14:41:19 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 14:41:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-irc 14:41:30 meeting: i18n ITS working group 14:41:36 chair: Yves 14:41:37 scribe: Felix 14:41:43 scribeNick: fsasaki 14:42:58 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0069.html 14:43:12 rrsagent, make log public 14:51:37 YvesS has joined #i18nits 14:59:29 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 14:59:34 zakim, dial felix-home 14:59:34 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 14:59:36 +Yves_Savourel 14:59:52 +Sebastian_Rahtz 15:00:01 +[IPcaller] 15:00:19 zakim, drop felix 15:00:19 sorry, fsasaki, I do not see a party named 'felix' 15:00:23 zakim, drop felix-home 15:00:23 sorry, fsasaki, I do not see a party named 'felix-home' 15:00:35 zakim, who is here? 15:00:35 On the phone I see Yves_Savourel, Sebastian_Rahtz, [IPcaller] 15:00:36 On IRC I see YvesS, RRSAgent, Zakim, fsasaki, rahtz 15:00:43 zakim, dial felix-home 15:00:46 ok, fsasaki; the call is being made 15:00:52 +Felix 15:01:09 GoutamSaha has joined #i18nits 15:01:18 Hi Goutam. 15:01:19 AZ has joined #i18nits 15:01:26 Hi Felix 15:01:44 Hi Andrejz 15:01:49 chriLi has joined #i18nits 15:01:53 Hi Yves 15:02:00 zakim, who is noisy? 15:02:11 fsasaki, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (92%) 15:02:29 -[IPcaller] 15:02:40 Dialing in on land line 15:02:52 +??P21 15:03:13 zakim, ??P21 is Christian 15:03:13 +Christian; got it 15:03:54 regrets: Diane, Najib, Richard 15:03:59 +Andrzej_Zydron 15:04:08 Back again 15:04:27 topic: action items 15:04:45 action: Christian and Felix to provide examples for tests, and see if we can come up with a common set of conformance levels (ONGOING) 15:05:27 mail on conformance: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0133.html 15:05:48 felix: we might discuss this during the week 15:06:12 yves: please look at this during the week 15:06:14 action: all to look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0133.html and give comments 15:06:40 action: Yves to write a mail for the selector change (DONE) 15:06:49 felix made the changes in the spec 15:07:11 action: Sebastian, Yves and Felix to test the usage of the element, to see if it is usefull (DONE) 15:07:34 Yves: I had some concern, but it seems to be useful 15:08:25 Felix: I made changes to section 3.4.2 Dislocated Selection on this 15:08:37 action: Andrzej to start an article about the relations between various standards. (ONGOING) 15:08:45 Yves: I have a few comments 15:08:56 .. maybe it was not clear what I or others were expecting 15:09:07 .. I expected "ITS versus other standards" 15:09:18 .. your slides are a general overview of standards 15:09:46 AZ: this is a start of the standards 15:09:56 Yves: yes, the different formats we have 15:10:06 AZ: I will continue this in the next weeks 15:10:53 Christian: From a process point of view: 15:10:53 .. as you start of creating content for such a text 15:10:53 .. this type of text was a kind of follow up from the Berlin meeting 15:11:08 .. that is, then should one use ITS / XLIFF, how do they work together 15:11:11 .. we need something like that very urgently 15:11:18 AZ: I could expand on this 15:11:45 Yves: we need to be careful to spend the time on ITS for the specs 15:12:01 .. so please manage their time as much as possible 15:12:11 .. so this action item has not high priority 15:12:35 AZ: No it is presentation like. I'll continue in the next couple of weeks 15:12:44 Christian: One detail question: 15:12:58 .. on "TBX". Is it finished? 15:13:06 AZ: It is still under discussion 15:13:31 action: Christian to write a non-normative section on selection, at the beginning of the scope section. (ONGOING) 15:13:54 Yves: Done and integrated 15:14:02 Christian: and commeted on it 15:14:17 .. by Felix 15:14:21 .. some background: 15:14:54 .. I would like to integrate the changes which Felix asked for until the next working draft 15:15:10 Yves: so when should we look at this section? 