17:56:06 RRSAgent has joined #wcag-teama 17:56:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/09/13-wcag-teama-irc 17:56:13 Zakim, list conferences 17:56:13 I see TAG_Weekly()12:30PM, WS_WSCG()1:00PM active 17:56:15 also scheduled at this time are XML_QueryWG(tf)1:00PM, WAI_(WCAGA)2:00PM, SW_BPD(SETF)1:00PM 17:56:27 zakim, this will be WAI_ 17:56:27 ok, ben; I see WAI_(WCAGA)2:00PM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 17:58:11 Meeting: WCAG Team A Meeting 17:58:16 Christophe has joined #wcag-teama 17:58:44 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/0026.html 17:59:08 agenda+ What is sufficient to meet each SC? 17:59:18 agneda+ Review of draft guide documents. 17:59:31 agenda+ Status of action items and questions. 18:00:16 agenda+ Review of draft guide documents 18:00:40 RRSAgent, draft minutes 18:00:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/13-wcag-teama-minutes.html ben 18:00:54 RRSAgent, make log world 18:01:48 Gez has joined #wcag-teama 18:02:20 WAI_(WCAGA)2:00PM has now started 18:02:24 Regrets: Alex_Li, Sebastiano_Nutarelli, Chris_Ridpath, Bruno_von_Niman, Roberto_Castaldo 18:02:27 +Christophe_Strobbe 18:02:49 +Gez_Lemon 18:03:59 +??P2 18:04:09 zakim, ??P2 is Ben_Caldwell 18:04:09 +Ben_Caldwell; got it 18:05:48 David_MacDonald has joined #wcag-teama 18:05:55 am I in 18:07:25 + +1.213.408.aaaa 18:07:43 +[IPcaller] 18:08:06 zakim, [IPcaller] is David_MacDonald 18:08:06 +David_MacDonald; got it 18:08:38 zakim, +1.213.408.aaa is Neil_Soiffer 18:08:38 +Neil_Soiffer; got it 18:09:16 zakim, take up agendum 1 18:09:16 agendum 1. "What is sufficient to meet each SC?" taken up [from ben] 18:09:20 hi Christophe say hi to Leuven 18:10:38 zakim, take up agendum 2 18:10:38 agendum 2. "Status of action items and questions." taken up [from ben] 18:12:09 discussing: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/0038.html 18:14:12 proposal: remove "user interface controls" from definition of "change of context? 18:18:09 resolution: remove "user interface controls" from definition 18:18:33 zakim, mute David 18:18:33 David_MacDonald should now be muted 18:18:47 zakim, unmute David 18:18:47 David_MacDonald should no longer be muted 18:18:53 zakim, mute Gez 18:18:53 Gez_Lemon should now be muted 18:19:19 zakim,, unmute Gez 18:19:19 I don't understand ', unmute Gez', ben 18:19:25 zakim, unmute Gez 18:19:25 Gez_Lemon should no longer be muted 18:20:14 zakim, mute Gez 18:20:14 Gez_Lemon should now be muted 18:20:54 Yeah, I thought they were relevant to the guideline, but if definitions exist elsewhere I'd be happy with those 18:21:28 Neil has joined #wcag-teama 18:22:13 Yeah, I'll look it up 18:22:45 action: Gez to look at definition of focus in other W3C specs 18:23:14 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#event-handlerdef 18:24:04 I'm not precious about any of the definitions I provided. They were things I thought needed defining, but if they're defined elswhere I'd be happy with those definitions 18:24:32 Event handler isn't mentioned in my text, but I used fire an event, which requires an event handler 18:28:32 This success criteria is a negative one, so I couldn't think of anything that could be done to meet it, more what to avoid 18:29:36 anything with onfocus="" that changes context 18:30:30 +??P4 18:30:52 Hi Greeg - I'm muted, so having to type 18:31:19 gregg has joined #wcag-teama 18:31:21 hi 18:35:47 discussing Christophe's draft: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/0035.html 18:39:23 Neil has joined #wcag-teama 18:52:11 remote scripting could be used to provide a complete change of content automatically, which would fall under this guidelines - I think Christophe has it covered in option 1 18:53:09 discussing: gregg's proposal - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/0031.html 18:53:55 zakim, mute me 18:53:55 Christophe_Strobbe should now be muted 18:54:20 zakim, unmute me 18:54:20 Christophe_Strobbe should no longer be muted 18:56:22 proposal: move L2 SC2 (When any component 18:56:22 receives focus, it does not cause a change of context.) to level 1. 