19:51:06 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 19:51:07 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-irc 19:51:11 RRSAgent, make logs world 19:51:16 Meeting: WCAG WG telecon 19:55:41 ben has joined #wai-wcag 19:55:45 lmascaro has joined #wai-wcag 19:56:09 WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has now started 19:56:16 +[Microsoft] 19:58:49 +[IBM] 19:59:04 +??P2 19:59:08 Andi has joined #wai-wcag 19:59:16 zakim, ??P2 is Gregg_and_Ben 19:59:16 +Gregg_and_Ben; got it 19:59:16 Makoto has joined #wai-wcag 19:59:21 Christophe has joined #wai-wcag 19:59:30 zakim, [IBM] is Andi_Snow-Weaver 19:59:30 +Andi_Snow-Weaver; got it 19:59:38 +[IPcaller] 19:59:43 zakim, [Microsoft] is Rob_Haverty 19:59:43 +Rob_Haverty; got it 19:59:45 gregg has joined #wai-wcag 19:59:56 zakim, [IPcaller] is Luca 19:59:56 +Luca; got it 20:00:05 Zakim, Luca is lmascaro 20:00:05 +lmascaro; got it 20:00:09 zakim, mute me 20:00:09 lmascaro should now be muted 20:00:10 +Don_Evans 20:00:13 +Wendy 20:00:21 +Loretta_Guarino_Reid 20:00:29 zakim, who's on the phone? 20:00:29 On the phone I see Rob_Haverty, Andi_Snow-Weaver, Gregg_and_Ben, lmascaro (muted), Don_Evans, Wendy, Loretta_Guarino_Reid 20:00:30 jslatinOFHNetIRC has joined #wai-wcag 20:00:39 +??P6 20:00:51 zakim, ??P6 is Makoto_Ueki 20:00:51 +Makoto_Ueki; got it 20:01:05 +??P7 20:01:07 +??P8 20:01:12 zakim, ??P7 is rellero 20:01:12 +rellero; got it 20:01:15 +Tim_Boland 20:01:35 +John_Slatin 20:01:35 zakim, ??P8 is Christophe_Strobbe 20:01:36 +Christophe_Strobbe; got it 20:01:39 Becky has joined #wai-wcag 20:01:39 zakim, mute me 20:01:39 rellero should now be muted 20:01:41 +Diane_Stottlemyer 20:01:44 zakim, who's typing? 20:01:44 I don't understand your question, wendy. 20:01:48 heh 20:01:53 zakim, who's making noise? 20:02:02 +Yvette_Hoitink 20:02:03 wendy, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Rob_Haverty (9%), Andi_Snow-Weaver (17%), Gregg_and_Ben (25%), Loretta_Guarino_Reid (24%), John_Slatin (47%) 20:02:08 +Matt_May 20:02:12 +Becky_Gibson 20:02:21 Yvette has joined #wai-wcag 20:02:31 zakim, who's on the phone? 20:02:31 On the phone I see Rob_Haverty, Andi_Snow-Weaver, Gregg_and_Ben, lmascaro (muted), Don_Evans, Wendy, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Makoto_Ueki, rellero (muted), Christophe_Strobbe, 20:02:33 Agenda+ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0066.html 20:02:35 ... Tim_Boland, John_Slatin, Diane_Stottlemyer, Yvette_Hoitink, Matt_May, Becky_Gibson 20:02:38 scribe: Becky 20:03:01 agenda+ Check-in, assignments and Face to Face (15 minutes) 20:03:08 zakim, mute me 20:03:08 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 20:04:03 +David_MacDonald 20:04:40 Tim has joined #wai-wcag 20:05:25 q+ 20:05:47 +Michael_Cooper 20:05:49 David has joined #wai-wcag 20:06:03 Michael has joined #wai-wcag 20:06:33 Topic: General Comments from Gregg about goals for Face to Face 20:07:18 gv: want all content complete and survey created for each GL before F2F 20:07:22 +Sofia_Celic 20:11:15 ack becky 20:14:56 +??P18 20:15:47 +??P19 20:15:54 zakim, who's making noise? 