12:09:01 RRSAgent has joined #eo 12:09:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/09/09-eo-irc 12:09:11 Zakim has joined #eo 12:09:19 zakim, this will be eowg 12:09:20 ok, Justin; I see WAI_EOWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 21 minutes 12:09:30 Meeting: EOWG 12:09:43 Wayne has joined #eo 12:10:03 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005JulSep/0140.html 12:14:21 I'm ready to scribe. 12:15:37 good morning Wayne 12:15:56 good morning 12:16:40 good afternoon all! ;) 12:16:48 zakim, ping me in 10 12:16:48 ok, shadi 12:16:56 :-) 12:17:00 good afternoon shadi 12:18:56 I don't think I'll ever live long enough to find live this international conversationl comon place. 12:26:48 Scribe: Wayne 12:26:49 shadi, you asked to be pinged at this time 12:26:52 scribenick: wayne 12:26:58 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has now started 12:27:05 +??P0 12:27:15 +Doyle_Saylor 12:28:00 -??P0 12:28:12 Andrew has joined #eo 12:29:02 Hello Shadi - and all you North Americans 12:29:02 -Doyle_Saylor 12:29:04 +Doyle_Saylor 12:29:05 +Shawn 12:29:50 +??P0 12:29:53 +Shadi 12:30:01 +Judy 12:30:14 hi aussi andrew 12:30:19 +??P3 12:30:37 zakim, p0 is wayne 12:30:37 sorry, Wayne, I do not recognize a party named 'p0' 12:30:44 +??P4 12:30:48 Zakim, ??p4 is Andrew 12:30:48 +Andrew; got it 12:30:56 zakim, ??p0 is wayne 12:30:56 +wayne; got it 12:31:08 +??P6 12:31:08 zakim, ??P3 is Johanna 12:31:09 +Johanna; got it 12:31:13 rcastaldo has joined #eo 12:31:13 + +1.517.974.aaaa 12:31:20 Hi all 12:31:21 zakim, aaa is Justin 12:31:21 sorry, Justin, I do not recognize a party named 'aaa' 12:31:32 zakim, aaaa is Justin 12:31:32 +Justin; got it 12:31:44 zakim, please mute me 12:31:44 Justin should now be muted 12:31:46 +??P7 12:32:35 zakim, who is here? 12:32:35 On the phone I see Doyle_Saylor, Shawn, wayne, Shadi, Judy, Johanna, Andrew, ??P6, Justin (muted), ??P7 12:32:38 On IRC I see rcastaldo, Andrew, Wayne, Zakim, RRSAgent, Justin, shadi, shawn 12:32:39 +Bingham 12:32:41 -Bingham 12:33:06 zakim, ??P6 is Helen(probably) 12:33:06 +Helen(probably); got it 12:33:17 +??P8 12:33:36 01zakim, rcastaldo is Roberto Castaldo 12:33:57 +Bingham 12:33:59 zakim, ??P7 is Roberto 12:33:59 +Roberto; got it 12:34:11 thanks Shawn 12:34:12 zakim, ??P8 is Tanguy 12:34:12 +Tanguy; got it 12:34:36 zakim, please unmute me 12:34:36 Justin should no longer be muted 12:34:44 zakim, who is here? 12:34:44 On the phone I see Doyle_Saylor, Shawn, wayne, Shadi, Judy, Johanna, Andrew, Helen(probably), Justin, Roberto (muted), Tanguy, Bingham 12:34:46 On IRC I see rcastaldo, Andrew, Wayne, Zakim, RRSAgent, Justin, shadi, shawn 12:35:39 zakim, mute me 12:35:39 wayne should now be muted 12:35:56 zakim, mute me 12:35:56 Justin should now be muted 12:36:15 judy has joined #eo 12:36:54 zakim, who's here? 12:36:54 On the phone I see Doyle_Saylor, Shawn, wayne (muted), Shadi, Judy, Johanna, Andrew, Helen(probably), Justin (muted), Roberto, Tanguy, Bingham 12:36:56 On IRC I see judy, rcastaldo, Andrew, Wayne, Zakim, RRSAgent, Justin, shadi, shawn 12:37:01 Chair: Judy 12:37:29 Regrets: Barry, Sailesh, Alan, William 12:39:07 Topic 1: Outreach 12:40:26 Andrew, what is the exact title of that act that guarentees several rights in education? 12:40:40 Harvey has joined #eo 12:41:03 Disability Standards for Education - see links from http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/policies.html 12:43:02 see also http://www.wanau.org/forums2005/perth.html 12:44:10 Topic 2: Rorganization of the Evaluation Resource Suite 12:45:16 +hbj 12:45:51 Helle has joined #eo 12:49:27 Shawn: The purpose of today's review is to evaluate what we have for posting prior to completing all of the propsed sections. Are these ready to post, with a few changes, but without major rewriting? 