19:10:15 RRSAgent has joined #ws-addr 19:10:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-ws-addr-irc 19:10:25 zakim, this will be ws_ad 19:10:25 ok, mnot; I see WS_AddrWG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 50 minutes 19:10:40 Meeting: Web Services Addressing Working Group Teleconference 19:10:45 Chair: Mark Nottingham 19:11:06 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/BBA71019-D565-4E93-9BD7-A0EBD9B65497@bea.com 19:17:20 abbie has joined #ws-addr 19:46:55 TonyR has joined #ws-addr 19:50:41 TomRutt has joined #ws-addr 19:53:25 mlpeel has joined #ws-addr 19:54:07 WS_AddrWG()4:00PM has now started 19:54:15 + +44.238.022.aaaa 19:54:16 MSEder has joined #ws-addr 19:55:03 +Abbie_Barbir 19:57:09 Nilo has joined #ws-addr 19:57:35 pauld has joined #ws-addr 19:58:30 +??P3 19:58:33 +Mark_Peel 19:58:43 zakim, ??p3 is me 19:58:43 +TonyR; got it 19:59:49 +MSEder 19:59:55 +[Microsoft] 20:00:09 zakim,mute me 20:00:09 MSEder should now be muted 20:00:20 +Nilo_Mitra 20:00:43 prasad has joined #ws-Addr 20:01:03 +Tom_Rutt 20:01:50 +Bob_Freund 20:01:57 +MarkN 20:02:01 +Mark_Peel/Katy_Warr 20:02:24 +Prasad_Yendluri 20:02:41 GlenD has joined #ws-addr 20:02:43 +Hugo 20:02:47 +Marc_Hadley 20:02:48 Katy has joined #ws-addr 20:02:50 Zakim, drop hugo 20:02:50 Hugo is being disconnected 20:02:51 -Hugo 20:02:54 +Hugo 20:03:03 +Pete_Wenzel 20:03:09 +Steve_Vinoski 20:03:16 marc has joined #ws-addr 20:03:29 +pauld 20:03:31 dhull has joined #ws-addr 20:03:58 anish has joined #ws-addr 20:04:08 +[IBM] 20:04:18 +[Microsoft.a] 20:04:24 Paco has joined #ws-addr 20:04:24 +Anish 20:04:40 RebeccaB has joined #ws-addr 20:05:18 +Dave_Hull 20:05:44 +Andreas_Bjarlestam 20:06:29 zakim, who is on the phone? 20:06:29 On the phone I see Andreas_Bjarlestam, +44.238.022.aaaa, Abbie_Barbir, TonyR, Mark_Peel, MSEder, [Microsoft], Nilo_Mitra, Tom_Rutt, Bob_Freund, MarkN, Mark_Peel/Katy_Warr, 20:06:32 ... Prasad_Yendluri, Hugo, Marc_Hadley, Pete_Wenzel, Steve_Vinoski, pauld, [IBM], [Microsoft.a], Anish, Dave_Hull 20:06:37 Arun has joined #ws-addr 20:06:59 +[Sun] 20:07:02 zakim, [sun] is me 20:07:02 +Arun; got it 20:07:04 zakim, Microsoft.a contains Marsh 20:07:04 +Marsh; got it 20:07:11 andreas has joined #ws-addr 20:07:15 +GlenD 20:07:36 zakim,mute me 20:07:36 MSEder should now be muted 20:08:07 Zakim, Mark_Peel/Katy_Warr really is Katy_Warr 20:08:08 I don't understand 'Mark_Peel/Katy_Warr really is Katy_Warr', hugo 20:08:25 -[Microsoft.a] 20:08:28 Zakim, Mark_Peel/Katy_Warr is really Katy_Warr 20:08:28 +Katy_Warr; got it 20:08:31 +[Microsoft.a] 20:08:56 zakim, Microsoft.a contains MarcGoodner 20:08:56 +MarcGoodner; got it 20:09:10 zakim, Microsoft contains Marsh 20:09:10 +Marsh; got it 20:09:31 zakim,unmute me 20:09:31 MSEder should no longer be muted 20:09:48 + +1.831.332.aabb 20:10:15 zakim,mute me 20:10:15 MSEder should now be muted 20:10:36 bob has joined #ws-addr 20:10:37 sribe: MSEder 20:10:44 scribe: MSEder 20:11:05 topic: agenda item 3 20:11:28 {When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified as 20:11:28 the address of an EPR, such as the ReplyTo or FaultTo EPR, the 20:11:28 underlying SOAP protocol binding provides a channel to the specified 20:11:28 endpoint. Any underlying protocol binding supporting the SOAP 20:11:28 request-response message exchange pattern provides such a channel for 20:11:29 response messages. For instance, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding[SOAP 1.2 Part 20:11:31 2: Adjuncts] puts the reply message in the HTTP response. 