15:50:40 RRSAgent has joined #rif 15:50:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc 15:50:44 zakim, this will be rif 15:50:44 ok, sandro; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 15:51:36 sandro has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Feb/0021.html 15:51:44 holger has joined #rif 15:53:03 MarkusK has joined #rif 15:53:48 Hassan has joined #rif 15:54:29 ChrisW has joined #rif 15:54:43 deepalik has joined #rif 15:54:55 Guizhen has joined #rif 15:55:41 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:55:48 +Sandro 15:55:53 FrankMcCabe has joined #rif 15:55:58 Harold has joined #rif 15:56:14 +??P2 15:56:21 csma has joined #rif 15:56:29 Allen has joined #rif 15:56:47 +josb 15:56:48 +??P4 15:56:53 msintek has joined #rif 15:57:07 zakim, ??P4 is me. 15:57:07 +Guizhen; got it 15:57:19 +[LMU] 15:57:20 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:57:20 On the phone I see Sandro, ??P2, josb, Guizhen, [LMU] 15:57:26 +fgm 15:57:33 +??P18 15:57:34 Zakim, fgm is me 15:57:35 +FrankMcCabe; got it 15:57:41 Deborah_Nichols has joined #rif 15:57:46 zakim, ??P18 is me 15:57:46 +csma; got it 15:57:49 zakim, mute me 15:57:49 FrankMcCabe should now be muted 15:58:01 zakim, who is on the call? 15:58:04 On the phone I see Sandro, ??P2, holger?, Guizhen, PaulaP, FrankMcCabe (muted), csma 15:58:04 +[IPcaller] 15:58:17 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 15:58:21 zakim, ??P2 is Hassan 15:58:21 +Hassan; got it 15:58:38 I got it, Hassan. 15:58:47 zakim, ??P2 is Hassan 15:58:47 I already had ??P2 as Hassan, csma 15:58:54 +[IBM] 15:58:56 zakim, [ibm] is temporarily me 15:58:56 +ChrisW; got it 15:59:15 +??P27 15:59:22 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:59:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-minutes.html sandro 15:59:29 +Deborah_Nichols 15:59:38 +Allen_Ginsberg 15:59:44 pfps has joined #rif 15:59:46 +Ora_Lassila 15:59:50 zakim, mute me 15:59:50 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 16:00:13 igor has joined #rif 16:00:18 +??P32 16:00:31 -??P27 16:00:34 Zakim, ??P32 is pfps 16:00:34 +pfps; got it 16:00:49 +Deepali_Khushraj 16:00:56 Meeting: RIF 16:00:58 +[NRCC] 16:01:04 DonaldC has joined #rif 16:01:08 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 16:01:13 +Evan_Wallace 16:01:13 Chair: Christian de Sainte Marie 16:01:17 +Michael_Sintek 16:01:17 Zakim, [NRCC] is me 16:01:18 +Harold; got it 16:01:32 +David_Hirtle 16:01:34 + +1.441.224.aaaa 16:01:35 JeffPan has joined #rif 16:01:38 +??P42 16:01:58 zakim, ??P42 is me 16:01:58 +JeffPan; got it 16:02:06 + +34.91.488.aabb 16:02:11 + +353208789aacc 16:02:14 zakim, Michael_Sintek is msintek 16:02:14 +msintek; got it 16:02:23 Zakim, mute me 16:02:23 msintek should now be muted 16:02:27 - +353208789aacc 16:03:05 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:05 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), Guizhen, PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), Allen_Ginsberg 16:03:07 deepalik, ...? 16:03:08 ... (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), +1.441.224.aaaa, David_Hirtle (muted), JeffPan, AxelPolleres 16:03:16 zakim, mute me. 16:03:16 Guizhen should now be muted 16:03:18 johnhall has joined #rif 16:03:23 I seem to be in the phone call, but not listed as me? 16:03:25 +[IPcaller] 16:03:30 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:30 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), Guizhen (muted), PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), 16:03:34 ... Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), +1.441.224.aaaa, David_Hirtle (muted), JeffPan, AxelPolleres, 16:03:35 zakim, who is talking? 