IRC log of dawg on 2006-01-12

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:58:23 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dawg
15:58:23 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-dawg-irc
15:58:33 [DanC]
agenda + test suite maintenance
15:58:40 [DanC]
zakim seems lagged
15:58:58 [Zakim]
+??P1
15:59:09 [AndyS]
zakim, ??P1 is me
15:59:14 [Zakim]
+AndyS; got it
15:59:56 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
16:00:11 [jeen]
Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
16:00:11 [Zakim]
+jeen; got it
16:00:11 [ericP]
zakim, please dial ericP-415
16:00:13 [Zakim]
ok, ericP; the call is being made
16:00:14 [Zakim]
+EricP
16:01:06 [Zakim]
+DanC
16:01:36 [kendallclark]
kendallclark has joined #dawg
16:01:38 [AndyS]
Sergio, saw your message: the fix to the second part is to scope G' to the whole query, right? No more is needed.
16:01:44 [Zakim]
+Kendall_Clark
16:02:15 [ericP]
http://www.w3.org/2006/01/10-dawg-minutes
16:02:23 [AndyS]
The first part (distinguished variables) : I realised we don't really define the scope of variables and could handle it there. e.g.
16:02:38 [Zakim]
+Lee_Feigenbaum
16:02:48 [LeeF]
zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is, not surprisingly, LeeF
16:02:48 [Zakim]
I don't understand you, LeeF
16:02:53 [DanC]
Meeting: DAWG Weekly
16:02:54 [LeeF]
didn't think you would
16:02:55 [DanC]
Chair: DanC
16:03:00 [DanC]
Scribe: Elias
16:03:05 [EliasT]
Scribe: EliasT
16:03:05 [LeeF]
zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is LeeF
16:03:05 [Zakim]
+LeeF; got it
16:03:14 [Zakim]
+PatH
16:03:26 [AndyS]
If SELECT'ed, then distinguished. If mentioned in two separate BGPs in teh same query ,distinguished (inc bnodes). Else not distingusihed.
16:03:33 [kendallclark]
(not $$ charity! :>)
16:03:35 [Zakim]
+Jos_De_Roo
16:03:44 [SerT]
Andy, it's difficult to scope G' to the whole query because the algebra is separated form the BGP
16:03:50 [Jos_De_Roo]
Jos_De_Roo has joined #dawg
16:03:52 [patH]
patH has joined #dawg
16:04:04 [SerT]
u need to use the same graph every time
16:04:32 [AndyS]
So same G' for the whole query execution?
16:05:05 [SerT]
yes
16:05:26 [patH]
Yes, neds to be same, but does not need to be G. See my email reply just sent.
16:05:49 [DanC]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
16:05:49 [Zakim]
On the phone I see EliasT, AndyS, jeen, EricP, DanC, Kendall_Clark, LeeF, PatH, Jos_De_Roo
16:07:51 [kendallclark]
yeah, birth certificate if I can find it. ;>
16:07:58 [DanC]
http://www.w3.org/2006/01/10-dawg-minutes
16:08:42 [ericP]
RRSAgent, are you here?
16:08:42 [RRSAgent]
I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'are you here'
16:09:52 [Souri]
Souri has joined #dawg
16:10:14 [DanC]
Zakim, pick a scribe
16:10:14 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose PatH
16:10:33 [AndyS]
Sergio, and about part 1 - that is about scoping of vars - can we explicitly define what we need?
16:10:33 [DanC]
Zakim, pick a scribe
16:10:33 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose EliasT
16:10:33 [DanC]
Zakim, pick a scribe
16:10:33 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose AndyS
16:10:46 [DanC]
AndyS at risk for end of 17Jan meeting
16:10:49 [DanC]
Zakim, pick a scribe
16:10:49 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Jos_De_Roo
16:11:33 [DanC]
scribe 17 Jan: AndyS, backed by DanC
16:11:43 [DanC]
scribe 17 Jan: AndyS, backed by DanC, KC
16:11:55 [DanC]
RESOLVED to meet next 17 Jan, noting DanC at risk
16:12:07 [DanC]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
16:12:07 [Zakim]
On the phone I see EliasT, AndyS, jeen, EricP, DanC, Kendall_Clark, LeeF, PatH, Jos_De_Roo
16:13:04 [AndyS]
Sergio - are you dialing into the telecon?