18:57:38 Change of content is mentioned at the end of Gregg's guide doc 19:00:13 No, I think it would be more appropriate at level 1 19:01:56 resolved: remove L1 SC1 Rationale: if you meet the other level 1 19:01:56 success criterion, then a user agent should be able to programmatically 19:01:56 determine changes in context in a fairly straightforward way. 19:02:48 Sorry, Ben - could you repeat that? 19:03:37 Yeah - I'll define context menus and change of content 19:03:48 resolution: move L2 SC2 to level 1 19:04:28 action: Gez to include clarification about change in context vs. change in content and incorporate david's suggestion about menus 19:06:47 resolution: revise definition of "change in context" to read, "change of user agent, viewport, or focus; or complete change of main content. " 19:06:53 I'm going to call in again - as I'd like to be able to speak :-) 19:07:03 -Gez_Lemon 19:07:25 discussing Ben's draft: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/att-0037/3.2_L2_SC1.htm 19:08:35 +Gez_Lemon 19:09:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teama/2005Sep/att-0037/3.2_L2_SC1.htm 19:11:43 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/#conformance 19:12:24 zakim, mute Gez 19:12:24 Gez_Lemon should now be muted 19:13:25 resolution: move L2 SC1 (Components that are repeated on multiple delivery units within a set of delivery units occur in the same order each time they are repeated.) to level 3 19:14:28 The definition you've provided for same order looks fine to me 19:17:59 issue: should we include something that addresses subtle changes in repeated content? 19:20:27 action: Neil to explore including a criterion about differences in content being easily discernable 19:22:46 A user agent may be aware that content has changed, but may not relay that change to the user; for example, a screen reader may be aware an element had changed, but wouldn't automatically read the change to the user unless they re-read the page 19:29:12 zakim, close this item 19:29:12 agendum 2 closed 19:29:13 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 19:29:14 1. What is sufficient to meet each SC? [from ben] 19:30:44 zakim, take up agendum 1 19:30:44 agendum 1. "What is sufficient to meet each SC?" taken up [from ben] 19:33:18 discussing: decisions we need from the group now? 19:33:25 1) deleting L1 SC1 19:33:34 2.) moving L2 SC1 to L1 19:34:02 3.) moving L2 SC1 to L3 19:34:20 4) proposed definitions (change of context & same order) 19:38:10 action: ben to create survey on above items 19:39:26 -David_MacDonald 19:39:27 -Christophe_Strobbe 19:39:27 -Ben_Caldwell 19:39:29 -Gez_Lemon 19:39:30 -Neil_Soiffer 19:39:32 -??P4 19:39:33 WAI_(WCAGA)2:00PM has ended 19:39:34 Attendees were Christophe_Strobbe, Gez_Lemon, Ben_Caldwell, +1.213.408.aaaa, David_MacDonald, Neil_Soiffer 19:39:58 ben_ has joined #wcag-teama 19:41:40 zakim, bye 19:41:40 Zakim has left #wcag-teama 19:41:54 RRSAgent, generate minutes 19:41:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/13-wcag-teama-minutes.html ben_ 19:43:27 Christophe has left #wcag-teama 19:43:39 chair: Ben_Caldwell 19:43:47 RRSAgent, generate minutes 19:43:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/13-wcag-teama-minutes.html ben_ 19:58:22 ben_ has left #wcag-teama 20:29:13 gregg has left #wcag-teama