16:56:32 RRSAgent has joined #swbp 16:56:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc 16:56:42 Meeting: SemWeb Best Practices and Deployment WG 16:56:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0006.html 16:57:00 Raphael has joined #swbp 16:57:07 hi all 16:57:13 SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started 16:57:21 + +30210772aaaa 16:57:23 +[UMD] 16:57:51 -[UMD] 16:57:56 +[CWI] 16:58:11 cgi-irc has joined #swbp 16:58:24 +Ralph 16:58:42 +[UMD] 16:58:54 zakim, [umd] is ChrisH 16:58:54 +ChrisH; got it 16:58:54 BenjaminNguyen has joined #swbp 16:59:36 zakim, [cwi] is Raphael 16:59:36 +Raphael; got it 16:59:45 thx Zakim :-) 17:00:10 aliman_scribe has joined #swbp 17:01:01 Regrets: Phil, Libby, Deb, Alan, Jeff, DanBri, Fabien, 17:01:20 regrets from me, wrt phone 17:01:45 +??P4 17:01:46 +Alistair_Miles (was ??P4) 17:02:05 jjc has joined #swbp 17:02:37 Jacco has joined #swbp 17:02:38 Chair: Ralph 17:02:39 +DavidB 17:03:18 giorgos has joined #swbp 17:03:31 zakim, mute alistair 17:03:31 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:03:37 BenjaminN: I'm on irc only today 17:03:45 +[IPcaller] 17:03:47 +Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen 17:03:52 Zakim, IPcaller is jjc 17:03:52 +jjc; got it 17:04:12 vassilis has joined #swbp 17:04:14 zakim, mute jacco 17:04:14 Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen should now be muted 17:04:38 zakim, aaaa is Giorgos 17:04:38 +Giorgos; got it 17:04:45 Zakim, mute me 17:04:45 jjc should now be muted 17:05:22 Previous: 2005-09-19 http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html 17:05:34 Topic: Admin 17:05:44 zakim, list attendees 17:05:44 As of this point the attendees have been +30210772aaaa, Ralph, ChrisH, Raphael, Alistair_Miles, DavidB, Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen, jjc, Giorgos 17:05:48 I can join by phone if needed, but nothing to report in OEP. 17:05:52 zakim, who's on the call? 17:05:52 On the phone I see Giorgos, Raphael (muted), Ralph, ChrisH, Alistair_Miles (muted), DavidB, jjc (muted), Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen (muted) 17:06:49 PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 19 September telecon: http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html 17:07:01 GaryNg has joined #SWBP 17:07:21 aye 17:07:33 RESOLVED to accept the minutes of the 19 September telecon: http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html 17:07:50 nope 17:08:06 ACTION: Ralph create a registration page for the November f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-irc.html#T17-13-32] 17:08:10 -- done 17:08:14 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35495/ftf-3/ Registration for Third F2F meeting 17:08:19 +Gary_Ng 17:08:31 zakim, unmute me 17:08:31 Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen should no longer be muted 17:08:38 this web page needs a password to be accessed, no ? 17:09:11 yes, you need your Member Access password for this form 17:09:12 zakim, mute jacco 17:09:12 Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen should now be muted 17:09:29 ok 17:10:03 Zakim, unmute me 17:10:03 jjc should no longer be muted 17:10:07 Ralph: are there others who may wish to attend by teleconf? 17:10:08 -Giorgos 17:10:14 Zakim, mute me 17:10:14 jjc should now be muted 17:10:18 DBooth: possibly remote, will know soon 17:10:29 Jeremy: expect to know later in the week whether I can attend in person 17:10:34 Zakim, unmute me 17:10:34 jjc should no longer be muted 17:10:38 +Giorgos 17:10:47 Zakim, mute me 17:10:47 jjc should now be muted 17:10:59 dwood has joined #swbp 17:11:00 ACTION: Ralph check on possibility of remote participation for f2f 17:11:40 Guus, any progress on finding a dinner sponsor? 