14:29:05 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dawg
14:29:05 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc
14:29:09 <Zakim> +Yoshio
14:29:12 <ericP> can anyone hear me?
14:29:38 <Zakim> +Jeen_Broekstra
14:29:48 <Zakim> -EricP
14:29:58 <ericP> zakim, please dial hugo-617
14:29:58 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
14:30:00 <Zakim> +Hugo
14:30:07 <ericP> testing?
14:30:20 <ericP> myabe there's a mute button somewhere on this strange device
14:30:28 <DanC> Zakim, who's muted?
14:30:28 <Zakim> I see no one muted
14:30:34 <Zakim> +Kendall_Clark
14:31:12 <ericP> i have the phone wires in my teeth, actually
14:31:26 <DanC> Regrets: JosD, Howard, Alberto, KevinW
14:31:32 <DanC> Zakim, take up agendum 1
14:31:32 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0165.html" taken up [from DanC]
14:31:37 <DanC> Regrets: JosD, Howard, Alberto, KevinW
14:31:43 <DanC> Zakim, who is on the phone?
14:31:43 <Zakim> On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, DanC, Yoshio, Jeen_Broekstra, Hugo, Kendall_Clark
14:32:05 <kendall> Eric's $1 cellphone is fun till it starts shocking him!
14:32:51 <Zakim> +[IBM]
14:33:31 <DanC> (auditing http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who ... missing Bijan. odd.)
14:33:40 <Yoshio> hi
14:34:29 <ericP> who is [IBM] ?
14:34:35 <SteveH> jakim, whos on the phone?
14:34:37 <SteveH> zakim, whos on the phone?
14:34:37 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, SteveH.
14:34:45 <kendall> +1
14:34:51 <SteveH> ericP, [IBM] might be me
14:35:09 <ericP> last weeks minutes approved
14:35:19 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Jeen_Broekstra
14:35:20 <SteveH> zakim, mute me
14:35:22 <Zakim> sorry, SteveH, I do not see a party named 'SteveH'
14:35:23 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Hugo
14:35:28 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark
14:35:39 <ericP> zakim, Hugo is really EricP
14:35:39 <Zakim> +EricP; got it
14:35:44 <DanC> scribe next week: KendallC/DanC
14:36:18 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
14:36:18 <Zakim> agendum 2. "issue: fromUnionQuery" taken up [from DanC]
14:36:55 <DanC> looking at 1.31 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
14:36:55 <Zakim> +??P30
14:37:01 <ericP> for the record, continued actions:
14:37:02 <ericP> ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff (xmlAbstractSyntax)
14:37:05 <ericP> ACTION: AndyS to define a term for abstract form of SPARQL query
14:37:08 <ericP> ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23
14:37:10 <ericP> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency)
14:37:13 <ericP> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
14:37:16 <ericP> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
14:37:18 <ericP> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
14:37:21 <ericP> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
14:37:28 <JanneS> JanneS has joined #dawg
14:37:33 <ericP> KendallC: HTTP binding spec is fluid. attribute names changing.
14:38:12 <ericP> ... parts not dependent on that are all done.
14:38:41 <ericP> ... went with 1 default graph and one or more named graphs
14:38:54 <SteveH> zakim, unmute me
14:38:54 <Zakim> sorry, SteveH, I do not see a party named 'SteveH'
14:39:17 <JanneS2> JanneS2 has joined #dawg
14:39:21 <kendall> Andy's proposal, as I understood it, was for 1 default graph and for zero or more named graphs.
14:40:02 <JanneS2> (sorry for joining late, the unknown ID would be me)
14:40:19 <ericP> DanC: steve, what if you get only one background graph?
14:40:47 <AndyS> Minor - can there be zero default graph URIs?
14:41:05 <ericP> Steve: need to read the proposal
14:41:26 <AndyS> Not sure it makes a huge difference. Might default to empty??
14:41:35 <ericP> KendallC: I understood 0 or more BG and 0 or more named at the end of the last Telecon
14:41:38 <Yoshio> q+ to ask can one ask the server what is used as the background graph?
14:42:12 <ericP> ... I understood Andy's modification to be a simplification
14:42:36 <kendall> It works for me to have zero background graphs
14:42:51 <Janne> Janne has joined #dawg
14:42:55 <ericP> q+ to say the critical issue to me is whether i can do prov queries on the BG graph
14:43:32 <ericP> ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0440.html>
14:43:43 <ericP> CONTINUED
14:46:03 <ericP> KendallC: I'm confident that what we express what we want in HTTP. not sure what the exact bytes are for the WSLD HTTP binding.
