12:24:52 RRSAgent has joined #eo 12:24:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/17-eo-irc 12:26:05 yeah sure 12:26:10 \me thinks maybe shawn has an irish accent in her fingers tonight 12:26:25 :) 12:26:35 pasquale has joined #eo 12:26:37 it comes from replying to barry's email this morning, i guess 12:26:39 :) 12:26:43 hi all, goodmornig 12:27:06 good morning, pasquale. do you have a couple of minutes to talk about the call (about CSS)? 12:27:13 s/about/after 12:27:32 hi pasquale. you're european so good afternoon! 12:28:17 Meeting: EOWG 12:28:17 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has now started 12:28:21 +Doyle_Saylor 12:28:24 +Loughborough 12:28:27 Chair: Judy 12:28:28 i've problem with skype today, for now i must go with IRC 12:28:33 sorry 12:29:02 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005AprJun/0159.html 12:29:26 +Shadi 12:29:40 +Shawn 12:29:47 +??P2 12:30:04 Zakim, ??P2 is Justin 12:30:04 +Justin; got it 12:31:14 +??P4 12:31:15 +??P5 12:31:24 Regrets: Sailesh, Ron, Alan, Chuck 12:31:54 Zakim, ??P4 is Wayne 12:31:54 +Wayne; got it 12:32:04 Zakim, ??P5 is Liam 12:32:05 +Henk 12:32:06 +Liam; got it 12:32:15 +Bingham 12:32:25 +Jack 12:32:30 +Judy 12:32:43 zakim, who is here? 12:32:43 On the phone I see Loughborough, Doyle_Saylor, Shadi, Shawn, Justin, Liam, Wayne, Henk, Bingham, Jack, Judy 12:32:46 On IRC I see pasquale, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, Wayne, judy, emmajane, Andrew, shawn, shadi 12:32:58 +??P9 12:33:04 +??P11 12:33:27 Zakim, ??P9 is Barry 12:33:27 +Barry; got it 12:33:28 +??P12 12:33:32 zakim, ??p21 is Andrew 12:33:32 sorry, Andrew, I do not recognize a party named '??p21' 12:33:38 barry has joined #eo 12:33:39 Zakim, ??P11 is Pasquale 12:33:39 +Pasquale; got it 12:33:42 + +1.416.531.aaaa 12:33:46 zakim, ??p12 is Andrew 12:33:46 +Andrew; got it 12:34:05 Zakim, aaaa is Emma 12:34:05 +Emma; got it 12:34:16 Helle has joined #eo 12:34:56 I'm a little late on the phone will sjoin asap 12:35:35 zakim, who's here? 12:35:35 On the phone I see Loughborough, Doyle_Saylor, Shadi, Shawn, Justin, Liam, Wayne, Henk, Bingham, Jack, Judy, Barry, Pasquale, Andrew, Emma 12:35:37 On IRC I see Helle, barry, pasquale, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, Wayne, judy, emmajane, Andrew, shawn, shadi 12:37:02 +Helle_Bjarno 12:37:18 +Sylvie_Duchateau 12:38:41 zakim, mute helle 12:38:41 Helle_Bjarno should now be muted 12:38:57 zkim, who is making noise? 12:39:07 zakim, who is making noise? 12:39:19 shawn, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Judy (91%), Pasquale (27%) 12:40:03 scribe? 12:42:52 zakim, mute helle 12:42:52 Helle_Bjarno should now be muted 12:43:27 zakim, mute me 12:43:27 sorry, emmajane, I do not see a party named 'emmajane' 12:43:38 zakim, mute me 12:43:38 Wayne should now be muted 12:43:57 Can someone make my names match? 12:44:01 zakim, emma is emmajane 12:44:01 +emmajane; got it 12:44:06 thanks 12:44:11 no problem 12:44:26 zakim, unmute me 12:44:26 Helle_Bjarno should no longer be muted 12:45:10 JackW has joined #eo 12:45:37 zakim, unmute me 12:45:37 emmajane should no longer be muted 12:46:09 zakim, mute me 12:46:15 Wayne should now be muted 12:46:54 scribe info is at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html 12:47:02 scribe: wayne 12:47:12 scribenick: Wayne 12:47:29 zakim, who is here? 12:47:29 On the phone I see Loughborough (muted), Doyle_Saylor, Shadi, Shawn, Justin, Liam, Wayne, Henk, Bingham, Jack, Judy, Barry, Pasquale, Andrew, emmajane, Helle_Bjarno, 12:47:32 ... Sylvie_Duchateau (muted) 12:47:33 On IRC I see JackW, Helle, barry, pasquale, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, Wayne, judy, emmajane, Andrew, shawn, shadi 12:47:42 present: Loughborough (muted), Doyle_Saylor, Shadi, Shawn, Justin, Liam, Wayne, Henk, Bingham, Jack, Judy, Barry, Pasquale, Andrew, emmajane, Helle_Bjarno, 12:47:52 present+ Sylvie_Duchateau 12:48:57 topic: Outreach 12:49:31 present+ Eric Velleman 12:49:39 Shawn, is