16:13:08 [DanC]
Jos is also offering to scribe 17 Jan.
16:13:22 [DanC]
though at risk
16:13:28 [SerT]
I'm trying but I've got problems with the skype account
16:13:54 [DanC]
whee!
16:14:15 [DanC]
Zakim, next item
16:14:15 [Zakim]
agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda" taken up [from DanC]
16:14:23 [DanC]
Zakim, close item 1
16:14:23 [Zakim]
agendum 1, Convene, take roll, review records and agenda, closed
16:14:24 [Zakim]
I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
16:14:25 [Zakim]
2. Issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol [from DanC]
16:14:27 [DanC]
Zakim, take up item 2
16:14:27 [Zakim]
agendum 2. "Issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol" taken up [from DanC]
16:15:06 [DanC]
ACTION: KC to refine .wsdl description w.r.t. mime types [DONE]
16:15:43 [AndyS]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl
16:15:47 [DanC]
Zakim, who's talking?
16:15:57 [Zakim]
DanC, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AndyS (4%), jeen (11%), DanC (69%), Kendall_Clark (4%), EricP (4%)
16:16:45 [DanC]
sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:15:22
16:16:51 [DanC]
sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 2006/01/11 19:14:45
16:17:55 [DanC]
revision 1.17
16:17:55 [DanC]
date: 2006/01/11 19:14:45; author: kclark; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4
16:17:55 [DanC]
changed input and output serializations according to telcon on Tue (added "application/xml" to POST's input
16:17:55 [DanC]
and */* to GET's output
16:17:55 [DanC]
----------------------------
16:17:56 [DanC]
revision 1.16
16:17:58 [DanC]
date: 2006/01/09 20:14:21; author: kclark; state: Exp; lines: +7 -5
16:18:00 [DanC]
- added faultSerialization="*/*" to queryHttpGet and queryHttpPost
16:18:04 [DanC]
----------------------------
16:18:06 [DanC]
revision 1.15
16:18:08 [DanC]
date: 2006/01/09 19:59:32; author: kclark; state: Exp; lines: +52 -43
16:18:10 [DanC]
- updated WSDL namespace IRIs
16:18:12 [DanC]
- Singin', come out if things aren't said, Shoot an apple off my head
16:18:14 [DanC]
- you can't bind the same operation twice with the same name, so I split the HTTP binding of SparqlQuery.query into
16:18:17 [DanC]
a queryHttpGet binding and a queryHttpPost binding. Which kinda sucks, but works.
16:18:19 [DanC]
- removed wsdlx:safety="true" for the query operation, since we give it a POST binding (it's still safe in the relevant
16:18:22 [DanC]
sense, but it's not safe at the HTTP level)
16:18:24 [DanC]
- I either had binding faults wrong or the WSDL changed, but I replaced <fault name="MalformedQuery"...> with <fault
16:18:27 [DanC]
ref="tns:MalformedQuery"...>, since binding fault components don't have a name property, but rather a ref property
16:18:30 [DanC]
- (fault|input|output)Serialization attributes now work roughly like Accept: headers in HTTP... You can specify more than
16:18:35 [DanC]
one IMT or you can specify IMT ranges (though WSDL discourages using range specifiers). Accordingly, I:
16:18:37 [DanC]
- added whttp:outputSerialization="application/sparql-results+xml, application/rdf+xml" to queryHttpGet binding
16:18:50 [DanC]
(this means if you want to return results in another IMT, you make a new binding, minimally)
16:18:52 [DanC]
- replaced queryHttpPost's whttp:inputSerialization type (which was, inexplicably, set to "multipart/form-data") with
16:18:55 [DanC]
the proper value "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
16:18:57 [DanC]
- set queryHttpPost's outputSerialization to the same as queryHttpGet's
16:19:27 [DanC]
whttp:outputSerialization="application/sparql-results+xml, application/rdf+xml, */*"
16:20:36 [ericP]
ack eric
16:21:09 [patH]
I have to run away for about 3 minutes, will stay dialled in and muted.
