IRC log of swbp on 2005-08-02
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:54:20 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swbp
- 13:54:20 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc
- 13:54:31 [Ralph]
- Meeting: SWBPD RDFXHTML TF
- 13:56:13 [Ralph]
- Previous: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes
- 14:00:28 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #swbp
- 14:01:02 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)10:00AM has now started
- 14:01:09 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 14:01:22 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 14:01:25 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 14:01:26 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 14:01:34 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 14:01:34 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 14:01:36 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 14:01:37 [Ralph]
- Chair: Ben
- 14:01:43 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:01:45 [Zakim]
- +Danbri
- 14:01:52 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 14:01:56 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:02:17 [Steven]
- I'll check the router
- 14:02:20 [Steven]
- Just a mo
- 14:03:05 [Ralph]
- Ben: most of my actions CONTINUE
- 14:05:12 [Ralph]
- ... worried about finding an interim chair for next 6 weeks
- 14:05:22 [Ralph]
- Ralph: yeah, no progress on finding a candidate
- 14:05:37 [Ralph]
- DanBri: I'm willing to chair a few telecons but not the entire 6 weeks
- 14:06:08 [Ralph]
- Ralph: likewise
- 14:07:48 [danbri]
- in http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/#tools ?
- 14:09:05 [danbri]
- q+ to ask steven if HTML link type text changed from feb to may
- 14:09:25 [danbri]
- agenda+ danbri progress report re http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/
- 14:10:04 [Steven_]
- Steven_ has joined #swbp
- 14:10:17 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/Guide/Overview.html Art of Consensus
- 14:10:34 [Steven_]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 14:10:34 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven_; the call is being made
- 14:10:34 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 14:10:34 [Ralph]
- see "Style for Group-internal Drafts" under "The Recommendation Track"
- 14:11:25 [Ralph]
- Steven: possible regrets from Mark
- 14:13:22 [Ralph]
- Topic: RDF Role
- 14:13:39 [Ralph]
- Steven: as far as I'm concerned, it's resolved
- 14:13:51 [Ralph]
- agenda+ RDF Role attribute
- 14:13:56 [Ralph]
- Topic: Action Review
- 14:14:13 [Ralph]
- agenda+ HTML rel types [DanBri]
- 14:15:28 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben create a way to track progress on the 3 issues of qnames, reification, and custom attributes and elements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action01]
- 14:15:30 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:15:34 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben send mail to www-html-editors to assign an issue for the GRDDL namespace document behind the profile [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
- 14:15:36 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:15:39 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben to notify working group via a status report of upcoming WD of Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action02]
- 14:15:40 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:15:43 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben to put together the "ACID" test for XHTML2 RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action02]
- 14:15:44 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:15:52 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Mark to check edge cases of inheritance in RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action06]
- 14:15:57 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:16:01 [Ralph]
- ACTION: jjc to review rdf concepts and fragments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action10]
- 14:16:06 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:16:16 [Ralph]
- ACTION: All take a serious look at Mark's bnode proposal summary http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action07]
- 14:16:33 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 14:17:26 [Ralph]
- drop agendum 3
- 14:17:36 [Ralph]
- zakim, agenda?
- 14:17:37 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda:
- 14:17:40 [Zakim]
- 1. danbri progress report re http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/ [from danbri]
- 14:17:41 [Zakim]
- 2. RDF Role attribute [from Ralph]
- 14:18:02 [Ralph]
- Ralph: HTML2 Last Call status?
- 14:18:11 [Ralph]
- Steven: churning through issues; schema is getting close
- 14:18:27 [Ralph]
- ... we now have a complete RelaxNG version and it's being converted to XML Schema
- 14:18:52 [Ralph]
- ... f2f scheduled for early September; that's the most likely moment to decide to go to Last Call
- 14:19:50 [Ralph]
- DanBri: have the link type definitions changed much since the Feb [editor's] draft and the latest public WD?
- 14:20:00 [Ralph]
- Steven: there is a good diff-marked document
- 14:20:02 [Steven_]
- Diff version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2-diff.html
- 14:20:33 [benadida]
- back
- 14:20:51 [Ralph]
- Steven: copyright is new
- 14:21:04 [Ralph]
- ... icon and profile are also new
- 14:21:45 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please make logs public
- 14:22:08 [Ralph]
- Steven: in the diff, yellow is added text, green is changed text
- 14:22:25 [Ralph]
- ... orange is deleted text (but I thought that this version did not show deleted text)
- 14:22:40 [danbri]
- q+ to check that preferred xhtml2 ns is exactly "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/"
- 14:22:50 [benadida]
- ack
- 14:23:19 [Ralph]
- move to next agendum
- 14:23:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "danbri progress report re http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/" taken up [from danbri]
- 14:23:22 [Zakim]
- danbri, you wanted to ask steven if HTML link type text changed from feb to may and to check that preferred xhtml2 ns is exactly "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/"
- 14:23:56 [danbri]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/
- 14:23:59 [Ralph]
- DanBri: my task was to make an RDF representation of the HTML link types and draft a note
- 14:24:13 [Steven_]
- Orange colour means that the statement is a 'must'
- 14:24:17 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/ XHTML link types in RDF
- 14:24:38 [Ralph]
- DanBri: lots of open issues at the end of this draft
- 14:25:02 [Ralph]
- ... current text is largely copied from the XML document
- 14:25:34 [Ralph]
- ... would like to hear from implementors on some of the details
- 14:25:52 [Ralph]
- ... some things missing; e.g. bookmark titles
- 14:26:01 [Ralph]
- ... one open issue: what is the namespace URI?