that right for topic marker 12:50:39 Harvey has joined #eo 12:50:41 it has been hot! 12:50:44 zakim, mute me 12:50:44 emmajane should now be muted 12:51:01 zakim, mute me 12:51:01 Helle_Bjarno should now be muted 12:51:02 zakim, mute me 12:51:03 Wayne should now be muted 12:51:19 topic: Highlights 12:51:46 zakim, mute me 12:51:46 Pasquale should now be muted 12:52:09 Shawn Wording size, tone, shorter, personal, authorship... Conceptual not formating 12:53:02 Shawn: Task force was very active, has had attrition, opportunities 12:53:19 See: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut3/ 12:55:32 Barry: Good balance for the things we want to cover. How will topics be rolled over? 12:56:14 Shawn: We hope for more than once a month. Roll over topics as they occur. Hoping for once a week 12:56:25 shadi_ has joined #eo 12:58:28 General: Aproval 12:58:35 good to go! 12:59:24 The Web Standards Project (www.wasp.org) is keen to have an RSS feed that they can use. 12:59:49 zakim, unmute me 12:59:49 emmajane should no longer be muted 12:59:53 The Web Standards Project (www.wasp.org) is keen to have an RSS feed that they can use. 13:00:05 (hmm, I'm gray?) 13:00:52 zakim, mute me 13:00:52 emmajane should now be muted 13:01:26 Judy: Please look at these carefully; look at wording; 13:01:55 Bill: expand the acronym. 13:03:43 Doyle: Headline doesn't seem to work. How does this work with other languages 13:04:54 Andrew: Headlines should target the audience they want. 13:06:07 Bill: Tied to "Got Milk" with "Got ATAG". Will this transfer internationally? 13:06:36 zakim, unmute me 13:06:36 Helle_Bjarno should no longer be muted 13:07:03 Judy: Language level looks like it is a more consistent language level (natural). 13:07:22 Helle: Agrees that it is clear now. 13:10:15 Shawn: Authorship listing has problems. It would personalize the page, but there are problems identifying all the authors. 13:11:36 Bill: Finding your way is a key element rather than a news item. (It is a standing need.) 13:13:17 lol to finding your mojo :-) 13:15:06 Someone pointed out that the play on words that equates "wai" with "way" doesn't work internationally. WAI is often pronouncet with a long I. 13:15:49 Helle: Should point what part of W3C is working on the document. 13:16:06 zakim, mute me 13:16:06 Helle_Bjarno should now be muted 13:16:44 topic: Retrofitting Web Sites for Accessibility 13:18:06 Judy: What we want to focus on is the reorganization 13:19:41 Shadi: Developers should be given strategies and tools to strategize and organize removing know barriers from their web site. conceptual comments, no formatting and wording. 13:20:25 Judy: The nested bullets are not the final look; 13:21:03 Judy: Organizational concepts, idea flow... 13:22:19 http://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/ 13:22:25 q+ 13:22:46 Liam: Organizations are interested a plan, setting steps etc.... 13:23:20 Judy: The WAI implementation document addresses many of these issues. 13:24:04 Shadi: Could Liam reflect on that thought a liitle more... would be interested... 13:24:59 What url are we discussing? 13:25:09 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/retrofit/ 13:25:12 Liam: Information about other resources, process management, want answers to problems, have a site to retrofit. 13:26:08 q- 13:26:26 Shadi: This issue was raised in previous 13:27:34 William: Pays no heed to the barriers being social, not just technical, misses the disability rights focus. 13:29:12 William: Explicit problem, the real barriers are not preceptible to many developers 13:31:02 zakim, mute me 13:31:02 Wayne should now be muted 13:34:30 Shadi: This is not technical to the point markup; Perhaps we need the referencing. 13:35:36 Henk: You must repair a site according to a report. You may not need awareness. 13:37:03 Justin: You do need the some awareness information so that content managers don't add bad content. 