IRC log of swbp on 2005-04-07

Timestamps are in UTC.

16:55:43 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #swbp

16:55:43 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc

16:55:49 [Ralph]

Meeting: SemWeb BPD

16:56:24 [Ralph]

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html

16:58:07 [Ralph]

Ralph has changed the topic to: SWBPD 07 April agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html

16:58:18 [aldogan]

aldogan has joined #Swbp

16:59:55 [DavidW]

DavidW has joined #swbp

16:59:56 [Zakim]

SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started

17:00:03 [Zakim]

+Ralph

17:02:06 [guus]

guus has joined #swbp

17:02:08 [Zakim]

+DanBri

17:03:53 [Zakim]

+Aldo

17:04:08 [libby]

libby has joined #swbp

17:04:09 [JeffP]

JeffP has joined #swbp

17:04:13 [Zakim]

+Darren_Govoni

17:04:28 [ekw]

ekw has joined #swbp

17:05:23 [Ralph]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0022.html previous meeting 2005-03-24

17:05:36 [Zakim]

+Evan_Wallace

17:05:48 [Zakim]

+??P8

17:05:59 [JeffP]

Jeff Pan

17:06:05 [Ralph]

zakim, ??p8 is Jeff

17:06:05 [Zakim]

+Jeff; got it

17:06:23 [GaryNg]

GaryNg has joined #swbp

17:06:49 [guus]

i am unable to dial in, unfortunately

17:07:17 [Ralph]

understood, Guus

17:07:24 [Ralph]

David will chair

17:07:31 [Zakim]

+Gary_Ng

17:07:43 [DavidW]

In a few moments, once I can dial in myself

17:08:15 [dgovoni]

hi david

17:08:38 [Ralph]

Regrets: Jeremy, Benjamin, Deb, Phil, Marco, Alan, Andreas, Fabien, Guus (will monitor irc)

17:08:47 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

17:08:49 [Zakim]

+??P13

17:08:54 [Natasha]

Natasha has joined #swbp

17:09:04 [Ralph]

zakim, ??p13 is Natasha

17:09:04 [Zakim]

+Natasha; got it

17:09:16 [Ralph]

zakim, ipcaller is Guus

17:09:16 [Zakim]

+Guus; got it

17:09:54 [Zakim]

+ +1.703.418.aaaa

17:10:04 [Ralph]

zakim, aaaa is Chris

17:10:04 [Zakim]

+Chris; got it

17:10:50 [DavidW]

dialing in now

17:11:19 [Zakim]

+David_Wood

17:11:42 [Ralph]

zakim, nominate a scribe

17:11:42 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Natasha

17:12:23 [Ralph]

Scribe: Natasha

17:12:54 [danbri]

agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html

17:12:57 [Ralph]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0022.html previous meeting 2005-03-24

17:13:21 [Zakim]

+??P16

17:13:24 [Natasha]

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the March 24 telecon:

17:13:32 [DavidW]

seconded

17:13:36 [Ralph]

zakim, ??p16 is Alan

17:13:36 [Zakim]

+Alan; got it

17:13:54 [Natasha]

Accepted

17:14:05 [Natasha]

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of Boston ftf 4-5 March:

17:14:22 [Natasha]

Ralph seconds

17:14:23 [Alan]

Alan has joined #SWBP

17:14:29 [Natasha]

Accepted

17:14:47 [Natasha]

PROPOSED next telecon 21 April 1700 UTC

17:14:54 [Natasha]

Note: NOT 1800 UTC

17:15:06 [Natasha]

regrets Alan

17:15:10 [Natasha]

regrets Dan

17:15:41 [Natasha]

Agenda amendments

17:15:46 [Natasha]

WrdNet earlier in the call

17:15:55 [Natasha]

SKOS and VM move to later in the call

17:16:10 [Natasha]

ACTION: chairs & ralph to organise straw poll on f2f location

17:16:27 [Natasha]

continued, assigned to Guus

17:16:42 [Natasha]

