IRC log of wai-wcag on 2005-05-26
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 18:50:46 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
- 18:50:46 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/05/26-wai-wcag-irc
- 18:52:55 [wendy]
- Regrets: Sebastiano Nutarelli, Makoto Ueki, WATANABE Takayuki
- 19:40:17 [wendy]
- zakim, this will be wcag
- 19:40:17 [Zakim]
- ok, wendy; I see WAI_WCAG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 20 minutes
- 19:43:58 [wendy]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0563.html
- 19:44:05 [wendy]
- agenda+ Agenda review and face to face announcements (5 minutes)
- 19:44:12 [wendy]
- agenda+ Techniques Task Force update (5 minutes)
- 19:44:26 [wendy]
- agenda+ Guideline 3.1 Proposals (25 minutes)
- 19:44:40 [wendy]
- agenda+ Guideline 2.3 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)
- 19:44:50 [wendy]
- agenda+ Guideline 2.2 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)
- 19:44:57 [wendy]
- agenda+ Guideline 3.2 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)
- 19:45:06 [wendy]
- agenda+ Guideline 4.1 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)
- 19:51:44 [Michael]
- Michael has joined #wai-wcag
- 19:54:50 [jslatin]
- jslatin has joined #wai-wcag
- 19:57:40 [Yvette]
- Yvette has joined #wai-wcag
- 19:57:44 [ben]
- ben has joined #wai-wcag
- 19:57:46 [Christophe]
- Christophe has joined #wai-wcag
- 19:57:48 [Yvette]
- Hi all
- 19:58:42 [jslatin]
- i didn't have time to make a chart of responses to straw poll. can someone help us track how many yesses, nos, etc.?
- 19:58:50 [Yvette]
- sure
- 19:58:59 [jslatin]
- want to identify controversial items for discussion first
- 19:59:17 [Zakim]
- WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has now started
- 19:59:24 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Cooper
- 19:59:36 [Yvette]
- some were even unanimous :-)
- 19:59:42 [Zakim]
- +John_Slatin
- 19:59:43 [Christophe]
- I don't have access to the results of the questionnaires
- 20:00:02 [Becky_Gibson]
- Becky_Gibson has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:00:02 [jslatin]
- whoops, i forgot-- i think that's jsut me and wendy and gregg, not sure
- 20:00:03 [Zakim]
- +Becky_Gibson
- 20:00:29 [wendy]
- everyone should have access to the questionnaires, lemme see if one of the settings i messed up.
- 20:00:30 [Yvette]
- I do have access
- 20:00:45 [rcastaldo]
- rcastaldo has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:00:51 [Zakim]
- +Wendy
- 20:00:53 [rcastaldo]
- Hi all :)
- 20:00:57 [Yvette]
- Hmm, I got kicked off the phone
- 20:01:05 [jslatin]
- hi roberto!
- 20:01:07 [wendy]
- christophe - which one were you trying to get?
- 20:01:13 [rcastaldo]
- Hi :)
- 20:01:15 [Zakim]
- +Yvette_Hoitink
- 20:01:22 [wendy]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 20:01:22 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Michael_Cooper, John_Slatin, Becky_Gibson, Wendy, Yvette_Hoitink
- 20:01:34 [Zakim]
- +Christophe_Strobbe
- 20:01:43 [Zakim]
- +Loretta_Guarino_Reid
- 20:02:08 [Zakim]
- +Dave_MacDonald
- 20:02:14 [Zakim]
- + +1.202.558.aaaa - is perhaps Bengt_Farre
- 20:02:38 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Li
- 20:02:48 [Zakim]
- +Andi_Snow_Weaver
- 20:03:02 [Andi]
- Andi has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:03:11 [Zakim]
- +Matt
- 20:03:24 [mcmay]
- mcmay has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:03:31 [Zakim]
- +JasonWhite
- 20:03:49 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 20:03:58 [ben]
- zakim, ??P21 is Gregg_and_Ben
- 20:03:58 [Zakim]
- +Gregg_and_Ben; got it
- 20:04:36 [David]
- David has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:04:39 [David]
- test
- 20:05:07 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Barta
- 20:05:20 [ben]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 20:05:20 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Michael_Cooper, John_Slatin, Becky_Gibson, Wendy, Yvette_Hoitink, Christophe_Strobbe, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Dave_MacDonald, Bengt_Farre, Alex_Li,
- 20:05:23 [Zakim]
- ... Andi_Snow_Weaver, Matt, JasonWhite, Gregg_and_Ben, Mike_Barta
- 20:05:41 [rcastaldo]
- I'm on the phone too :)
- 20:06:02 [gregg]
- gregg has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:06:36 [wendy]
- zakim, take up item 1
- 20:06:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Agenda review and face to face announcements (5 minutes)" taken up [from wendy]
- 20:07:55 [Zakim]
- -Bengt_Farre
- 20:08:07 [wendy]
- registration for F2F open until 8 June.