14:46:28 <ericP> DanC: you use a complex type. iirc, the HTTP GET binding only specifies simple types.
14:46:42 <kendall> This is what I'm talking about:
14:46:43 <kendall> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#_operation_styles
14:47:16 <DaveB> seems to me it's way to early to be using wsdl2 here, when it takes 10 mins to write an http binding for sparql
14:47:30 <DanC> ok? ACTION KendallC: ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs
14:47:45 <ericP> EricP: there are two open source WSDL 2.0 impls at apache
14:48:14 <DanC> ACTION KendallC: ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs
14:48:51 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
14:48:51 <Zakim> agendum 3. "issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol" taken up [from DanC]
14:49:09 <ericP> i believe all three actions are in RRSAgents brain
14:49:16 <kendall> btw, it's the xs:choice between SparqlX and xs:string forms of the query that is at issue
14:49:28 <ericP> ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft).
14:49:46 <DanC> (blending with next agendum)
14:49:54 <Zakim> -Jeen_Broekstra
14:50:01 <jeen> crap
14:50:24 <ericP> ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste
14:50:52 <Zakim> + +1.313.346.aaaa
14:51:37 <kendall> this bit:
14:51:38 <kendall> <xs:choice>
14:51:38 <kendall>                <xs:element ref="sparqlx:rdf-query"></xs:element>
14:51:38 <kendall>                <xs:element ref="sparql-query"></xs:element>
14:51:39 <kendall>            </xs:choice>
14:52:05 <DanC> <output messageLabel="Out" element="st:query-result">
14:53:59 <jeen> ack
14:54:09 <ericP> AndyS: would like to see the protocol spec aligned with DaveB's result set syntax
14:55:10 <ericP> ... outer tag is called <sparql>
14:55:22 <ericP> ... <result/> is used elsewhere
14:56:07 <ericP> KendallC: will fix before publication
14:56:46 <DanC> ack danc
14:56:46 <Zakim> DanC, you wanted to ask for an example of a SELECT, a CONSTRUCT, and an ASK
14:57:28 <ericP> ... what's harder is that the result is a choice between to elements
14:57:48 <ericP> DanC: i think you need two interfaces
14:58:01 <DaveB> q+
14:58:41 <ericP> ... make your best guess. this is what you want the community to review.
14:58:59 <DanC> ack yoshio
14:58:59 <Zakim> Yoshio, you wanted to ask can one ask the server what is used as the background graph?
15:00:07 <DanC> [[
15:00:07 <DanC> _:factBookService
15:00:07 <DanC> saddle:dataSet <...fact-book-part-1.rdf>, <...fact-book-part-2.rdf>.
15:00:08 <DanC> ]]
15:00:13 <ericP> yoshio: [above Q: +] can we use sadl to ask about the BG names
15:01:02 <ericP> danc: there is a notion of a saddle data set
15:01:31 <DanC> yes, http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/# is 404 unfortunately
15:02:03 <ericP> yoshio: is namespace .../# acceptable?
15:02:36 <ericP> DanC: not aware of any prob.
15:03:00 <ericP> EricP: http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/#somethingClever is serializable as a qname
15:03:36 <kendall> (ok, fwiw, the misalignment with results format is fixed, now...in version 1.32)
15:04:00 <ericP> (too bad, could have used it to get good ACTION karma)
15:04:05 <kendall> :>
15:04:50 <DanC> ACTION Yoshio: edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC
15:04:55 <kendall> ACTION kendall: uncommment saddle stuff, email to list
15:05:25 <SteveH> SteveH has joined #dawg
15:06:51 <DaveB> q-
15:06:51 <DanC> ACTION DanC: generate SELECT, CONSTRUCT, ASK protocol traces
15:06:58 <DanC> ack ericp
15:06:58 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to say the critical issue to me is whether i can do prov queries on the BG graph
15:07:01 <kendall> oh, come on, we all know you don't *really* care about rules! :>
15:07:51 <DaveB> I was just going to give info, I won't be using this protocol draft without an http section with examples in it
15:08:47 <DanC> PROPOSED: to publish protocol WD, contingent on inclusion of HTTP examples, saddle examples
15:08:49 <ericP> DanC: any problem with publishing SPARQL protocol on Fri?
15:09:00 <DanC> PROPOSED: to publish protocol WD, contingent on inclusion of HTTP examples, saddle prose
15:09:24 <ericP> DaveB: not useful to me unless there are HTTP examples.