ACTION: Guus to organise straw poll on f2f location

17:16:52 [Natasha]

Location of f2f

17:17:10 [Natasha]

There is also an offer from Stanford to hold f2f

17:17:30 [Natasha]

Will include in the strawpoll: Stanford, Vancouver, Galway

17:17:43 [Natasha]

ACTION Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an

17:17:43 [Natasha]

interested participant has been unable to get a response from his

17:17:43 [Natasha]

AC Rep

17:18:08 [Natasha]

Ralph was in a process of finding his out, but ISI has a new AC rep, so they may be progress on that issue

17:18:20 [Natasha]

Action continued

17:18:23 [Natasha]

ACTION: Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an

17:18:23 [Natasha]

interested participant has been unable to get a response from his

17:18:23 [Natasha]

AC Rep

17:18:39 [Ralph]

Topic: WordNet TF

17:18:51 [ChrisW]

ChrisW has joined #swbp

17:18:59 [Natasha]

ACTION guus to contact aldo re whether he can attend next telecon

17:19:02 [Natasha]

completed

17:19:17 [Natasha]

Current status of the TF:

17:19:28 [Natasha]

Aldo is writing a new version of the note on data model for WN

17:19:55 [Natasha]

Princeton plans to add new relationships to WN 2.1, perhaps also change in top levels

17:20:27 [danbri]

(I'd like to review it)

17:20:59 [Natasha]

ISLE lexical entries: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0069.html

17:21:42 [Natasha]

Aldo: are we in the position to add a liason action with ISLE

17:22:02 [danbri]

(re pronunciation extensions, we have work at http://www.w3.org/Voice/ that we should connect with...)

17:22:06 [Natasha]

Guus: time line is very important and estimate of feasibility

17:22:43 [Natasha]

Guus: is this something you can resolve in 3-6 months?

17:23:15 [Natasha]

Aldo: certainly possible

17:23:20 [danbri]

q+ to ask re http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html

17:24:51 [danbri]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wnNounsyb_v7.owl 404s (link from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0066.html)

17:25:08 [Natasha]

Guus: suggests to update the TF description to reflect the addition

17:25:17 [Natasha]

and we will discuss it at the next telecon

17:25:25 [Natasha]

ACTION: Aldo to update the TF description

17:25:28 [Zakim]

danbri, you wanted to ask re http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html

17:26:16 [Natasha]

DanB: relationship to the document that Brian began to draft last year. Is it obsoleted by Aldo's work?

17:26:20 [danbri]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html

17:26:46 [aldogan]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0068.html

17:26:58 [Ralph]

-> http://www.w3.org/2004/11/01-swbp#item12 November f2f WNET discussion minutes

17:27:20 [danbri]

all i can find is rdf/owl doc... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet_datamodel.owl

17:27:49 [Natasha]

Aldo: the datamodel is still based on the one Brian suggested

17:27:53 [Natasha]

but it has changed a bit

17:28:02 [Natasha]

Changes are described in the document

17:28:44 [Natasha]

Some of the documentation is in the OWL file and should be moved to the document directly

17:30:23 [Natasha]

Guus: It will be good to have another TF telecon discussion on teh datamodel

17:30:27 [Zakim]

-Aldo

17:30:38 [danbri]

ah, found the big file: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wnNounsyn_v7.owl (via browsing directory)

17:30:38 [Natasha]

Agenda item 2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14

17:30:55 [Ralph]

Topic: Proposed resolution httpRange-14

17:31:00 [Natasha]

ACTION davidw to draft the http-range-14 message

17:31:02 [Natasha]

completed

17:31:16 [Natasha]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0202.html

17:31:28 [danbri]

q+ to note that I started a document on this topic (drafted as VM but without coordination w/ VM TF members)

17:31:36 [Natasha]

David: woudl be interested to know what happened on the TAG side

17:32:10 [danbri]

my sketch http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/httpclass/1

17:32:54 [danbri]

q+ to note that TAG minutes showed Tim as misunderstanding our position (I sent mail)

17:32:58 [Natasha]

Ralph advised Dan Connolly that if TAG wanted to devise a forum to discuss the technical issues with us, we will be glad to do that

17:33:21 [ChrisW]

i agree with david

17:33:24 [Natasha]

David: How much energy/time are we willing to spend on this?