16:03:39 ... [IPcaller] 16:03:41 +??P11 16:03:46 ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sandro (41%), ??P11 (4%), csma (4%), AxelPolleres (18%) 16:03:54 +Mike_Dean 16:03:56 zakim, ??P11 is me 16:03:57 zakim, mute axel 16:04:02 +DonaldC; got it 16:04:04 AxelPolleres should now be muted 16:04:11 zakim, mute me 16:04:12 +??P26 16:04:16 DonaldC should now be muted 16:04:33 GiorgosStamou has joined #rif 16:04:41 Since I use a call number, I wonder if I am listed as calling from the 441 area code? 16:04:44 saidtabet has joined #RIF 16:04:50 zakim, mute axelPolleres 16:04:52 AxelPolleres was already muted, ChrisW 16:04:53 That is, I don't dial in directly 16:04:57 Could be, LeoraMorgenstern. Try pressing 4 1 # 16:04:59 zakim, who is talking? 16:04:59 zakim, mute me 16:05:00 sorry, saidtabet, I do not see a party named 'saidtabet' 16:05:08 there is a lot of noise on the line 16:05:10 zakim, who is talking? 16:05:11 ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (54%), csma (34%), JeffPan (24%) 16:05:21 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (19%), csma (78%) 16:05:24 zakim, mute [ipcaller] 16:05:24 [IPcaller] should now be muted 16:05:28 zakim, Saidtabet is said_tabet 16:05:29 zakim, mute me 16:05:30 sorry, saidtabet, I do not recognize a party named 'Saidtabet' 16:05:31 +[IPcaller.a] 16:05:39 JeffPan should now be muted 16:05:41 GiorgosStoilos has joined #rif 16:05:42 zakim, saidtabet is said_tabet 16:05:52 sorry, saidtabet, I do not recognize a party named 'saidtabet' 16:05:52 I'm going to hang up and call again. Maybe that will help figure this out. 16:05:55 zakim, mute me 16:05:59 zakim, mute me 16:06:00 +Igor_Mozetic 16:06:01 zakim ipcaller.a is me 16:06:06 sorry, saidtabet, I do not see a party named 'saidtabet' 16:06:08 Igor_Mozetic should now be muted 16:06:10 -JeffPan 16:06:15 mala has joined #rif 16:06:49 zakim, mute me 16:06:49 sorry, johnhall, I do not see a party named 'johnhall' 16:06:57 - +1.441.224.aaaa 16:07:04 +Leora_Morgenstern 16:07:09 +saidtabet 16:07:10 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:07:11 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), Guizhen (muted), PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), 16:07:16 ... Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj, Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), DonaldC 16:07:21 ... (muted), Mike_Dean, ??P26, [IPcaller.a], Igor_Mozetic (muted), Leora_Morgenstern 16:07:23 saidtabet is Said_Tabet 16:07:26 +Guizhen_Yang 16:07:34 zakim [ipcaller] is me 16:07:34 +saidtabet 16:07:42 zakim, mute me 16:07:42 Leora_Morgenstern should now be muted 16:08:00 +??P21 16:08:03 zakim [ipcaller.a]is me 16:08:11 zakim, who is talking? 16:08:12 zakim, P21 is me 16:08:12 sorry, JeffPan, I do not recognize a party named 'P21' 16:08:16 ack guizhen 16:08:22 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: csma (58%), [IPcaller.a] (23%) 16:08:27 zakim, ??P21 is me 16:08:27 +JeffPan; got it 16:08:27 Guizhen, are you on the call? 16:08:33 yes. 16:08:54 -[IPcaller.a] 16:08:56 Mala 16:09:05 zakim, guizhen is mala 16:09:05 +mala; got it 16:09:13 Darko has joined #rif 16:09:28 zakim, unmute Guizhen_Yang 16:09:28 Guizhen_Yang was not muted, sandro 16:09:45 scibe: Harold 16:09:47 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:09:47 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), mala, PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), Allen_Ginsberg 16:09:51 ... (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), DonaldC (muted), 16:09:54 ... Mike_Dean, ??P26, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Leora_Morgenstern (muted), Guizhen_Yang, JeffPan 16:09:59 scribeNick: Harold 16:10:26 +[IPcaller.a] 16:10:38 +[IVML] 16:10:38 zakim, mute me. 16:10:38 Guizhen_Yang should now be muted 16:10:38 +1 16:10:38 +1 16:10:47 Minutes from last week accepted. 