ISSUE-249: Should we include information use of DCCI in BP2?
DCCI
Should we include information use of DCCI in BP2?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Scoping document Phase 2
- Raised by:
- Daniel Appelquist
- Opened on:
- 2008-05-08
- Description:
- As discussed in call 8 May 2008
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] Thursday 11 September 2008 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-09-11)
- [minutes] Thursday 03 July 2008 Teleconf (from fd@w3.org on 2008-07-03)
- ISSUE-249 (DCCI): Should we include information use of DCCI in BP2? [Scoping document Phase 2] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-05-08)
Related notes:
Based on the discussion we had during Sophia's F2F:
http://www.w3.org/2008/06/17-bpwg-minutes.html#item_awareness
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: DCCI is not implemented yet. We should not create any dependency on it. Don't mention DCCI in this version of MWABP.
Resolution taken
François Daoust, 3 Jul 2008, 15:32:35Display change log