20:11:34 } 20:11:35 Note that the only difference with what is recorded in the minutes (and 20:11:37 reflected to the CR resolution) and what I remember is the clause (", 20:11:39 such as ...") which appears editorial, but I thought I should bring this 20:11:41 up. In my opinion, my recollection provides clearer text, but I want to 20:11:43 check since I want to send it to the ws-rx tc. 20:12:23 Marsh has joined #ws-addr 20:12:34 gpilz has joined #ws-addr 20:12:40 +1 20:12:41 text posted to IRC as resolution 20:13:09 resolution: no objections to Umits resolution from the face-to-face 20:13:14 +Umit_Yalcinalp 20:13:24 +JeffM 20:14:46 resolution: no objections to posting minutes from face-to-face with Umits amendments. 20:15:17 uyalcina has joined #ws-addr 20:15:23 resolution: no objections to posting minutes from last week's face-to-face 20:15:38 October 10, 2005 20:15:48 brb 20:16:01 topic:review of action items 20:16:23 Marc has completed his action items 20:16:39 Umit will get to her items next week 20:16:47 Paul completed his action item 20:17:09 Anish has not been able to get to his action item 20:17:37 topic: 5 proposed and new issues 20:17:58 Katy will own the issue 20:18:06 back 20:20:08 q+ 20:20:21 Katy: summarizes the issue 20:20:26 ack anish 20:21:41 +Dave_Orchard 20:21:52 topic: i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? 20:21:52 i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? 20:21:52 i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? 20:21:52 i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? 20:21:52 topic: i065 - What to do when SOAPAction and Default Action Pattern conflict? 20:22:50 discussion about changing the must to a should 20:23:36 a plus 1 from Glenn's cat 20:24:36 a number of people speaking for the original solution as proposed by Katy 20:26:33 q+ 20:26:39 q+ 20:27:18 Glenn: cleaner to keep WS-A action and soap action as the same thing 20:27:36 ack anish 20:27:52 s/Glenn/Glen/g 20:29:05 Anish: value of soap action in WSDL has to be URI? 20:29:41 ack Marsh 20:30:48 +DOrchard 20:30:52 -Dave_Orchard 20:32:19 Mark: wants to know if people are ready to close this issue 20:33:25 action: Katy to document the current proposals, and put them in an e-mail for next week 20:33:30 Need to consider which migration scenario is more important: WSDL without WS-Addr or WSDL with WS-Addr submission - that shoudl inform our discussion 20:33:35 resolution: Katy will document the current proposals in an e-mail for future discussion 20:33:47 jeffm has joined #ws-addr 20:34:06 topic: agenda item 6 20:34:23 resolution: wait for proposals 20:34:34 http://www.w3.org/mid/4B4D2001-302D-48CD-9FA4-C170E0891718@Sun.COM 20:35:03 topic: cr8 - SOAPAction 20:35:18 Marc: summarizes issue 20:36:42 Mark: by nature restricted a soap 1.1 20:36:48 Marc: Yes 20:38:17 Anish: what does soap 1.2 say 20:40:41 Marc: issue restricted to SOAP 1.1 20:41:07 resolution: accept Marc's proposal for cr8 20:41:39 mark: no more open CR issues 20:42:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Oct/0055.html 20:42:33 