15:15:54 Christian: We will continue the discussion 15:16:07 Felix: o.k. Let's keep the list in the loop 15:16:27 action: everybody to keep feedback on new sections 3.1 and 3.2, until Friday 15:18:54 topic: draft document public or not? 15:19:32 general question: should the draft document be public? 15:19:47 Yves: should we keep the link public, and have a stronger wording? 15:20:08 Felix: would be fine with me. 15:22:04 Yves: people might think that the editor's copy is the final copy 15:22:26 action: Felix to add a strong statement on the top of the document about "editors" copy 15:22:29 topic: action items (part 2) 15:22:51 action: Everybody to read the spec and comment on the spec until the publication date (ONGOING) 15:23:10 Yves: we need all comments until the next monday 15:23:19 action: Felix to put up an agenda for the tech plenary f2f. (DONE) 15:24:23 felix: it is only a first attempt 15:24:27 .. how about a call? 15:24:42 Yves: how about the 28th? 15:25:02 Christian: how about 4 p.m. German time? 15:25:22 action: Felix to make a telecon schedule with zakim 15:26:21 Yves: I am fine with the f2f agenda 15:26:32 .. another question, about the timeline 15:26:39 topic: timeline for ITS 15:26:53 Yves: it seems we will not have time for everything in ITS 15:27:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0073.html 15:27:06 we have to choose 15:28:06 Yves: directionality and translatability are fine 15:28:14 .. segmentation is important as well, but we don't have much time 15:28:23 .. we need to have a thought on that quickly 15:28:33 .. even if we would have to drop something else 15:28:46 Christian: so "segmentation" is about identifying inline elements? 15:28:56 Yves: that is only a part of the topic 15:29:09 .. in general it is the question "how should things be segmented in an XML document"? 15:29:29 .. beyond inline there might be subflow elements 15:29:38 Felix: Yves started a wiki on that 15:29:55 Yves: yes, and Richard and Martin said the topic covers more than inline versus block 15:30:08 .. we need to talk about this often in the comming week? 15:30:15 .. do you agree? 15:30:41 felix: I agree, but what would you drop? 15:30:46 Yves: maybe ruby? 15:32:26 felix: maybe we could try to put it into 1.0, by just referencing the existing ruby stuff 15:33:15 Yves: I am planning on dropping the constraints 15:33:24 .. also maybe terminology 15:33:36 .. because we only can identify terms, that's it 15:33:51 .. the problem is, it is not sufficient enough for e.g. docbook 15:34:31 .. it is useful, but maybe we need more 15:34:52 Christian: we feedback we have so far on terms: 15:35:23 .. it would be good to have a link to a term base, and (sorry, missed this) 15:36:37 felix: I would also propose a span-like element 15:36:47 Yves: dir, trans, seg, term, locinfo, ruby, span-like 15:36:58 .. these should be in 1.0 of ITS? 15:37:38 Sebastian: span-like is not a data category, but an extra tool to make use of data categories 15:37:59 Yves: we would drop the constraints, though 15:38:27 .. is it necessary to have them in ITS 1.0? 15:38:40 Sebastian: it is not necessary 15:39:10 Yves: we should discuss mainly these items and not s.t. else 15:39:33 topic: action items (part 3) 15:39:50 action: Owners of the modularizations to keep working on them. (ONGOING) 15:40:08 Yves: I did s.t., have not sent it to Felix 15:40:33 Sebastian: I have to put more words into my part 15:40:37 Yves: how about DITA? 15:40:53 Christian: I attended the DITA sub TC conference 15:41:17 topic: call with DITA sub translation meeting 15:41:21 Yves: we had a call with DITA 15:41:34 .. we are putting a liaison together with DITA and ITS 15:41:41 Christian: how is the situation? 15:41:53 .. we had a meeting with a sub TC of DITA 15:42:08 .. I am not sure whether this is a regular sub TC of the OASIS formal process 15:42:27 .. I an wondering about this because if the sub TC is not bound by the OASIS process 15:42:45 .. some of the issues related to IP seem to be much more complicated 15:43:04 Yves: I think they are in the process of forming this sub TC 15:43:29 .. even if we don't participate in those meetings 15:43:45 .. the DITA committe would review our work 15:44:36 Christian: one last comment: who wants to participate in the sub committee? 