- 20:08:10 [wendy]
- zakim, close this item
- 20:08:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 20:08:12 [Zakim]
- I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 20:08:13 [Zakim]
- 2. Techniques Task Force update (5 minutes) [from wendy]
- 20:08:17 [Yvette]
- zakim, mute me
- 20:08:17 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted
- 20:08:19 [wendy]
- zakim, next item
- 20:08:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Techniques Task Force update (5 minutes)" taken up [from wendy]
- 20:08:23 [Zakim]
- + +1.202.558.aabb - is perhaps Bengt_Farre
- 20:08:33 [wendy]
- scribe: wendy
- 20:08:38 [wendy]
- mc: gives TTF update
- 20:08:47 [rcastaldo]
- I'm connected again, and I'm not Bengt_Farre
- 20:09:05 [wendy]
- baseline mockups soon. prep for discussion at F2F. lots of work on 2.4.
- 20:09:45 [wendy]
- minutes from yesterday: http://www.w3.org/2005/05/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html
- 20:09:58 [wendy]
- (still need to be cleaned up)
- 20:10:49 [wendy]
- js: focus on next public WDs.
- 20:11:16 [wendy]
- zakim, close this item
- 20:11:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 closed
- 20:11:17 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 20:11:19 [Zakim]
- 3. Guideline 3.1 Proposals (25 minutes) [from wendy]
- 20:11:19 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Cooper
- 20:11:20 [wendy]
- zakim, next item
- 20:11:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Guideline 3.1 Proposals (25 minutes)" taken up [from wendy]
- 20:12:11 [ben]
- Last Week's 3.1 Results: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/meaning0516/results
- 20:12:33 [ben]
- This week's results (includes updated proposals for 3 criterion): http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/meaning0526/results
- 20:14:43 [wendy]
- zakim, who's making noise?
- 20:14:55 [Zakim]
- wendy, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: John_Slatin (73%), Christophe_Strobbe (4%), Loretta_Guarino_Reid (26%), Mike_Barta (4%)
- 20:15:26 [wendy]
- zakim, who's muted?
- 20:15:26 [Zakim]
- I see Yvette_Hoitink, Bengt_Farre muted
- 20:15:43 [rcastaldo]
- I'm muted too
- 20:17:10 [wendy]
- last week's 3.1 discussion: http://www.w3.org/2005/05/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item05
- 20:19:06 [wendy]
- discussing: Proposed wording Level 1 SC3: A measure of the education level required to read the content is available.
- 20:19:42 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland
- 20:20:10 [Yvette]
- q+
- 20:20:21 [Yvette]
- zakim, unmute me
- 20:20:21 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted
- 20:20:24 [Tim]
- Tim has joined #wai-wcag
- 20:20:36 [Yvette]
- q-
- 20:21:03 [wendy]
- ack alex
- 20:22:12 [wendy]
- q+
- 20:22:43 [wendy]
- ack john
- 20:23:59 [Yvette]
- q+
- 20:25:49 [wendy]
- ack wendy
- 20:26:15 [gregg]
- q+
- 20:26:24 [wendy]
- ack yvette
- 20:28:03 [wendy]
- i have reservations, think it's important, but can live with it.
