This is an archive of an inactive wiki and cannot be modified.

This is one of the possible Use Cases.

1. Abstract

This is a fairly detailed use case about representing e-contract rules, including about exception handling, and including the use of background ontological knowledge drawn from an OWL ontology about business processes. (By BenjaminGrosof)

2. Status

This use case is based primarily on the example in the 2004 IJEC journal paper ""SweetDeal: Representing Agent Contracts With Exceptions using Semantic Web Rules, Ontologies, and Process Descriptions", at http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof/#sweetdeal-exceptions-ijec.

That was the original use case motivating the development of Description Logic Programs (http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof/#DLP).

This use case is still undergoing editing.

FOR NOW: please see the above IJEC paper at http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof/#sweetdeal-exceptions-ijec.

3. Benefits of Interchange

List below some benefits of interchange in this use case, i.e. why interchange matters.

4. Requirements on the RIF

List requirements of this use case on the RIF.

5. Breakdown

5.1. Actors and their Goals

List the different parties who interact in this use case, along with their goals. They should be named with abstract role names, like "Buyer", "Seller", "Buyer's Agent", and "Government Agency".

5.2. Main Sequence

Provide the typical course of events, ordered as below in a sequence of steps.

  1. First step of sequence

  2. ...

  3. Last step of sequence

5.3. Alternate Sequences

Describe possible variations of the main sequence in separate subsections, assigning a title to each.

5.3.1. (Title of Alternate Sequence)

Describe the alternate sequence, referring to the steps in the main sequence above if convenient (to avoid repetition).

6. Narratives

Describe possible scenarios illustrating the use case in separate subsections, assigning a title to each.

6.1. (Title of Narrative)

Describe an individual scenario. Samples rules and other test data may be optionally included.

7. Commentary

Comments, issues, etc. Again, note that the wiki automatically keeps a revision history.