16:21:32 [DanC]
PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 , sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 proto-wd/Overview.html 1.93 addresses issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
16:21:44 [DanC]
roger, patH
16:22:04 [ericP]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/i18n/kanji-01-results.ttl to XML
16:22:39 [patH]
back now.
16:23:25 [AndyS]
What XML can one send in POST? Add application/xml+rdf for same hook for RDF?
16:24:40 [EliasT]
AndyS: can there be both parameters in the URL and XML in the content body
16:24:49 [EliasT]
LeeF: thinks so
16:25:00 [DanC]
(I presume andy means "... an match this WSDL interface decl")
16:26:21 [Zakim]
-jeen
16:26:22 [AndyS]
Yes - we need to serialize the request and query.
16:26:27 [EliasT]
kendallclark: It's perfectly legal for an endpoint implementation to change how to take the in messages whether url parameters or content body in the HTTP implementation.
16:27:14 [EliasT]
kendallclark: our WSDL only specifies bindings but says nothing how the service tag needs to be defined.
16:27:54 [jeen_]
jeen_ has joined #dawg
16:28:12 [AndyS]
An answer of "it's OK" is fine.
16:28:16 [EliasT]
kendallclark: we could say that any changes in the service to our bindings could be considered illegal SPARQL, but it won't be illegal WSDL.
16:29:01 [EliasT]
kendallclark: WSDL tools will try their best to do what we have designed.
16:29:03 [kendallclark]
blah blah blah!
16:29:11 [EliasT]
kendallclark: blah blah blah.
16:29:16 [kendallclark]
heh :>
16:30:25 [Zakim]
+??P22
16:30:33 [jeen]
Zakim, ??P22 is me
16:30:33 [Zakim]
+jeen; got it
16:31:14 [kendallclark]
no one does, as far as i know
16:31:15 [DanC]
PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 , sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 proto-wd/Overview.html 1.93 addresses issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
16:32:52 [Souri2]
Souri2 has joined #dawg
16:33:55 [EliasT]
Zakim, mute me
16:33:55 [Zakim]
EliasT should now be muted
16:34:11 [DanC]
PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 , sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 proto-wd/Overview.html 1.93 section 2. SPARQL Protocol addresses issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
16:34:14 [AndyS]
Editorial : "Section 5: References: normative" but it has B informative : s/5/5.A/ ??
16:34:17 [DanC]
PROPOSED: that sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.17 , sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.17 proto-wd/Overview.html 1.93 section 2. SPARQL Protocol (less 2.2.1 )addresses issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
16:34:18 [kendallclark]
zakim, mute me
16:34:18 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
16:34:48 [kendallclark]
yep, that's right Andy
16:34:56 [kendallclark]
zakim, unmute me
16:34:56 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
16:35:37 [DanC]
RESOLVED, PatH abstaining
16:36:26 [DanC]
(marsh is really pending. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0046 )
16:37:10 [DanC]
pls visit http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
16:37:50 [DanC]
HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
16:37:50 [DanC]
* 2005-11-01T19:40:55Z from leigh
16:37:50 [DanC]
* 2006-01-05T05:01:42Z from kendall
16:38:34 [DanC]
ACTION KC: send an [OK?] msg re HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused
16:39:48 [DanC]
... and to paul etc.