17:34:42 [Zakim]

danbri, you wanted to note that I started a document on this topic (drafted as VM but without coordination w/ VM TF members) and to note that TAG minutes showed Tim as

17:34:46 [Zakim]

... misunderstanding our position (I sent mail)

17:35:53 [guus]

q?

17:37:16 [Natasha]

DanBri started a document to describe the positions

17:37:18 [guus]

zakim, wo's talking?

17:37:18 [Zakim]

I don't understand your question, guus.

17:37:33 [guus]

zakim, who is talking?

17:37:43 [Zakim]

guus, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Ralph (82%), Jeff (4%)

17:37:58 [Natasha]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0012.html

17:39:39 [DavidW]

zakim, mute me

17:39:39 [Zakim]

David_Wood should now be muted

17:40:22 [tbaker]

tbaker has joined #swbp

17:40:49 [danbri]

hi tom

17:40:56 [tbaker]

hi dan

17:41:15 [Zakim]

+Tom_Baker

17:41:24 [Natasha]

Ralph: we need to distinguish ehether our arguments are deployment-oriented (something in our charter) vs architecture-driven arguments

17:41:34 [Zakim]

+Tom_Baker.a (was Tom_Baker)

17:43:05 [Natasha]

Guus proposes action: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level

17:43:30 [Natasha]

ACTION: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level

17:44:09 [Natasha]

Agenda item 2.2 OMG: ODM review

17:44:20 [Natasha]

ACTION Guus to review OWL metamodel

17:44:29 [Natasha]

continued, trying to finish this week

17:44:42 [Natasha]

ACTION Deb to go over OWL metamodel and provide a summary

17:44:44 [Natasha]

continued

17:44:55 [Natasha]

ACTION Chris to provide input to DAWG based on deployment experience.

17:45:00 [Natasha]

completed

17:45:12 [Ralph]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0021.html Chris's summary of his DAWG action

17:45:16 [Natasha]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0021.html

17:45:31 [Natasha]

ACTION deb sort SOURCE issue discussion timing out with DanC how you

17:45:31 [Natasha]

like; copy in davidw

17:45:36 [Natasha]

done

17:45:55 [Natasha]

ACTION jjc to review XML schema LC draft

17:46:11 [Natasha]

continued; the draft is coming out shortly

17:46:23 [Natasha]

ACTION jeff to review XML schema LC draft

17:46:28 [Natasha]

continued; the draft is coming out shortly

17:47:53 [Natasha]

Agenda item 3. TF UPDATE

17:48:12 [Natasha]

SWBPD FAQ proposal: last time we agreed to do it

17:49:10 [Natasha]

Last week we decided that FAQ will be part of the Tutorial work

17:49:40 [Natasha]

Topic: OEP TF

17:49:51 [Natasha]

ACTION Guus review of part-whole draft

17:49:57 [Ralph]

Yes, Benjamin volunteers for FAQ in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0213.html

17:50:28 [Natasha]

completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0017.html

17:50:34 [Natasha]

ACTION Bill review of part-whole draft

17:51:25 [Ralph]

Regrets+ Brian

17:51:29 [Natasha]

completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0209.html

17:51:48 [Natasha]

There was also a review by Natasha: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0219.html

17:52:20 [guus]

zakim who is here?

17:52:37 [guus]

q?

