discussion of Candidate Reccomendation Phase" taken up [from ben] 20:09:19 See message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006JanMar/0382.html 20:09:33 agenda+ Glossary Issues 20:09:42 agenda+ Team C Proposals week of February 13 2006 20:09:49 agenda+ Guideline 1.1 Techniques (16 February) 20:09:56 agenda+ GL 2.4 Issues and Techniques (Feb 16) 20:10:02 agenda+ SC 1.3.1 Techniques (Feb 16) 20:10:10 agenda+ Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.) 20:10:17 agenda+ GL 1.3 Techniques and Issues (Feb 23) 20:10:23 agenda+ GL 2.4 Techniques and Issues (Feb 23) 20:10:30 agenda+ GL 3.1 Techniques and Issues (Feb 23) 20:10:36 agenda+ Techniques for Guideline 2.2 20:12:55 Andi has joined #wai-wcag 20:22:19 zakim, who is on the phone? 20:22:19 On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Cynthia_Shelly, Michael_Cooper (muted), Judy, Sorcha_Moore, Tim_Boland, Yvette_Hoitink, Roberto_Scano (muted), John_Slatin, 20:22:23 ... Christophe_Strobbe, Gregg_and_Ben, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, Bengt_Farre, Becky_Gibson, Sofia_Celic (muted) 20:24:01 ack t 20:29:27 zakim, close this item 20:29:27 agendum 1 closed 20:29:28 I see 10 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 20:29:29 2. Glossary Issues [from ben] 20:30:34 Using the summary attribute of the table element to give an overview of data tables, Providing a label for groups of radio buttons or checkboxes using the fieldset and legend elements, How to meet 3.1.1, Using lang attribute on HTML element, Using DIR attribute of HTML element, HTML tech: using lang attribute to identify changes, Adding DIR attribute to block-level element, Providing def. of word or phrase used in an usual or restricted way, using inline definit 20:30:51 +David_MacDonald.a 20:31:33 zakim, take up agendum 2 20:31:33 agendum 2. "Glossary Issues" taken up [from ben] 20:32:40 resolution: accept items that weren't controversial in survey - TBD provide list 20:33:18 resolution: close issue 1597 with comment "Overcome by events. New definition is based on "baseline."" 20:37:00 David_MacDonald has joined #wai-wcag 20:37:13 resolution: close 1846 with comment - Yes. WCAG 2.0 is intended to be be applied to content developed in multiple languages. Initialisms, acronyms, and abbreviations are addressed by SC 3.1.4 and the related "How to Meet..." and Techniques documents. 20:39:20 +Kerstin_Goldsmith 20:42:48 resolution: define "real-time events" as "events that are live" 20:43:11 action: GV to check that new real-time events definition works for the SC 20:43:27 resolution: close 722 with comment - new definition for real-time events 20:44:28 ... (see above) 20:45:08 resolution: close 1722 with comment 20:45:10 ... We have tried to remove nested definitions where we can. 20:48:35 ack cynthia 20:48:57 ack j 20:51:08 action: John, Gregg to search for existing standard definitions of "normative" and "informative" (relates to issue 403) 20:54:58 resolution: close 1593 with comment - 20:55:01 ... Definition was updated since this issue was raised. Any change of context, including those listed is allowed in response to a user action. The guidelines prevent changing the context not in response to user agent, but spontaneously. 20:55:16 ... (see new definition) 21:01:39 ack cy 21:02:55 ack k 21:08:02 resolution: close 1594 and 1595 21:08:14 ... define "functionality: processes and outcomes achievable through user action" 21:09:36 ISO 9126 set Functionality - A set of attributes that bear on the existence of a set of functions and their specified properties. The functions are those that satisfy stated or implied needs. 21:09:39 q+ to say American English is official language of W3C 21:09:53 ack j 21:11:29 ack m 21:11:29 Michael_Cooper, you wanted to say American English is official language of W3C 21:12:18 q+ 21:13:40 ack c 21:13:46 ack y 21:15:51 ack Ker 21:17:38 action: Gregg to refine definition of caption 21:18:31 action 3 = Gregg to refine definition of caption (relates to issue 1696) 21:18:56 Captions are a text version of video narrative and are synchronized with the images on screen. (www.umuc.edu/ade/glossary.html) 21:21:33 resolution: add following note to definition of sign language (re issue 1696) - 21:21:36 ... Note: although some languages have a singed counterpart, most sign languages are an independent language which is unrelated to the spoken language of the same country or culture. 