ISSUE-10: Can the mobileOK Trustmark be awarded to processes (e.g. content adaptation)? If so, how?
Can the mobileOK Trustmark be awarded to processes (e.g. content adaptation)? If so, how?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- mobileOK Basic tests
- Raised by:
- Yih-Farn Chen
- Opened on:
- 2005-09-15
- Description:
- relates to ISSUE-2 and ISSUE-3
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] Thu July 6 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-07-06)
- Re: [minutes] Thursday June 29 teleconf (from gilespayne@nttdocomo-std.com on 2006-07-03)
- Re: mobileOK tools (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-07-02)
- [minutes] Thursday June 29 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-06-29)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday June 29 teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-29)
- [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-06-15)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-15)
- Regrets - Thursday 8 June teleconf (from ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org on 2006-06-08)
- [agenda] Thursday 8 June teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-06-07)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from gilespayne@nttdocomo-std.com on 2006-06-05)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-06-05)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-06-05)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from parcher@icra.org on 2006-06-05)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2006-06-05)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-05)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2006-06-02)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from gilespayne@nttdocomo-std.com on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2006-06-02)
- RE: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-02)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from srowen@google.com on 2006-06-02)
- ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2006-06-01)
- Re: ACTION-273 Discuss ISSUE-10 mobileOK for processes and related topics (from srowen@google.com on 2006-06-01)
- [minutes] Thu 17 November teleconference (from dom@w3.org on 2005-11-22)
- ISSUE-10: Can the mobileOK Trustmark be awarded to processes (e.g. content adaptation)? If so, how? - Proposed Resolution (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-11-16)
- ACTION-29 - Create a document to describe how MobileOK will be used as a trustmark (from paulwalsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-10-02)
- RE: ACTION-49 Give input for BP conformance (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-20)
- ISSUE-10: Can the mobileOK Trustmark be awarded to processes (e.g. content adaptation)? If so, how? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-09-15)
Related notes:
This cannot be determined until we have decided what mobileOK for content
actually means.
Display change log