16:10:47 ... (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), DonaldC (muted), 16:10:49 zakim, [IVML] is me 16:10:49 ... Mike_Dean, ??P26, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Leora_Morgenstern (muted), Guizhen_Yang (muted), JeffPan, [IPcaller.a], [IVML] 16:10:52 +GiorgosStoilos; got it 16:11:25 JosDeRoo has joined #rif 16:11:39 zakim. mute me 16:11:46 zakim [ipcaller.a] is johnhall 16:11:49 zakim, mute me 16:11:49 Allen_Ginsberg was already muted, Allen 16:12:02 [CONTINUED] ACTION: csma to ask ISO whether liaison is worthwhile for ISO IEC 16:12:02 Joint Task Force 1, SC 32, Working Group 2: Metadata Standards US 16:12:02 national body is ANSI L8 might be interesting for liaison. See 16:12:02 [http://metadata-standards.org/] 16:12:03 csma has not received answer from Ed Barkm., so action CONTINUED. 16:12:36 zakim, unmute me 16:12:36 DonaldC should no longer be muted 16:12:45 Said's action wrt a JSR94 email is DONE. 16:12:57 +Jos_De_Roo 16:12:57 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 16:13:04 q? 16:13:10 zakimmute me 16:13:12 zakim, mute me 16:13:12 DonaldC should now be muted 16:13:15 +??P51 16:13:18 ack jeff 16:13:27 zakim, mute me 16:13:27 sorry, johnhall, I do not see a party named 'johnhall' 16:13:32 Zakim, +??P51 is me 16:13:32 sorry, Darko, I do not recognize a party named '+??P51' 16:13:40 +??P52 16:13:44 Zakim, Jos_De_Roo is me 16:13:44 +JosDeRoo; got it 16:13:46 [CONTINUED] ACTION: csma to ask ISO whether liaison is worthwhile for ISO IEC Joint Task Force 1, SC 32, Working Group 2: Metadata Standards US national body is ANSI L8 might be interesting for liaison. See [http://metadata-standards.org/] 16:13:51 Zakim, +??P52 is me 16:13:51 sorry, Darko, I do not recognize a party named '+??P52' 16:13:52 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:13:53 On the phone I see Sandro (muted), Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), mala, PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), 16:13:56 Zakim, mute me 16:13:56 ... Allen_Ginsberg (muted), Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle (muted), AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), 16:14:01 JosDeRoo should now be muted 16:14:02 ... DonaldC (muted), Mike_Dean, ??P26, Igor_Mozetic (muted), Leora_Morgenstern (muted), Guizhen_Yang (muted), JeffPan, [IPcaller.a], GiorgosStoilos, JosDeRoo, ??P51, ??P52 16:14:08 \me zakim, ??P52 is me 16:14:32 +Giorgos_Stamou 16:14:32 q? 16:14:40 Zakim, ??P51 is me 16:14:40 +Darko; got it 16:14:51 zakim, unmute me 16:14:51 Allen_Ginsberg should no longer be muted 16:15:02 3. UCR 16:15:04 Zakim, mute me 16:15:04 Darko should now be muted 16:15:05 q+ 16:15:05 zakim, please mute 16:15:08 I don't understand 'please mute', GiorgosStamou 16:15:15 zakim, unmute me 16:15:15 Leora_Morgenstern should no longer be muted 16:15:18 q? 16:15:19 Zakim, mute me 16:15:20 Giorgos_Stamou should now be muted 16:16:06 ACTION: csma to ask ISO whether liaison is worthwhile for ISO IEC Joint Task Force 1, SC 32, Working Group 2: Metadata Standards US national body is ANSI L8 might be interesting for liaison. See [http://metadata-standards.org/] [CONTINUED] 16:16:07 ack leora 16:16:43 Leora and JeffP have action human-oriented CONTINUED. 16:16:44 ACTION: Said to send a message to JSR94 that the RIF has started its work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-rif-minutes.html#action02] [DONE] 16:16:57 ChrisW action CONTINUED. 