16:55:43 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #swbp
16:55:43 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc
16:55:49 <Ralph> Meeting: SemWeb BPD
16:56:24 <Ralph> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html
16:58:07 <Ralph> Ralph has changed the topic to: SWBPD 07 April agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html
16:58:18 <aldogan> aldogan has joined #Swbp
16:59:55 <DavidW> DavidW has joined #swbp
16:59:56 <Zakim> SW_BPD()1:00PM has now started
17:00:03 <Zakim> +Ralph
17:02:06 <guus> guus has joined #swbp
17:02:08 <Zakim> +DanBri
17:03:53 <Zakim> +Aldo
17:04:08 <libby> libby has joined #swbp
17:04:09 <JeffP> JeffP has joined #swbp
17:04:13 <Zakim> +Darren_Govoni
17:04:28 <ekw> ekw has joined #swbp
17:05:23 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0022.html previous meeting 2005-03-24
17:05:36 <Zakim> +Evan_Wallace
17:05:48 <Zakim> +??P8
17:05:59 <JeffP> Jeff Pan
17:06:05 <Ralph> zakim, ??p8 is Jeff
17:06:05 <Zakim> +Jeff; got it
17:06:23 <GaryNg> GaryNg has joined #swbp
17:06:49 <guus> i am unable to dial in, unfortunately
17:07:17 <Ralph> understood, Guus
17:07:24 <Ralph> David will chair 
17:07:31 <Zakim> +Gary_Ng
17:07:43 <DavidW> In a few moments, once I can dial in myself
17:08:15 <dgovoni> hi david
17:08:38 <Ralph> Regrets: Jeremy, Benjamin, Deb, Phil, Marco, Alan, Andreas, Fabien, Guus (will monitor irc)
17:08:47 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
17:08:49 <Zakim> +??P13
17:08:54 <Natasha> Natasha has joined #swbp
17:09:04 <Ralph> zakim, ??p13 is Natasha
17:09:04 <Zakim> +Natasha; got it
17:09:16 <Ralph> zakim, ipcaller is Guus
17:09:16 <Zakim> +Guus; got it
17:09:54 <Zakim> + +1.703.418.aaaa
17:10:04 <Ralph> zakim, aaaa is Chris
17:10:04 <Zakim> +Chris; got it
17:10:50 <DavidW> dialing in now
17:11:19 <Zakim> +David_Wood
17:11:42 <Ralph> zakim, nominate a scribe
17:11:42 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Natasha
17:12:23 <Ralph> Scribe: Natasha
17:12:54 <danbri> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0018.html
17:12:57 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0022.html previous meeting 2005-03-24
17:13:21 <Zakim> +??P16
17:13:24 <Natasha> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the March 24 telecon:
17:13:32 <DavidW> seconded
17:13:36 <Ralph> zakim, ??p16 is Alan
17:13:36 <Zakim> +Alan; got it
17:13:54 <Natasha> Accepted
17:14:05 <Natasha> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of Boston ftf 4-5 March:
17:14:22 <Natasha> Ralph seconds
17:14:23 <Alan> Alan has joined #SWBP
17:14:29 <Natasha> Accepted
17:14:47 <Natasha> PROPOSED next telecon 21 April 1700 UTC
17:14:54 <Natasha> Note: NOT 1800 UTC
17:15:06 <Natasha> regrets Alan
17:15:10 <Natasha> regrets Dan
17:15:41 <Natasha> Agenda amendments
17:15:46 <Natasha> WrdNet earlier in the call
17:15:55 <Natasha> SKOS and VM move to later in the call
17:16:10 <Natasha> ACTION: chairs & ralph to organise straw poll on f2f location
17:16:27 <Natasha> continued, assigned to Guus
17:16:42 <Natasha> ACTION: Guus to organise straw poll on f2f location
17:16:52 <Natasha> Location of f2f
17:17:10 <Natasha> There is also an offer from Stanford to hold f2f
17:17:30 <Natasha> Will include in the strawpoll: Stanford, Vancouver, Galway
17:17:43 <Natasha> ACTION Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an
17:17:43 <Natasha>   interested participant has been unable to get a response from his
17:17:43 <Natasha>   AC Rep
17:18:08 <Natasha> Ralph was in a process of finding his out, but ISI has a new AC rep, so they may be progress on that issue
17:18:20 <Natasha> Action continued
17:18:23 <Natasha> ACTION: Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an
