ISSUE-101: Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping?

RDF Syntax Uses Classes

Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RIF in RDF
Raised by:
Sandro Hawke
Opened on:
2010-06-18
Description:
It's possible to do the RIF-in-RDF mapping with our without using rdf:type arcs and corresponding RDF/OWL classes.

Using classes means using more triples, but may make the RDF version easier to understand.

One complication of using classes: if RDFS/OWL reasoning is done, there may be additional rdf:type arcs inferred. In the presence of incomplete reasoning, with rule-transformation rules, this might result in simply having different (but also correct) rdf:type arcs from the expected/original ones.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 7 September (from csma@fr.ibm.com on 2010-09-06)
  2. Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 Aug (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-08-23)
  3. [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 Aug (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2010-08-23)
  4. [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 10 August (from cawelty@gmail.com on 2010-08-09)
  5. [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 27 July (from csma@fr.ibm.com on 2010-07-26)
  6. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 [Switching to KR Argument] (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
  7. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
  8. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
  9. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
  10. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
  11. Re: RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-25)
  12. RIF-in-RDF: Requirement 4 (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-25)
  13. Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu on 2010-07-22)
  14. RE: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca on 2010-07-21)
  15. Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-21)
  16. Re: Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com on 2010-07-21)
  17. Toward closing the RIF-in-RDF open issues (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-07-20)
  18. RIF-in-RDF ready for review, okay for FPWD? (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-06-18)
  19. ISSUE-102: Naming of RDF properties (and maybe classes) in RIF-in-RDF mapping [RIF in RDF] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-18)
  20. ISSUE-101 (RDF Syntax Uses Classes): Should rdf:type arcs be a part of the RIF-in-RDF mapping? [RIF in RDF] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-18)

Related notes:

Closed by resolution at telecon 10 Aug 2010 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Aug/att-0017/2010-08-10-rif-minutes-edited.html)

Christian de Sainte Marie, 6 Sep 2010, 14:35:03

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 101.html,v 1.1 2013-02-08 09:09:32 vivien Exp $