16:17:04 zakim, mute me 16:17:04 Leora_Morgenstern should now be muted 16:17:10 PhilippeB has joined #rif 16:17:28 StanDevitt has joined #rif 16:17:29 q? 16:17:30 ACTION:* Leora, JeffP to review and report on human oriented rules section of UCR, sending e-mail by friday. [CONTINUED] 16:17:39 csma proposed new section on publication: DONE. 16:17:50 ACTION:* Stan to review and report on human oriented rules section of UCR, sending e-mail by friday. [DONE] 16:17:57 +Gary_Hallmark 16:18:16 ACTION:* Chris Welty will come up with another example narrative for a RichKR use case [CONTINUED] 16:18:23 +??P55 16:18:23 "What belongs to RIF vs. OWL/RDF?" DONE. 16:18:27 +[Agfa] 16:18:37 q? 16:18:41 ACTION:* Christian will propose another scenario for the publication use case [CONTINUED] 16:18:41 zakim, unmute me 16:18:41 FrankMcCabe should no longer be muted 16:18:48 zakim, ??P55 is me 16:18:49 I already had ??P55 as StanDevitt, PhilippeB 16:19:31 -StanDevitt 16:19:34 ed was not aware that he was supposed to be helping! 16:19:35 ACTION:* Christian will start an email discussion on "What part of the RIF vs. OWL/RDF Compatibility belongs to RIF and what part belong to OWL/RDF" [DONE] 16:19:40 Frank info integr action is CONTINUED since Ed was not available. 16:19:43 I will contact him again this week. 16:19:54 zakim, mute me 16:19:54 FrankMcCabe should now be muted 16:20:01 ACTION:* Frank will do the scenarios for information integration with Ed Barkmeyer assisting [CONTINUED] 16:20:12 +??P55 16:20:17 GaryHallmark has joined #rif 16:20:38 zakim, ??p55 is me 16:20:38 +PhilippeB; got it 16:20:46 zakim, mute me 16:20:46 PhilippeB should now be muted 16:20:56 q? 16:20:57 Paul is on the call, but not on irc 16:21:18 zakim, who is on the call? 16:21:18 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), mala, PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), Allen_Ginsberg, 16:21:21 ... Ora_Lassila, pfps, Deepali_Khushraj (muted), Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle, AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), DonaldC (muted), Mike_Dean, ??P26, 16:21:25 ... Igor_Mozetic (muted), Leora_Morgenstern (muted), Guizhen_Yang (muted), JeffPan, [IPcaller.a], GiorgosStoilos, JosDeRoo (muted), Darko (muted), DaveReynolds (muted), 16:21:28 ... Giorgos_Stamou (muted), Gary_Hallmark, [Agfa], PhilippeB (muted) 16:21:42 ACTION:* Paul Vincent will do the detailed scenario for "Interoperability between rule engines" [CONTINUED] 16:21:56 PaulV scenario for Interop between rule engines is currently evaluated by Allen & David, because only sent 10 mins before call: CONTINUED. 16:22:01 StanDevitt has joined #rif 16:22:02 ok no probelm 16:22:09 q? 16:22:26 Discussion on state of document. 16:22:39 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:22:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-minutes.html sandro 16:22:50 zakim, [ipcaller.c] may be johnhall 16:22:50 sorry, FrankMcCabe, I do not understand your question 16:22:57 David: Recent input. Condensed subsections for each general uc category. 16:23:28 zakim, who is talking? 16:23:39 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Allen_Ginsberg (25%), David_Hirtle (77%) 16:23:54 Publication not changed much, since only 2 uc's were there; now with csma more complete. 16:24:01 never mind who's talking. Who's playing the violin 16:24:13 Other subsections are being condensed. 16:24:22 -[IPcaller.a] 16:24:41 q? 16:25:38 +John_Hall 16:25:44 zakim, mute me 16:25:44 John_Hall should now be muted 16:25:46 Allen: Credit scenario (2.4) changed; have a look at that. 16:26:05 ircleuser has joined #rif 16:26:15 q+ 16:26:19 ircleuser has left #rif 16:26:22 zakim, unmute me 16:26:22 DonaldC should no longer be muted 16:26:30 q? 16:27:25 ACTION: Donald, Said, John: Scenario where R 16:27:34 IF enters the play. 16:27:41 ack harold 16:27:51 zakim, mute me 16:27:51 DonaldC should now be muted 16:27:53 Present: Allen_Ginsberg AxelPolleres ChrisW Darko DaveReynolds David_Hirtle Deborah_Nichols Deepali_Khushraj DonaldC