17:18:23 <Natasha>   interested participant has been unable to get a response from his
17:18:23 <Natasha>   AC Rep
17:18:39 <Ralph> Topic: WordNet TF
17:18:51 <ChrisW> ChrisW has joined #swbp
17:18:59 <Natasha> ACTION guus to contact aldo re whether he can attend next telecon
17:19:02 <Natasha> completed
17:19:17 <Natasha> Current status of the TF:
17:19:28 <Natasha> Aldo is writing a new version of the note on data model for WN
17:19:55 <Natasha> Princeton plans to add new relationships to WN 2.1, perhaps also change in top levels
17:20:27 <danbri> (I'd like to review it)
17:20:59 <Natasha> ISLE lexical entries: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0069.html
17:21:42 <Natasha> Aldo: are we in the position to add a liason action with ISLE
17:22:02 <danbri> (re pronunciation extensions, we have work at http://www.w3.org/Voice/ that we should connect with...)
17:22:06 <Natasha> Guus: time line is very important and estimate of feasibility
17:22:43 <Natasha> Guus: is this something you can resolve in 3-6 months?
17:23:15 <Natasha> Aldo: certainly possible
17:23:20 <danbri> q+ to ask re http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html
17:24:51 <danbri> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wnNounsyb_v7.owl 404s (link from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0066.html)
17:25:08 <Natasha> Guus: suggests to update the TF description to reflect the addition
17:25:17 <Natasha> and we will discuss it at the next telecon
17:25:25 <Natasha> ACTION: Aldo to update the TF description
17:25:28 <Zakim> danbri, you wanted to ask re http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html
17:26:16 <Natasha> DanB: relationship to the document that Brian began to draft last year. Is it obsoleted by Aldo's work?
17:26:20 <danbri> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html
17:26:46 <aldogan> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Feb/0068.html
17:26:58 <Ralph> -> http://www.w3.org/2004/11/01-swbp#item12 November f2f WNET discussion minutes
17:27:20 <danbri> all i can find is rdf/owl doc... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet_datamodel.owl
17:27:49 <Natasha> Aldo: the datamodel is still based on the one Brian suggested
17:27:53 <Natasha> but it has changed a bit
17:28:02 <Natasha> Changes are described in the document
17:28:44 <Natasha> Some of the documentation is in the OWL file and should be moved to the document directly
17:30:23 <Natasha> Guus: It will be good to have  another TF telecon discussion on teh datamodel
17:30:27 <Zakim> -Aldo
17:30:38 <danbri> ah, found the big file: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wnNounsyn_v7.owl (via browsing directory)
17:30:38 <Natasha> Agenda item 2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14
17:30:55 <Ralph> Topic: Proposed resolution httpRange-14
17:31:00 <Natasha> ACTION davidw to draft the http-range-14 message
17:31:02 <Natasha> completed
17:31:16 <Natasha> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0202.html
17:31:28 <danbri> q+ to note that I started a document on this topic (drafted as VM but without coordination w/ VM TF members)
17:31:36 <Natasha> David: woudl be interested to know what happened on the TAG side
17:32:10 <danbri> my sketch http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/httpclass/1
17:32:54 <danbri> q+ to note that TAG minutes showed Tim as misunderstanding our position (I sent mail)
17:32:58 <Natasha> Ralph advised Dan Connolly that if TAG wanted to devise a forum to discuss the technical issues with us, we will be glad to do that
17:33:21 <ChrisW> i agree with david
17:33:24 <Natasha> David: How much energy/time are we willing to spend on this?
