ISSUE-117: Should it be possible to claim conformance to individual BPs rather than the whole of mobileOK?

Should it be possible to claim conformance to individual BPs rather than the whole of mobileOK?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
mobileOK Basic tests
Raised by:
Jo Rabin
Opened on:
2006-07-10
Description:
Per my ACTION-300 from the meeting on Thursday 6th July.

A note has gone in to the mobileOK draft [1] requesting public comment on
whether mobileOK sustains the idea that you can claim conformance to individual
BPs or whther you have to claim conformance to the whole thing or nothing.

Jo
[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Trustmark/060708#id4485315
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [minutes] Thu July 13 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-07-13)
  2. ISSUE-117: Should it be possible to claim conformance to individual BPs rather than the whole of mobileOK? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2006-07-10)

Related notes:

Duplicate of 113.

13 Jul 2006, 00:00:00

Closed as it is a duplicate of ISSUE-113

13 Jul 2006, 00:00:00

Display change log ATOM feed


Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>, Daniel Appelquist <daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com>, Chairs, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, François Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 117.html,v 1.1 2011/01/10 15:19:38 dom Exp $