16:40:08 [DanC]
Zakim, next item
16:40:08 [Zakim]
agendum 3. "Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD)" taken up [from DanC]
16:40:32 [ericP]
ack ericP
16:40:42 [LeeF]
zakim, mute me
16:40:42 [Zakim]
LeeF should now be muted
16:41:36 [DanC]
ACTION: EricP to propose text on behalf of the W3C team about security and policy
16:42:19 [EliasT]
ericP: He has a spoken comment from Thomas that he would like to put on text
16:42:50 [DanC]
-> http://incubator.apache.org/woden/ a WSDL 2.0 validator
16:45:06 [EliasT]
kendallclark: I'm a satisfied with the security and policy text in the protocol draft. However, Graham has almost convinced that there are some issues that need to be addressed.
16:45:26 [EliasT]
kendallclark: It would make sense in the W3C folks could harmonize and give me one text, but if not I'll have to do it myself.
16:46:14 [EliasT]
kendallclark: If ericP sends me a list of the URIs with the issues, I'll address all of the issues this afternoon.
16:46:41 [DanC]
ACTION: EricP send KC all the team input on policy, cc DanC
16:47:21 [DanC]
ACTION: KC consider policy input and let us know what text results
16:47:48 [DanC]
action -3
16:48:07 [DanC]
. ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing results
16:48:34 [DanC]
WITHDRAWN.
16:49:13 [kendallclark]
DanC: May I remove the shaming list of pending comments on the doc?
16:49:45 [jeen]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/rf1/
16:49:48 [DanC]
yes, KC
16:50:49 [DanC]
mf:result <rf1-example-mixedbindings.srx>
16:51:26 [DanC]
JB: steve is aware
16:52:03 [EliasT]
jeen: I have added another test for ordered/unordered results. It can be found at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/rf1/
16:52:22 [EliasT]
DanC: I was unaware of support for .srx files in QL test suite.
16:52:28 [DanC]
PROPOSED: to publish protocol editor's draft version 1.89 2006/01/07 21:31:23 + @@changes reviewed by @@whom, results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 + @@changes (example of... darn; forgot) reviewed by @@whom as 2nd Last Call WD.
16:53:33 [DanC]
PROPOSED: to publish protocol editor's draft version 1.93 policy section changes reviewed by KC, EP/DC; results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 as 2nd Last Call WD.
16:54:21 [DanC]
"A conformant SPARQL Protocol service"
16:54:42 [DanC]
hypertext anchor, pls
16:54:45 [DanC]
KC: ok
16:55:16 [EliasT]
kendallclark: I have added a new term that defines "A conformat SPARQL Protocol service".
16:55:40 [DanC]
"This set of documents comprises the ^specification of^ the SPARQL Protocol"
16:57:23 [kendallclark]
*grr*
16:57:24 [libby]
libby has joined #dawg
16:59:06 [libby]
in my calendar and everything
17:00:35 [kendallclark]
coolio
17:00:38 [DanC]
PROPOSED: to publish protocol editor's draft version 1.93 policy section changes reviewed by KC, EP/DC + hypertext anchor in conformance; results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 as 2nd Last Call WD, with comments due 27 Jan (provided we can publish near 13 Jan)
17:00:38 [libby]
is it now?
17:00:50 [DanC]
yes, started an hour ago. join the fun.
17:00:51 [LeeF]
15 minutes left today, libby
17:00:52 [DanC]
15 more min
17:00:54 [libby]
sorry again
17:01:03 [DanC]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
17:01:03 [Zakim]
On the phone I see EliasT (muted), AndyS, EricP, DanC, Kendall_Clark, LeeF (muted), PatH, Jos_De_Roo, jeen
17:01:12 [EliasT]
Zakim, unmute me please
17:01:12 [Zakim]
EliasT should no longer be muted
17:01:21 [DanC]
ack EliasT
17:01:34 [LeeF]
zakim, unmute me
17:01:34 [Zakim]
LeeF should no longer be muted
17:02:30 [DanC]
(hmm.. I see 1.95 now...)