- 20:28:26 [gregg]
- ack g
- 20:28:35 [wendy]
- resolution: delete Level 1 SC3: A measure of the education level required to read the content is available.
- 20:28:49 [wendy]
- s/delete/not accept the proposal
- 20:29:53 [wendy]
- q+ to say, "should only be reopened with new evidence or information"
- 20:29:57 [wendy]
- q-
- 20:32:09 [wendy]
- discussing: Proposed text: A mechanism is available to identify the primary natural language or languages of the delivery unit.
- 20:33:00 [Yvette]
- q+ to say "Becky and I had similar alternative proposal"
- 20:34:35 [wendy]
- We need a definition of what "mechanism is available" means.
- 20:35:15 [Tim]
- how to objectively test "availability of mechanism"?
- 20:35:26 [wendy]
- action: john to take a pass at definition of what "mechanism is available" means
- 20:35:39 [wendy]
- ack yvette
- 20:35:39 [Zakim]
- Yvette, you wanted to say "Becky and I had similar alternative proposal"
- 20:35:57 [wendy]
- The primary natural language or languages of a delivery unit can be programmatically determined.
- 20:37:27 [wendy]
- 6 issues related to programmatically determined: http://tinyurl.com/8ralm
- 20:37:52 [wendy]
- especially: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
- 20:39:45 [wendy]
- ack alex
- 20:40:20 [wendy]
- ack john
- 20:42:30 [wendy]
- multiple languages per document, comma-separated list: "Technique 9: Provide a comma-separated list of languages" http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-lang.html#ri20040728.121940236
- 20:45:11 [Christophe]
- that refers to HTTP headers, not to HTML's lang attribute
- 20:46:04 [Christophe]
- HTML spec always says "a language": e.g http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/sgml/dtd.html#LanguageCode
- 20:48:47 [Becky]
- q+
- 20:48:56 [wendy]
- ack becky
- 20:49:02 [ben]
- q+ to say, "we're using programmatically determined in ~ 6 other criterion"
- 20:49:10 [David]
- q+
- 20:51:03 [wendy]
- ack ben
- 20:51:04 [Zakim]
- ben, you wanted to say, "we're using programmatically determined in ~ 6 other criterion"
- 20:51:06 [wendy]
- oops.
- 20:51:15 [wendy]
- zakim, mute Bengt
- 20:51:15 [Zakim]
- Bengt_Farre should now be muted
- 20:51:25 [wendy]
- ack dav
- 20:51:32 [gregg]
- q+
- 20:51:37 [Tim]
- I prefer "programmatically determined" from testing standpoint
- 20:52:21 [gregg]
- ack g
- 20:54:06 [gregg]
- The primary natural language or languages of the delivery unit can be programmatically determined.
- 20:54:14 [wendy]
- resolution: use "programmatically determined" here. will consider other uses of "mechanism is available" at a later time.
- 20:54:23 [wendy]
- resolution: The primary natural language or languages of the delivery unit can be programmatically determined.
- 20:55:05 [wendy]
- Discussing: Proposed wording Level 3 SC1: A mechanism is available for identifying specific definitions of words used in an unusual or restricted way, including idioms and jargon.
- 20:55:16 [wendy]
- Current text: Where a word has multiple meanings and the intended meaning is not the first in the associated dictionary(s), then additional markup or another mechanism is provided for determining the correct meaning.
- 20:57:50 [Yvette]
- zakim, mute me
- 20:57:50 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should now be muted
- 20:58:31 [gregg]
- q+
- 20:58:59 [wendy]
- ack g
- 20:59:01 [Becky]
- q+
- 21:01:02 [rcastaldo]
- I've got to leave the call. Bye everybody, hear you next week
- 21:01:11 [Zakim]
- -Bengt_Farre
- 21:01:18 [rcastaldo]
- rcastaldo has left #wai-wcag
- 21:01:43 [Michael]
- Michael has joined #wai-wcag
- 21:01:52 [wendy]
- Note that Bengt was actually Roberto Castaldo
- 21:02:14 [wendy]
- ack b
- 21:02:53 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Cooper
- 21:03:17 [wendy]
- ack j
- 21:04:32 [wendy]
- q+ to ask "time check?"