17:12:38 Topic: 2. Liaisons 17:12:44 Zakim, mute me 17:12:44 Gary_Ng should now be muted 17:13:05 ACTION: Jeremy to brief the WG on use of IRIs in SPARQL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action05] 17:13:06 Zakim, unmute me 17:13:06 jjc should no longer be muted 17:13:16 Jeremy: sent earlier today 17:14:13 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0014.html IRIs [Jeremy 2005-10-03] 17:14:18 -- done 17:14:27 MY action: I can sponsor the dinner from my Knowledge Web budget 17:14:38 Guus, thank you! 17:15:07 Jeremy: this issue, of W3C recs depending on earlier versions of IRI (before standard status), being not quite compatible with the IRI standard impacts many recs 17:15:24 Topic: 2.4 Protocol and Formats WG request 17:15:52 ACTION: jjc review EARL requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/25-swbp-minutes.html#action05] 17:15:53 -- done 17:16:22 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0020.html Review of EARL requirements [Jeremy 2005-10-03] 17:16:24 sorry, no progress on 2.4 17:16:49 Jeremy: shall I send this to PFWG as my personal comments on behalf of the WG? 17:16:50 Ralph: yes 17:17:18 ACTION: Alistair and Guus to help the WAI Protocol and Formats WG on their vocabulary [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action07] 17:17:30 zakim, unmute alistair 17:17:30 Alistair_Miles was not muted, aliman 17:19:10 -- continues 17:19:42 Topic: 4. TF Updates 17:20:03 zakim, who's on the call? 17:20:03 On the phone I see Raphael (muted), Ralph, ChrisH, Alistair_Miles, DavidB, jjc, Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen (muted), Gary_Ng (muted), Giorgos 17:20:16 Topic: 4.0 MM TF 17:21:03 Giorgos: (see mail) -- first draft of a deliverable has been produced 17:21:38 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0004.html MM TF Schedule for f2f meeting in Galway [Girgos 2005-10-03] 17:21:57 Giorgos: would like to schedule 2 telecons; this Wed and 21 Oct 17:22:11 q+ to suggest Wed may be too soon 17:22:33 ... would like to have 2 reviewers review a document 1 week before the f2f 17:22:43 ... Mike Uschold has volunteered to be 1 reviewer 17:23:35 zakim, unmute me 17:23:35 Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen should no longer be muted 17:24:12 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0138.html [MM/admin] First version of first deliverable [Jacco 2005-09-30] 17:24:14 jjc, you wanted to suggest Wed may be too soon 17:24:44 Jeremy: TF participants should read this draft before first telecon, is Wed too soon? 17:24:54 Jacco: the idea for the Wed telecon is to distribute the work 17:25:52 TomB has joined #swbp 17:26:16 Is the call underway? I'm dialing in... 17:26:16 -> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/TeleconferenceHowTo.htm Teleconference How-To 17:26:24 (call underway) 17:27:22 zakim, mute me 17:27:22 Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen should now be muted 17:27:34 Topic: 4.1 PORT 17:27:40 + +1.310.765.aabb 17:27:58 Alistair: Ralph sent his review of SKOS Core proposals 17:28:03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0021.html 17:28:11 ... we're following up on his suggestions 17:28:15 Natasha has joined #swbp 17:28:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0079.html 17:28:22 ... see my mail for f2f planning 17:28:58 +??P10 17:29:12 zakim, ??p10 is Natasha 17:29:12 +Natasha; got it 17:29:18 aabb is TomB 17:29:30 ChrisW has left #swbp 17:29:40 ChrisW has joined #swbp 17:29:41 Topic: 4.2 OEP 17:29:46 nothing to report 17:29:52 all actions continued 17:30:10 chrisw is the QCR note ready to review? 17:30:14 yes 17:30:20 Natasha: we're working on Semantic Integration, may have something ready for f2f 17:30:28 where's the version I should review? 