17:34:42 <Zakim> danbri, you wanted to note that I started a document on this topic (drafted as VM but without coordination w/ VM TF members) and to note that TAG minutes showed Tim as
17:34:46 <Zakim> ... misunderstanding our position (I sent mail)
17:35:53 <guus> q?
17:37:16 <Natasha> DanBri started a document to describe the positions
17:37:18 <guus> zakim, wo's talking?
17:37:18 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, guus.
17:37:33 <guus> zakim, who is talking?
17:37:43 <Zakim> guus, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Ralph (82%), Jeff (4%)
17:37:58 <Natasha> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0012.html
17:39:39 <DavidW> zakim, mute me
17:39:39 <Zakim> David_Wood should now be muted
17:40:22 <tbaker> tbaker has joined #swbp
17:40:49 <danbri> hi tom
17:40:56 <tbaker> hi dan
17:41:15 <Zakim> +Tom_Baker
17:41:24 <Natasha> Ralph: we need to distinguish ehether our arguments are deployment-oriented (something in our charter) vs architecture-driven arguments
17:41:34 <Zakim> +Tom_Baker.a (was Tom_Baker)
17:43:05 <Natasha> Guus proposes action: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level
17:43:30 <Natasha> ACTION: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level
17:44:09 <Natasha> Agenda item 2.2 OMG: ODM review
17:44:20 <Natasha> ACTION Guus to review OWL metamodel
17:44:29 <Natasha> continued, trying to finish this week
17:44:42 <Natasha> ACTION Deb to go over OWL metamodel and provide a summary
17:44:44 <Natasha> continued
17:44:55 <Natasha> ACTION Chris to provide input to DAWG based on deployment experience.
17:45:00 <Natasha> completed
17:45:12 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0021.html Chris's summary of his DAWG action
17:45:16 <Natasha> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0021.html
17:45:31 <Natasha> ACTION deb sort SOURCE issue discussion timing out with DanC how you
17:45:31 <Natasha>    like; copy in davidw
17:45:36 <Natasha> done
17:45:55 <Natasha> ACTION jjc to review XML schema LC draft
17:46:11 <Natasha> continued; the draft is coming out shortly
17:46:23 <Natasha> ACTION jeff to review XML schema LC draft 
17:46:28 <Natasha> continued; the draft is coming out shortly
17:47:53 <Natasha> Agenda item 3. TF UPDATE
17:48:12 <Natasha> SWBPD FAQ proposal: last time we agreed to do it
17:49:10 <Natasha> Last week we decided that FAQ will be part of the Tutorial work
17:49:40 <Natasha> Topic: OEP TF
17:49:51 <Natasha> ACTION Guus  review of part-whole draft
17:49:57 <Ralph> Yes, Benjamin volunteers for FAQ in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0213.html
17:50:28 <Natasha> completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0017.html
17:50:34 <Natasha> ACTION Bill  review of part-whole draft
17:51:25 <Ralph> Regrets+ Brian
17:51:29 <Natasha> completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0209.html
17:51:48 <Natasha> There was also a review by Natasha: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0219.html
17:52:20 <guus> zakim who is here?
17:52:37 <guus> q?