- 21:06:38 [wendy]
- q-
- 21:08:03 [wendy]
- becky gives example about teen site and slang used to appeal to.
- 21:08:22 [wendy]
- john says "not assuming authors will design a site to be used by the entire world" - is an implicit assumption
- 21:08:49 [wendy]
- include this idea/example and "restricted way" - in guide doc
- 21:11:01 [wendy]
- resolution: adopt proposed wording for Level 3 SC1 - A mechanism is available for identifying specific definitions of words used in an unusual or restricted way, including idioms and jargon. Issue: need to define tests for "unusual or restricted way"
- 21:15:17 [wendy]
- action: john send updated guideline 3.1 with decisions from today
- 21:15:21 [wendy]
- zakim, close this item
- 21:15:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 closed
- 21:15:22 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 21:15:23 [Zakim]
- 4. Guideline 2.3 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes) [from wendy]
- 21:15:25 [wendy]
- zakim, next item
- 21:15:25 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Guideline 2.3 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)" taken up [from wendy]
- 21:15:47 [wendy]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/flicker2005-05-25/results
- 21:16:28 [wendy]
- issue 1323 - 11 close this issue, 1 keep it open
- 21:16:41 [wendy]
- q+ to say "focus on controversial"
- 21:17:04 [wendy]
- e.g., - Issue 1167 - Should we add a level 3 SC about notification? 3 - 9
- 21:17:21 [wendy]
- resolution: close issue 1323 with gv's comment
- 21:18:49 [wendy]
- q-
- 21:19:35 [wendy]
- resolution: close issue 1386
- 21:21:16 [Yvette]
- zakim, unmute me
- 21:21:16 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink should no longer be muted
- 21:24:26 [wendy]
- resolution: do not add a new level 3 SC about notification and close issue 1167.
- 21:25:19 [wendy]
- resolution: adopt Proposed wording Guideline 2.3 Allow users to avoid content that could cause seizures due to photosensitivity.
- 21:26:09 [wendy]
- zakim, close this item
- 21:26:09 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 closed
- 21:26:10 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 21:26:11 [Zakim]
- 5. Guideline 2.2 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes) [from wendy]
- 21:26:22 [wendy]
- zakim, next item
- 21:26:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Guideline 2.2 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes)" taken up [from wendy]
- 21:26:28 [ben]
- 2.2 survey results: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/time-limits0525/results
- 21:29:04 [wendy]
- q+ to propose that Christophe rework proposal based on feedback
- 21:32:33 [gregg]
- ack w
- 21:32:33 [Zakim]
- wendy, you wanted to propose that Christophe rework proposal based on feedback
- 21:33:35 [wendy]
- resolution/action: christophe rework proposal for Level 1 SC 1 based on feedback
- 21:34:11 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 21:34:22 [Tim]
- Have to leave call now..best wishes
- 21:34:25 [Tim]
- Tim has left #wai-wcag
- 21:34:59 [wendy]
- Discussing: Proposed wording Level 2 SC 1: Content does not blink, or a method is available to stop any blinking of content in the delivery unit, or a method is available to disallow blinking entirely in the content of the delivery unit.
- 21:35:23 [wendy]
- responses: proposed 5, current 4. lots of comments.
- 21:36:16 [wendy]
- resolution/action: christophe reword proposal for Level 2 SC 1 based on feedback.
- 21:36:48 [wendy]
- resolution: adopt Proposed wording for Level 2 SC 2: Moving or time-based content can be paused by the user.