Marsh: is there a CR issue about what action should be used for general purpose soap faults 20:43:40 ... why are we not saying anything about soap faults 20:43:55 ... proposal is to use our general URI 20:44:56 Marc: soap already has strict definition about what is the fault 20:45:59 ... does not see that we have to do this 20:47:42 (I prefer "different from", "different to" just sounds British to me, "different than" bugs me, but it's not ungrammatical) 20:48:39 Marsh: maybe we need to talk more about faults 20:49:03 TomRutt has joined #ws-addr 20:50:28 resolution: Marsh will post this issue to the CR list 20:50:44 topic: CR testing 20:51:03 Paul: summarizes issue 20:51:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Oct/0095.html 20:51:30 Paul: test suite with test cases being built up 20:53:53 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Oct/att-0095/CR_TestCases-fixed.html 20:55:13 Mark: how should we proceed on this? 20:55:45 ... maybe we need an extra call or people go back and look at this 20:56:42 ... identify soon who is planning to do testing 20:57:36 Glen: Apache is planning to 20:57:48 Katy: IBM is planning to 20:58:08 Arun: Sun is planning to 20:58:08 Microsoft and Sun 20:59:19 Mark: should we have a separate testers call? 20:59:44 Glen: General agreement 21:01:05 -Marc_Hadley 21:01:06 -Arun 21:01:07 -Tom_Rutt 21:01:08 -JeffM 21:01:09 -[IBM] 21:01:10 -DOrchard 21:01:11 - +1.831.332.aabb 21:01:12 bob has left #ws-addr 21:01:12 -[Microsoft.a] 21:01:14 -Dave_Hull 21:01:15 -GlenD 21:01:16 -Bob_Freund 21:01:18 -Hugo 21:01:20 -Mark_Peel 21:01:20 TonyR has left #ws-addr 21:01:22 -pauld 21:01:24 -[Microsoft] 21:01:26 -MarkN 21:01:28 -Prasad_Yendluri 21:01:30 -Anish 21:01:32 -Nilo_Mitra 21:01:34 -Pete_Wenzel 21:01:36 -TonyR 21:01:38 - +44.238.022.aaaa 21:01:40 -Katy_Warr 21:01:42 -Andreas_Bjarlestam 21:01:44 -Steve_Vinoski 21:02:12 Zakim, list participants 21:02:12 As of this point the attendees have been +44.238.022.aaaa, Abbie_Barbir, Mark_Peel, TonyR, MSEder, Nilo_Mitra, Tom_Rutt, Bob_Freund, MarkN, Prasad_Yendluri, Hugo, Marc_Hadley, 21:02:12 zakim, list partcipants 21:02:15 ... Pete_Wenzel, Steve_Vinoski, pauld, [IBM], Anish, Dave_Hull, Andreas_Bjarlestam, Arun, Marsh, GlenD, Katy_Warr, MarcGoodner, +1.831.332.aabb, Umit_Yalcinalp, JeffM, 21:02:17 ... Dave_Orchard, DOrchard 21:02:18 I don't understand 'list partcipants', MSEder 21:02:37 RRSAgent, generate minutes 21:02:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-ws-addr-minutes.html MSEder 21:02:47 zakim, bye 21:02:47 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +44.238.022.aaaa, Abbie_Barbir, Mark_Peel, TonyR, MSEder, Nilo_Mitra, Tom_Rutt, Bob_Freund, MarkN, Prasad_Yendluri, Hugo, Marc_Hadley, 21:02:47 Zakim has left #ws-addr 21:02:48 Katy has left #ws-addr 21:02:50 ... Pete_Wenzel, Steve_Vinoski, pauld, [IBM], Anish, Dave_Hull, Andreas_Bjarlestam, Arun, Marsh, GlenD, Katy_Warr, MarcGoodner, +1.831.332.aabb, Umit_Yalcinalp, JeffM, 21:02:53 ... Dave_Orchard, DOrchard 21:02:58 RRSAgent, bye 21:02:58 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-ws-addr-actions.rdf : 21:02:58 ACTION: Katy to document the current proposals, and put them in an e-mail for next week [1] 21:02:58 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-ws-addr-irc#T20-33-25