13:38:05 Judy: You need a mini-project planning for retro 13:38:11 zakim, mute me 13:38:11 Wayne should now be muted 13:40:29 Regrets+ Roberto 13:40:50 q+ 13:43:46 Judy: Would flipping the order work: Introduction, actualy retrofitting details, then how you got there and how to prefent it. 13:44:53 Andrew concurs with the flipping idea - lets fix the emergency first, then look at preventing future problem 13:44:55 Barry: Higer priority how do sort out the worst things, then how to prevent it? Triage concept. 13:47:41 Shadi: Maybe the heading of section 2 "Fixing the Causes" is misleading. Many parts of the section are practical. Don't get caught in titles. 13:48:55 William: Need triage on top. 13:50:01 Shadi: Fire fighting seems more technical and less process oriented. It doesn't match the begining of the call. 13:50:34 Shadi: When you say more practical, what do you mean? 13:51:03 Judy: Can we brain storm on process steps? 13:51:30 ???: Estimating time and other costs of retrofitting 13:51:46 Liam: 13:53:07 Andrew: Who is involved; Go back to authors for example. Assigning responsibility 13:54:13 William: User complaints; User has standing; Lawyers, Client,.. 13:54:48 Wayne: does William mean "role" rather than standing? 13:56:26 Shadi: What is different about retrofitting from than other design issues? 13:57:35 zakim, mute me 13:57:37 Wayne should now be muted 13:58:23 Shadi: The only unique thing about retrofitting is prioritizing. 13:58:37 Shadi: Where do I start? 13:58:59 q+ 13:59:02 Henk: Do miss the related pages. 13:59:04 ack me 14:02:42 zakim, mute me 14:02:42 Wayne should now be muted 14:03:56 topic: Before/After 14:06:07 Judy: Lots of talk about Before/After retrofitting demonstrations; One example was placed before congress, but it was not stand alone. 14:07:08 There were many requests for demo, and we have people to volunteer; We are looking at feedback from EO before that work goes ahead. 14:08:36 zakim, unmute me 14:08:36 Helle_Bjarno should no longer be muted 14:09:22 Jack: I have seen before an after demos. These really helps people say "I get this now" 14:10:00 Jack: Used one, but did not think it was a WAI demo 14:10:34 Judy: Context- want to fit in with Retrofitting and Evaluation Suite 14:11:26 Helle: The concept is sound. 14:12:00 William: Historically there are lots of examples, but they are hard to find. 14:12:28 Judy: Develop site that is clear and usable. 14:12:54 Helle: What is the starting point? Are we starting from scratch? 14:13:32 Judy: There are three from before, but they are not ready to go. It is pretty rough. 14:16:25 Judy: Like an EO document, introduction (context), references,..bad site, model analysis, mini retrofitting plan, a fixed site. 14:18:04 William: Same set of pages and same appearance. Should it be improved apearance: 14:18:48 Helle: We must not mix up accessible and usable. 14:19:39 ???: The idea is to fix accessibility without changing the sight. 14:20:15 Liam: Site has one good view and several bad looks. 14:20:36 s/liam/barry 14:20:45 Helle: doen't that mean that the intended appearance should stay the same 14:21:07 s/???/Barry 14:21:13 ? 14:21:32 Barry: I think we agree 14:21:42 s/Liam: Site has/Barry: Site has 14:22:19 s/???: The/?Eric: The 14:24:53 zakim, unmute me 14:24:53 emmajane should no longer be muted 14:26:17 Judy: Bad site, evaluation of site (clear about what is needed), mini plan, new site 14:26:43 Wayne: probably need some alternative views. (wish list) 14:26:53 q+ 14:26:58 q- barry 14:27:58 q+ 14:29:10 heh 14:29:32 q- 14:29:36 Shadi: Bad html means invalid and misused. Main focus should not be how people experience a site. 14:29:37 ack emmajane 14:31:25 Emma: Should not miss some alternative views like color blindness,... 14:31:48 Judy: focus on one good site, followed by links to other sites. 14:31:50 Andrew: or contrast issues (often age related) 14:33:51 Eric: We have a group to work on bad and good pages. 14:36:14 wayne: and also the fact that we shouldn't imply that graphic design changes should _not_ be required to make a site accessible as graphic changes can often mean more people will be required to make the fixes. 