21:21:49 s/singed/signed 21:22:21 +??P18 21:22:22 judy has joined #wai-wcag 21:22:24 -Kerstin_Goldsmith 21:24:15 judy has joined #wai-wcag 21:24:56 resolution: close 1849 by adding following note to definition of Unicode - 21:24:58 ... The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0.1, defined by: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2003. ISBN 0-321-18578-1), as amended by Unicode 4.0.1 (http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.1/). 21:27:24 +[IPcaller] 21:27:34 Sorcha - rejoining 21:27:34 -Sorcha_Moore 21:27:41 zakim, IP Sorcha_Morre 21:27:41 I don't understand 'IP Sorcha_Morre', Michael 21:27:49 zakim, [IP Sorcha_Moore 21:27:49 I don't understand '[IP Sorcha_Moore', Michael 21:27:58 zakim, IPcaller is Sorcha_Moore 21:27:58 +Sorcha_Moore; got it 21:28:09 ;-) 21:28:19 thanks 21:29:31 ack Cynthia 21:29:37 ack John 21:29:44 ack c 21:31:05 zakim, mute me 21:31:05 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 21:31:32 q+ 21:31:38 q+ to say "1 hour on 1 agenda item" 21:32:16 for "information," see JEremy Campbell (1982), _Grammatical Man_ 21:32:46 resolution: close 1858 by removing the third bullet from the current definition 21:33:12 ... new definition: information 21:33:13 1 A message to be sent and received, 21:33:15 2 A collection of facts or data from which inferences may be drawn. 21:33:42 ack y 21:33:43 Yvette, you wanted to say "1 hour on 1 agenda item" 21:34:36 ack c 21:34:39 zakim, mute me 21:34:39 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 21:36:59 -Bengt_Farre 21:38:42 q+ to say: "Does it make sense to make a distinction between 'host delivery units' and 'supporting delivery units'?" 21:41:07 +??P2 21:41:17 zakim, ??P2 is Bengt_Farre 21:41:17 +Bengt_Farre; got it 21:41:29 -Bengt_Farre 21:41:56 +??P2 21:42:00 zakim, ??P2 is Bengt_Farre 21:42:00 +Bengt_Farre; got it 21:48:51 ack tim 21:49:10 q+ 21:49:24 ack c 21:49:24 Christophe, you wanted to say: "Does it make sense to make a distinction between 'host delivery units' and 'supporting delivery units'?" 21:50:48 q+ 21:51:08 ack j 21:53:10 ack g 21:56:22 +1 for longer-but-more-understandable-approach 21:56:44 ack c 21:57:11 q+ 21:58:04 q+ 21:58:11 -Roberto_Scano 21:59:11 rscano has left #wai-wcag 22:00:05 q- 22:00:40 action: Gregg to explore wording for all the cases of "delivery unit", "authored unit", "perceivable unit" 22:00:48 q- g 22:00:50 ack c 22:01:11 zakim, mute me 22:01:11 Christophe_Strobbe should now be muted 22:02:39 zakim, close this item 22:02:39 agendum 2 closed 22:02:40 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 22:02:42 3. Team C Proposals week of February 13 2006 [from ben] 22:02:46 zakim, take up agendum 3 22:02:46 agendum 3. "Team C Proposals week of February 13 2006" taken up [from ben] 22:05:41 q+ 22:06:00 q+ 22:07:26 ack Mich 22:08:38 q- 22:12:00 resolution: accept with edits technique Using both keyboard and other device-specific functions 22:12:17 action: Michael to work with Cynthia on the onclick issue for Using both keyboard and other device-specific functions 22:12:21 scribe: Andi 22:13:24 See http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T22-12-21 22:14:10 topic: Ensuring that users are not trapped in content. 22:14:16 resolution: accept with edits 22:14:55 topic: Providing a script on page that warns the user a timeout is about to expire. 22:15:28 return to committee to address comments 22:17:15 this technique is a valid technique - "How to meet" document requires this technique AND a technique to allow the user to extend the time. 22:18:07 resolution: accept with edits 22:18:30 topic: Ensuring content blinks for less than three seconds. 