17:30:36 ACTION: GUUS to approve new version of simple part note going to first WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/05-swbp-minutes.html#action06] 17:30:38 oh, wait, I take that back - QCR note is NOT ready to review (sorry) 17:30:41 -- continues 17:30:58 Zakim, mute me 17:30:58 jjc should now be muted 17:31:05 ok, will wait on ChrisW to nudge me when QCR is ready 17:31:12 ack 17:31:14 please continue my review action 17:31:20 Natasha: waiting for Guus' comments on N-ary relations 17:31:23 ACTION: Alistair to review Qualified Cardinality note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action09] 17:31:36 ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action10] 17:31:40 -- continues 17:31:59 ACTION: Jeremy to ask HP folks about reviewing Semantic Integration note, which will be ready for review near the F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action11] 17:32:14 Zakim, unmute me 17:32:14 jjc should no longer be muted 17:32:41 Zakim, mute me 17:32:41 jjc should now be muted 17:32:52 Jeremy: I've asked for a reviewer, don't yet have a response 17:33:01 ACTION: Libby to review OWL Time note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action12] 17:33:04 -- continues 17:33:25 Chris, anything you can type about status of OWL Time? 17:33:35 OWL TIme is ready for review 17:33:54 definitely 17:33:57 i cannot find a url for owl time in the minutes... 17:34:12 Chris, could you provide us a pointer pls? 17:34:16 can you put up one? 17:34:34 Topic: 4.3 WordNet 17:34:40 (no representatives) 17:34:44 go to the OEP web page 17:34:51 all the notes & drafts are there 17:34:52 Topic: 4.4 XML Schema datatypes 17:34:59 Zakim, unmute me 17:34:59 jjc should no longer be muted 17:35:03 guus how do you think we should approach liason with PFWG? I read their initial message but its not very specific. 17:35:29 Jeremy: we have a working draft that presents alternatives 17:35:46 OWL Time: http://www.isi.edu/~pan/SWBP/time-ontology-note/time-ontology-note.html 17:35:48 OEP Web Page: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ 17:36:03 Time Zone: http://www.isi.edu/~pan/SWBP/time-zone-note/time-zone-note.html 17:36:07 Jeremy: we've had a response (from HP) that one of the alternatives is not a good choice 17:36:12 zakim, mute alistair 17:36:12 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:36:29 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0010.html [XSCH] F2F thoughts [Jeremy 2005-10-03] 17:37:57 ACTION: JeffP to draft a response to dave reynolds [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/25-swbp-minutes.html#action09] 17:38:00 -- continues 17:38:02 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:38:02 On the phone I see Raphael (muted), Ralph, ChrisH, Alistair_Miles (muted), DavidB, jjc, Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen (muted), Gary_Ng (muted), Giorgos, +1.310.765.aabb, Natasha 17:38:34 zakim, mute me 17:38:34 sorry, TomB, I do not see a party named 'TomB' 17:38:38 Topic: Vocabulary management 17:38:41 +David_Wood 17:38:45 Zakim, mute me 17:38:46 jjc should now be muted 17:38:50 zakim, unmute me 17:38:50 sorry, TomB, I do not see a party named 'TomB' 17:39:11 i think you are aabb TomB 17:39:36 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0012.html Tom's report on 27 Sep VMTF telecon 17:40:20 dwood_ has joined #swbp 17:40:25 TomB: we reached consensus on a deliverable to help people understand what to serve at a namespace URI 17:40:37 q+ to mention URI dereferencing stuff 17:40:48 zakim, unmute me 17:40:48 sorry, aliman, I do not see a party named 'aliman' 17:40:54 zakim, unmute alistair 17:40:54 Alistair_Miles should no longer be muted 17:41:01 ... we expect to be able to document a common solution between Dublin Core, SKOS, and FOAF 17:41:10 ... this would create a nice example that others can follow 17:41:13 zakim, mute me 17:41:13 sorry, dwood_, I do not see a party named 'dwood_' 17:41:24 aliman, you wanted to mention URI dereferencing stuff 17:41:24 zakim, DaveW is dwood 17:41:26 sorry, dwood_, I do not recognize a party named 'DaveW' 17:41:36 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0116.html 17:41:43 zakim, nick dwood_ is David_Wood 17:41:43 ok, RalphS, I now associate dwood_ with David_Wood 17:41:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0024.html 17:42:03 zakim, mute me 17:42:03 David_Wood should now be muted 17:42:13 Alistair: I've shown how to implement part of this in apache 17:42:24 DWood: is this using 303 redirect? 