- 14:26:13 [Ralph]
- ... have been assuming that we'd use the XHTML2 namespace
- 14:26:31 [Ralph]
- ... so what [char] is at the end of the namespace URI?
- 14:27:01 [Ralph]
- Steven: we could do a redirect if necessary -- what's the reason for requiring it?
- 14:27:25 [Ralph]
- DanBri: TAG resolution on # vs. / and information resources [see httpRange-14]
- 14:27:55 [Ralph]
- Steven: we put the / at the end to help with the RDF stuff; we thought this gave us the most flexibility
- 14:29:02 [benadida]
- q+ to ask about using RDF/A to define the RDFS
- 14:29:11 [Ralph]
- DanBri: I tried to find an expansion for XHTML to use with the acronym tag
- 14:29:24 [Ralph]
- Steven: use Extensible Hypertext Markup Language
- 14:29:24 [benadida]
- ack
- 14:29:26 [benadida]
- ack ben
- 14:29:26 [Zakim]
- benadida, you wanted to ask about using RDF/A to define the RDFS
- 14:29:28 [danbri]
- ""Extensible Hypertext Markup Language" = XHTML
- 14:30:41 [Ralph]
- Ben: does the httpRange-14 issue resolution mean that we can't have an XHTML2 document containing RDF/A that is an RDF Schema for the rel types?
- 14:30:57 [danbri]
- +1 on it being nice to have an RDF/A version
- 14:31:03 [Ralph]
- ... it would be nice from a consistency viewpoint if we could write the RDF schema in RDF/A
- 14:31:04 [danbri]
- (I'd like an application/rdf+xml too)
- 14:31:49 [Ralph]
- DanBri: I think this should be possible with a combination of redirects and content negotiation
- 14:33:47 [Ralph]
- Ralph: in a private conversation with TimBL yesterday he confirmed that 303 and possibly 308 were the only acceptable redirection responses for the httpRange-14 resolution
- 14:33:54 [Ralph]
- DanBri: will this make it on the TAG agenda?
- 14:34:12 [Ralph]
- Ralph: not likely unless we raise it, possibly via a use case
- 14:34:26 [Ralph]
- DanBri: I though I'd done that with a purl.org example
- 14:36:03 [Ralph]
- DanBri: I'd like to propose [an updated version of] http://www.w3.org/2005/05/hrel/ to the SWBPD WG to be a Working Draft
- 14:36:19 [Ralph]
- ... I'd like to link from this document directly to the XHTML document
- 14:38:33 [danbri]
- looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset-rdfs ... tiny little doc
- 14:40:43 [Ralph]
- DanBri: should feedback go to just the TF mailing list, or should this be considered a joint WG task with feedback to both lists?
- 14:40:51 [Ralph]
- Steven: there is no objection to the TF owning this
- 14:41:05 [Ralph]
- ... the HTML WG has enough on its hands and are happy to just coordinate
- 14:41:13 [Ralph]
- s/TF/SWBPD WG/
- 14:41:34 [Ralph]
- Steven: fine with me to direct feedback just to the TF mailing list
- 14:41:51 [Ralph]
- DanBri: ok to point into the XHTML2 spec for the definitions?
- 14:41:55 [Ralph]
- [no objections]
- 14:42:07 [danbri]
- <rdf:Property rdf:about"#start">
- 14:42:09 [danbri]
- <rdfs:label>start</rdfs:label>
- 14:42:10 [danbri]
- <rdfs:comment>Refers to the first resource in a collection of resources. A typical use case might be a collection of chapters in a book.</rdfs:comment>
- 14:42:12 [danbri]
- <rdfs:range rdf:resource"#Document"/>
- 14:42:13 [danbri]
- <rdfs:domain rdf:resource"#Document"/>
- 14:42:15 [danbri]
- <rdf:type rdf:resource"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/>
- 14:42:17 [danbri]
- </rdf:Property>
- 14:42:25 [Ralph]
- DanBri: RDF/OWL definitions in-line or in appendix?