15:10:06 <kendall> yoshio: w3c's rules workshop is this week, Wed & Thur, in DC.
15:10:15 <ericP> DanC: critical path: KendallC, YoshioF, EricP, DanC
15:10:21 <ericP> RESOLVED
15:10:52 <kendall> which namespace is 404?
15:11:00 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
15:11:00 <Zakim> agendum 4. "protocol publication candidate" taken up [from DanC]
15:11:05 <DanC> Zakim, close agendum 4
15:11:05 <Zakim> agendum 4 closed
15:11:06 <Zakim> I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:11:07 <Zakim> 5. SPARQL Query Results XML Format  [from DanC]
15:11:08 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
15:11:08 <Zakim> agendum 4 was just opened, DanC
15:11:21 <DanC> Zakim, take up item 4
15:11:21 <Zakim> agendum 4. "protocol publication candidate" taken up [from DanC]
15:11:34 <kendall> well, even funnier for DanC not to really care about, which I what I meant (smart-assedly, to be sure)
15:11:47 <kendall> s/I what/is what/
15:13:39 <kendall> ISSUE: Normativeness of the XML schemas. Pick one?
15:15:10 <ericP> namespace <http://www.w3.org/2005/03/saddle/#> no longer a 404
15:15:57 <ericP> AndyS: given streaming requirents, you might want to say whether it's ordered
15:16:15 <DaveB> monotonicalliy increasing index integers
15:16:16 <ericP> DaveB: will add that it's monotonically increasing
15:16:22 <DaveB> 2.3.3 editorial note
15:16:25 <DaveB> 4 also re schemas
15:18:14 <ericP> DanC: it would be nice to publish the results wiht protocol
15:18:19 <DanC> PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 1.25 + editorial notes from DaveB
15:18:43 <ericP> RESOLVED
15:19:03 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
15:19:03 <Zakim> agendum 5. "SPARQL Query Results XML Format " taken up [from DanC]
15:19:14 <DanC> Zakim, close agendum 5
15:19:14 <Zakim> agendum 5 closed
15:19:15 <Zakim> I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:19:16 <Zakim> 6. issue: valueTesting [from DanC]
15:19:18 <DanC> Zakim, take up item 6
15:19:18 <Zakim> agendum 6. "issue: valueTesting" taken up [from DanC]
15:20:28 <kendall> zakim, mute me
15:20:29 <Zakim> Kendall_Clark should now be muted
15:21:20 <ericP> ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal
15:21:22 <ericP> CONTINUED
15:21:30 <ericP> ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe
15:21:32 <ericP> CONTINUED
15:23:46 <DanC> ACTION DanC: send comment on non-use of <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes> to schema comments list
15:25:00 <ericP> scribe is losing a lot of audio. please back me up by scribing important things you notice
15:25:20 <DanC> Zakim, close this item
15:25:20 <Zakim> agendum 6 closed
15:25:21 <Zakim> I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
15:25:22 <Zakim> 7. issue: sort [from DanC]
15:25:23 <DanC> agenda?
15:25:23 <ericP> AndyS: EricP, is the spec alligned with your head?
15:25:32 <kendall> zakim, unmute me
15:25:32 <Zakim> Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
15:25:43 <AndyS> EricP: Yes it is aligned.
15:25:43 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
15:25:43 <Zakim> agendum 7. "issue: sort" taken up [from DanC]
15:25:45 <jeen> Zakim, unmute me
15:25:45 <Zakim> Jeen should no longer be muted
15:25:49 <ericP> EricP: yes, needs expanding, not directly contradictory
15:25:54 <kendall> zakim, mute me
15:25:54 <Zakim> Kendall_Clark should now be muted
15:26:12 <DanC> does 1.42 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ include Jeen's tests?
15:27:02 <ericP> ACTION: JeenB to Write a few sort test cases. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0159.html>
15:27:08 <DanC> (hardware problems... ew... that's why I want redundancy in the ability to regen the .html)
15:27:18 <DanC> (andy did or did not get the same answers?)
15:27:21 <SteveH> DanC, agreed
15:27:24 <ericP> DanC, DONE?
