IRC log of xproc on 2005-12-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:43:42 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 15:43:42 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-irc
- 15:43:43 [Norm]
- zakim, this will be xproc
- 15:43:43 [Zakim]
- ok, Norm; I see XML_PMWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 17 minutes
- 15:43:51 [ebruchez]
- ebruchez has joined #xproc
- 15:45:51 [Norm]
- zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2005/12/15-agenda.rdf
- 15:45:52 [Zakim]
- working on it, Norm
- 15:45:53 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Welcome and introductions
- 15:45:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 added
- 15:45:55 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Administrivia
- 15:45:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 added
- 15:45:57 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Face-to-face meeting at the Tech Plenary?
- 15:45:58 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 added
- 15:45:59 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Meet on 22 Dec?
- 15:46:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 added
- 15:46:02 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Review of charter and deliverables
- 15:46:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 added
- 15:46:05 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Discussion
- 15:46:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 added
- 15:46:09 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Use Cases
- 15:46:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 added
- 15:46:13 [Zakim]
- agenda+ Requirements
- 15:46:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 8 added
- 15:46:17 [Zakim]
- done reading agenda, Norm
- 15:49:16 [Ale1]
- Ale1 has joined #xproc
- 15:53:56 [ht]
- Norm, are you going to try to be like our hero PaulG and chair _and_ take minutes?
- 15:54:02 [ht]
- Or will we need a scribe?
- 15:54:32 [Norm]
- ht, I'm going to try today at least :-)
- 15:54:51 [ht]
- OK, I'll be available if you need me as fallback
- 15:55:58 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has now started
- 15:56:05 [Zakim]
- +Norm
- 15:56:09 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has joined #xproc
- 15:56:13 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norman Walsh
- 15:56:13 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 15:56:13 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 15:56:13 [Norm]
- Date: 15 Dec 2005
- 15:56:13 [Norm]
- Chair: Norman Walsh
- 15:56:14 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2005/12/15-agenda.html
- 15:56:36 [Jeni]
- Jeni has joined #xproc
- 15:57:15 [Norm]
- zakim, list agenda
- 15:57:15 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda:
- 15:57:17 [Zakim]
- 1. Welcome and introductions
- 15:57:18 [Zakim]
- 2. Administrivia
- 15:57:20 [Zakim]
- 3. Face-to-face meeting at the Tech Plenary?
- 15:57:21 [Zakim]
- 4. Meet on 22 Dec?
- 15:57:22 [Zakim]
- 5. Review of charter and deliverables
- 15:57:23 [Zakim]
- 6. Discussion
- 15:57:24 [Zakim]
- 7. Use Cases
- 15:57:25 [Zakim]
- 8. Requirements
- 15:59:30 [Zakim]
- +Jeni_Tennison
- 15:59:58 [Zakim]
- +[ArborText]
- 16:00:08 [Jeni]
- Zakim, Jeni is Jeni
- 16:00:08 [Zakim]
- +Jeni; got it
- 16:00:27 [ht]
- zakim, please call ht-781
- 16:00:27 [Zakim]
- ok, ht; the call is being made
- 16:00:29 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 16:00:42 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.891.aaaa
- 16:01:00 [Norm]
- zakim, aaaa Ale1
- 16:01:00 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'aaaa Ale1', Norm
- 16:01:04 [Norm]
- zakim, aaaa is Ale1
- 16:01:04 [Zakim]
- +Ale1; got it
- 16:01:27 [AndrewF]
- AndrewF has joined #xproc
- 16:02:13 [Zakim]
- +??P11
- 16:02:28 [Zakim]
- + +1.650.491.aabb
- 16:02:30 [Jeni]
- Zakim, mute me
- 16:02:30 [Zakim]
- Jeni should now be muted
- 16:02:31 [Norm]
- zakim, ?P11 is AndrewF
- 16:02:32 [Zakim]
- sorry, Norm, I do not recognize a party named '?P11'
- 16:02:40 [Norm]
- zakim, ??P11 is AndrewF
- 16:02:40 [Zakim]
- +AndrewF; got it
- 16:02:45 [Norm]
- zakim, aabb is ebruchez
- 16:02:45 [Zakim]
- +ebruchez; got it
- 16:03:02 [MSM]
- zakim, please call Michael-Office
- 16:03:02 [Zakim]
- ok, MSM; the call is being made
- 16:03:03 [Zakim]
- +Michael
- 16:03:05 [Zakim]
- +??P20
- 16:03:08 [richard]
- richard has joined #xproc
- 16:03:17 [Zakim]
- +??P13
- 16:03:19 [MSM]
- zakim, who's here?