17:53:02 [Ralph]

Natasha: the current draft doesn't talk about any patterns at the instance level

17:53:29 [Ralph]

Alan: there is a set of examples about geography that I wanted to deal with separately

17:53:45 [Ralph]

... have to be careful with expressing qualifiers

17:54:11 [Ralph]

Natasha: I just wanted to point out to people that the relationships can be expressed just as a normal property

17:54:23 [Ralph]

Alan: welcome additions from Natasha

17:54:41 [Natasha]

publication status of OEP Notes

17:54:56 [Natasha]

Chris cleaning up some pubrules violations

17:55:13 [ChrisW]

... in the specified values note

17:55:17 [Natasha]

Ralph: Classes as values is ready to go; sent for transition approval; might be published today

17:55:50 [Natasha]

Chris: no further progress on other OEP notes

17:57:04 [Ralph]

Evan: semantics of business rules work has potential overlap with ODM

17:57:52 [Ralph]

... there is some coordination contention in OMG about how much consistency is desired between that spec and ODM

17:58:04 [Ralph]

... business rules work does not have a formal semantics

17:58:25 [Ralph]

Topic: XML Schema datatypes

17:58:40 [Ralph]

ACTION: jeff to coordinate editorial changes, formatting requirements, etc for XML schema dtypes

17:58:42 [Ralph]

--done

17:58:59 [Ralph]

ACTION: Ralph help Jeff and Jeremy with XML Schema Datatype publication request

17:59:01 [Zakim]

-Chris

17:59:04 [Natasha]

Natasha has left #swbp

17:59:17 [Zakim]

-Natasha

17:59:34 [Ralph]

Jeff: Vocabulary Management

18:00:15 [Ralph]

TomB: DanBri drafted a small note "Some Things that HTTP URIs can name"

18:00:25 [Ralph]

... we wanted to cover things like this in the VM Note

18:01:12 [Ralph]

... intend to schedule some TF telecons in next 2-3 weeks

18:02:09 [Ralph]

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/httpclass/1 Some Things That Hashless HTTP URIs Can Name

18:02:26 [Ralph]

DanBri: I'd like Task Force members to take a look at what I've started

18:02:46 [Ralph]

Guus: can this be merged with the main document?

18:03:08 [Ralph]

DanBri: the separate document may be a focal point for our interaction with TAG

18:03:27 [Ralph]

TomB: the material might be 2-3 paragraphs in the main document, so it is appropriate to have it separate for now

18:04:00 [Ralph]

Topic: RDF in XHTML

18:04:19 [Ralph]

ACTION: DanBri help write an rdf schema for the additional xhtml2 namespace elements

18:04:44 [Ralph]

DanBri: I had assumed that this action would be triggered by a new XHTML2 Working Draft

18:05:12 [danbri]

ralph: tf had a telecon earlier this week

18:05:19 [danbri]

...both mark b. and steven p attended

18:05:25 [danbri]

...update in the public record from them

18:05:36 [danbri]

... a new URI for an editor's draft (not on the w3.org site)

18:05:49 [danbri]

(http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html btw defines Editor's Drafts; a new page)

18:05:59 [danbri]

...not clear if we want to work from an editor's draft vs wait

18:06:39 [Ralph]

ACTION: Gavin find out from his community and contacts if they have use cases

18:06:47 [Ralph]

--continues

18:06:50 [Ralph]

ACTION: Tom Baker ask DC colleagues if many use rdf inside html

18:07:02 [tbaker]

can i respond to that?

18:07:21 [Ralph]

TomB: I got two responses that I summarized to the WG list

18:07:36 [Ralph]

... can get more feedback if necessary

18:07:54 [Ralph]

-- action complete

18:07:59 [Ralph]

ACTION: BenA set a time for the RDF-in-XHTML telecons

18:08:05 [Ralph]

-- done

18:08:16 [Ralph]

ACTION: the rdf in html tf to discuss whether GRIDDL needs to work on XHTML2 documents

18:08:25 [Ralph]

-- continues

18:08:43 [Ralph]

Guus: this seems a general goal of the TF, propose to withdraw

18:08:54 [Ralph]

-- action withdrawn

18:09:17 [Ralph]

Guus: only action DanBri and action Gavin still outstanding

18:09:39 [Ralph]

DanBri: it is important to have a way to extract RDF from RDF/A

18:09:50 [Ralph]

... this should be a part of the TF agenda

18:10:10 [Ralph]

Guus: I asked Jeremy to give a talk on the status of this work at WWW2005

18:10:23 [danbri]

(reason for fussing on this is that the qnames-in-attribute values aspect complicates things, as it raises the Q of whether GRDDLs are XSLT 1.0 or 2.0, how to deploy w/ both environments, etc etc.)

