13:27:49 RRSAgent has joined #eo 13:27:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/11/18-eo-irc 13:28:03 Zakim has joined #eo 13:28:14 zakim, this will be eowg 13:28:14 ok, pasquale, I see WAI_EOWG()8:30AM already started 13:28:22 zakim, who is here? 13:28:22 On the phone I see ??P0, Doyle_Saylor 13:28:23 On IRC I see RRSAgent, alan, pasquale, Andrew, shawn 13:28:25 +Sylvie_Duchateau\Tanguy_Lohéac 13:28:44 Meeting: EOWG 13:28:57 barry has joined #eo 13:29:17 +Shawn 13:29:28 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005OctDec/0100.html 13:29:36 zakim, ??P0 is Alan 13:29:36 +Alan; got it 13:30:11 +??P4 13:30:19 +??P5 13:30:36 +??P6 13:30:39 +??P7 13:30:39 zakim, ??p6 is Andrew 13:30:41 +Andrew; got it 13:30:52 zakim, ??P5 is Shadi 13:30:52 +Shadi; got it 13:30:57 +Loughborough 13:31:02 zakim, ??P4 is Barry 13:31:02 +Barry; got it 13:31:19 zakim, ??p7 is pasquale 13:31:19 +pasquale; got it 13:32:51 zakim, who is here? 13:32:51 On the phone I see Alan, Doyle_Saylor, Sylvie_DuchateauTanguy_Lohéac (muted), Shawn, Barry, Shadi, Andrew, pasquale, Loughborough 13:32:53 On IRC I see barry, Zakim, RRSAgent, alan, pasquale, Andrew, shawn 13:34:26 Topic: Outreach Updates 13:34:26 Wayne has joined #eo 13:35:05 Shadi: short report from Tunis 13:36:22 scribe: Andrew 13:36:29 scribenick: andrew 13:37:34 Harvey has joined #eo 13:37:39 I am having a little computer trouble today, I'll join in a couple of minutes. 13:37:53 ack shadi 13:39:08 Topic: Outreach updates 13:39:24 +Bingham 13:39:38 Shadi: short report from Tunis at WSIS 13:40:11 +??P10 13:40:34 Barry: reported on the large scale survey across the EU that he has been involved in 13:40:35 zakim, ??P10 is wayne 13:40:35 +wayne; got it 13:40:58 Barry: outcomes to be announced next week and the report launched 13:42:27 Barry: Lead partner was RNIB; others included AbilityNet & SOCITM Insight 13:43:03 Harvey: attended presentation by Maria XXX from School for the Blind 13:45:23 Barry: starting point was a common set of services from each state, plus sites the state nominated 13:46:09 Barry: auto scan of all sites (500) plus manual evaluation on subset (30 sites) 13:46:47 Barry: manual eval confirmed auto test plus issues auto testing can't look at 13:47:45 Barry: instead of just WCAG "A", broke it into four categories 13:47:55 zakim, mute me 13:47:55 wayne should now be muted 13:48:28 Barry: methodologies described in forthcoming report 13:49:10 Barry: tried to pick out particularly good practice, and named state and org 13:49:29 Barry: long list of recommendations also in the report 13:51:16 Barry: most states ahve WCAG "AA" as their objective, even if not many have achieved it 13:51:59 zakim, unmute me 13:51:59 wayne should no longer be muted 13:54:10 zakim, mute me 13:54:10 wayne should now be muted 13:54:48 Topic: Before/After Demo (BAD) 13:55:14 See: requirements - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/retrofit/requ-basite 13:56:05 s/See/Shadi 13:56:41 Shadi: 4 pages that look equivalent but are inaccessible and accessible repsectively 13:57:04 Shadi: plus a model evaluation 13:58:00 wayne, unmute me 13:58:00 Shadi: List of Web accessibility barriers selected for demonstration - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/features 13:59:03 Shadi: not comprehensive list of accessibility barries, but representative 13:59:16 shadi: can add accessibility barriers later 13:59:35 Shadi: each of the four pages demonstrates different bariers 14:01:07 Shadi: before (inaccessible) pages - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/before/ 14:01:49 Shadi: not complete, but developing rapidly 14:02:15 Shadi: some pages not only break with assistive technology, but also with some browsers 14:02:41 Shadi: after (accessible) pages - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/after/ 14:03:00 Shadi: the after pages are not as developed as the before pages 14:03:55 Shadi: any comments/feedback? 14:04:07 William: it looks pretty good 14:06:27 Andrew: it will be a nice collection for demo purposes 14:06:44 Shawn: is the visual design final? 14:07:08 Shadi: pretty much final, maybe some fine tuning 14:08:10 Shadi: does the top yellow warning/notice banner work? 14:09:36 Andrew: yellow stands out, but as it does not match the colour scheme it does not detract from the design 14:10:15 Barry: red on yellow is a bit difficult to read but words are good 14:10:46 All: agree that placement is good 14:12:41 Action: issues 1) reconsider red on yellow; 2) make banner text scalable; 3) consider link to good site as well as to 'about' 14:13:14 wayne, unmute me 14:13:26 zakim, unmute me 14:13:26 wayne should no longer be muted 14:15:23 Action: issues 4) add some padding to the text 14:16:09 Wayne: the before page works fine with my custom stylesheet 14:16:37 Shadi: it would be good to get some feedback from Wayne so we can possibly break it a bit more 14:17:18 Action: Wayne to check all 'before' pages and provide feedback to TF 14:20:53 Wayne: top banner currently interferes with page for me - rest of page is good 14:21:58 Action: issues 5) strong bottom border line 14:21:58 Barry: likes overall visual design - not as strong concerns as Wayne as can factor out the banner (once you realise it's purpose) 14:24:49 Shawn: is grey boring? William - yes; Barry - no, quite common 14:26:03 Action: issues 6) are some space around the borders, e.g. 