Evan_Wallace FrankMcCabe Gary_Hallmark GiorgosStamou GiorgosStoilos Mala Guizhen_Yang HaroldBoley Hassan Igor_Mozetic JeffPan JosDeRoo LeoraMorgenstern MarkusK Michael_Sintek Mike_Dean Ora_Lassila PaulaP PhilippeB StanDevitt csma HohnHall pfps SaidTabet SandroHawke JosDeBruijn HolgerLausen 16:28:08 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:28:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-minutes.html sandro 16:28:13 q+ 16:28:50 [ACTION] Donal, Said, John: provide scenario for human-oriented use case showing where RIF is used 16:28:59 ack sandro 16:29:01 ack sandro 16:29:12 Harold: When omitting larger portions of material, can it still be linked? 16:29:12 ACTION: Donal, Said, John: provide scenario for human-oriented use case showing where RIF is used 16:29:27 rrsagent, withdraw action 10 16:29:27 I'm logging. I don't understand 'withdraw action 10', ChrisW. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:29:35 rrsagent, remove action 10 16:29:35 I'm logging. I don't understand 'remove action 10', ChrisW. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:29:38 David: Difficult, if final document should be self-contained. 16:29:45 rrsagent, you are a moron 16:29:45 I'm logging. I don't understand 'you are a moron', ChrisW. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:29:46 q? 16:30:13 Sandro: Perhaps no technical/organizational/editorial problem to provide links. 16:30:41 csma: Stand-alone has advantages. 16:31:09 csma: If you think something valuable was omitted, say it now or soon. 16:32:10 q? 16:32:28 Allen: With the many changesr/restructuring it was hard to keep all links at all times (just to work at one place); they can be brought back on one of the uc pages. 16:32:59 Allen: ... so people would still find them; could also contain reqs etc. 16:33:35 Allen: ... but would be separate from main document. 16:33:36 ack sandro 16:34:21 PaulV has joined #rif 16:34:45 Sandro: Not sure what you exactly mean. But yes, we can still bring links back later. 16:36:16 csma: People should offer ways to insert what they want to have in. Better than just linking to things. 16:36:51 csma: We should have all material now. Can we have a new draft soon? 16:38:34 Allen: Waiting only for above-mentioned uc explanation wrt RIF. 16:39:30 David: Unless we enumerate all indiv. reqs, we can not see global req; so iterative process needed. 16:39:37 -Mike_Dean 16:40:03 David: Allen and I don't see exact distinction between desing goals and reqs. 16:40:27 q? 16:40:48 Allen: Ties in with discussion on what RIF is and isn't. 16:41:51 csma: Should RIF be executable 16:42:02 for instance. 16:43:05 Allen: Right. Partly motivated by OWL's UCR document: "What's an ontology?". 16:43:11 q? 16:43:19 -Deepali_Khushraj 16:43:52 josb has joined #rif 16:43:56 the owl docuemtn says what is an ontology, then the RIF document shoudl say what is a rule 16:43:56 I think that the design goals for the RIF is something that should be figured out by the whol group 16:44:23 not what is a RIF 16:44:34 Allen: Peter and Francois want to see RIF be executable, which is fine. But: What about interchange between overlapping languages -- we need a discussion, 16:44:34 (just looking at the analogy) 16:45:03 how about the analogy with HTML and HTTP? Language versus Protocol 16:45:21 PaulV has joined #rif 16:45:33 Hmm, I wouldn't say that my "requirement" is that the RIF be executable - however, forbidding it from being executable is not something that I can sign on to. 16:45:38 csma: Discussion not easy on the telecon. Mailing list discussion is unfolding well. Will need to come to conclusion at one point. 16:46:31 csma: Are there any other issues that need come in? E.g.: Data access, linked to issue of query languages. 