20:16:05 wendy, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gregg_and_Ben (13%), Becky_Gibson (19%), ??P18 (4%), ??P19 (13%) 20:16:17 zakim, ??P18 is Katie_Haritos-Shea 20:16:17 +Katie_Haritos-Shea; got it 20:16:20 Kesh has joined #wai-wcag 20:17:11 wc: Face 2 Face agenda is aggressive. Plan to work until 7:30 pm each night 20:17:52 zakim, ??P19 is Kerst_Goldsmith 20:17:52 +Kerst_Goldsmith; got it 20:18:03 oops 20:18:12 zakim, Kerst_Goldsmith is Kerstin_Goldsmith 20:18:12 +Kerstin_Goldsmith; got it 20:22:02 q+ to say "There is a test suite coming" 20:23:14 ack Chris 20:23:14 Christophe, you wanted to say "There is a test suite coming" 20:25:02 Topic: Review results of Questionnaire for Guideline 1.3 Issues 20:25:43 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/teamc-2_5/results 20:27:52 gv: question / discussion is: does GL 1.3 L1 SC1 prevent plain text on the web 20:30:42 q+ 20:30:50 q- 20:30:57 ack Wendy 20:31:34 q+ 20:34:34 q+ to say "how do we know that people don't skim paragraphs?" 20:35:41 q+ 20:35:52 q+ katie 20:35:57 q+ to say "Note: only structure that has been provided... b/c it's not about providing structure...it's about ensuring that what is there is prog determined" 20:36:00 q+ 20:36:20 ack ben 20:36:41 ack wendy 20:36:41 wendy, you wanted to say "how do we know that people don't skim paragraphs?" and to say "Note: only structure that has been provided... b/c it's not about providing 20:36:44 ... structure...it's about ensuring that what is there is prog determined" 20:38:54 ack David 20:40:01 ack Katie 20:41:07 q+ 20:41:45 ack Andi 20:48:59 ack gregg 20:49:01 q+ to say "i thought we had decided at brussels that we wouldn't have a criterion about what structure to provide, but that when structure is there that it is programmatically determined. why can't we clarify that with a note on the SC?" 20:51:19 q+ 20:51:21 ack lor 20:51:23 ack wen 20:51:23 wendy, you wanted to say "i thought we had decided at brussels that we wouldn't have a criterion about what structure to provide, but that when structure is there that it is 20:51:27 ... programmatically determined. why can't we clarify that with a note on the SC?" 20:52:03 q+ 20:54:45 -Diane_Stottlemyer 20:55:40 ack John 20:55:59 q- 20:56:15 would

text text text
text text text
text text

pass Guideline 1.3 Level 1 SC 1? 20:56:26 if the brs are used to create "paragraphs" 20:57:18 +Alex_Li 20:58:20 my question was really "would
text text text
text text text
text text
pass... 20:59:43 gv: asks: is there consensus that we will have some type of exception for text if we keep this SC at level 1? 21:00:01 you mean:
text text text
text text text
text text
? if so, there are a couple other issues w/the markup. the text needs to be in a block element. 21:00:17 q+ 21:00:23 zakim, unmute me 21:00:23 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 21:00:24 gv: consensus that we do not want to outlaw all text documents? 21:01:34 ack gregg 21:01:52 concern about how this relates to the defn of the br element - http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#edef-BR 21:02:10 lgr: does this SC require that you expose whatever structure is there? 21:05:20 ack lor 21:05:26 ack kar 21:05:28 ack kat 21:05:29 q+ 21:05:57 q+ 21:06:11 khs: we need to not focus so much on HTML but on content 21:07:03 ack yve 21:08:12 yh: seems like we are trying to write GL that allow text documents - maybe we need to decide that plain text docs are not accessible 21:08:14 +1 yvette's point 21:08:17 -Sofia_Celic 21:08:19 ack ben 21:08:46 zakim, mute me 21:08:46 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 21:09:07 bc: objects to adding an exception for text only 21:09:10 ack gregg 21:10:03 gv: concern about relying on structure provided by technology thus technology that has no markup automatically passes- which isn't what we want 21:14:47 q+ 21:15:21 q- 21:15:50 -Rob_Haverty 21:17:10 ack john 21:18:50 gv: seems like we will not move; still need to figure out what we are going to do with text documents 21:19:30 gv: outcome of discussion - will not move GL 1.3 L1 SC1 to