- 16:03:19 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, Jeni (muted), PGrosso, Ht, Ale1, AndrewF, ebruchez, Michael, ??P20, ??P13
- 16:03:21 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see richard, AndrewF, Jeni, PGrosso, Ale1, ebruchez, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, ht, MSM
- 16:03:47 [Norm]
- zakim, ??P13 is RuiLopes
- 16:03:47 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P13 as MSM, Norm
- 16:03:49 [Zakim]
- +amilows
- 16:03:58 [Norm]
- zakim, ??P20 is richard
- 16:03:58 [Zakim]
- +richard; got it
- 16:04:06 [Norm]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:04:06 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, Jeni (muted), PGrosso, Ht, Ale1, AndrewF, ebruchez, Michael, richard, MSM, amilows
- 16:04:23 [ht]
- zakim, MSM is RuiLopes
- 16:04:23 [Zakim]
- +RuiLopes; got it
- 16:04:55 [Norm]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:04:55 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, Jeni (muted), PGrosso, Ht, Ale1, AndrewF, ebruchez, Michael, richard, RuiLopes, amilows
- 16:06:02 [Norm]
- Present: Norm, Jeni, Paul, Henry, Alessandro, Andrew, Eric, Michael, Richard, Rui, and Alex
- 16:06:15 [Norm]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:06:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Welcome and introductions" taken up
- 16:07:03 [Jeni]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:07:03 [Zakim]
- Jeni should no longer be muted
- 16:07:35 [Norm]
- Scribe decides not to attempt to record introductions.
- 16:07:59 [Jeni]
- Zakim, mute me
- 16:07:59 [Zakim]
- Jeni should now be muted
- 16:08:35 [MSM]
- q?
- 16:08:37 [Norm]
- Norm asks if the WG minds having Rui as a guest this week as he hasn't finished the invited expert process. No objections.
- 16:08:55 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has joined #xproc
- 16:09:03 [Norm]
- zakim, amilows is alexmilowski
- 16:09:03 [Zakim]
- +alexmilowski; got it
- 16:13:02 [Norm]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:13:02 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Norm, Jeni (muted), PGrosso, Ht, Ale1, AndrewF, ebruchez, Michael, richard, RuiLopes, alexmilowski
- 16:15:06 [Norm]
- Chair thanks the members for their introductions.
- 16:15:15 [Norm]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:15:15 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Administrivia" taken up
- 16:15:36 [Norm]
- Zakim: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- 16:15:59 [Norm]
- RRSAgent: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
- 16:15:59 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent', Norm. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 16:16:11 [Norm]
- RRS Agent: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
- 16:17:43 [alexmilowski]
- port issue?
- 16:18:09 [AndrewF]
- http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi
- 16:18:46 [Norm]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:18:46 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Face-to-face meeting at the Tech Plenary?" taken up
- 16:18:53 [cmsmcq]
- cmsmcq has joined #xproc
- 16:20:02 [MSM]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/tp6groups.html
- 16:20:05 [PGrosso]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html is the only URL for the TP info to date.
- 16:20:07 [Norm]
- We have two days of f2f space at the Tech Plenary outside Cannes on M/T the 27/28 Feb 2006
- 16:20:44 [rlopes]
- rlopes has joined #xproc
- 16:21:09 [Jeni]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:21:09 [Zakim]
- Jeni should no longer be muted
- 16:21:54 [Norm]
- Regrets from Jeni for the f2f
- 16:21:54 [Jeni]
- Zakim, mute me
- 16:21:54 [Zakim]
- Jeni should now be muted
- 16:22:17 [Norm]
- Proposed: to hold the f2f meeting at the Tech Plenary as planned.
- 16:22:18 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:22:24 [Norm]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:22:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Meet on 22 Dec?" taken up
- 16:23:50 [MSM]
- regrets: Richard, Alessandro
- 16:23:50 [Norm]
- Regrets for 22 Dec: Richard, Ale1
- 16:23:58 [Norm]
- Next meeting: 22 Dec 2005
- 16:24:32 [Norm]
- In general we'll meet weekly at 11:00 EST on Thursdays
- 16:25:44 [alexmilowski]
- Are there definitions of the WG acronyms on http://www.w3.org/2005/10/tp6groups.html ?