16:47:31 ACTION: csma will incite this broader discussion on mailing list. 16:47:59 +[IPcaller.a] 16:48:16 David: Should we have an action for everyone look over what we have? 16:48:20 zakim, mute josb 16:48:20 josb should now be muted 16:48:37 you were kind of noisy, josb. 16:48:44 csma: Prefer, next week someone to summarize consensus on design goals. 16:48:59 sorry, sandro 16:49:03 no problem. 16:49:09 (just explaining why I muted you) 16:50:11 anyway, thx for muting me :) 16:50:13 zakim, who is here? 16:50:13 On the phone I see Sandro, Hassan (muted), holger? (muted), mala, PaulaP (muted), FrankMcCabe (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Deborah_Nichols (muted), Allen_Ginsberg, 16:50:16 ... Ora_Lassila, pfps, Harold, Evan_Wallace, msintek (muted), David_Hirtle, AxelPolleres (muted), [IPcaller] (muted), DonaldC (muted), ??P26, Igor_Mozetic (muted), 16:50:20 ... Leora_Morgenstern (muted), Guizhen_Yang (muted), JeffPan, GiorgosStoilos, JosDeRoo (muted), Darko (muted), DaveReynolds (muted), Giorgos_Stamou (muted), Gary_Hallmark (muted), 16:50:25 ... [Agfa], PhilippeB (muted), John_Hall (muted), josb (muted) 16:50:28 On IRC I see PaulV, josb, StanDevitt, GaryHallmark, PhilippeB, DaveReynolds, JosDeRoo, Darko, mala, GiorgosStoilos, saidtabet, GiorgosStamou, johnhall, JeffPan, AxelPolleres, 16:50:32 ... DonaldC, igor, pfps, LeoraMorgenstern, Deborah_Nichols, msintek, Allen, csma, Harold, FrankMcCabe, Guizhen, ChrisW, Hassan, MarkusK, holger, RRSAgent, Zakim, sandro, 16:50:34 ... EvanWallace, PaulaP, David_Hirtle, mdean 16:50:48 Allen: People who say RIF should be executable, what do they think this means for interchange/interop? Maybe executability supports interchange/interop. 16:51:47 csma: People with high-level design goals should propose them on mailing list. 16:52:03 zakim, unmute me 16:52:03 DonaldC should no longer be muted 16:52:53 David: Would be nice to have backlinks from reqs to uc's. 16:53:26 -Leora_Morgenstern 16:53:37 requirements from the original use cases or from the categories? 16:53:43 csma: Who could copy all req sections from all uc's into one document for next week? 16:53:56 I can do that 16:54:29 +??P0 16:54:32 ACTION: Paula will do this, removing duplicates if time permits. 16:54:34 q? 16:54:55 ok 16:55:04 \me Sorry, got disconnected and had to reconnect 16:55:19 zakim, mute me 16:55:19 DonaldC should now be muted 16:55:24 P0 is LeoraMorgenstern 16:55:27 Donald: Will bring in new reqs by posting/email. 16:55:41 ACTION: Paula to copy all requirements from original use cases into a single place, removing duplicates and pointing back to originals 16:55:47 q? 16:55:52 rrsagent, drop action 13 16:55:55 zakim, mute me 16:55:55 LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted 16:55:58 q+ 16:56:06 zakim, unmute me 16:56:06 PaulaP should no longer be muted 16:56:09 ack paula 16:56:49 -FrankMcCabe 16:56:51 zakim, mute me 16:56:51 Allen_Ginsberg should now be muted 16:56:59 David: Paula, put it at the 'source' section to begin with. 16:57:13 ACTION:* Harold will explain what Lloyd Topor extensions etc mean [DONE] 16:58:04 ChrisW: Fine, DONE. 16:58:59 ChrisW: Discussion RIFRAF and uc's 16:59:24 ChrisW: Which parts are relevant for phase 1. 17:00:09 ChrisW: Example: bNodes -- one idea is going beyond Horn logic: so is it not phase 1? 17:00:45 -Ora_Lassila 17:01:27 -holger? 17:01:57 ChrisW: Answer to "What goes int phase 1 / phase 2?" is not crisp. 17:02:29 + +1.408.460.aadd - is perhaps holger? 17:02:31 should we have a mailing list discussion on this topic: which features belong to phase 1 17:02:34 -holger? 17:02:43 ChirsW: So we need to decide, as a group, that we will or will not deal with some issues in the 1st year. 17:03:24 csma: What is the impact of phase 1 / 2 on rule interchange reqs? 17:03:36 + +1.408.460.aaee - is perhaps holger? 