12:49:57 Topic: Outreach 12:50:14 will move this down in rewrite 12:50:41 Topic: Reorganization of the Evaluation Resource Suite 12:51:09 move the early conversation.. to this point 12:52:08 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/Overview.html 12:52:26 zakim, mute hbj 12:52:26 hbj was already muted, shadi 12:53:30 Helen: Initial response is that the documents stand alone. 12:54:59 zakim, mute me 12:54:59 wayne should now be muted 12:55:29 EOWG: The documents stand alone. 12:56:30 q+ 12:57:51 Shawn: Do we need to add a small business case paragraph to the overview page? 12:59:09 Harvey: It wold add to the page and might attact readers. 12:59:36 q- 13:02:27 fyi old version: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/eval-links 13:02:50 Shawn: On the Overview Page look now, does the list of items show up well. 13:03:15 Doyle: I cannot see the whole list... 13:03:50 Shawn: The intent was not to show the whole list, but that the list is there. 13:04:43 wayne, mute me 13:04:56 zakim, mute me 13:04:56 wayne was already muted, Wayne 13:06:07 Doyle: My impression is that 2 screens is a natural usability limit. 13:06:59 zakim, unmute me 13:06:59 Justin should no longer be muted 13:07:43 Shawn: One thing we would like to add is some kind of business benefits. For now we have just one addition to this list, but later there could be more. 13:09:09 Judy: What if we had an h2 that has contents of resource suite. 13:10:39 Shawn: We are using an anotated list pages -merges title anotation with a page contents box. 13:13:27 Shadi: in the previous version the links were separated. See in IRC the "fyi old version..." 13:14:08 zakim, please mute me 13:14:08 Justin should now be muted 13:18:39 Roberto: The name "consideration for specific Contexts" needs work. 13:23:01 (looking at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/template.html ) 13:23:19 Shawn: Is everyone comfortable with the currnet title for the "tools list". 13:24:51 Shawn: ...and with the reporting template? 13:25:02 [No objections] 13:25:19 Shawn: Does the long title on anotated link list correspond well with the short title on the actual dlcument? 13:25:53 EOWG: yes 13:26:44 Shawn: Will we add the small business case paragraph be added now or with the next revision. 13:27:52 Shadi: This would come quite soon? At this point the mini business case paragraph wuld be added. 13:29:38 Shawn: Given the need for review and the editors schedule this would delay the posting by a month. 13:34:53 Shawn: Reconsider the title "considerations for Specific Content". 13:37:41 Shadi: The special considerations page came out in a face to face discussion, but we did not come up with a specific title. 13:40:43 zakim, please unmute me 13:40:43 Justin should no longer be muted 13:41:25 Hellen: If you read the page the title is clear, but the title does not lead you to the page. 13:43:11 Considerations for Evaluating Special Types of Web Sites 13:45:41 EOWG Brainstorm: Managing, strategies, different kinds of websites, managine evaluation strategies your business might have..., 13:45:44 brainstorm options: 13:45:49 managing evaluation 13:45:53 evaluation strategies 13:46:01 Things to Consider Along The Way 13:46:02 evaluation approaches 13:46:14 evaluation considerations 13:47:05 zakim, mute me 13:47:05 wayne should now be muted 13:47:05 help with evaluation planning 13:47:19 additional conderations 13:47:30 zakim, please mute me 13:47:30 Justin should now be muted 13:48:21 Johana: (spelling?) Accessibility evaluation needs to be clear? 13:48:25 specific contexts for web accessibility evaluation 13:50:03 Andrew: considerations for accessibility evaluation 13:50:30 specific context consideration... 13:50:42 Special Considerations of Web Accessibility Evaluation 13:50:59 Andrew: so what about - considerations for accessibility evaluation in specific contexts 13:51:27 Roberto: Specific context is ok, long "specfic context for consideration". 