IRC log of dawg on 2005-06-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:28:07 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dawg
- 14:28:07 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc
- 14:28:15 [ericP]
- zakim, this will be DAWG
- 14:28:15 [Zakim]
- ok, ericP, I see SW_DAWG()10:30AM already started
- 14:28:17 [DaveB]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:28:17 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ??P29
- 14:28:23 [DaveB]
- Zakim, ??P29 is DaveB
- 14:28:23 [Zakim]
- +DaveB; got it
- 14:28:27 [Zakim]
- +??P30
- 14:28:31 [Zakim]
- -DaveB
- 14:28:31 [ericP]
- Meeting: DAWG
- 14:28:32 [Zakim]
- +DaveB
- 14:28:40 [AndyS]
- zakim, ??P30n is AndyS
- 14:28:40 [Zakim]
- sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named '??P30n'
- 14:28:41 [ericP]
- Chair: DaveB
- 14:28:49 [ericP]
- who's scribe?
- 14:28:50 [AndyS]
- zakim, ??P30 is AndyS
- 14:28:50 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 14:28:52 [DaveB]
- kendall
- 14:28:55 [Zakim]
- +HowardK
- 14:29:37 [Zakim]
- +EricP
- 14:29:42 [Zakim]
- +??P31
- 14:29:53 [DaveB]
- Zakim, agenda + Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
- 14:29:55 [HiroyukiS]
- Zakim, ??P31 is HiroyukiS
- 14:29:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 added
- 14:29:58 [Zakim]
- +HiroyukiS; got it
- 14:30:00 [Zakim]
- +??P33
- 14:30:05 [DaveB]
- Zakim, agenda + Next f2f?
- 14:30:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 added
- 14:30:10 [Zakim]
- +Kendall_Clark
- 14:30:11 [DaveB]
- Zakim, agenda + Last call for SPARQL QL
- 14:30:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 added
- 14:30:17 [DaveB]
- Zakim, agenda + FILTER()
- 14:30:17 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 added
- 14:30:21 [ericP]
- win go 20
- 14:30:31 [jeen]
- Zakim, ??P33 is jeen
- 14:30:31 [Zakim]
- +jeen; got it
- 14:30:57 [ericP]
- agenday request: grammar
- 14:31:36 [DaveB]
- Zakim, agenda + yacker grammer
- 14:31:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 added
- 14:31:52 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 14:31:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda" taken up [from DaveB]
- 14:31:59 [kendall]
- ericp: is there "another" grammar from which the grammar in the spec is generated?
- 14:32:12 [kendall]
- i was looking for some text to cut and paste w/out all the production numbers and such :>
- 14:32:31 [DaveB]
- I saw "Regrets from JanneS, Yoshio, patH tentative regrets: DanC, SteveH"
- 14:32:37 [DaveB]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:32:37 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, HowardK, EricP, HiroyukiS, jeen, Kendall_Clark
- 14:32:38 [ericP]
- kendall, http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/sparqlTest/bnf?lang=perl
- 14:32:49 [kendall]
- ah, excellent. thx eric.