18:10:23 [Ralph]

... am worried that there may not be a public WD by then

18:11:15 [Ralph]

Ralph: we are putting a lot of pressure on the HTML WG to issue a new public WD

18:11:30 [Ralph]

Topic: RDFTM

18:11:43 [Ralph]

Guus: constructive comments from Steve Newcomb

18:11:47 [Ralph]

Topic: ADTF

18:11:58 [libby]

[[

18:11:58 [Ralph]

Libby: I've been looking at the notes from Boston f2f

18:11:59 [libby]

*

18:12:00 [libby]

only applications and demos with their own [WWW]DOAP descriptions will be included

18:12:00 [libby]

*

18:12:02 [libby]

only freely downloadable apps and demos will be included unless they are products of a W3C member company

18:12:04 [libby]

*

18:12:08 [libby]

for the time being only RDF, RDFS and OWL applications will be included

18:12:10 [libby]

]]

18:12:36 [Ralph]

Libby: have we made an official decision on these criteria?

18:12:54 [Ralph]

Ralph: I thought the meeting gave the authority to the TF to decide the criteria

18:13:01 [Ralph]

Libby: good, we'll send a note out then

18:13:41 [Ralph]

Topic: Tutorial Page

18:13:54 [Ralph]

Guus: Benjamin and Jeff volunteered to work on this

18:14:44 [Ralph]

... happy to have two people

18:15:21 [Ralph]

... I'd like a simple procedure proposed for people to submit questions

18:15:35 [Ralph]

... per Alan's suggestion in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0097.html

18:15:57 [JeffP]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0215.html

18:16:03 [Ralph]

ACTION: Jeff to talk with Benjamin to propose a process for submission of FAQ questions

18:16:17 [Ralph]

Topic: SE TF

18:16:43 [Ralph]

Jeff: telecon considered whether automated software engineering experts were needed in the TF

18:16:50 [Ralph]

... consensus of TF was that we do need such expertise

18:17:32 [Ralph]

Guus: for an invited expert, we need a good description of a person with the required expertise and an explanation of why this expertise is not available among the W3C Membership

18:18:16 [Ralph]

... main point is that the critical expertise is not present in the WG and justification for why the recommended person works for an organization that is not a W3C Member

18:19:05 [Ralph]

Jeff: re status of draft: we're working on Michael and David's comments

18:19:13 [guus]

q?

18:19:18 [Ralph]

... example section is being restructured

18:19:57 [Ralph]

... we would like more review of the existing examples in the draft

18:20:11 [Ralph]

... Michael suggested that we need an example for section 3.3

18:20:32 [Ralph]

... we would like the WG to supply an example for 3.3 else we will drop that section

18:20:55 [Ralph]

... we hope to have a document for review by 23 April

18:21:32 [Ralph]

... proposed idea section will make the concept of ontology-driven architecture more clear

18:22:13 [Ralph]

... we have a workshop proposal on "Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering" for ISWC accepted, chaired by Evan

18:22:31 [Ralph]

Guus: a report of that workshop would be a useful contribution to this group

18:22:38 [Ralph]

Topic: PORT TF

18:23:06 [danbri]

Alistair's PORT TF summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0015.html (i) SKOS core ready to go (ii) Tom has some issues (which he'll summarise) (iii) minor comments re Publishing thes doc.