17:42:36 Alistair: yes 17:42:40 s/DWood/David Booth/ 17:43:13 Alistair: redirect is based on the content-type requested 17:43:23 ... would like feedback on whether this is or is not a good idea 17:43:47 TomB: DCMI has a problem with 303 redirects for historical reasons, as we depend on the purl.org service 17:45:34 Topic: 4.6 RDF-in-HTML 17:45:45 me 17:45:48 zakim mute me 17:45:59 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Sep/0024.html meeting record: 2005-09-27 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon 17:47:05 Zakim, unmute me 17:47:05 jjc should no longer be muted 17:47:19 sorry, just clarifying for benefit of minutes ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0116.html is a proposed URI dereferencing policy for SKOS Core (a 'hash' RDF namespace) ... 17:47:57 Ralph: the TF is discussing a proposal for a syntax that would permit expressing both URIs and QNames within an XML Attribute 17:48:06 and ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0024.html describes how to implement this policy using apache directives ... would very much appreciate comments (i.e. do this/don't do this) from WG 17:48:39 ACTION: Jeremy write a formal description of the CURI proposal for WG consideratoin 17:48:49 zakim, mute alistair 17:48:49 Alistair_Miles should now be muted 17:49:37 Jeremy: the proposal also addresses the blank node issue 17:50:11 ACTION: Gavin find out from his community and contacts if they have 17:50:11 use cases for GRDDL 17:50:34 Ralph: propose to withdraw this action? 17:50:41 Zakim, mute me 17:50:41 jjc should now be muted 17:50:47 -- withdrawn 17:51:07 ACTION: DanBri to ask TF for sign-off on putting the draft xhtml vocab to the WG for review. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/05-swbp-minutes.html#action09] 17:51:24 -- continues 17:51:31 Topic: 4.7 ADTF 17:52:40 Ralph: we've decided that the machine break-in was non-destructive and intend to put the blog back on the Net 17:52:54 Topic: RDFTM 17:53:07 (no representative) 17:53:13 Topic: Tutorial Page 17:53:28 ACTION: Guus to ping Benjamin and Jeff about the Tutorial Page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action08] 17:53:33 Guus? 17:53:45 was this regarding an old action ? 17:53:57 yes, Benjamin 17:54:00 ewallace has joined #swbp 17:54:07 can you give us an update on the status of the tutorial page? 17:54:07 I made a post in july regarding jeff's ping 17:54:22 status is the following 17:54:24 q+ to ask ralph about language variants of SKOS Core spec 17:54:42 page is up and I made all modifications received up till july 17:54:49 I have received nothing more to add since then 17:55:01 ok, thanks, Benjamin 17:55:27 action Guus done, then 17:55:39 +Evan_Wallace 17:55:43 Topic: SE TF 17:56:23 (no representative) 17:56:32 zakim, unmute alistair 17:56:32 Alistair_Miles should no longer be muted 17:56:37 aliman, you wanted to ask ralph about language variants of SKOS Core spec 17:56:58 ralph 2.1 was skipped over waiting for David 17:57:13 Alistair: when we publish a revised SKOS WD, should we publish all the variants or can we publish just the English version? 