15:45:50 Yves, Felix: maybe not, only if there is s.t. ITS related 15:46:32 Yves: last action item ... 15:46:39 action: Yves to explore constraint support in CSS and possibly contact a CSS guru. (DROPPED) 15:47:45 topic: assign people to data categories 15:47:53 Yves: directionality 15:47:59 .. any pending issue? 15:48:12 .. I don't think so 15:48:40 Sebastian: we need implementation examples 15:49:29 felix: we could check this as the other data categories 15:49:39 Yves: that is a good idea 15:49:54 .. visualization related stuff would be difficult 15:51:07 Sebastian: do we need to validate this? 15:52:16 Felix: No, we can leave this to the HTML spec. I will implement the selection 15:52:29 action: Felix to implement the tests for directionality 15:52:56 sebastian: we need example documents, for all data categories 15:53:19 Yves: we don't need to assign a person to translatability 15:53:35 .. segmentation: I will take that one for driving it 15:53:48 AZ: I would like to work on it too 15:53:56 Felix: how about doing it together? 15:54:05 Az, Yves: yes 15:54:11 Christian: some comments: 15:54:25 .. we have some easy mechanisms for identifying inline 15:54:32 .. as Richard said 15:54:48 .. so it might be good to start from the scratch 15:54:52 Yves: o.k. 15:54:55 .. terminology? 15:55:00 Christian: yes! 15:55:14 Yves: Localization information 15:55:51 .. maybe we have solved the problem with the proposal from Felix 15:57:38 .. described at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0131.html 15:57:44 .. I will implement that 15:58:10 .. I will start an implementation of it 15:58:25 Sebastian: well, all these things need more examples 15:58:30 Yves: yes. 15:58:36 .. ruby will be the next one 15:58:47 Felix: I will go down that path 15:59:13 Yves: span like element 15:59:18 Felix: I will do that too 15:59:52 Yves: in general: 16:00:34 .. we need to do work on text, and the examples 16:00:57 zakim mute az 16:01:06 zakim, mute az 16:01:06 sorry, AZ, I do not see a party named 'az' 16:01:40 christian: are all examples in the spec valid? 16:01:45 Yves: I see two aspects: 16:01:52 .. having short examples is good 16:01:59 .. we have to make sure if they are valid 16:02:15 .. one thing we could do is to use always one document 16:02:30 .. so that we have some continuation for each example 16:02:58 Christian: I am not sure if it is really possible 16:03:12 Yves: we have to organize the examples better 16:03:27 action: Everybody to think of how to organize examples inside and outside the specification 16:03:38 topic: versioning of ITS 16:03:49 yves: we need to have a versioning mechanism for ITS 16:03:57 .. e.g. 1.0 very 2.0 16:04:04 topic: techniques document 16:04:15 Yves: I got only a few comments 16:04:22 .. if you have time, please have a look 16:04:36 .. the step between the wiki and the document is small 16:04:51 topic: other topics / business 16:04:51 Yves: none 16:04:59 .. next meeting: next week, same time 16:05:11 .. please comment as much as possible before next monday 16:05:14 -Sebastian_Rahtz 16:05:15 -Andrzej_Zydron 16:05:15 -Christian 16:05:20 -Felix 16:05:24 -Yves_Savourel 16:05:26 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 16:05:28 Attendees were Yves_Savourel, Sebastian_Rahtz, [IPcaller], Felix, Christian, Andrzej_Zydron 16:05:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:05:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:05:35 Good Night Everyone 16:12:04 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:12:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:12:30 YvesS has left #i18nits 16:13:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:13:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:16:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:16:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 16:32:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:32:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/08-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 18:17:10 Zakim has left #i18nits