15:27:33 <DanC> not sure yet, ericp
15:28:32 <ericP> q+ to ask if redundant bNodes are smushed
15:28:49 <KevinW> KevinW has joined #DAWG
15:29:02 <ericP> AndyS: i can pass some of JeenB's tests, but not all
15:29:06 <ericP> CONTINUED
15:30:06 <DaveB> (I've  made 1.26 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/  with issues)
15:30:11 <AndyS> AndyS: Passes for the wrong reasons (failure to check indexes)
15:30:29 <kendall> hostile irc mutings?! :>
15:30:58 <Zakim> +Kevin
15:32:14 <jeen> (andys, checked in fix for test 1, should work now)
15:32:25 <AndyS> Thanks.
15:32:33 <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
15:32:33 <Zakim> agendum 8. "issue: punctuationSyntax" taken up [from DanC]
15:32:44 <kendall> -groan-
15:33:50 <AndyS> Pass (with weak testing only)
15:34:15 <ericP> AndyS: i consider the grammar in bugfix mode
15:35:19 <kendall> triple-quoted strings, like python? """Hi, I'm a string"""?
15:35:45 <ericP> SteveH, is there a reason to have WHERE optional?
15:36:35 <DaveB> I agree with steve on """s, WHERE {} compulsory
15:36:57 <DanC> ack ericp
15:36:57 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to ask if redundant bNodes are smushed
15:37:13 <AndyS> """ has an issue about line ends :-)
15:37:13 <DanC> what's the line-end issue?
15:37:22 <kendall> (just trying to make sure I heard correctly)
15:37:38 <SteveH> SteveH has joined #dawg
15:37:40 <DanC> yes, like python, """Hi, I'm a string"""
15:37:57 <kendall> thx
15:38:50 <ericP> lots of drop out. DaveB, please scribe.
15:38:51 <AndyS> DanC: If we have a bare NL in a string, can be \r\n or \n -- Linux or Windows
15:39:03 <DaveB> just acking that """turtle style""" is ok
15:39:16 <DaveB> and make these things compulsory: 1) WHERE 2 ) outer {}
15:39:19 <DanC> yes, an both \r\n and \n have the same impact? ah... no, the don't match the same things. I see.
15:42:41 <DanC> PROPOSED: that the grammar in 1.326 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ addresses punctuationSyntax
15:42:51 <DanC> Zakim, who's on the phone?
15:42:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see DaveB, AndyS, DanC, Yoshio, EricP, Kendall_Clark (muted), [IBM], ??P30, Jeen, Kevin
15:43:01 <DaveB> detail detail, there's more clashes with turtle in the wd.
15:43:06 <DaveB> I've not read rq23 since then
15:43:40 <ericP> DaveB: abstain or neigh
15:44:02 <Janne> me abstains, too, need to reread - I need to run for tonight to do baby sitting, cu next week
15:44:14 <Zakim> -??P30
15:44:28 <ericP> DanC: a lot of people want turtle alignment
15:44:31 <DaveB> I have no time before  next telcon
15:44:41 <ericP> ... makes DaveB (close to) critical path
15:44:53 <Janne> Janne has left #dawg
15:45:41 <DanC> EricP: I got LALR [(1)?] problems with {}
15:45:50 <DaveB> ericP I presently have no conflicts, but I think I ripped out some bits 
15:45:52 <ericP> ()
15:45:58 <kendall> wow, audio is awful
15:48:38 <DaveB> lol
15:49:49 <Zakim> -Kendall_Clark
15:51:34 <DanC> Zakim, agenda?
15:51:34 <Zakim> I see 3 items remaining on the agenda:
15:51:36 <Zakim> 8. issue: punctuationSyntax [from DanC]
15:51:37 <Zakim> 9. reconsider issue useMentionOp? [from DanC]
15:51:38 <Zakim> 10. test suite maintenance [from DanC]
15:52:43 <DaveB> let's see, my lexer has 4 states for IDs, prefixes and """-literals x2
15:54:54 <Yoshio> q+ to say what surprised me in Dave's message was that "." can be  understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in?
15:54:54 <DanC> (so Andy, a hunk of java linked from grammar section would be quite resopnsive to my requests.)