17:57:51 q+ to comment about legalese 17:57:53 ... it would be nice to publish all the translations as a set but I don't speak all the languages 17:58:04 Ralph: publishing a WD is a great way to solicit those comments 17:58:43 Zakim, unmute me 17:58:43 jjc should no longer be muted 17:58:50 jjc, you wanted to comment about legalese 17:59:11 Jeremy: the practice in W3C is that the [US] English version is normative 18:00:46 zakim, unmute me 18:00:46 David_Wood should no longer be muted 18:00:51 Zakim, mute me 18:00:51 jjc should now be muted 18:01:10 ACTION: DavidWood and Brian to review SPARQL Last Call document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action04] 18:01:17 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0087.html SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments [DWood 2005-09-20] 18:01:19 q+ to ask about postponed issues for sparql 18:01:28 David's review done 18:02:02 DWood: my comments led to a long discussion between the editors 18:02:45 ... I didn't want to see a requirement in the SPARQL protocol for an illegal use of WSDL 2.0 18:03:33 Zakim, mute me 18:03:33 Giorgos should now be muted 18:03:41 - +1.310.765.aabb 18:03:43 ... editors were questioning ehther I was supportive or dismissive of WSDL 2 integration 18:03:53 (still on irc) 18:03:56 ... I support WSDL 2 bindings but want them to be legal 18:04:26 ... the SPARQL language is still in Last Call; would the WG like my review of that as well? 18:05:25 ... I expect DAWG would like review from SWBPD for both the Language and the Protocol 18:05:32 ... I think Brian intended to review the Language 18:06:00 ACTION: David Wood draft SPARQL Language review on behalf of the WG 18:06:22 zakim, who's on the call? 18:06:22 On the phone I see Raphael (muted), Ralph, ChrisH, Alistair_Miles, DavidB, jjc (muted), Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen (muted), Gary_Ng (muted), Giorgos (muted), Natasha, David_Wood, 18:06:25 ... Evan_Wallace 18:07:23 -Natasha 18:08:12 On translations - the Ruby recommendation, which is primarily targeted at Japanese, was published on 31st May 2001, and translation came out 3rd August 2001. Conclusion: even when Japanese would have been a well-motivated normative language, the rule of US English first was followed 18:08:18 I skimmed David's review, seemed good but don't have nearly enough tech savvy (or time :) to do a proper review 18:08:58 DBooth: I thought DavidW's review was fine 18:09:21 ... what coordination is taking place with the WSDL folk? 18:09:38 DWood: it's the DAWG's task to do that coordination 18:09:39 Zakim, mute me 18:09:39 jjc was already muted, jjc 18:10:47 DWood: there's a not insubstantial amount of work needed to resolve the technical issue 18:11:07 ... I don't think this work can be done during Candidate Rec phase 18:12:55 q+ to talk about OWL experience 18:13:00 Ralph: is there an alternative for DAWG to not be dependent on changed to WSDL 2? 18:13:14 DWood: DAWG would have to give up some features in SPARQL Protocol 18:13:53 ... I fear that the WSDL community is big enough that if SPARQL protocol is non-conformant, it will lead to SPARQL not being implemented 18:14:32 DBooth: the WSDL work has been going on for a long time. I was part of it at one time. I would not expect the WG to be very receptive to making changes at this point. 18:14:35 -ChrisH 18:14:49 Zakim, unmute me 18:14:49 jjc should no longer be muted 18:15:15 Jeremy: WebOnt completed before RDF Core WG finished 18:15:29 ... we waited for a few months while RDF Core finished and this did not do any harm 18:15:36 jjc, you wanted to talk about OWL experience 18:16:30 ... it's not a bad thing for a WG to wait; didn't need to hold telecons during that period 18:16:58 DBooth: I endorse David Wood's message that SPARQL should conform to WSDL 2 18:17:20 aliman, you wanted to ask about postponed issues for sparql 18:18:11 DBooth: propose that SWBPD recommend to DAWG that the SPARQL Protocol conform to WSDL 2.0 18:18:39 ... speaking personally, not for HP 18:20:33 + 18:21:18 - 18:21:24 DWood: DanC forwarded my message to the public-rdf-dawg-comments 18:21:55 Evan: I second the proposal 18:22:10 any objections? 