14:36:51 erm. triple negatives.... 14:37:03 graphic design changes != required 14:37:33 emma, I got it 14:37:38 thanks 14:37:54 -Doyle_Saylor 14:37:55 -Barry 14:37:55 -Jack 14:37:56 -Helle_Bjarno 14:37:58 -Shadi 14:37:59 -Judy 14:38:01 -Loughborough 14:38:03 -Sylvie_Duchateau 14:38:04 -emmajane 14:38:06 -Bingham 14:38:16 topic: highlight heading re-wording 14:38:16 (after end of official call :) 14:38:16 from discussion: judy "authoring tool not clear...." andrew: "as is catches the target audience" 14:38:16 1. Blog, Wiki, CMS... Got ATAG? 14:38:16 2. Got ATAG? Authoring Tools, Blog, Wiki, CMS... 14:38:17 pros of 2: adds authoring tools. think "got atag" nicer up front. 14:38:19 cons of 2: "blog, wiki, cms" lower & might lost, and that's who & what we're trying to catch with this one 14:38:19 -Liam 14:38:26 -Henk 14:38:31 -Pasquale 14:38:50 -Wayne 14:39:00 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut3/ 14:39:05 zakim, who is here? 14:39:05 On the phone I see Shawn, Justin, Andrew 14:39:06 On IRC I see shadi, JackW, barry, pasquale, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, judy, emmajane, Andrew, shawn 14:39:17 Got ATAG? Authoring Tools, Blog, Wiki, CMS... 14:39:34 Shawn: I agree with Andrew that the terms will catch the attention of the right people/interested people. And then the content of the section will hopefully expand on the title for those that don't know the terms. 14:39:40 Blog, Wiki, CMS... Got ATAG? 14:40:37 Got ATAG? Authoring Tools, Blog, Wiki, CMS... 14:41:14 Got ATAG? Blog, Wiki, CMS... 14:41:15 "Got ATAG? [Complicance] for your Authoring Tool" 14:41:29 emmajane - can you join call? 14:41:37 on the phone? 14:41:41 d'oh. I just hung up. :) 14:41:44 yes. same # 14:41:53 I'll call back in. Sorry. :) 14:43:00 Blogs, Wikis, CMS... Got ATAG? 14:43:23 it won't let me back in :( 14:43:36 it says it's restricted. 14:43:46 http://www.got-milk.com/index.html 14:44:02 emma - we're almost fone 14:44:09 s/fone/done 14:44:19 It says the code isn't valid anymore. 14:44:50 That'll teach me for next time. ;) 14:50:17 -Shawn 14:50:23 -Andrew 14:50:25 emmajane, we don't usually do this. :-) 14:50:28 -Justin 14:50:29 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended 14:50:30 Attendees were Doyle_Saylor, Loughborough, Shadi, Shawn, Justin, Wayne, Henk, Liam, Bingham, Jack, Judy, Barry, Pasquale, +1.416.531.aaaa, Andrew, Helle_Bjarno, Sylvie_Duchateau, 14:50:33 ... emmajane 14:50:52 rrsagnet, make logs world 14:50:57 rrsagent, make logs world 14:51:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:51:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/06/17-eo-minutes.html shawn 14:51:16 shawn: stay and chat after you mean? 14:51:29 right - dont' usually stay on the line after the call. 14:51:57 well, not everyone :) 14:52:32 it's often worth waiting an extra minute or wor - just in case 14:53:12 sometimes you get to hear an interesting bit :) 14:53:38 that's when all the gossip happens, eh? 14:53:41 also, joining a few mins early to chat about the weather or news or vacations or such :) 14:54:18 i must be missing something - don't find much gossip 14:54:18 shawn: I met up with Laurie Harrison on Wednesday. She said she used to be part of this group and says hello. 14:54:43 hum... must have been before my time... or my memory is really bad :/ 14:54:53 hey - say hello from Andrew and Brian in Melbourne next time 14:54:54 no, not much gossip 14:55:04 ok, off to other stuff 14:55:07 I think she remembered your name. She used to be at Uni of Toronto with Jutta Trevoranus (sp?) 14:55:10 have a great wkend. 14:55:29 and I've got to call london (uk that is, not ontario) 14:55:39 goodnight 14:55:42 night! 14:55:48 shawn has left #eo 16:18:19 shawn has joined #eo 16:22:54 pasquale has joined #eo 16:23:04 hi shawn 16:23:12 hi! 16:23:45 can i call you? 16:23:54 zakim, bye 16:23:54 Zakim has left #eo 16:23:57 rrsagent, bye 16:23:57 I see no action items