Logistics

As usual for Telecons.

Participants

(to be filled in during/after meeting)

Duration: 90 min

Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 conference code 74394# ('RIFWG') IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #rif Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc

Chair: Chris Welty Scribe: Benjamin Grosof (first alternate: Bijan Parsia ) See Scribes List http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ScribesList

Please note that RIF WG telecons are for for attendance only by Working Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs.

Roll call (please read before telecon the following)

Next Meeting: 7 February

Agenda amendments

ACTION: csma to ask ISO whether liaison is worthwhile for ISO IEC Joint Task Force 1, SC 32, Working Group 2: Metadata Standards US national body is ANSI L8 might be interesting for liaison. See http://metadata-standards.org/

Review active liaisons:

Other liaisons (e.g. JSR94)?

Discussion (Allen & David)

ACTION: Christian to send an email to announce the one week deadline for reviewing edited general use cases ACTION: Ian Horrocks to write scenario for RichKR including ‘features’ ACTION: Chris Welty will come up with another example narrative for a RichKR use case ACTION: Christian will propose another scenario for the publication use case ACTION: Paul Vincent will do the detailed scenario for "Interoperability between rule engines" ACTION: Frank will do the scenarios for information integration with Ed Barkmeyer assisting ACTION: Leora will do the Decision Support detailed scenario ACTION: Donald will submit an email about the use case for interchanging rules specified in different metamodels

ACTION: chris clarify desiderata for list of classifications ACTION: Chris Classifications draft Jan 31

Discussion (ChrisW): connecting the RIFRAF and the (generalised) Use Cases

Recent email threads: b-node semantics:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jan/0056.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jan/0010.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jan/0083.html ACTION: Christian will start an email discussion on "What part of the RIF vs. OWL/RDF Compatibility belongs to RIF and what part belong to OWL/RDF"
ACTION: JosDeRoo to update RIF wrt SPARQL rdfSemantics issue and its pending resolution
ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantics and summarize the possible solutions which have come up during the discussions on the mailing list