- 14:42:36 [Ralph]
- Steven: my preference has been to put all that in appendices
- 14:42:58 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I'd like to see it inline somewhere [appendix is fine]
- 14:43:28 [Ralph]
- DanBri: note my addition of a Class of documents
- 14:43:51 [Ralph]
- Steven: when we say 'documents' we actually mean anything addressable by a URI -- i.e. a resource
- 14:44:01 [Ralph]
- DanBri: 'resource' is an overloaded term
- 14:44:26 [Ralph]
- ... can we agree to use the TAG's definition of 'information resource'?
- 14:44:29 [Ralph]
- Steven: fine by me
- 14:44:47 [Ralph]
- DanBri: on the ATOM mailing list there has been discussion of new link types, identified by URI\
- 14:45:00 [Ralph]
- ... I'd like to cite that from this document
- 14:45:03 [danbri]
- see atom-syntax
- 14:45:37 [Ralph]
- ... there's a built-in set of link types in ATOM
- 14:45:45 [Ralph]
- ... they've decided to use the IETF process to register new link types
- 14:46:05 [Ralph]
- ... shortnames acceptable if URI has been registered with IETF, otherwise a full URI is acceptable
- 14:46:21 [Ralph]
- move to next agendum
- 14:46:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "RDF Role attribute" taken up [from Ralph]
- 14:46:54 [Ralph]
- Steven: my proposal was to make role a synonym for rdf:type
- 14:47:15 [Ralph]
- ... Jeremy said he'd be happier if it were a subtype [subProperty] of rdf:type
- 14:47:45 [Ralph]
- Ben: the role attribute can be applied to any element?
- 14:47:57 [Ralph]
- Steven: yes, it was originally introduced for accessibility
- 14:48:11 [danbri]
- q+ to suggest it be considered _syntax_ for rdf:type, not a subPropertyOf (which takes us out of OWL DL/Lite for all apps)
- 14:48:13 [Ralph]
- ... the accessibility community began defining some roles they needed
- 14:48:23 [Ralph]
- ... it dawned on the HTML WG that role was more generally useful
- 14:48:33 [benadida]
- ack danbri
- 14:48:33 [Zakim]
- danbri, you wanted to suggest it be considered _syntax_ for rdf:type, not a subPropertyOf (which takes us out of OWL DL/Lite for all apps)
- 14:49:36 [Ralph]
- DanBri: we should try to avoid shutting out OWL-DL from using XHTML2
- 14:50:15 [Ralph]
- Ben: how does <div role='whatever'> apply to the element? Does this effectively become a bnode?
- 14:50:34 [Ralph]
- Steven: it may well be
- 14:51:08 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben add role attribute to the [HTML] issues list
- 14:51:42 [Ralph]
- Ben: should this be part of the RDF Schema that DanBri is working on?
- 14:51:59 [Ralph]
- DanBri: if we're only using rdf:type it's pure syntax and doesn't affect the schema
- 14:52:16 [Ralph]
- ... is there anything else in the syntax that shows up as RDF Properties or Classes?
- 14:52:22 [Ralph]
- Steven: don't think so
- 14:52:43 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:52:50 [Ralph]
- close this agendum
- 14:56:23 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 14:56:34 [Zakim]
- -Danbri
- 14:56:40 [Ralph]
- DanBri: ok for me to announce the link types document to the WG when I'm ready?
- 14:56:41 [Ralph]
- Ben: sure
- 14:56:46 [Ralph]
- [adjourned]
- 14:56:49 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 14:56:50 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)10:00AM has ended
- 14:56:51 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Ralph, Ben_Adida, Steven, Danbri
- 14:57:34 [benadida]
- benadida has left #swbp
- 14:59:00 [danbri]
- "New!Style for Group-internal Drafts" is indeed in /Guide/
- 14:59:09 [danbri]
- i was looking for 'Editor's ...'
- 15:05:08 [Ralph]
- as was I
- 15:05:31 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please draft minutes
- 15:05:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-minutes.html Ralph
- 15:05:43 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 15:05:43 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #swbp
- 15:05:48 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-actions.rdf :
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben create a way to track progress on the 3 issues of qnames, reification, and custom attributes and elements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action01] [1]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-15-28
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben send mail to www-html-editors to assign an issue for the GRDDL namespace document behind the profile [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [2]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-15-34
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to notify working group via a status report of upcoming WD of Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action02] [3]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-15-39
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to put together the "ACID" test for XHTML2 RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action02] [4]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-15-43
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark to check edge cases of inheritance in RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action06] [5]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-15-52
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: jjc to review rdf concepts and fragments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action10] [6]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-16-01
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: All take a serious look at Mark's bnode proposal summary http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action07] [7]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-16-16
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben add role attribute to the [HTML] issues list [8]
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-irc#T14-51-08