17:02:35 [Zakim]
+Libby_Miller
17:03:00 [kendallclark]
A conformant SPARQL Protocol service may provide a default RDF dataset against which SPARQL query requests are executed in cases where there is no RDF dataset specified in the protocol or in the query request. A conformant SPARQL Protocol service may refuse to process any query request that does not specify an RDF dataset. Finally, a conformant SPARQL Protocol service may refuse to process any query request against any specified RDF dataset. See 2.1.4 query Fau
17:03:02 [DanC]
1.94 and 1.95 are TOC tweaks, evidently
17:03:07 [kendallclark]
yep
17:03:13 [DanC]
PROPOSED: to publish protocol editor's draft version 1.95 + policy section changes reviewed by KC, EP/DC + hypertext anchor in conformance; results format version 1.78 of 2006/01/04 15:59:22 as 2nd Last Call WD, with comments due 27 Jan (provided we can publish near 13 Jan)
17:03:49 [DanC]
ack leeF
17:04:19 [kendallclark]
Ah, there is an HTML anchor for "conformant SPARQL Protocol service":
17:04:23 [kendallclark]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/#conf
17:04:27 [kendallclark]
not a very good one, mind
17:05:36 [Zakim]
-EliasT
17:05:56 [DanC]
so RESOLVED.
17:06:02 [DanC]
ACTION DanC: noodle on status
17:06:09 [DanC]
ACTION KC: tell EricP when you're done
17:06:12 [DanC]
ACTION EricP: publish
17:07:45 [SerT]
I cannot dialin, system says the conference's restricted
17:08:25 [libby]
try *0 sert
17:08:33 [libby]
ask amy toput you through
17:08:42 [LeeF]
kendallclark: One outstanding comment from Reto
17:09:11 [DanC]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
17:09:55 [DanC]
Zakim, next item
17:09:55 [Zakim]
agendum 4. "issues rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction" taken up [from DanC]
17:10:10 [kendallclark]
Ah, well, Reto says his comments are "minor, editorial" so maybe we're okay anyway
17:10:20 [DanC]
Zakim, close item 4
17:10:20 [Zakim]
agendum 4, issues rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction, closed
17:10:25 [Zakim]
I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
17:10:25 [DanC]
Zakim, next item
17:10:27 [Zakim]
5. issues#valueTesting [from DanC]
17:10:28 [Zakim]
agendum 5. "issues#valueTesting" taken up [from DanC]
17:10:50 [ericP]
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-logical-or EBV result is the same as xsd:boolean
17:10:53 [ericP]
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-false "false"^^xsd:boolean = "0"^^xsd:boolean
17:10:56 [ericP]
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-true "true"^^xsd:boolean = "1"^^xsd:boolean
17:10:59 [ericP]
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-xsdtype T=T T=1 1=T 1=1 F=F F=0 0=F 0=0
17:11:37 [LeeF]
ACTION: PatH revise Enrico's "Proposed changes" on matching and entailment for solution sequences, esp w.r.t. RDFmerge/order [CONTINUES]
17:11:46 [LeeF]
ACTION: Enrico to review draft text on matching and entailment for solution sequences [CONTINUES]
17:11:48 [DanC]
q+ to note bug: rdfs:value should be rdf:value
17:11:54 [LeeF]
# ACTION: JosD to make test case from Sergio's basic query patterns examples [CONTINUES]
17:11:59 [LeeF]
ACTION: JosD to make test case from Sergio's basic query patterns examples
17:12:07 [LeeF]
ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically equivalent" vs graph equivalent [CONTINUES]
17:14:01 [DanC]
ack danc
17:14:01 [Zakim]
DanC, you wanted to note bug: rdfs:value should be rdf:value
17:14:36 [LeeF]
zakim, please mute me
17:14:36 [Zakim]
LeeF should now be muted
17:15:00 [LeeF]
Jos_De_Roo: rdfs: value -- the full URI -- is nonexistent
17:15:35 [LeeF]
(above the Data)
17:15:36 [DanC]
q+ to move to adjourn
17:15:47 [AndyS]
boolean-logical-OR
17:15:48 [LeeF]
NotApproved
17:15:48 [LeeF]
Various lexical forms of xsd:boolean equal an EBV..