22:20:20 -Tim_Boland 22:20:50 zakim, unmute me 22:20:50 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:21:17 zakim, mute me 22:21:17 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 22:22:27 zakim, unmute me 22:22:27 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:25:26 resolution: accept with edits - Michael to work with Yvette to address her concern 22:28:28 timing is not a valid test because the length of the blinking can be affected by the end user's hardware 22:29:38 can only tell by examining the code or the technology - authors don't always have access to it 22:30:51 zakim, unmute me 22:30:51 Christophe_Strobbe should no longer be muted 22:31:32 zakim, mute me 22:31:32 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 22:31:55 resolution: change procedure to "Find all items that blink. For each item that blinks, determine the interval between when the blinking starts and when it stops." This does not completely resolve the issue but it's better. 22:35:04 topic: 1.1 survey 22:35:45 resolution: accept with edits. Team A to get with those who posted "other" comments to ensure that their issues are resolved with recent edits. 22:36:26 zakim, unmute me 22:36:26 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:36:31 topic 2.4 survey (February 16) 22:36:33 BRB 22:36:39 zakim, close this item 22:36:39 agendum 3 closed 22:36:40 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 22:36:41 4. Guideline 1.1 Techniques (16 February) [from ben] 22:36:48 zakim, close agendum 4 22:36:48 agendum 4, Guideline 1.1 Techniques (16 February), closed 22:36:49 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 22:36:50 5. GL 2.4 Issues and Techniques (Feb 16) [from ben] 22:36:54 zakim, take up agendum 5 22:36:54 agendum 5. "GL 2.4 Issues and Techniques (Feb 16)" taken up [from ben] 22:40:02 ack c 22:40:03 ack c 22:41:04 q+ to say "Links can be programmatically determined?" 22:42:05 topic: drop 2.4.1 22:43:07 q? 22:43:12 action: cynthia to write some techniques on nav bars, send to Team B (John) 22:43:13 zakim, unmute me 22:43:13 Yvette_Hoitink was not muted, Yvette 22:44:50 ack l 22:44:51 q+ 22:44:57 ack y 22:44:57 Yvette, you wanted to say "Links can be programmatically determined?" 22:46:36 ack b 22:46:48 q+ 22:47:31 q- 22:48:39 -Bengt_Farre 22:48:52 bengt has left #wai-wcag 22:50:31 topic: Describing the delivery unit in text immediately preceding the programmatic reference 22:52:16 q+ to say it's hard to favour a technique, even a good one, that supports a SC I voted against 22:52:56 ack m 22:52:56 Michael_Cooper, you wanted to say it's hard to favour a technique, even a good one, that supports a SC I voted against 22:52:56 q+ 22:53:39 q+ to say "this is a general technique" 22:53:52 ack d 22:54:09 q+ to say "can't have different bars for different technologies" 22:56:36 ack John 22:56:38 ack Lore 22:57:04 ack Yve 22:57:04 Yvette, you wanted to say "this is a general technique" and to say "can't have different bars for different technologies" 22:57:48 ack Cynth 22:59:05 zakim, mute me 22:59:05 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 23:01:49 no resolution - discuss on list - try to get to consensus position 23:01:51 zakim, close this item 23:01:51 agendum 5 closed 23:01:53 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 23:01:54 6. SC 1.3.1 Techniques (Feb 16) [from ben] 23:01:55 -Yvette_Hoitink 23:02:00 zakim, close agendum 6 23:02:00 agendum 6, SC 1.3.1 Techniques (Feb 16), closed 23:02:01 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 23:02:02 7. Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.) [from ben] 23:02:04 zakim, take up agendum 7 23:02:04 agendum 7. "Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.)" taken up [from ben] 23:02:16 +Yvette_Hoitink 23:05:51 -Judy 23:06:35 q+ to say Ben's comment clarifies, but doesn't affect my vote. But, it's the same sort of situation as we just had with 2.4, not sure how to resolve to my satisfaction. 23:07:40 zakim, unmute me 23:07:40 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 23:08:00 ack m 23:08:00 Michael_Cooper, you wanted to say Ben's comment clarifies, but doesn't affect my vote. But, it's the same sort of situation as we just had with 2.4, not sure how to resolve to my 23:08:03 ... satisfaction. 