17:03:55 csma: Prioritized list? 17:03:59 zakim, aaee is me. 17:03:59 sorry, Guizhen, I do not recognize a party named 'aaee' 17:04:03 ChrisW: Yes. 17:04:28 zakim, aaee is me. 17:04:28 sorry, Guizhen, I do not recognize a party named 'aaee' 17:04:33 -josb 17:05:08 ack sandro 17:05:15 csma: Should we add "phase 1 / 2" column to List of Systems? 17:05:26 ChrisW: Yes. 17:05:33 +1 to Sandro 17:05:49 Sandro: Procedurally, ask if all understand what people's action is? 17:05:54 +1 to Sandro' comment 17:06:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/List_of_Rule_Systems 17:06:53 csma: For people who have entered a system, they should enter what the phase 1 / 2 impact is. Interop impact? 17:07:29 Sandro: Hard to imagine how to have impact beyond Horn. 17:08:16 s/Hard to imagine how to have impact beyond Horn./Hard to imagine they wouldn't all have non-Horn features/ 17:09:29 csma: Example: Translated JRules a few examples into logic notation 17:10:21 Chris: Will start this action. 17:10:39 q? 17:10:54 ACTION: Chris to start email discussion about what issues are "fuzzy" wrt phase 1 & 2 17:11:00 ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantics and summarize the possible solutions which have come up during the discussions on the mailing listat Lloyd Topor extensions etc mean [DONE] 17:11:08 4. OWL & RDF Compatibility 17:11:46 JosB's page: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/bNode_Semantics 17:11:57 csma: E.g., when you discuss bNodes in the head, you should say why it's important for interchange. 17:12:06 apologies, my connection is failing me 17:12:07 -[Agfa] 17:12:34 -Giorgos_Stamou 17:12:41 ChrisW: Josb action is DONE. 17:13:15 q? 17:13:20 Sandro: Don't see anything time-critical here -- cannot go to far ahead of design discussion. 17:13:30 s/to far/too far/ 17:13:37 ACTION 17 = JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantics and summarize the possible solutions which have come up during the discussions on the mailing list [DONE] 17:13:50 zakim, unmute me 17:13:50 DonaldC should no longer be muted 17:14:53 csma: Question of interchange of human-oriented syntax related to OWL & RDF: Could you use write terms and facts in OWL & RDF? 17:15:58 zakim, mute me 17:15:58 DonaldC should now be muted 17:16:14 ack sandro 17:16:32 Donald (and Said): Yes, will disuss OWL & RDF applicability for human-oriented uc. 17:17:34 Sandro: bNode action can be removed from future agendas, but people can of course still bring in any new aspects about this. 17:18:21 Sandro: At some point will come up again as a design decision when we have to make a choice. 17:18:28 +1 17:18:32 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F2 17:18:59 thanks Sandro! 17:19:07 Sandro: 2F2F is coming up. 24 people are registered so far; expect another 15 or so. 17:19:30 csma: Will publish agenda and documents soon. 17:19:36 s/2F2F/F2F2/ 17:20:25 -GiorgosStoilos 17:20:28 Mainly UCR document. 17:20:46 q+ 17:21:42 q? 17:21:50 -PhilippeB 17:22:02 ack axel 17:22:09 Harold: Uniform notation for dates: yyyy-mm-dd? 17:22:09 year-month-day as on http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Telecons 17:22:59 q? 17:23:04 Zakim, mute me 17:23:04 AxelPolleres should now be muted 17:23:09 +1 17:23:12 +1 17:23:12 +1 17:23:14 +1 17:23:16 (re adjourning) 17:23:17 -Guizhen_Yang 17:23:18 -Evan_Wallace 17:23:20 -DaveReynolds 17:23:22 -holger?.a 17:23:23 -Gary_Hallmark 17:23:24 -John_Hall 17:23:25 -Igor_Mozetic 17:23:26 -Sandro 17:23:27 exit 17:23:28 -msintek 17:23:30 -[IPcaller] 17:23:31 -DonaldC 17:23:35 -Darko 17:23:36 -David_Hirtle 17:23:37 bye 17:23:38 quit 17:23:40 bye 17:23:40 -AxelPolleres 17:23:41 bye 17:23:44 Guizhen has left #rif 17:23:47 -LeoraMorgenstern 17:23:48 bye 17:23:48 -mala 17:23:52 -Deborah_Nichols 17:23:54 msintek has left #rif 17:23:54 -holger? 