13:51:42 evaluation approaches for specific contexts 13:52:04 context considerations for web accessibility evaluation 13:52:45 contextual considerations for web accessibility evaluation 13:53:06 specific contexts that influence evaluation 13:53:56 Andrew likes Judy's suggestion "Evaluation Approaches for Specific Contexts" 13:54:39 Specific contexts notes for 01web accessibility evaluation 13:54:46 Judy: I favor something that includes web accessiblity. Reactions: Specific Contests for Web Accessibility Evaluation. 13:54:56 evaluation approaches for specific contexts 13:55:04 vs. 13:55:19 specific contexts for web accessibility evaluation 13:55:20 Andrew: Invert it Evaluation aproaches is the lead (key). 13:56:59 -hbj 13:57:06 bye 13:57:27 Judy: (1) Evaluation approaches for specific contexts (2) Specific Contexts for Web Accessibility Evaluation. 13:59:44 EOWG: without objective.. votes for (1) 14:00:54 Shawn: Approach for Specific Contexts would wrap but it might be complete. 14:01:04 s/objective/objection 14:01:15 Andrew: Just use "Specific Contexts" for the short name. 14:01:27 EOWG: no objections 14:02:00 shawn, what are the action items? 14:05:48 Shawn: We move to 2c. Serious concerns.. 14:08:22 -Roberto 14:08:27 Bye all 14:08:32 rcastaldo has left #eo 14:11:41 I'd like to have a feedback person to report problems to, with authority to get the problem fixed 14:13:07 Shawn: Thare are many weakness to the page, so should we change it or pull it? 14:13:39 EOWG: without objection, but with regrets we pull it. 14:16:24 Judy: Would like reaction to the proposal: keep "selected topics" but pull the "large site" section. 14:16:44 EOWG: aproves without objection. 14:18:39 Judy: the four pages in draft listed in the agenda, should be put in place on the site with the changes noted in this meeting? 14:18:55 EOWG: aproved without objection. 14:22:59 Topic: Selecting Web Evaluation Tools Section 14:23:38 -Bingham 14:24:36 Shadi: The changes are section 3: Changed the names, check point coverage was changed. Both changes were suggested in group review. 14:24:39 Currently http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/selectingtools.html 14:25:30 +Bingham 14:27:07 Harvey has joined #eo 14:34:18 zakim, please unmute me 14:34:18 Justin should no longer be muted 14:35:31 zakim, please mute me 14:35:31 Justin should now be muted 14:36:05 Group: The last sentence of "What ...tools. cannot do" change "make Web sites accessible" to "determine Web sites accessibility." 14:36:51 Shawn: Please fill out the survey when it comes relating to this meeting. 14:37:14 Shawn, help how do I determine "action items"? 14:37:20 -Shadi 14:37:21 -Doyle_Saylor 14:37:21 -Tanguy 14:37:22 -Bingham 14:37:22 -Helen(probably) 14:37:24 -Johanna 14:37:24 -Judy 14:37:27 shadi has left #eo 14:37:39 -Andrew 14:37:41 -Justin 14:39:35 -wayne 14:39:36 -Shawn 14:39:37 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended 14:39:38 Attendees were Doyle_Saylor, Shawn, Shadi, Judy, Andrew, wayne, Johanna, +1.517.974.aaaa, Justin, Bingham, Helen(probably), Roberto, Tanguy, hbj 14:40:54 present: Doyle_Saylor, Shawn, Shadi, Judy, Andrew, wayne, Johanna, Justin, Bingham, Helen, Roberto, Tanguy, Helle 14:41:20 zakim, bye 14:41:20 Zakim has left #eo 14:41:27 rrsagent, make logs world 14:41:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:41:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/09/09-eo-minutes.html shawn 14:41:55 ok, Wayne. you should be able to get the minutes from above URI. 14:43:26 hey wayne/shawn - who was Johanna? 14:44:31 Thank you! 14:49:58 Johanna works with Barry. she's interested in eval resource suite. as soon as we figure out how she will fit into gropu, i'll ask her to e-mail introduction to herself to the list 14:50:05 (andrew, answer above) 14:50:30 rrsagent, bye 14:50:30 I see no action items