level 2 21:19:58 resolution: close the first 3 items of survey with no change to the document 21:20:35 Topic: survey on issue 796 21:22:08 khs: seems like all benefits are relating to visual issues 21:24:24 khs: don't want to lose other benefits 21:24:46 ack Katie 21:24:53 ack John 21:25:55 js: propose add hearing disabilities to the benefits proposal 21:29:29 action: John send proposal to edit benefits 21:29:57 resolution: accept combining benefits with incorporation of John's edit 21:31:09 Topic: Survey about issue 827 proposing a new SC 21:32:01 resolution: do not adopt this proposed SC 21:32:24 Topic: Survey about issue 938 to modify examples 21:32:58 resolution: pass this issue on the editors 21:33:34 Topic: Survey on issue 1036 - proposal to close 21:35:04 resolution: flash is covered under 2.3 and blink is covered under 2.2 - notify the issue submitter and close 21:35:41 Topic: issue to add new SC in GL 1.3: Instructions for understanding or operating a delivery unit do not depend on users' ability to perceive visual characteristics such as shape or visual location of components. 21:35:51 ack lor 21:36:36 q+ to say "harmonizes with JIS guidelines" 21:37:23 ack wendy 21:37:23 wendy, you wanted to say "harmonizes with JIS guidelines" 21:38:29 q+ to say "combine with L2 SC2" 21:39:25 ack be 21:39:25 Becky, you wanted to say "combine with L2 SC2" 21:39:48 ack be 21:45:18 resolution: add SC as proposed (above) to GL 1.3 Level 3 21:45:47 Topic: Issue 1309 and 1339 - propose new wording for programmatically determined 21:48:56 -Tim_Boland 21:48:57 ack l 21:49:03 Tim has left #wai-wcag 21:49:03 ack k 21:49:51 -lmascaro 21:49:54 ack a 21:52:19 ack lo 21:52:25 ack katie 21:52:52 gv: will take the def. of programmatically determined to F2F 21:53:12 Topic: Issue 1441 21:53:30 Resolution: unanimous vote to close issue 1441 21:54:09 Topic: issue 1705 - want better assoc. of examples with the Guidelines 21:56:21 Issue 1705 remains open until changes are made to better assoc examples with GL 21:56:30 Topic: Issue 1733 and 1734 21:57:49 q+ 21:58:06 zakim, unmute me 21:58:06 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 21:58:51 ack katie 22:02:55 resolution: close issues saying that it is at level 2 and no consensus to move to level 1 22:03:31 (cont) because it would constain default presentation which, so far, we have not done at level 1 22:03:46 Topic: issue 1735 22:03:55 Resolution: close as proposed 22:04:01 ack yDe combinatie van informatica, geschiedenis en bedrijfskunde vind ik bijzonder interessant. Ik heb technische informatica en bedrijfsinformatietechnologie gestudeerd en ben daarnaast al sinds mijn veertiende regelmatig in archieven te vinden voor stamboom- of historisch onderzoek. Doordat ik in alledrie deze onderwerpen goed thuis ben, kan ik vaak een brug vormen tussen de verschillende partijen die bij dergelijke projecten betrokken zijn. Tevens 22:04:05 oi? 22:04:24 Andi has left #wai-wcag 22:05:03 Topic: GL 4.2 - issue 426 22:05:20 zakim, mute me 22:05:20 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 22:05:29 -Andi_Snow-Weaver 22:05:30 resolution: close as proposed 22:05:57 Topic: issue 971 and 1713 22:06:03 resolution: close as proposed 22:06:26 Topic: issue 1537 22:06:47 zakim, unmute me 22:06:47 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:07:32 Will leave open until there are techniques 22:08:11 Kesh has left #wai-wcag 22:08:14 -Wendy 22:08:23 zakim, mute me 22:08:23 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 22:08:24 Topic: new proposed wording for 2.2 L2 SC2 22:09:05 -Kerstin_Goldsmith 22:09:44 -Don_Evans 22:09:50 zakim, unmute me 22:09:50 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:10:33 q+ 22:11:25 ack l 22:11:28 ack y 22:14:03 zakim, mute me 22:14:03 Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted 22:15:39 * content can be paused by the user 22:15:39 * timing or movement is essential (for example, competitive gaming) and timing or movement cannot be frozen, even momentarily without invalidating the activity. 