17:53:02 <Ralph> Natasha: the current draft doesn't talk about any patterns at the instance level
17:53:29 <Ralph> Alan: there is a set of examples about geography that I wanted to deal with separately
17:53:45 <Ralph> ... have to be careful with expressing qualifiers
17:54:11 <Ralph> Natasha: I just wanted to point out to people that the relationships can be expressed just as a normal property
17:54:23 <Ralph> Alan: welcome additions from Natasha
17:54:41 <Natasha> publication status of OEP Notes
17:54:56 <Natasha> Chris cleaning up some pubrules violations
17:55:13 <ChrisW> ... in the specified values note
17:55:17 <Natasha> Ralph: Classes as values is ready to go; sent for transition approval; might be published today
17:55:50 <Natasha> Chris: no further progress on other OEP notes
17:57:04 <Ralph> Evan: semantics of business rules work has potential overlap with ODM
17:57:52 <Ralph> ... there is some coordination contention in OMG about how much consistency is desired between that spec and ODM
17:58:04 <Ralph> ... business rules work does not have a formal semantics
17:58:25 <Ralph> Topic: XML Schema datatypes
17:58:40 <Ralph> ACTION: jeff to coordinate editorial changes, formatting  requirements, etc for XML schema dtypes
17:58:42 <Ralph> --done
17:58:59 <Ralph> ACTION: Ralph help Jeff and Jeremy with XML Schema Datatype publication request
17:59:01 <Zakim> -Chris
17:59:04 <Natasha> Natasha has left #swbp
17:59:17 <Zakim> -Natasha
17:59:34 <Ralph> Jeff: Vocabulary Management
18:00:15 <Ralph> TomB: DanBri drafted a small note "Some Things that HTTP URIs can name"
18:00:25 <Ralph> ... we wanted to cover things like this in the VM Note
18:01:12 <Ralph> ... intend to schedule some TF telecons in next 2-3 weeks
18:02:09 <Ralph> -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/httpclass/1 Some Things That Hashless HTTP URIs Can Name
18:02:26 <Ralph> DanBri: I'd like Task Force members to take a look at what I've started
18:02:46 <Ralph> Guus: can this be merged with the main document?
18:03:08 <Ralph> DanBri: the separate document may be a focal point for our interaction with TAG
18:03:27 <Ralph> TomB: the material might be 2-3 paragraphs in the main document, so it is appropriate to have it separate for now
18:04:00 <Ralph> Topic: RDF in XHTML
18:04:19 <Ralph> ACTION: DanBri help write an rdf schema for the additional xhtml2 namespace elements
18:04:44 <Ralph> DanBri: I had assumed that this action would be triggered by a new XHTML2 Working Draft
18:05:12 <danbri> ralph: tf had a telecon earlier this week
18:05:19 <danbri> ...both mark b. and steven p attended
18:05:25 <danbri> ...update in the public record from them
18:05:36 <danbri> ... a new URI for an editor's draft (not on the w3.org site)
18:05:49 <danbri> (http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html btw defines Editor's Drafts; a new page)
18:05:59 <danbri> ...not clear if we want to work from an editor's draft vs wait
18:06:39 <Ralph> ACTION: Gavin find out from his community and contacts if they have use cases
18:06:47 <Ralph> --continues
18:06:50 <Ralph> ACTION: Tom Baker ask DC colleagues if many use rdf inside html
18:07:02 <tbaker> can i respond to that?
18:07:21 <Ralph> TomB: I got two responses that I summarized to the WG list
18:07:36 <Ralph> ... can get more feedback if necessary
18:07:54 <Ralph> -- action complete
18:07:59 <Ralph> ACTION: BenA set a time for the RDF-in-XHTML telecons
18:08:05 <Ralph> -- done
18:08:16 <Ralph> ACTION: the rdf in html tf to discuss whether GRIDDL needs to work on XHTML2 documents
18:08:25 <Ralph> -- continues
18:08:43 <Ralph> Guus: this seems a general goal of the TF, propose to withdraw
18:08:54 <Ralph> -- action withdrawn
18:09:17 <Ralph> Guus: only action DanBri and action Gavin still outstanding
18:09:39 <Ralph> DanBri: it is important to have a way to extract RDF from RDF/A
18:09:50 <Ralph> ... this should be a part of the TF agenda
18:10:10 <Ralph> Guus: I asked Jeremy to give a talk on the status of this work at WWW2005
18:10:23 <danbri> (reason for fussing on this is that the qnames-in-attribute values aspect complicates things, as it raises the Q of whether GRDDLs are XSLT 1.0 or 2.0, how to deploy w/ both environments, etc etc.)