- 16:25:46 [Norm]
- Eric wonders if we can change times. Norm proposes we stick with this until the f2f
- 16:26:14 [Norm]
- Cancelled: 29 Dec 2005; next meeting after 22 Dec will be 5 Jan 2006
- 16:26:47 [richard]
- http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Processing.html
- 16:26:47 [Norm]
- Group page: http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=38398
- 16:27:24 [Norm]
- zakim, next agendum
- 16:27:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Review of charter and deliverables" taken up
- 16:27:49 [Norm]
- Charter: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/xml-processing-model-wg-charter.html
- 16:27:49 [MSM]
- Charter: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/xml-processing-model-wg-charter.html
- 16:28:06 [Norm]
- Public group page: http://www.w3.org/XML/Processing/
- 16:28:55 [Norm]
- ACTION: ht to update administrative page with pointers to relevant docs (Charter, etc.)
- 16:30:09 [Norm]
- We'll do most of our work on the public page
- 16:31:41 [Norm]
- Norm takes a run through the charter
- 16:32:57 [MSM]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 16:33:08 [Zakim]
- MSM, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Norm (31%)
- 16:35:19 [ht]
- q+ to wave a big stick
- 16:35:27 [Norm]
- ack ht
- 16:35:27 [Zakim]
- ht, you wanted to wave a big stick
- 16:36:42 [Norm]
- HT points out that there are two kinds of WGs (broadly) ones that are inventing new stuff, ones that are standardizing existing technology and working on interoperability. We're in the latter group and are well placed to work quickly.
- 16:37:41 [Norm]
- AlexM wonders how others feel about the charter and if there's consensus regarding the goals
- 16:38:48 [Norm]
- AlexM: I have two hot buttons: extensibility and streaming pipelines
- 16:40:00 [Norm]
- Richard: Scripting language has two parts: having a way to specify a sequence of processes and to talk about what form the data is in as it passes through the process. It would be nice if we could do the former without constraining the latter
- 16:40:38 [Norm]
- Richard: One could imagine describing a pipeline without talking about data models and have different implementations that did the same thing with different data models
- 16:40:47 [MSM]
- Richard, do you mean one implementation that passes SAX events at the process boundaries, and one that passes a DOM around, and one that passes XML (or NSGML) around?
- 16:40:58 [richard]
- yes, that sort of choice
- 16:41:02 [MSM]
- +1
- 16:41:36 [MSM]
- q+ to wander off to the second goal (so don't call on me til we're done discussing the first deliverable)
- 16:41:41 [Norm]
- Eric: Richard has a good point; those can be separated and we shouldn't enforce a particular data model
- 16:42:05 [Norm]
- Eric: Wonders if the use cases we have today can be met with this kind of implementation
- 16:42:44 [Norm]
- Eric: It's not necessary that V1 be able to do everything in every pipline language. We should try to get the bulk of the use cases and let individual vendors provide extensions for the rest.
- 16:43:50 [Norm]
- Rui: I think there should be some kind of registry so that we can have common components that do the same thing in different implementations
- 16:44:15 [ht]
- q+
- 16:44:27 [richard]
- q+
- 16:44:33 [Norm]
- Rui: different implementations should be able to get the same results with the core components
- 16:44:35 [MSM]
- queue=ht, richard, MSM
- 16:44:42 [Norm]
- ack ht
- 16:45:38 [Norm]
- ht: If I understand Rui correctly, it addresses one of the weaknesses of the original Sun pipeline note which is the awkardness of having to have indirection to identify what each stage of the pipeline does
- 16:46:04 [rlopes]
- exactly
- 16:46:23 [Norm]
- ht: If you had a registry, you could identify small names for the processes that do things, like registering "XSLT" for the XSLT 1.0 process
- 16:47:07 [Norm]
- ack richard
- 16:47:51 [Norm]
- richard: proposes that URIs could be used to identify such components; there will be some standard (and some non-standard) components and they will need to be named
- 16:48:18 [Norm]
- richard: it would be nice if you could abstract away exactly how the data is provided to these components
- 16:48:46 [Norm]
- richard: on the one hand you have a scripting language and on the other hands you have components that describe the kinds of inputs that they accept
- 16:50:35 [Norm]
- ht: I'm going to signal early that I think the hard question is going to be conditionals and whether or not we have some form of conditionality. The driving force behind answering that is probably going to be error handling. I'm not sure I have a clear opinion.