- 14:32:59 [ericP]
- kendall, but it's not generatd from that
- 14:33:19 [kendall]
- (we seem to have a quorom :>)
- 14:33:21 [AndyS]
- KC: It's produced by a perl (!) script from javacc. Can take and tailor the perl script
- 14:33:36 [Zakim]
- +??P37
- 14:33:38 [AndyS]
- Could produce text if you need
- 14:33:42 [kendall]
- hmm, okay. no biggie. i'm using antlr to genereate a python parser (:>)
- 14:33:54 [DaveB]
- minutes was http://www.w3.org/2005/06/07-dawg-irc
- 14:33:56 [kendall]
- +HiroyukiS
- 14:33:56 [DaveB]
- for last week
- 14:34:02 [kendall]
- erp :>
- 14:34:59 [kendall]
- 2 requests for "more human readable" minutes from last week's meeting
- 14:35:06 [kendall]
- (er, at least 2 requests)
- 14:35:20 [kendall]
- so, formally, minutes from last week's meeting not accepted today
- 14:35:44 [kendall]
- ACTION: DanC To produce a more humanly readable version of last week's meeting minutes
- 14:35:51 [kendall]
- CONTINUE other actions from agenda
- 14:35:57 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 2
- 14:35:58 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Next f2f?" taken up [from DaveB]
- 14:36:23 [AndyS]
- Can fly Newark <-> Bristol nowadays
- 14:36:28 [kendall]
- Nice :>
- 14:36:32 [JosD]
- JosD has joined #dawg
- 14:36:56 [kendall]
- Jeen on holiday from 4 August to 8 August
- 14:37:06 [kendall]
- EricP on holiday during August
- 14:37:11 [AndyS]
- AndyS:Not week of August 15
- 14:37:19 [kendall]
- KendallC also on holiday in Houston for some 7 week period during August
- 14:37:20 [Zakim]
- +JosD
- 14:37:30 [ericP]
- my vacation is roughly the same dates as Jeen
- 14:37:40 [kendall]
- (Append attendees: +Jos)
- 14:39:12 [kendall]
- AndyS notes that cancelling a scheduled f2f is easier than slipping one in at the last minute)
- 14:39:43 [AndyS]
- VLDB: Aug 30 - Sept 2
- 14:39:44 [kendall]
- Souri also attending
- 14:39:49 [kendall]
- (sorry, I missed you too)
- 14:39:57 [kendall]
- er, he's not on IRC :>
- 14:40:01 [kendall]
- +Souri
- 14:40:20 [DaveB]
- Zakim, who's on the call?
- 14:40:20 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, HowardK, EricP, HiroyukiS, jeen, Kendall_Clark, Souri, JosD
- 14:40:37 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 3
- 14:40:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Last call for SPARQL QL" taken up [from DaveB]
- 14:40:39 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 4
- 14:40:39 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "FILTER()" taken up [from DaveB]
- 14:40:52 [DaveB]
- re http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0338.html
- 14:40:57 [DaveB]
- and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0341.html
- 14:41:08 [kendall]
- Request to put brackets around FILTER (is that right?)
- 14:41:14 [kendall]
- re: some ambiguities in the grammar
- 14:41:23 [kendall]
- this change affects tests we've already approved
- 14:41:29 [kendall]
- er, this change *would* affect them
- 14:41:49 [kendall]
- DaveB in favor of the change
- 14:41:52 [AndyS]
- Example: "{ FILTER q:name() :a :b }"
- 14:42:14 [kendall]
- +q to ask about "compliance" (sorry!)
- 14:42:21 [kendall]
- q+ to ask about "compliance" (sorry!)
- 14:42:56 [DaveB]
- q-
- 14:43:17 [kendall]
- DaveB would rather have "brackets everywhere", doesn't like the special cases
- 14:43:29 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/sparqlTest?lang=perl&markup=html#prod-sparqlTest-Query
- 14:43:29 [kendall]
- AndyS thinks regex will be commonly used
- 14:43:48 [ericP]
- the above link is how i solved it
- 14:44:00 [ericP]
- (in the sparql grammar)
- 14:45:21 [DaveB]
- discussion of regex in python, seems it has a perl5 compat regex library
- 14:46:01 [kendall]
- (eek, sorry, badly scribing AND misleading the discussion!)
- 14:46:28 [kendall]
- Jeen: doesn't like the special cases either
- 14:46:56 [kendall]
- All the builtin functions are allowed w/out the outer brackets
- 14:47:09 [kendall]
- Proposal: All the builtin functions are allowed w/out the outer brackets
- 14:47:26 [DaveB]
- with FILTER
- 14:47:29 [kendall]
- Proposal: All the builtin functions are allowed w/out the outer brackets with FILTER
- 14:47:46 [kendall]
- Where all the builtin functions is...
