14:29:09 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:29:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/05/03-dawg-irc 14:29:35 hello, 14:29:39 Zakim, who's on the phone? 14:29:39 On the phone I see ??P27, Yoshio 14:29:42 +Jeen_Broekstra 14:29:45 Zakim, ??P27 is DaveB 14:29:45 +DaveB; got it 14:29:48 +DanC 14:29:49 howardk has joined #dawg 14:29:50 +??P30 14:29:52 zakim, mut me 14:29:52 I don't understand 'mut me', Yoshio 14:29:55 (and i believe anyone can rename that abstract type in the GET URI serialization in their section of a WSDL...) 14:29:55 zakim, ??P30 is AndyS 14:29:55 +AndyS; got it 14:30:11 +Kendall_Clark 14:30:13 Meeting: RDF Data Access weekly 14:30:15 zakim, mute me 14:30:15 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 14:30:46 Topic: Convene, take roll, review records and agenda 14:30:50 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0185.html 14:30:58 Pref we suggest one comon one so simple clients don't have to lool in service description at all 14:31:01 +??P33 14:31:19 +Kevin 14:31:30 KevinW has joined #DAWG 14:31:33 e.g. I write a support library and ship it to many people for use on many services 14:31:42 Andy: I'm fine w/ that. But "default-graph-uri" is the last thing we talked about on mail/phone-call... DanC's suggestion to the contrary notwithstanding IMO 14:31:49 +HowardK 14:32:17 Don't care about the name much - as long as it is stable! 14:32:22 sure 14:32:30 yes, to scribing 14:32:31 jannesaa has joined #dawg 14:32:32 DanC was jusy noting what people currently do, I think 14:32:37 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:32:37 On the phone I see DaveB, Yoshio (muted), Jeen_Broekstra, DanC, AndyS, Kendall_Clark (muted), ??P33, Kevin, HowardK 14:32:56 Zakim, ??P33 is JanneS 14:32:56 +JanneS; got it 14:33:07 http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-minutes 14:33:23 missing one of howard's actions 14:33:40 Janne was there 14:34:01 last week's minutes APPROVED, with Howard's action addition and with Janne attending (and with Jeen's misplaced "crap")...? 14:34:04 JosD has joined #dawg 14:34:48 +EricP 14:35:06 next meeting 17 May? 14:35:20 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark (muted) 14:35:23 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose AndyS 14:35:27 10 May -- no meeting because of WWW conflict 14:35:35 17 May -- meeting @ regular time, JanneS scribing 14:35:35 +??P37 14:35:38 jannes has joined #dawg 14:35:52 zakim, unmute me 14:35:53 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 14:36:45 (adding rules workshop precis to agenda) 14:36:47 agenda + rules workshop notes 14:36:58 Topic: issue fromUnionQuery 14:37:41 ericp: current design is a subset of the implemented algae expressivity 14:38:34 algae separates databases from provenance 14:39:21 eric's action continued 14:39:37 . ACTION: KendallC to draft protocol section on specifying datasets 14:39:37 (fromUnionQuery) including WSDL types and HTTP examples 14:40:36 params: default-graph-uri named-graph-uri 14:41:28 t 14:41:28 14:41:44 (hmm... spaces between them or multiple occurences?) 14:42:59 fwiw output-xslt-params isn't as important as having an output-xslt-mime-type 14:43:07 named-graph-uri=x1&named-graph-uri=x2 14:43:41 Do we want to use "default" in rq23 so protocol and rq23 agree? We have tended to say "default", not "background" in discussions. 14:43:52 I'm waiting for http defn, examples. nothing there yet 14:44:12 typo: t 14:44:38 q+ to ask what if no deafult-graph-uri is given 14:45:31 Andy: I'd like them to agree, so "default" works for me in rq23 14:45:32 why are the complexType contents in a sequence? surely the contents is unordered? 14:46:50 DaveB: yr right. don't need seq. i'll think about that and fix. 14:47:29 zakim, unmute me 14:47:29 Yoshio should no longer be muted 14:49:25 (ah, the xs:sequences are artifacts of my schema editor...) 14:50:42 I'm happy 14:51:25 q+ a minor point 14:51:47 please someone summary up the answer to my question? 14:52:11 Yoshio: the behavior of an implementation when there is no default-graph-uri specified is itself unspecified 14:52:46 "output-xslt-mime-type"...is what Dave wants... 