18:10:23 <Ralph> ... am worried that there may not be a public WD by then
18:11:15 <Ralph> Ralph: we are putting a lot of pressure on the HTML WG to issue a new public WD
18:11:30 <Ralph> Topic: RDFTM
18:11:43 <Ralph> Guus: constructive comments from Steve Newcomb
18:11:47 <Ralph> Topic: ADTF
18:11:58 <libby> [[
18:11:58 <Ralph> Libby: I've been looking at the notes from Boston f2f
18:11:59 <libby>     *
18:12:00 <libby>       only applications and demos with their own [WWW]DOAP descriptions will be included
18:12:00 <libby>     *
18:12:02 <libby>       only freely downloadable apps and demos will be included unless they are products of a W3C member company
18:12:04 <libby>     *
18:12:08 <libby>       for the time being only RDF, RDFS and OWL applications will be included
18:12:10 <libby> ]]
18:12:36 <Ralph> Libby: have we made an official decision on these criteria?
18:12:54 <Ralph> Ralph: I thought the meeting gave the authority to the TF to decide the criteria
18:13:01 <Ralph> Libby: good, we'll send a note out then
18:13:41 <Ralph> Topic: Tutorial Page
18:13:54 <Ralph> Guus: Benjamin and Jeff volunteered to work on this
18:14:44 <Ralph> ... happy to have two people
18:15:21 <Ralph> ... I'd like a simple procedure proposed for people to submit questions
18:15:35 <Ralph> ... per Alan's suggestion in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0097.html
18:15:57 <JeffP> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Mar/0215.html
18:16:03 <Ralph> ACTION: Jeff to talk with Benjamin to propose a process for submission of FAQ questions
18:16:17 <Ralph> Topic: SE TF
18:16:43 <Ralph> Jeff: telecon considered whether automated software engineering experts were needed in the TF
18:16:50 <Ralph> ... consensus of TF was that we do need such expertise
18:17:32 <Ralph> Guus: for an invited expert, we need a good description of a person with the required expertise and an explanation of why this expertise is not available among the W3C Membership
18:18:16 <Ralph> ... main point is that the critical expertise is not present in the WG and justification for why the recommended person works for an organization that is not a W3C Member
18:19:05 <Ralph> Jeff: re status of draft: we're working on Michael and David's comments
18:19:13 <guus> q?
18:19:18 <Ralph> ... example section is being restructured
18:19:57 <Ralph> ... we would like more review of the existing examples in the draft
18:20:11 <Ralph> ... Michael suggested that we need an example for section 3.3
18:20:32 <Ralph> ... we would like the WG to supply an example for 3.3 else we will drop that section
18:20:55 <Ralph> ... we hope to have a document for review by 23 April
18:21:32 <Ralph> ... proposed idea section will make the concept of ontology-driven architecture more clear
18:22:13 <Ralph> ... we have a workshop proposal on "Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering" for ISWC accepted, chaired by Evan
18:22:31 <Ralph> Guus: a report of that workshop would be a useful contribution to this group
18:22:38 <Ralph> Topic: PORT TF
18:23:06 <danbri> Alistair's PORT TF summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Apr/0015.html (i) SKOS core ready to go (ii) Tom has some issues (which he'll summarise) (iii) minor comments re Publishing thes doc.
18:23:33 <Ralph> DanBri: we have 3 documents that we hope to publish at the same time
18:23:39 <Ralph> ... all have been reviewed
18:23:46 <Ralph> ... SKOS Core Guide appears to be ready to go
18:23:59 <Ralph> ... SKOS Core Specifications had some comments from TomB
18:24:25 <Ralph> TomB: my comments were to be precise about the relationship between parts of the specification and the corresponding RDF schema
18:24:39 <danbri> (re status w.r.t. notion of Editor's Draft, we can now cite http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html to explain what these are)
18:24:51 <Ralph> TomB:... which version is authoritative?