18:23:33 [Ralph]

DanBri: we have 3 documents that we hope to publish at the same time

18:23:39 [Ralph]

... all have been reviewed

18:23:46 [Ralph]

... SKOS Core Guide appears to be ready to go

18:23:59 [Ralph]

... SKOS Core Specifications had some comments from TomB

18:24:25 [Ralph]

TomB: my comments were to be precise about the relationship between parts of the specification and the corresponding RDF schema

18:24:39 [danbri]

(re status w.r.t. notion of Editor's Draft, we can now cite http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html to explain what these are)

18:24:51 [Ralph]

TomB:... which version is authoritative?

18:25:09 [Ralph]

... when changes are made, how to describe what the status of those changes will be

18:25:29 [Ralph]

... some additional citations needed for people to find explanations of the different document types

18:25:55 [Ralph]

... some more work needs to be done, but these are not issues that should hold up publication

18:26:21 [Ralph]

DanBri: 3rd doc is Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web

18:26:33 [Ralph]

... some debate about whether to use the word "publish" or "convert"

18:26:48 [Ralph]

... I think the 3 documents are basically ready to go

18:27:54 [Ralph]

Guus: we need a proposal on the agenda to approve these for publication

18:28:42 [Ralph]

... I am willing to handle the publication proposal by mail if the TF wishes

18:29:16 [Ralph]

TomB: I expect to sit down with Alistair next week and we can review the draft then

18:29:43 [Ralph]

Guus: we'll propose to consider publication of the set of 3 documents at the next telecon

18:29:53 [Ralph]

... TF can ask for earlier consideration by mail if you wish

18:30:00 [danbri]

http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html

18:30:10 [Ralph]

DanBri: editors should note Style Guide for Internal Editors Drafts

18:31:22 [Zakim]

-Alan

18:31:23 [Ralph]

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2005AprJun/0012.html Style for Group-internal Drafts (or, "How to avoid confusion with TR page documents") [Ian Jacobs 2005-04-07]

18:31:26 [Ralph]

adjourned

18:31:29 [Zakim]

-Evan_Wallace

18:31:31 [Zakim]

-Gary_Ng

18:31:32 [Zakim]

-Jeff

18:31:32 [Zakim]

-David_Wood

18:31:33 [Zakim]

-Tom_Baker.a

18:31:35 [Zakim]

-Ralph

18:31:56 [Zakim]

-bristol

18:32:03 [Zakim]

-Guus

18:32:40 [Zakim]

-Darren_Govoni

18:33:16 [Zakim]

SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended

18:33:17 [Zakim]

Attendees were Ralph, Aldo, Darren_Govoni, danbri, libby, Evan_Wallace, Jeff, Gary_Ng, [IPcaller], Natasha, Guus, +1.703.418.aaaa, Chris, David_Wood, Alan, Tom_Baker

18:33:35 [Ralph]

rrsagent, please make logs world-visible

18:33:45 [Ralph]

rrsagent, please draft minutes

18:33:45 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-minutes.html Ralph

18:34:05 [Ralph]

rrsagent, bye

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

I see 13 open action items:

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: chairs & ralph to organise straw poll on f2f location [1]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-16-10

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Guus to organise straw poll on f2f location [2]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-16-42

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an [3]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-18-23

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Aldo to update the TF description [4]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-25-25

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level [5]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-43-30

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: jeff to coordinate editorial changes, formatting requirements, etc for XML schema dtypes [6]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-58-40

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Ralph help Jeff and Jeremy with XML Schema Datatype publication request [7]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-58-59

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: DanBri help write an rdf schema for the additional xhtml2 namespace elements [8]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-04-19

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Gavin find out from his community and contacts if they have use cases [9]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-06-39

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Tom Baker ask DC colleagues if many use rdf inside html [10]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-06-50

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: BenA set a time for the RDF-in-XHTML telecons [11]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-07-59

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: the rdf in html tf to discuss whether GRIDDL needs to work on XHTML2 documents [12]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-08-16

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

ACTION: Jeff to talk with Benjamin to propose a process for submission of FAQ questions [13]

18:34:05 [RRSAgent]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-16-03

18:34:17 [dgovoni]

dgovoni has left #swbp