'traffic' should not be against the page boundry 14:30:16 Shawn: lets consider navigation for the demo and between the good/bad pages 14:31:15 s/boring? William - yes;/boring? Harvey - yes; 14:37:45 Shawn: do we all agree that best is a tweaking of the top warning banner? 14:38:14 +Jack 14:38:19 All: all agree that notificayion and navigation can be in the top bar on bother versions 14:38:56 present + Jack 14:39:26 zakim, who is here? 14:39:26 On the phone I see Alan, Doyle_Saylor, Sylvie_DuchateauTanguy_Lohéac (muted), Shawn, Barry, Shadi (muted), Andrew, pasquale, Loughborough, Bingham, wayne, Jack 14:39:29 On IRC I see Harvey, Wayne, barry, Zakim, RRSAgent, alan, pasquale, Andrew, shawn 14:41:28 present: Alan Chuter, Doyle Saylor, Tanguy Lohéac, Shawn Lawton Henry, Andrew Arch, Barry, Shadi, Pasquale, William Loughborough, Harvey Bingham, Wayne Dick 14:41:29 -Alan 14:45:11 Andrew: what about using the LHS nav to link to the report, and then to the repaierd (or damaged) page? 14:45:37 s/repaierd/repaired 14:46:56 Shadi: please think about use cases - page by page vs site vs report etc 14:48:39 Shawn: Andrew's suggestion may also alow demo of menu hierarchy 14:49:29 Shawn: it should always be clear as to whether you are in the before or after site 14:49:45 William: keep is simple 14:50:37 Barry: disagrees with Andrew's suggestion - keep suite navigation separate from model navigation 14:51:49 Barry: keep all suite navigation to the page linked from the banner at the top, might be extra links but simple and discreet 14:52:37 Barry: put the good/bad indicator into the top banner, not on the page (but top banner needs to be kept concise) 14:54:14 Shadi: what about using colour in the banner to help differentiate between good/bad? 14:54:50 Wayne: whhy not just say BEFORE & AFTER? 14:55:00 s/whhy/why 14:56:28 zakim, who is here? 14:56:28 On the phone I see Doyle_Saylor, Sylvie_DuchateauTanguy_Lohéac (muted), Shawn, Barry, Shadi (muted), Andrew, pasquale, Loughborough, Bingham, wayne, Jack 14:56:34 On IRC I see Harvey, Wayne, barry, Zakim, RRSAgent, pasquale, Andrew, shawn 15:00:25 -pasquale 15:01:20 +pasquale 15:01:48 -Barry 15:02:31 +Barry_McMullin 15:02:32 Shadi: what about information that is actually informative about accessibility? 15:04:00 William: keep the pages pure - keep accessibility info out 15:04:27 Most: agree with William; Andrew doesn't mind accessibility info 15:04:31 -Jack 15:13:04 Regrets: Henk Snetselaar, Justin Thorp, Liam McGee, Roberto Castaldo 15:16:04 zakim, who is here? 15:16:04 On the phone I see Doyle_Saylor, Sylvie_DuchateauTanguy_Lohéac (muted), Shawn, Shadi, Andrew, Loughborough, Bingham, wayne, pasquale, Barry_McMullin 15:16:06 On IRC I see Harvey, Wayne, barry, Zakim, RRSAgent, pasquale, Andrew, shawn 15:16:37 Shawn: discussion seems to be that the top bar should NOT be integrated more into the site, but can still demo best practice such as use of colour 15:17:23 Shadi: thanks to TF members - Steve Faulkner, Liam McGee, Pasquale, Tanguy 15:18:13 Action: consider links to 'intro', 'before', 'after', 'eval' in the top banner 15:18:25 Regrets + Helle 15:18:57 Topic: List of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools 15:19:52 Shadi: update on activities - user interface almost stable; TF collecting data 15:20:22 Shadi: see - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2005/tools-tf 15:25:28 William: will be collecting the accessibility of the tools themselves? 15:25:50 Andrew: we are trying to gather this information from the vendors/developers 15:26:07 Topic: Note EOWG meeting schedule for November and December 15:26:18 See - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings 15:26:57 Shawn: may need to progress some activities via email as we are missing several Friday meetings in the next month and a half 15:30:22 -Bingham 15:30:51 -Barry_McMullin 15:30:53 -Sylvie_DuchateauTanguy_Lohéac 15:30:55 -Shadi 15:30:56 -Doyle_Saylor 15:30:57 -Shawn 15:30:58 -wayne 15:31:05 -pasquale 15:31:07 -Loughborough 15:31:11 zakim, make logs world 15:31:11 I don't understand 'make logs world', shawn 15:31:12 -Andrew 15:31:14 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended 15:31:15 Attendees were Doyle_Saylor, Sylvie_Duchateau\Tanguy_Lohéac, Shawn, Alan, Andrew, Shadi, Loughborough, Barry, pasquale, Bingham, wayne, Jack, Barry_McMullin 15:31:21 rrsagent, make logs world 15:31:33 andrew ***THANKS*** 15:31:43 thanks shawn - i was just looking it up 15:32:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:32:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/11/18-eo-minutes.html shawn 15:34:14 bye shawn and andrew, have a good day/night 15:34:27 bye pasquale 15:34:58 good night 16:06:50 shawn has left #eo 17:33:18 Zakim has left #eo