- 16:51:38 [Norm]
- ack msm
- 16:51:57 [MSM]
- zakim, unmute Michael
- 16:51:57 [Zakim]
- Michael should no longer be muted
- 16:52:07 [Norm]
- zakim, michael is msm
- 16:52:07 [Zakim]
- +msm; got it
- 16:52:44 [Norm]
- MSM: one goal for the first deliverable: I'd like to propose that the spec be able to be short; no more than 15 normative pages.
- 16:53:08 [Norm]
- MSM: The Algol 60 report is 17 pages.
- 16:53:23 [Norm]
- MSM: It ought to be implementable by a desperate perl hacker in a week or two.
- 16:54:37 [Norm]
- MSM: I'm nervous about the second deliverable. I think it may not be possible. While I agree that there are contexts, like browsers, where it makes sense to have a default processing model, but there's a lot of pressure to force XML away from a declarative semantics and towards an imperative semantics and its going to be difficult to resist that pressure if we aren't resolute.
- 16:55:07 [Norm]
- MSM: I think it's a trap to assign imperative semantics to the !DOCTYPE declaration or the existinance of a schema location hint.
- 16:55:25 [Norm]
- MSM: Those are declarative statements, not requests that processing occur
- 16:55:51 [Norm]
- MSM: It's very difficult to describe a default semantics without becoming imperative.
- 16:57:50 [PGrosso]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-proc-model-req-20040405/
- 16:58:13 [Norm]
- Chair encourages WG members to contribute use cases that they feel the should be solved by the core language
- 16:58:49 [Norm]
- Richard asks why the Core WG requirements document isn't in the charter
- 16:58:55 [Norm]
- Norm suggests oversight.
- 16:59:39 [Jeni]
- Thanks Norm!
- 16:59:44 [Jeni]
- bye
- 16:59:46 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 16:59:47 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 16:59:47 [Zakim]
- -AndrewF
- 16:59:48 [Zakim]
- -RuiLopes
- 16:59:48 [Zakim]
- -alexmilowski
- 16:59:49 [Zakim]
- -PGrosso
- 16:59:50 [Zakim]
- -ebruchez
- 16:59:51 [Zakim]
- -Jeni
- 16:59:53 [Zakim]
- -richard
- 16:59:55 [Zakim]
- -Ale1
- 16:59:57 [Zakim]
- -msm
- 16:59:59 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
- 17:00:01 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Norm, Jeni_Tennison, Jeni, PGrosso, Ht, +1.408.891.aaaa, Ale1, +1.650.491.aabb, AndrewF, ebruchez, richard, RuiLopes, alexmilowski, msm
- 17:00:11 [ht]
- Norm, presume you will link the minutes from the public page?
- 17:00:13 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has left #xproc
- 17:00:15 [ht]
- Or just email them. . .
- 17:00:16 [Ale1]
- Ale1 has left #xproc
- 17:00:21 [rlopes]
- bye
- 17:02:06 [ht]
- Michael, some status info on #xmlschema for your delectation . . .
- 17:02:10 [Norm]
- i/agendum 1./Topic: Welcome and introductions/
- 17:02:20 [Norm]
- i/agendum 2./Topic: Administrivia/
- 17:02:34 [Norm]
- i/agendum 3./Topic: Face-to-face meeting at the Tech Plenary?
- 17:02:52 [Norm]
- i/agendum 4./Topic: Meeting on 22 Dec 2005?/
- 17:03:15 [Norm]
- rrsagent, pointer?
- 17:03:15 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-irc#T17-03-15
- 17:03:55 [Norm]
- rrsagent, set logs world-visible
- 17:04:09 [ht]
- zakim, bye
- 17:04:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc
- 17:04:32 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:04:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 17:06:02 [Norm]
- i/agendum 5./Topic: Review of charter and deliverables/
- 17:06:48 [Norm]
- s/regrets:/telcon regrets /
- 17:06:53 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 17:08:41 [Norm]
- s/Accepted./Resolved/
- 17:10:01 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:10:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 17:12:30 [Norm]
- It inserts foo before the line that contains "bar"
- 17:13:38 [MSM]
- sure
- 17:13:46 [MSM]
- will you call, or shall i?
- 17:13:49 [Norm]
- Ok. I'll cal you in about 2 minutes
- 17:13:50 [MSM]
- 505 747-424
- 17:13:54 [MSM]
- 505 747-4224
- 17:20:41 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has left #xproc
- 18:17:50 [Norm]
- rrsagent, bye
- 18:17:50 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-actions.rdf :
- 18:17:50 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ht to update administrative page with pointers to relevant docs (Charter, etc.) [1]
- 18:17:50 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/15-xproc-irc#T16-28-55