14:53:05 i thought that would be one of the output params 14:54:01 I only support client-applied XSLT (currently) - server adds stylesheet, client auto does the xform 14:56:08 Dave - would XSLT on client be OK for your usage? 14:57:37 (such XSLT may be client accessible only - firewalls) 14:57:48 I was saying sparqlx is operation2 of the only interface 14:58:14 like an xslt transform, it's likely/possible this isn't implemetned 14:58:22 sparqlx status is ...?uncertain? 14:59:49 q+ to discuss consistent language vs. consistent services 15:00:26 I also see the proto-wd has a bunch of identifiers for languages and (some) unregistered mime types or xml vbr etc. in the saddle section. hmm. should xml vbr give a mime type hint? 15:01:28 I hope to implment when there is a spec (HTTP examples should be enough). SOAP later. 15:01:38 in tuscany I used output-type 15:01:41 output-type 15:01:43 is what i heard 15:01:55 and what I used at http://librdf.org/2005/sparqling 15:01:56 output-xslt-mimetype work? 15:04:02 I agree that it makes things easier to teach users, but that's not a reason to *specify* it, IMO 15:04:46 andy mentions he generates optionally 15:04:59 +1 to eric's point 15:05:47 can somebody type eric's point? 15:05:59 ericP: I'd rather leave XSLT outboard. 15:06:01 (sorry, hard to scribe and discuss at the same time) 15:06:31 -AndyS 15:06:43 +q to make a point about query/queryx 15:07:26 +??P0 15:07:38 zakim, ??P0 is AndyS 15:07:38 +AndyS; got it 15:07:38 P0, is that you AndyS? 15:11:37 (well, fwiw, when it was *very* simple, i wasn't grudging. now that it's getting more complex, i'm more grudging. :) 15:12:13 Tend to agree with KC 15:12:13 POLL: (0) no XSLT anywhere in SPARQL protocol, (1) ala Andy, a pointer that will come back in for the client, (2) yes, standardize an interface where the server does XSLT, with mimetype and all 15:12:59 ack yoshio 15:14:16 2 0 0/1 - 0/1 0 - 0/1 0 0 15:14:24 and Andy abstains 15:14:43 note Alberto and maybe morten does 2 15:15:01 q+ to ask what is (non SWEB) practice 15:15:24 3 impls of this vs 0 of wsdl :) 15:15:41 so? 15:15:43 q- ericP 15:16:43 Dave, put +1 on a WSDL side, too. We've implemented such as thing about a year ago for our product (but not the one we're discussing here) 15:20:00 DaveB: how about a separate interface: query-and-transform 15:21:30 Topic: protocol publication candidate 15:21:38 . ACTION: kendall to uncommment saddle stuff, email to list 15:22:16 . ACTION: Yoshio to edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC 15:24:05 I intended to try to have a conversation with Yoshio, on list, in response to his questions... 15:24:19 hoping others will join in :> 15:25:08 zakim, mute me 15:25:08 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:25:37 ACTION: Yoshio to edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC [Continues] 15:25:42 q- 15:25:45 yes, bijan owes the world answers (bijan and Jacek) 15:25:49 that's done 15:25:51 1.35 does ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste 15:25:53 zakim, unmute me 15:25:53 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:26:17 . ACTION: KendallC to ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs 15:26:32 continues. 15:26:41 . ACTION: DanC to generate SELECT, CONSTRUCT, ASK protocol traces 15:26:54 there was so much free time at the rules workshop! :> 15:27:24 sounds right to me 15:27:36 Topic: results format 15:27:37 critical path of protocol draft is still danc, eric, yoshio, kendall 15:27:54 q+ on status of rdf varbinding results format vs. xml varbinding format 15:27:57 EricP http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 1.29 looks ready to go 15:28:44 zakim, mute me 15:28:44 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:29:24 zakim, unmute me 15:29:24 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:29:29 (sorry, phone won't stop ringing) 15:30:18 ref 2.3.3 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 15:31:06 sorry, dave :> 15:32:30 pfffhthhthttt! 