17:15:48 [LeeF]
Data
17:15:54 [DanC]
"Various lexical forms of xsd:boolean equal an EBV.."
17:16:23 [LeeF]
ericP: already fixed double period typo
17:16:46 [LeeF]
ack LeeF
17:16:51 [AndyS]
New test is boolean-EBV-canonical ??
17:17:22 [DanC]
ADJOURN.
17:17:30 [Zakim]
-Libby_Miller
17:17:44 [Zakim]
-jeen
17:17:49 [DanC]
RRSAgent, make logs world-access
17:17:56 [LeeF]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes
17:17:56 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-dawg-minutes.html LeeF
17:18:54 [ericP]
Jos_De_Roo, i lost the end of your text
17:19:01 [ericP]
what were you saying?
17:19:06 [DanC]
yeah, jos, short-hands for true/false is propagating thru cwm-talk and turtle and such
17:19:39 [Zakim]
-Kendall_Clark
17:19:40 [Jos_De_Roo]
can we write t:ftext rdf:value false .
17:20:32 [AndyS]
yes - it is legal SPARQL.
17:22:17 [patH]
gotta go. Bye.
17:22:23 [Zakim]
-PatH
17:22:48 [ericP]
Jos_De_Roo, I agree that it's legal
17:22:58 [Jos_De_Roo]
ok, is clear now that we can write t:ftext rdfs:value "false"^^xsd:boolean .
17:22:59 [ericP]
i wonder if it's worth a test
17:23:44 [Jos_De_Roo]
oops.. rdf:value
17:23:48 [LeeF]
:-)
17:23:52 [Jos_De_Roo]
:)
17:24:46 [AndyS]
ARQ will have probs with \U because of Java 1.4 (and 1.5 is only halfway there :-|)
17:26:03 [SerT]
SerT has left #dawg
17:26:25 [AndyS]
Odd note: Eric found: \U does not allow \U00001234 (first 4 zeros) - is that a problem?
17:29:14 [Zakim]
-Jos_De_Roo
17:30:11 [Zakim]
-DanC
17:30:17 [Zakim]
-AndyS
17:30:19 [Zakim]
-LeeF
17:30:26 [Zakim]
-EricP
17:30:27 [Zakim]
SW_DAWG()11:00AM has ended
17:30:28 [Zakim]
Attendees were EliasT, AndyS, jeen, EricP, DanC, Kendall_Clark, LeeF, PatH, Jos_De_Roo, Libby_Miller
17:30:33 [LeeF]
LeeF has left #dawg
17:45:11 [EnricoFranconi]
EnricoFranconi has joined #dawg
17:55:02 [AndyS]
jeen?
17:55:12 [AndyS]
About the rf1 tests
17:55:32 [AndyS]
The data and the results don't match for the XMLliteral
17:55:43 [AndyS]
Sometimes it's <em>, sometimes <b>
17:55:58 [AndyS]
Sometimes it's "Alice" sometimes "alice"
17:56:16 [AndyS]
If I tweak those, ARQ passes the tests :-)
18:39:16 [LeeF_]
LeeF_ has joined #dawg
19:10:26 [LeeF]
LeeF has joined #dawg
19:10:28 [LeeF]
LeeF has left #dawg
19:25:45 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #dawg
20:55:54 [libby]
libby has joined #dawg
21:01:47 [SteveH]
SteveH has joined #dawg
21:30:36 [SteveH]
SteveH has joined #dawg