<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PositiveEntailmentTest id="Positional_Arguments"
    src="http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/test/repository/tc/Positional_Arguments" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2009/10/rif-test#">
    <status>Approved</status>
    <dialect>Core</dialect>
    <dialect>BLD</dialect>
    <dialect>PRD</dialect>
    <purpose>To demonstrate different syntactic options for specifying arguments</purpose>
    <description>This test case demonstrates the same use case as "named arguments" and "frames" using ordered (positional) arguments instead of named arguments or frames.</description>
    <PremiseDocument>
        <Normative syntax="RIF/XML">
            <name>Positional_Arguments-premise.rif</name>
            <remote>http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/test/repository/tc/Positional_Arguments/Positional_Arguments-premise.rif</remote>
        </Normative>
        <Presentation syntax="RIFBLD-PS"><![CDATA[
Document (
 Prefix(ex <http://example.org/example#>)
 Prefix(xs <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>) 

 Group ( 

  Forall ?Customer (
     ex:discount(?Customer 10) :- ex:gold(?Customer)
  )

  Forall ?Customer (
     ex:discount(?Customer 5) :- ex:silver(?Customer)
  )

  ex:gold("John Doe")
 )
)
]]></Presentation>
    </PremiseDocument>
    <ConclusionDocument>
        <Normative syntax="RIF/XML">
            <name>Positional_Arguments-conclusion.rif</name>
            <remote>http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/test/repository/tc/Positional_Arguments/Positional_Arguments-conclusion.rif</remote>
        </Normative>
        <Presentation syntax="RIFBLD-PS"><![CDATA[
ex:discount("John Doe" 10)
]]></Presentation>
    </ConclusionDocument>
</PositiveEntailmentTest>