18:22:44 DavidW: there is continuing discussion under the thread "WSDL happiness" in public-rdf-dawg 18:22:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0530.html 18:23:25 no objections? 18:23:36 sounds sensible to me 18:23:38 please type your name if you are in favor of this resolution 18:23:42 aye 18:23:45 dwood is in favor 18:23:54 Evan is in favor 18:24:11 Ralph (speaking individually) 18:24:12 Zakim, unmute me 18:24:12 jjc was not muted, jjc 18:24:16 abstain 18:25:06 RESOLVED that SWBPD recommend to DAWG that the SPARQL Protocol conform to WSDL 2.0 18:27:09 ACTION: Ralph report WSDL 2.0 resolution to DAWG (after 24 hours) 18:27:58 Alistair: my requirement is to get the contents of RDF Lists 18:28:18 ... that's not in the current Language; I see the issue marked as Postponed on DAWG issues list 18:28:41 ... what does 'postponed' mean? how long? 18:29:14 Ralph: generally, I think 'postponed' means "until the next group is chartered" 18:30:03 next meeting Monday, October 17 18:30:10 [adjourned] 18:30:12 -Evan_Wallace 18:30:13 -Gary_Ng 18:30:15 -David_Wood 18:30:16 -Alistair_Miles 18:30:17 -DavidB 18:30:17 bye all 18:31:20 bye 18:31:21 -Ralph 18:31:23 -Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen 18:31:33 -jjc 18:32:02 rrsagent, please make this record public 18:32:12 rrsagent, please draft minutes 18:32:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-minutes.html RalphS 18:33:28 zakim, list attendees 18:33:28 As of this point the attendees have been +30210772aaaa, Ralph, ChrisH, Raphael, Alistair_Miles, DavidB, Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen, jjc, Giorgos, Gary_Ng, +1.310.765.aabb, Natasha, 18:33:32 ... David_Wood, Evan_Wallace, 18:36:03 -Giorgos 18:37:28 Raphael has left #swbp 18:41:04 disconnecting the lone participant, Raphael, in SW_BPD()1:00PM 18:41:06 SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended 18:41:07 Attendees were +30210772aaaa, Ralph, ChrisH, Raphael, Alistair_Miles, DavidB, Jacco_van_Ossenbruggen, jjc, Giorgos, Gary_Ng, +1.310.765.aabb, Natasha, David_Wood, Evan_Wallace, 18:58:02 jjc has left #swbp 20:21:08 zakim, bye 20:21:08 Zakim has left #swbp 20:21:12 rrsagent, bye 20:21:12 I see 18 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-actions.rdf : 20:21:12 ACTION: Ralph create a registration page for the November f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-irc.html#T17-13-32] [1] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-08-06 20:21:12 ACTION: Ralph check on possibility of remote participation for f2f [2] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-11-00 20:21:12 ACTION: Jeremy to brief the WG on use of IRIs in SPARQL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action05] [3] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-13-05 20:21:12 ACTION: jjc review EARL requirements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/25-swbp-minutes.html#action05] [4] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-15-52 20:21:12 ACTION: Alistair and Guus to help the WAI Protocol and Formats WG on their vocabulary [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action07] [5] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-17-18 20:21:12 ACTION: GUUS to approve new version of simple part note going to first WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/05-swbp-minutes.html#action06] [6] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-30-36 20:21:12 ACTION: Alistair to review Qualified Cardinality note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/19-swbp-minutes.html#action09] [7] 20:21:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/03-swbp-irc#T17-31-23 20:21:12