22:16:24 content can be paused by the user unless the timing or movement is essential (for example, competitive gaming) and timing or movement cannot be frozen, even momentarily without invalidating the activity. 22:16:43 resolution: accept this proposed wording: content can be paused by the user unless the timing or movement is essential (for example, competitive gaming) and timing or movement cannot be frozen, even momentarily without invalidating the activity. 22:17:14 shawn has joined #wai-wcag 22:17:58 Topic: GL 2.2 L1 SC1 warning about time expiration 22:20:19 zakim, unmute me 22:20:19 Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted 22:22:17 Andi's proposed wording: the user is warned before time expires and given at least 20 seconds to extend the time-out with a simple action (for example, "hit any key"). The user is allowed to extend the timeout at least 10 times. 22:23:10 resolution: accept Andi's proposed wording (above) with the change to extend 10 times 22:23:30 Topic: Does the text of all songs need to be provided for any song that can be downloaded? 22:25:10 no resolution - discuss at Face to Face 22:27:11 Topic: Move Guideline 2.4 Level 3 SC1 from Guideline 2.4 to Guideline 3.1? 22:28:21 shawn has left #wai-wcag 22:28:25 Resolution: accept proposal to move 22:28:42 -rellero 22:28:49 -Michael_Cooper 22:29:23 Topic: Delete GL 3.1 L3 SC4 - Section titles are descriptive. and split 2.4 L2 SC3 into two SC 22:35:04 no resolution: will dicuss at Face to Face 22:35:42 zakim, unmute me 22:35:42 Yvette_Hoitink was not muted, Yvette 22:37:07 -Katie_Haritos-Shea 22:37:09 -Alex_Li 22:37:10 -Becky_Gibson 22:37:11 -John_Slatin 22:37:11 -Gregg_and_Ben 22:37:12 -Yvette_Hoitink 22:37:14 -Matt_May 22:37:15 -Loretta_Guarino_Reid 22:37:16 -Makoto_Ueki 22:37:18 -Christophe_Strobbe 22:40:35 zakim, bye 22:40:35 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Gregg_and_Ben, Andi_Snow-Weaver, Rob_Haverty, lmascaro, Don_Evans, Wendy, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Makoto_Ueki, rellero, Tim_Boland, 22:40:35 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 22:40:38 ... John_Slatin, Christophe_Strobbe, Diane_Stottlemyer, Yvette_Hoitink, Matt_May, Becky_Gibson, David_MacDonald, Michael_Cooper, Sofia_Celic, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Kerstin_Goldsmith, 22:40:40 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:40:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 22:40:51 ... Alex_Li 22:47:05 regrets: Roberto_Castaldo, Roberto_Scano, Takayuki_Watanabe, Luca_Mascaro, Sebastiano_Nutarelli, Gian_Sampson-Wild, Sofia_Celic 22:47:14 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:47:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 22:47:44 chair: Gregg_Vanderheiden 22:47:52 RRSAgent, generate minutes 22:47:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-minutes.html ben 22:50:43 Christophe has left #wai-wcag 22:50:58 RRSAgent, bye 22:50:58 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-actions.rdf : 22:50:58 ACTION: John send proposal to edit benefits [1] 22:50:58 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/13-wai-wcag-irc#T21-29-29