- 21:38:08 [Yvette]
- zakim, unmute me
- 21:38:08 [Zakim]
- Yvette_Hoitink was not muted, Yvette
- 21:39:29 [Andi]
- q+
- 21:40:44 [wendy]
- ack q
- 21:44:03 [gregg]
- ack a
- 21:44:05 [gregg]
- ack j
- 21:46:11 [Zakim]
- -Matt
- 21:49:09 [wendy]
- resolution: adopt Proposed wording for Level 3 SC 1: Except for real-time events, timing is not an essential part of the event or activity presented by the content. (clarify issues with differences between level 1 and this in the guide doc. e.g., a test that conforms to level 3 does not have a timeout)
- 21:51:30 [wendy]
- discussing: Proposed wording Level 3 SC 2: Non-emergency interruptions, such as the availability of updated content, are turned off by default.
- 21:51:49 [wendy]
- q+
- 21:53:14 [wendy]
- ack w
- 21:55:35 [wendy]
- counter-proposal: Non-emergency interruptions, such as the availability of updated content, can be postponed or suppressed by the user.
- 21:55:40 [Zakim]
- +Matt
- 21:56:32 [wendy]
- resolution: adopt modification of current wording for Level 3 SC 2 - Non-emergency interruptions, such as the availability of updated content, can be postponed or suppressed by the user.
- 21:56:37 [jslatin]
- just make it "notice about the availability" and we're all set
- 21:56:57 [wendy]
- discussing: Proposal for new benefit: People with low computer literacy, particularly the elderly, do not get confused or are not led to think that they have made a mistake.
- 21:57:27 [Yvette]
- q+
- 21:57:37 [Yvette]
- q-
- 21:58:03 [wendy]
- resolution: since informative, discuss proposed new benefit (re: low computer literacy) on the list.
- 21:58:25 [wendy]
- Issue 880 - Should blinking and movement be covered? - yes.
- 21:58:36 [wendy]
- however, need a proposal
- 21:58:49 [wendy]
- discussing -Issue 1525 - Reject the issue about server timeouts?
- 21:59:16 [wendy]
- 6 said to reject the issue, 2 said not to reject
- 21:59:48 [wendy]
- q+ to ask if that is accessibility or usability?
- 21:59:49 [ben]
- q+ to ask, "how is this case not already covered by level 1 SC?"
- 22:01:04 [wendy]
- several comments that the author does not control the server
- 22:01:51 [Andi]
- q+
- 22:02:34 [wendy]
- ack wendy
- 22:02:34 [Zakim]
- wendy, you wanted to ask if that is accessibility or usability?
- 22:03:50 [Zakim]
- -JasonWhite
- 22:05:24 [Andi]
- q-
- 22:05:29 [wendy]
- ack b
- 22:05:29 [Zakim]
- ben, you wanted to ask, "how is this case not already covered by level 1 SC?"
- 22:07:12 [wendy]
- http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=800
- 22:07:16 [wendy]
- ack a
- 22:07:36 [wendy]
- http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1525
- 22:08:28 [wendy]
- unresolved question: should server time-outs be at a lower level (2 or 3)?
- 22:09:22 [wendy]
- action: christophe look at comments on issue 1525 and write proposal to address.
- 22:09:30 [wendy]
- zakim, close this item
- 22:09:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 closed
- 22:09:31 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 22:09:32 [Zakim]
- 6. Guideline 3.2 Issue Summary and Proposals (25 minutes) [from wendy]
- 22:09:37 [wendy]
- zakim, save agenda
- 22:09:43 [Zakim]
- ok, wendy, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2005/05/26-wai-wcag-agenda.rdf
- 22:09:46 [wendy]
- Chair: Gregg
- 22:10:05 [wendy]
- RRSagent, generate minutes
- 22:10:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/05/26-wai-wcag-minutes.html wendy
- 22:10:14 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Barta
- 22:10:16 [Zakim]
- -Loretta_Guarino_Reid
- 22:10:17 [Zakim]
- -Matt
- 22:10:17 [Zakim]
- -Andi_Snow_Weaver