18:25:09 <Ralph> ... when changes are made, how to describe what the status of those changes will be
18:25:29 <Ralph> ... some additional citations needed for people to find explanations of the different document types
18:25:55 <Ralph> ... some more work needs to be done, but these are not issues that should hold up publication
18:26:21 <Ralph> DanBri: 3rd doc is Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web
18:26:33 <Ralph> ... some debate about whether to use the word "publish" or "convert"
18:26:48 <Ralph> ... I think the 3 documents are basically ready to go
18:27:54 <Ralph> Guus: we need a proposal on the agenda to approve these for publication
18:28:42 <Ralph> ... I am willing to handle the publication proposal by mail if the TF wishes
18:29:16 <Ralph> TomB: I expect to sit down with Alistair next week and we can review the draft then
18:29:43 <Ralph> Guus: we'll propose to consider publication of the set of 3 documents at the next telecon
18:29:53 <Ralph> ... TF can ask for earlier consideration by mail if you wish
18:30:00 <danbri> http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html
18:30:10 <Ralph> DanBri: editors should note Style Guide for Internal Editors Drafts
18:31:22 <Zakim> -Alan
18:31:23 <Ralph> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2005AprJun/0012.html Style for Group-internal Drafts (or, "How to avoid confusion with TR page documents") [Ian Jacobs 2005-04-07]
18:31:26 <Ralph> adjourned
18:31:29 <Zakim> -Evan_Wallace
18:31:31 <Zakim> -Gary_Ng
18:31:32 <Zakim> -Jeff
18:31:32 <Zakim> -David_Wood
18:31:33 <Zakim> -Tom_Baker.a
18:31:35 <Zakim> -Ralph
18:31:56 <Zakim> -bristol
18:32:03 <Zakim> -Guus
18:32:40 <Zakim> -Darren_Govoni
18:33:16 <Zakim> SW_BPD()1:00PM has ended
18:33:17 <Zakim> Attendees were Ralph, Aldo, Darren_Govoni, danbri, libby, Evan_Wallace, Jeff, Gary_Ng, [IPcaller], Natasha, Guus, +1.703.418.aaaa, Chris, David_Wood, Alan, Tom_Baker
18:33:35 <Ralph> rrsagent, please make logs world-visible
18:33:45 <Ralph> rrsagent, please draft minutes
18:33:45 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-minutes.html Ralph
18:34:05 <Ralph> rrsagent, bye
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> I see 13 open action items:
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: chairs & ralph to organise straw poll on f2f location [1]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-16-10
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to organise straw poll on f2f location [2]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-16-42
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph investigate what action may be taken when an [3]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-18-23
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Aldo to update the TF description [4]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-25-25
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Chairs to discuss the httpRange-14 issue at the coordination level [5]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-43-30
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: jeff to coordinate editorial changes, formatting  requirements, etc for XML schema dtypes [6]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-58-40
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Ralph help Jeff and Jeremy with XML Schema Datatype publication request [7]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T17-58-59
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanBri help write an rdf schema for the additional xhtml2 namespace elements [8]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-04-19
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Gavin find out from his community and contacts if they have use cases [9]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-06-39
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Tom Baker ask DC colleagues if many use rdf inside html [10]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-06-50
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: BenA set a time for the RDF-in-XHTML telecons [11]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-07-59
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: the rdf in html tf to discuss whether GRIDDL needs to work on XHTML2 documents [12]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-08-16
18:34:05 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeff to talk with Benjamin to propose a process for submission of FAQ questions [13]
18:34:05 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/07-swbp-irc#T18-16-03
18:34:17 <dgovoni> dgovoni has left #swbp