15:55:17 <DanC> (linked fromt the grammar section and published as part of the WD)
15:55:39 <DanC> next agendum
15:56:17 <DaveB> I was saying I use approx. first 60 tokens in yacc, then do my own thing in lexer.  turtle stuff I threw away and took from my turtle parser/lexer
15:56:26 <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0154.html
15:56:35 <DanC> Zakim, close this agendum
15:56:35 <Zakim> agendum 9 closed
15:56:36 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:56:37 <Zakim> 10. test suite maintenance [from DanC]
15:57:06 <ericP> ideally, i would like a spec that allowed an implementation without being very clever
15:57:31 <SteveH> +1
15:57:39 <Zakim> -DanC
15:57:40 <ericP> ADJOURNED
15:57:45 <Zakim> -AndyS
15:57:46 <Yoshio> oh
15:57:47 <Zakim> -[IBM]
15:57:47 <SteveH> bye
15:57:48 <Zakim> -Kevin
15:57:51 <Zakim> -DaveB
15:58:01 <Zakim> -Yoshio
15:58:01 <Zakim> -EricP
15:58:14 <DaveB> ericP: i've done hopefully all the rf1 changes that I'm going to, over to you
15:58:25 <ericP> roger that
15:59:12 <Zakim> -Jeen
15:59:13 <Zakim> SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended
15:59:15 <Zakim> Attendees were DaveB, DanC, AndyS, EricP, Yoshio, Jeen_Broekstra, Kendall_Clark, [IBM], +1.313.346.aaaa, Jeen, Kevin
15:59:58 <jeen> jeen has left #dawg
16:01:49 <Yoshio> DaveB?  what surprised me in your message was that "." can be  understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in?
16:02:14 <SteveH> SteveH has joined #dawg
16:02:24 <Yoshio> (^_^;)
16:04:01 <DaveB> DaveB has joined #dawg
16:05:00 <Yoshio> DaveB?  what surprised me in your message was that "." can be  understood as a part of a variable name, which grammar is it specified in? (in case you missed what I typed in just before you leave)
16:05:21 <KevinW> KevinW has left #DAWG
16:05:37 <DaveB> what grammar?  it's in xml qnames I think
16:05:41 <DaveB> but n3 doesn't like it
16:05:45 <DaveB> and turtle currently doesn't allow it
16:06:03 <DaveB> we're moving to allow . in both sparql and turtle
16:06:21 <DaveB> and use the same xml qnames definition
16:06:47 <Yoshio> ah, so not yet in the documents
16:07:28 <AndyS> Any idea of when might there be an updated Turtle spec?
16:08:57 <Yoshio> hmm, I support having "." as in N3, but not like haveing it as a part of a variable name...
16:09:01 <DaveB> maybe end of next week but www2005 priorities
16:09:33 <DaveB> variable names will have additional restrictions
16:09:38 <DaveB> no '-'
16:09:49 <Yoshio> agree
16:10:30 <DaveB> and no '.' says AndyS, I just found his mail to check
16:12:02 <Yoshio> I'm happy
16:12:14 <Yoshio> anyway, thanks for clarifying
16:12:39 <Yoshio> I'll wait for the new syntax
17:59:12 <DaveB> ha, I found a test bug
17:59:20 <DaveB> and I agree with ARQ, so it's not my bug
17:59:34 <DaveB> ex11.2.3.6_0.rq ex11.2.3.6_0.n3
17:59:38 <DaveB> answer should be
17:59:44 <DaveB> -----------------------------------------
17:59:44 <DaveB> | name    | mbox                        |
17:59:44 <DaveB> =========================================
17:59:44 <DaveB> | "Alice" | <mailto:alice@work.example> |
17:59:44 <DaveB> -----------------------------------------
17:59:51 <DaveB> result file says  rs:value    "alice@work.example" ;
18:00:00 <DaveB> it's a uri, not a string
18:05:13 <Zakim> Zakim has left #dawg
18:06:06 <DaveB> RRSAgent: please leave us
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> I see 19 open action items:
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff (xmlAbstractSyntax) [1]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-02
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: AndyS to define a term for abstract form of SPARQL query [2]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-05
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23 [3]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-08
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) [4]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-10
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [5]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-13
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page [6]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-16
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve [7]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-18
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) [8]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-37-21
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: EricP to try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0440.html> [9]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-43-32
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: KendallC to ask WSD WG for clarification about HTTP binding of WSDL2, esp lists of URIs [10]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-48-14
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft). [11]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-49-28
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste [12]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T14-50-24
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Yoshio to edit saddle descriptions provided by KendallC [13]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-04-50
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: kendall to uncommment saddle stuff, email to list [14]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-04-55
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC to generate SELECT, CONSTRUCT, ASK protocol traces [15]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-06-51-1
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal [16]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-21-20
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe [17]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-21-30
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes> to schema comments list [18]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-23-46
18:06:06 <RRSAgent> ACTION: JeenB to Write a few sort test cases. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0159.html> [19]
18:06:06 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/26-dawg-irc#T15-27-02