- 14:47:46 [AndyS]
- 'STR' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:46 [AndyS]
- | 'LANG' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:46 [AndyS]
- | 'DATATYPE' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:46 [AndyS]
- | RegexExpression
- 14:47:46 [AndyS]
- | 'BOUND' '(' Var ')'
- 14:47:46 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/sparqlTest?lang=perl&markup=html#prod-sparqlTest-Query
- 14:47:47 [AndyS]
- | 'isURI' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:49 [AndyS]
- | 'isBLANK' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:51 [AndyS]
- | 'isLITERAL' '(' Expression ')'
- 14:47:58 [kendall]
- (thanks andy!)
- 14:48:19 [AndyS]
- "{ FILTER q:name() :a :b }"
- 14:48:43 [ericP]
- { FILTER (q:name()) :a :b }
- 14:49:35 [kendall]
- AndyS: can also use an explicit syntax for function calls
- 14:49:36 [AndyS]
- &q:name()
- 14:50:09 [kendall]
- I hate it. :>
- 14:50:27 [DaveB]
- it makes q:name and () - empty list, different from &q:name() function call
- 14:50:35 [AndyS]
- Separate function call and q:name as constant value
- 14:51:25 [kendall]
- Proposal2: To adopt an explict syntax for function calls (which makes q:name and () empty list separate from &q:name() function call)
- 14:51:40 [kendall]
- Jeen doesn't like it
- 14:52:08 [kendall]
- Straw poll: proposal 1, proposal 2, neither
- 14:53:11 [kendall]
- (we rely too much on people being on irc. :>)
- 14:54:11 [DaveB]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 14:54:11 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, HowardK, EricP, HiroyukiS, jeen, Kendall_Clark, Souri, JosD
- 14:54:34 [kendall]
- JosD: don't really care
- 14:54:45 [kendall]
- Souri: don't really care
- 14:54:59 [kendall]
- Kendall: proposal1+, proposal2-
- 14:55:15 [kendall]
- Souri: proposal1+, proposal2-neutral
- 14:55:30 [kendall]
- Jeen: prop1+, prop2-
- 14:55:42 [kendall]
- Hiroyuki: prop2-mild pref
- 14:55:47 [kendall]
- EricP: mild for p2
- 14:55:54 [kendall]
- Howard: prop2-
- 14:56:05 [kendall]
- AndyS: p1+, p2-
- 14:56:18 [kendall]
- DaveB: p2 mild pref, but doesn't care much
- 14:57:39 [kendall]
- Editors are encouraged to take the straw poll as advice from the WG
- 14:57:45 [howardk]
- i'll talk louder jeen!
- 14:57:47 [jeen]
- :)
- 14:57:49 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 5
- 14:57:49 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "yacker grammer" taken up [from DaveB]
- 14:58:04 [kendall]
- yacker grammar, even :>
- 14:58:34 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/sparqlTest?lang=perl&markup=html#prod-sparqlTest-Query
- 14:58:38 [kendall]
- (/me not scribing this very closely...)
- 14:58:50 [DaveB]
- eric epxlaining what yacker does
- 14:58:58 [DaveB]
- had trouble using javacc grammar
- 14:59:05 [DaveB]
- machine generated something that can validate sparql
- 14:59:39 [kendall]
- Issue seems to be whether there is a link in the spec to more than one grammar
- 14:59:49 [kendall]
- Editorial disagreement put to the WG (yes?)
- 15:00:11 [ericP]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/sparqlTest/bnf?lang=perl
- 15:00:48 [kendall]
- AndyS prefers to reccomend one, rather than >1 grammars
- 15:01:26 [kendall]
- Jeen: can we add an informative link to other grammar, but only one normative grammar
- 15:01:35 [kendall]
- ?
- 15:03:36 [kendall]
- Very confusing, Eric.