15:32:38 Jeen asks what the status of the RDF results format is 15:32:50 SteveH has an action to publish it as a Note at his leisure 15:32:53 discussion lead to ericP pubbing rf1 and protocol at same time; rf1 waits for protocol 15:32:55 Which may never happen 15:33:12 60 mins up, I would need to run for tonight 15:33:44 Topic: issue: valueTesting 15:33:49 bye Janne 15:33:50 -JanneS 15:33:56 iltaa 15:33:57 jannes has left #dawg 15:34:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedType-eq-pass 15:34:08 . ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe 15:34:10 EricP to propose a test case for valuetesting 15:34:27 wants the action to continue with progress noted 15:35:05 I got it now 15:35:17 $Revision: 1.38 $ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedtype-eq-pass 15:36:41 FILTER ?rot1 = ?rot2 15:36:43 I wish I could see the results in that document 15:37:05 the result http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 is a 404 here 15:37:36 404 @ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 15:38:18 there's a system error mesage for ne-fail 15:38:22 "cannot open 'data/ValueTesting/extendedType-ne-fail.rq' for printing: No such file or directory" 15:38:36 2/3rds...cheap 15:40:07 ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of 15:40:07 to schema comments list 15:41:09 Topic: issue: sort 15:41:39 added something? 15:42:08 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sorting-one-of-one-column 15:43:13 they are not sorted results in those answers right now 15:43:23 (Some discussion of whether the test results are correct?) 15:43:33 (er, scratch that) 15:43:39 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/Sorting/one-of-one-column-result.n3 15:44:16 I'd prefer if the vbr xml term was the same as in the http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/result-set 15:44:50 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/ 15:45:47 vbr xml orders from 1 15:47:17 how do you spell that? 15:47:31 Seems to be me 15:47:34 zakim, mute me 15:47:34 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:47:42 I'm muted here now 15:47:45 discussion went to use rs:index and ordering from 1... 15:47:46 DC's a rough town! 15:48:03 That email thread was small details only 15:48:15 Have not tried todays test - rest were fine by me 15:48:20 I found a typo in the sort/manifest.ttl - newline in a "literal" 15:48:25 andy, are you happy with the "more sorting test cases" thread state? 15:48:45 Have not tried latest test but rest was OK 15:49:30 zakim, unmute me 15:49:30 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:49:38 Q1: non-determinate output 15:49:51 "ORDER BY" section of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#solutionsResults 15:50:12 Hodl on ... 15:50:53 -AndyS 15:51:03 DanC is looking for definitions text re order by 15:51:29 sec 10.1 15:51:41 +??P0 15:51:53 I just ran all the sort/*.rq tests - so the syntax is ok, but my sort checker runs sort(1) before comparing so that's not much use here! 15:51:56 zakim, ??P0 is AndyS 15:51:56 +AndyS; got it 15:52:59 (nice) 15:53:33 PROPOSED: that http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.328 and @@TEST address the sort issue 15:54:53 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/query-sort-1.rq 15:55:11 .me passed 8 of 8 after a CVS update - not looked at test 8 yet 15:55:28 PROPOSED: that http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.328 and the test including http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/query-sort-1.rq address the sort issue 15:56:16 poll... jeen... andy... 15:57:24 there's no chance I'll do sorting in a week. maybe in 2 months 15:58:16 I will have looked at them carefully in a week. 15:59:11 DanC suggests that Andy do a "I hereby propose this for sort" msg to stir up any remaining comments 15:59:28 Topic: SPARQL QL edits 15:59:49 well, actually not. 16:00:22 I declare victory on 7 action 1 16:00:25 ADJOURN. workshop chat after. 16:00:39 -JosD 16:00:45 -Kevin 16:00:47 KevinW has left #DAWG 16:00:48 bye all 16:00:58 -HowardK 16:01:14 -Jeen_Broekstra 16:01:43 -Yoshio 16:01:47 -Kendall_Clark 16:02:50 jeen has left #dawg