23:08:45 q+ to say "Sometimes seeing the technique helps you realize you're against the SC but by then the SC has already been voted for" 23:08:57 ack Lor 23:08:59 topic: Describing what will happen before a change to a form control is made 23:09:27 ack y 23:09:27 Yvette, you wanted to say "Sometimes seeing the technique helps you realize you're against the SC but by then the SC has already been voted for" 23:12:40 -Michael_Cooper 23:14:14 resolution: accept with edits - objections to SC are not valid reasons to object to the technique as long as the technique is valid for the SC 23:14:35 topic: Failure due to automatically submitting a form and presenting new content when the last field in the form is given a value without prior warning 23:14:37 zakim, who is on the phone? 23:14:37 On the phone I see Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Cynthia_Shelly, John_Slatin, Christophe_Strobbe, Gregg_and_Ben, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, Becky_Gibson, Sofia_Celic (muted), 23:14:38 Yvette_again has joined #wai-wcag 23:14:40 q+ 23:14:41 ... David_MacDonald.a, ??P18 (muted), Sorcha_Moore, Yvette_Hoitink 23:15:07 ack c 23:15:10 ack b 23:19:42 resolution: accept with edits - editors will ensure consistency of failure techniques 23:20:23 -??P18 23:21:05 topic: Failure due to launching a new window when a radio button is checked 23:22:33 resolution: accept with edits 23:22:46 topic: Failure due to launching a new window when an item in a pulldown menu is selected 23:23:55 +[IPcaller] 23:24:11 -Sorcha_Moore 23:24:28 zakim, [IPcaller] is Sorcha_Moore 23:24:28 +Sorcha_Moore; got it 23:24:50 q+ 23:25:52 return to Team A - not all instances of this should be a failure (for example, launching a dialog when you select a menu should be okay) 23:25:53 zakim, unmute me 23:25:53 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 23:26:02 ack Yve 23:30:55 topic: Providing a mechanism to open a new window instead of opening an automatic pop-up window and changing the current window without informing the user 23:30:58 return to Team A 23:31:15 topic: Failure due to opening a pop-up when a user enters text into an input field 23:31:18 return to Team A 23:31:35 -Sofia_Celic 23:31:36 -Cynthia_Shelly 23:31:37 -Christophe_Strobbe 23:31:38 -Gregg_and_Ben 23:31:39 -Loretta_Guarino_Reid 23:31:41 -David_MacDonald.a 23:31:42 -John_Slatin 23:31:43 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 23:31:45 -Yvette_Hoitink 23:31:45 -Sorcha_Moore 23:31:49 -Becky_Gibson 23:32:58 Christophe has left #wai-wcag 23:39:49 sure - how long do you need? 23:39:54 RRSAgent, bye 23:39:54 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-actions.rdf : 23:39:54 ACTION: GV to check that new real-time events definition works for the SC [1] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T20-43-11 23:39:54 ACTION: John, Gregg to search for existing standard definitions of "normative" and "informative" (relates to issue 403) [2] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T20-51-08 23:39:54 ACTION: Gregg to refine definition of caption (relates to issue 1696) [3] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T21-17-38 23:39:54 ACTION: Gregg to explore wording for all the cases of "delivery unit", "authored unit", "perceivable unit" [4] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T22-00-40 23:39:54 ACTION: Michael to work with Cynthia on the onclick issue for Using both keyboard and other device-specific functions [5] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T22-12-17 23:39:54 ACTION: cynthia to write some techniques on nav bars, send to Team B (John) [6] 23:39:54 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/23-wai-wcag-irc#T22-43-12 23:39:59 Zakim, bye 23:39:59 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Michael_Cooper, Judy, Tim_Boland, Cynthia_Shelly, Yvette_Hoitink, Sorka_Moore, John_Slatin, Christophe_Strobbe, 23:39:59 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 23:40:02 ... Sorcha_Moore, Roberto_Scano, Gregg_and_Ben, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, Bengt_Farre, Becky_Gibson, Sofia_Celic, Kerstin_Goldsmith