15:04:26 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #er
15:04:26 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-irc
15:04:32 <shadi> zakim, this will be ert
15:04:32 <Zakim> ok, shadi, I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM already started
15:04:41 <CarlosI> CarlosI has joined #er
15:04:53 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.aa]
15:05:04 <shadi> zakim, who is here?
15:05:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see [IPcaller], [IPcaller.a], Jim_Ley, [IPcaller.aa]
15:05:05 <Zakim> On IRC I see CarlosI, RRSAgent, Zakim, niq, ChrisR, JibberJim, drooks, shadi, ericP
15:05:18 <Zakim> +Shadi
15:05:22 <JibberJim> zakim, IPcaller.aa is really niq
15:05:22 <Zakim> +niq; got it
15:06:06 <JibberJim> zakim, IPcaller is really drooks
15:06:06 <Zakim> +drooks; got it
15:06:15 <JibberJim> zakim, IPcaller.a is really ChrisR
15:06:15 <Zakim> +ChrisR; got it
15:06:48 <shadi> meeting: ERT WG
15:06:54 <shadi> regrets: Johannes, Carlos
15:07:00 <shadi> regrets: Johannes, CarlosV
15:07:07 <Zakim> +Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
15:07:13 <shadi> scribe: Nick
15:07:18 <shadi> scribenick: niq
15:07:31 <shadi> agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues
15:07:51 <shadi> zakim, take up agendum 1
15:07:51 <Zakim> agendum 1. "EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues" taken up [from shadi]
15:08:09 <shadi> agenda+ HTTP in RDF namespaces
15:08:46 <niq> saz: testCase and testRequirement
15:12:46 <niq> carlosi: requirement != test
15:13:51 <niq> saz/carlosi: should we allow multiple requirements in one assertion?
15:15:53 <JibberJim> I think test case and requirement is a good thing, I agree with carlos's emails.
15:17:05 <drooks> it may take several test cases to prove a requirement... hence an assertion should be allowed to have multiple test cases
15:18:01 <JibberJim> Yes shadi, that's what I meant, and we allow both
15:18:37 <niq> Carlos, jim: requirement <--> testcase is a many-to-many thing
15:19:53 <niq> RESOLUTION: testCase and testRequirement are distinct and both required
15:21:19 <shadi> s/and both required/and should be both included
15:22:31 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jan/0048
15:23:45 <niq> saz: earl for streaming contents?
15:24:53 <niq> jim: EARL doesn't need to do anything.  We already allow people to define their own pointers into contents
15:25:21 <JibberJim> Yes
15:25:55 <niq> saz: nice to speel that out + example for earl guide
15:31:31 <niq> saz: no meet next week; use mailinglist
15:31:31 <shadi> ci: about to propose additions to the schema
15:31:50 <shadi> zakim, close item 1
15:31:50 <Zakim> agendum 1, EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues, closed
15:31:51 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:31:52 <Zakim> 2. HTTP in RDF namespaces [from shadi]
15:31:57 <shadi> zakim, take up item 2
15:31:57 <Zakim> agendum 2. "HTTP in RDF namespaces" taken up [from shadi]
15:33:14 <niq> saz: one namespace for http?
15:33:18 <niq> jim: yes
15:33:56 <niq> CarlosI: possible ambiguity re: extension headers
15:34:57 <niq> nrk:  http:request-this, http:response-that
15:36:13 <niq> nrk: two-level namespace
15:36:38 <niq> saz: that looks like what johannes suggests
15:37:57 <niq> provisional resolution as above, but wait for johannes before firming it up?
15:39:50 <Zakim> -Jim_Ley
15:39:51 <Zakim> -ChrisR
15:39:53 <Zakim> -drooks
15:39:56 <ChrisR> ChrisR has left #er
15:39:57 <Zakim> -niq
15:40:00 <Zakim> -Shadi
15:40:02 <Zakim> -Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
15:40:03 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended
15:40:04 <drooks> drooks has left #er
15:40:05 <Zakim> Attendees were Jim_Ley, Shadi, niq, drooks, ChrisR, Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
16:28:06 <shadi> chair: Shadi
16:28:16 <shadi> rrsagent, make minutes
16:28:16 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-minutes.html shadi
16:28:22 <shadi> rrsagent, make logs world
16:28:26 <shadi> rrsagent, make minutes
16:28:26 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-minutes.html shadi
16:28:30 <shadi> rrsagent, bye
16:28:30 <RRSAgent> I see no action items