- 15:04:30 [jeen]
- EricP wants to add both grammars to WD, let users 'vote' on which should be in Rec.
- 15:06:30 [kendall]
- I'm confused: is the point to help yacc users, to have 2 grammars, or both?
- 15:06:36 [kendall]
- these are v. diff!
- 15:11:14 [kendall]
- Souri: do these 2 grammars describe exactly the same language?
- 15:11:18 [kendall]
- Andy: No.
- 15:11:35 [kendall]
- Kendall: I want you guys as editors to pick one and recommend it. Period.
- 15:12:23 [kendall]
- Souri: Doesn't mind 2 grammars, minds 2 languages
- 15:13:10 [DaveB]
- Zakim, take up item 3
- 15:13:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Last call for SPARQL QL" taken up [from DaveB]
- 15:13:35 [kendall]
- other grammar proposal w/drawn
- 15:13:59 [DaveB]
- andy's action done re rq23 unionqu decision
- 15:14:04 [kendall]
- Eric: is caught up or will be soon
- 15:14:16 [kendall]
- Andy has a comment from DanC and one from teh comments list pending
- 15:14:33 [kendall]
- There are some markup issues
- 15:15:45 [DaveB]
- andys said - need to sync with xmlres namespace when it gets a datespace one
- 15:17:06 [kendall]
- Most of the pending stuff seems a matter of small edits
- 15:17:39 [DaveB]
- reviewer SH regrets for today
- 15:17:45 [DaveB]
- KC - nothing hold up for last call
- 15:18:09 [DaveB]
- JB - mostly editorial, seem addressed
- 15:18:13 [kendall]
- JB: comments mostly editorial, all of which seem to have been addressed. Pretty much happy.
- 15:18:55 [kendall]
- SteveH: possible issue re: precision of ints & decimals...
- 15:19:03 [kendall]
- er, this is via EricP's recollection
- 15:20:02 [kendall]
- We don't know for certain Steve's review of the doc's status
- 15:20:28 [ericP]
- last of the @@s removed from section 11
- 15:20:59 [kendall]
- Discussion of creating a namespace URI for the results bindings format
- 15:21:39 [kendall]
- rq23 mentions this namespace, so it needs to be an acceptable one
- 15:23:56 [kendall]
- Gathering advice about LC timing...
- 15:24:12 [kendall]
- Andy: wants there to be a period during which all 3 docs are LC simultaneously
- 15:24:19 [kendall]
- DaveB: seems okay w/ that
- 15:25:16 [DaveB]
- kc - would like overlap to be a month
- 15:25:20 [DaveB]
- and protocol to have a longer lc
- 15:25:40 [DaveB]
- kc - lc period for query should be subsantial, 2-3 mths
- 15:25:49 [DaveB]
- and think protocol can go to lc in the next month
- 15:26:24 [DaveB]
- ... queyr is clean, good but complex. seen buyin from rdql users, impl but not from other parts of community
- 15:27:15 [kendall]
- I'd like to see a 10 to 12 week LC period for the query doc, with at least 4 weeks of simultaneous LC for all 3 docs.
- 15:27:33 [DaveB]
- Revision 1.395 2005/06/14 15:19:37 eric
- 15:27:34 [DaveB]
- got rid of last @@s in section 11
- 15:27:36 [kendall]
- Proposed: to publish rq23 (1.395) as a LC doc
- 15:27:51 [kendall]
- Proposed: to publish rq23 (1.395), addressing FILTER and minor editorial changes, as a LC doc
- 15:31:31 [kendall]
- KC, JosD volunteer to review (after the 17th for KC)
- 15:32:30 [kendall]
- Proposed: to publish rq23 (1.395), addressing FILTER and 3 editorial changes, with KC & JosD reviewing these changes post 1.395, as a LC doc
- 15:34:39 [kendall]
- publish: UMD, Bristol, HP, Agfa, NT&T, Howard the K, JeenB, W3C, (Souri in spirit!)