17:23:55 -PaulaP 17:23:55 -JeffPan 17:23:56 -pfps 17:23:57 -Allen_Ginsberg 17:24:02 rrsagent, create minutes 17:24:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-minutes.html Darko 17:24:04 rrsagent, format minutes 17:24:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:24:11 zakim, who is on the call? 17:24:11 On the phone I see Hassan (muted), csma, MarkusK (muted), ChrisW, Harold, JosDeRoo (muted), Darko (muted) 17:24:14 -Hassan 17:24:24 rrsagent, make logs visible 17:24:35 rrsagent, make logs public 17:25:14 rrsagent, leave 17:25:14 I see 15 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-actions.rdf : 17:25:14 ACTION: csma to ask ISO whether liaison is worthwhile for ISO IEC Joint Task Force 1, SC 32, Working Group 2: Metadata Standards US national body is ANSI L8 might be interesting for liaison. See [http://metadata-standards.org/] [CONTINUED] [1] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-16-06 17:25:14 ACTION: Said to send a message to JSR94 that the RIF has started its work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-rif-minutes.html#action02] [DONE] [2] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-16-44 17:25:14 ACTION: * Leora, JeffP to review and report on human oriented rules section of UCR, sending e-mail by friday. [CONTINUED] [3] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-17-30 17:25:14 ACTION: * Stan to review and report on human oriented rules section of UCR, sending e-mail by friday. [DONE] [4] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-17-50 17:25:14 ACTION: * Chris Welty will come up with another example narrative for a RichKR use case [CONTINUED] [5] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-18-16 17:25:14 ACTION: * Christian will propose another scenario for the publication use case [CONTINUED] [6] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-18-41 17:25:14 ACTION: * Christian will start an email discussion on "What part of the RIF vs. OWL/RDF Compatibility belongs to RIF and what part belong to OWL/RDF" [DONE] [7] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-19-35 17:25:14 ACTION: * Frank will do the scenarios for information integration with Ed Barkmeyer assisting [CONTINUED] [8] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-20-01 17:25:14 ACTION: * Paul Vincent will do the detailed scenario for "Interoperability between rule engines" [CONTINUED] [9] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-21-42 17:25:14 ACTION: Donal, Said, John: provide scenario for human-oriented use case showing where RIF is used [11] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-29-12-1 17:25:14 ACTION: csma will incite this broader discussion on mailing list. [12] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-47-31 17:25:14 ACTION: Paula to copy all requirements from original use cases into a single place, removing duplicates and pointing back to originals [14] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-55-41 17:25:14 ACTION: * Harold will explain what Lloyd Topor extensions etc mean [DONE] [15] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T16-57-13 17:25:14 ACTION: Chris to start email discussion about what issues are "fuzzy" wrt phase 1 & 2 [16] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T17-10-54 17:25:14 ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantics and summarize the possible solutions which have come up during the discussions on the mailing list [DONE] [17] 17:25:14 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/07-rif-irc#T17-11-00 17:25:17 -Darko 17:25:24 -Darko