- 15:34:49 [kendall]
- opposed: ()
- 15:34:53 [kendall]
- abstains: ()
- 15:35:03 [kendall]
- RESOLVED, go to last call for sparql ql
- 15:35:04 [kendall]
- yay
- 15:36:06 [kendall]
- Action AndyS: revise rq23 per fromUnionQuery decision
- 15:36:09 [kendall]
- FINISHED
- 15:36:28 [kendall]
- ACTION: ericp arrange publication
- 15:36:36 [kendall]
- Jeen to scribe, DanC to chair meeting next Tuesday
- 15:36:50 [kendall]
- ACTION: ericp work w/ danc on SOTD and LC
- 15:36:59 [kendall]
- ACTION: danc message to chairs (?)
- 15:37:11 [kendall]
- ACTION: AndyS editorial changes to rq23
- 15:37:25 [kendall]
- ACTION: KendallC to review post 1.395 doc
- 15:37:34 [kendall]
- ACTION: JosD to review post 1.395 doc
- 15:37:40 [kendall]
- did I get them all?
- 15:37:57 [kendall]
- (er, some of those may want to be combined...)
- 15:38:07 [Zakim]
- -Kendall_Clark
- 15:38:08 [Zakim]
- -JosD
- 15:38:10 [Zakim]
- -Souri
- 15:38:11 [Zakim]
- -DaveB
- 15:38:13 [Zakim]
- -HowardK
- 15:38:15 [Zakim]
- -HiroyukiS
- 15:38:15 [DanC_mtg]
- I'm not available next tuesday. I said as much in email.
- 15:38:16 [Zakim]
- -EricP
- 15:38:16 [DaveB]
- meeting over
- 15:38:47 [DaveB]
- DanC_mtg: oops...
- 15:39:05 [DanC_mtg]
- oh well... if there's energy for meeting next week, I can find a chair again
- 15:40:40 [DaveB]
- ericP can you drive Zakim or RRSagent to print agendas and make irc logs public?
- 15:40:46 [DaveB]
- s/agendas/actions/
- 15:41:10 [Zakim]
- -jeen
- 15:42:50 [DanC_mtg]
- RRSAgent, make logs world-access
- 15:42:58 [DanC_mtg]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 15:42:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-minutes.html DanC_mtg
- 15:45:57 [DaveB]
- DaveB has joined #dawg
- 15:48:18 [DaveB]
- Zakim, please show the actions
- 15:48:18 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'please show the actions', DaveB
- 15:48:26 [DaveB]
- RRSAgent: please show the actions
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- I see 8 open action items:
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: DanC To produce a more humanly readable version of last week's meeting minutes [1]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T14-35-44
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: AndyS to revise rq23 per fromUnionQuery decision [2]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-06
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ericp arrange publication [3]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-28
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ericp work w/ danc on SOTD and LC [4]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-50
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: danc message to chairs (?) [5]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-59
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: AndyS editorial changes to rq23 [6]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-11
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: KendallC to review post 1.395 doc [7]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-25
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JosD to review post 1.395 doc [8]
- 15:48:26 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-34
- 15:49:14 [DaveB]
- RRSAgent: please make logs public
- 15:49:18 [DaveB]
- RRSAgent: please leave us
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- I see 8 open action items:
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: DanC To produce a more humanly readable version of last week's meeting minutes [1]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T14-35-44
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: AndyS to revise rq23 per fromUnionQuery decision [2]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-06
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ericp arrange publication [3]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-28
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ericp work w/ danc on SOTD and LC [4]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-50
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: danc message to chairs (?) [5]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-59
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: AndyS editorial changes to rq23 [6]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-11
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: KendallC to review post 1.395 doc [7]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-25
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: JosD to review post 1.395 doc [8]
- 15:49:18 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-dawg-irc#T15-37-34